UGL UX STUDIES FALL ‘12/ SPRING ‘13 RUTH YEH

SHELFLISTER UX

DEMOGRAPHICS •  N=3 •  Worked for library 2-3 semesters •  Shelves books 3 hours/week (media 4 hours/week) •  Trained for shelving 1-2 hours

OVERALL COMMENTS Did not find app helpful for shelving

Found app helpful for shelf-reading books

• Participants said it slowed them down compared to their usual shelving methods • Holding the tablet + scanner + books to be shelved was awkward

• Was told checking for order is not something that is usually done when shelving books • Having books out in the general area is better than not having them out at all

DESIGN SUGGESTIONS Layout • T itle of books/items should be below the horizontal divider rather than over it Add buttons • Add a “Go” button to the start/end book area • All three participants got stuck at one point because the app didn’t automatically search after scanning Remove buttons • Remove ability to select a book and move to the home screen • Participants would accidentally click on a book and not know how to move back to the ShelfList. This action also cleared the search results.

OUTPUT SUGGESTIONS Call numbers • Add call #’s in the book information output Emphasize information • Emphasize call numbers and titles • The current font ratio relative to information importance is off • SA’s do not use author or publication year in shelving; title is also rarely used

RECOMMENDATIONS

Market this as a training app for new shelvers • More experienced shelvers do not think it will aid them in shelving and probably won’t use it

Useful for shelfreading • Participant that thought the app was not helpful for shelf ordering because he could do it himself made mistakes.

Ask students to use the app when checking for book order

IDEAS FOR FUTURE APP

Streamline the process for checking out media/tech items from the library

Current system:

Ideas for future system:

• Manually search for specific templates for each tech item • Input student name and information • Print form and get signatures

• Scanning the item & student id will auto-fill the form/ template • E-sign system

COMPUTER SCIENCE STUDENTS INTERVIEWS

DEMOGRAPHICS •  N=3 •  4th year computer science majors •  Exit interview feedback for semester long project

CURRENT APPS USED

Web Browser

Minrva

Gmail

Self-created apps

Pizzazz

LIBRARY/RESEARCH NEEDS? Current Minrva functions •  Search books •  Request/renew items •  Citations Chat •  Add “ask-a-librarian” function Research efficiency •  Less work to get more information

LOCATION SPECIFIC NEEDS? Availability • Rooms • Tech/computers • Refine search results/availability based on current location Reservations • Study rooms • Technology Information • See hours of the libraries near your current location • Find exact location of specific book before going to library Coffee ordering app • Drinks can be delivered to students or picked up

EXAMPLE USE CASES Basic Library Tasks • Citations: while doing research can just scan books to generate citation • Renewals on-the-go • Accessing account from app Login system • Allows people to have a more personalized system • Can look at past search history

DESIGN PROCESS PROS Freedom

Feedback

•  Enjoyed openended style of project •  Starting from scratch instead of picking up a previous project

•  Weekly meetings were helpful (timely feedback to work) •  Staff made sure the app design worked with the audience being marketed to

Research •  Gathering information on current student needs

DESIGN PROCESS CONS More information

More structure

Afterwork

• Would like more information on the process • Knowing more about what was going to be changed before/ after the UX studies

• Wanted more strict deadlines or timelines/goals set • A hard deadline would have been helpful for setting personal benchmarks • Or splitting the app design process into stages or benchmarks

• Knowing what to do after the majority of the project is done • Set specific deliverables besides for just the modules

DATA PROBLEMS FOR LIBRARY SYSTEMS Non-standardized systems • Libraries do not have standardized systems for reservations or user data • Makes it difficult to access them quickly and efficiently as a developer No public APIs • No public APIs for library data so it’s difficult for the average student/programmer to develop apps Nate solves data problems • Students said they were only able to overcome these data issues because Nate had already gathered the resources

WHY COLLABORATE AGAIN?

Knowledgeable staff

Great communication

Student perspective on student issues

Quick/easy feedback

Great group to work with

PARTING REMARKS

Marketing Didn’t even Make sure to Advertise at know libraries advertise so the help desk would think students and make of stuff like know the brochures this app exists

MINRVA 2.0 UX

DEMOGRAPHICS •  N=3 •  2 Library science grad students, 1 accounting sophomore •  1 participant did not own a smartphone, 2 did not currently use mobile applications for library, research or coursework •  1 student did not have account with library

GENERAL COMMENTS

Don’t see myself doing hardcore research on my phone but app is great for doing administrative things with account

Would probably only use journal/ catalog search for a specific book while in the library

Really like the idea of being able to check requested items/ renew items on the app

LOG IN/LOG OUT Specify Account • Vufind Obvious location • Put the log in/out icon in a conspicuous location • I.E., upper right hand corner

BLOCKS

Description • Explain what this module is supposed to display

CATALOG SEARCH Layout • T itle of books/items should be below the horizontal divider rather than over it • This caused a lot of confusion among participants Unexpected Bugs • Could not see typed characters in search bar when phone is in portrait view Add Buttons • Make it clear that title names are clickable • Buttons to directly add to favorites or generate citation from search screen Databases • Add more libraries/Primo Add Requests • Want to be able to add requests from catalog search

CHECKED OUT

Renewal function • At the time of the study the renewal function was not operational

CITATION User Favorite • Especially helpful for international students Send via SMS • Add ability to send citation in text Directions • Display directions that explain that information must be loaded in from catalog search

COURSE RESERVES •  No comments

FAVORITES Helpful •  Liked that I could save items from my searches for the future Multiple Lists •  Add ability to create different lists to facilitate research •  Example: Lists for research paper and personal reading

FINES

Location • Specify where you owe the fine • Could be University or Library fines

JOURNAL SEARCH Least Favorite • Specify that it is an article search (not a search for journal names) Consistency with website • Language should be consistent throughout for what is an article/journal/ database More Choices • Would like more journals to choose from Unexpected Bugs • Application crashed at least once while in this module

REQUESTED ITEMS

Convenient • Can see if the item is ready for pick up while on-the-go

SCANNER

Unexpected Bugs • Application crashed at least once while in this module

TECHNOLOGY Specify Feeds • Specify where the feed is from More Locations • Add more library locations

WAYFINDER Display Floor • Show what floor the item is on Unexpected Bugs • Application crashed at least once in this module

SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE MODULES

Add general information on libraries (location/hours)

Integration with compass

Feed for scanner/room/ computer availability in the libraries

Room Reservations

Text to chat with “AskA-Librarian”

Changing the ordering of the modules on the home screen may help with new user learning curve

STUDENT COMPETITION

DEMOGRAPHICS •  Students participated in a mobile app development competition, afterward they were asked to come in for exit interviews •  N=14 Class Standing 8 6 4 2 0

School

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

CURRENT APPS USED Blackboard/ Compass

Dictionary/ Wikipedia

Internet Browsers

Istudy

Youtube

MTD app

Article Databases

Google apps

Dropbox

LIBRARY/RESEARCH NEEDS 6 said 6 said 4 said

• Find Resources • Check availability of resources • Productivity for Studying

LOCATION NEEDS 6 Said

• Availability of resources

7 said

• Navigation

2 said

• Reservation

1 said

• Information

2 said

•  Other/NA

DESIGN PROCESS PROS 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Brainstorming

Focus Groups

Design

Personalize

DESIGN PROCESS CONS 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0

USE CASES BY TYPE Application Use Case Types

New Innovation 19%

Information 11%

Reservation 11%

Find Resource 22% Group Work 18% Resource Availability 19%

WHY WOULD YOU PARTICIPATE AGAIN? 6 said 7 said 3 said 1 said

• To meet new people • For the experience • To apply their knowledge to another field • Liked that it was unrestricted/unstructured

HOW COULD WE IMPROVE THE COMPETITION? Implementation

“Location specific”

Communicate

Students expressed that they wanted to see their idea being carried to fruition

Explain location specific more thoroughly

Some students wanted more communication with the organizers

Perhaps team up with CS students to implement the ideas

Many students were confused by this term

Better communication within the library about the contest

RESPONSES TO TOURS AND PRESENTATION REVIEW 16 14 12 10 8

Yes

6

No

4 2 0 Tours

Review Changes

FINAL IMPRESSIONS

Provide a rubric for judges and give feedback with score sheets for participants after presentations

Competition was a nice way for students to collaborate with others and gain experience applying their fields

All participants said they would collaborate with the library again

RESEARCHER SUGGESTIONS

Procedure

Questions

Recruitment

• Set specific tasks • Talk-aloud • Screen recording

• Tailored to research interests • Be more specific

• Use fliers/web • Use online scheduler • Sign-Up Genius • Doodle

THE END

?? ??

Questions? ??