San Francisco International Airport – Bureau of Design & Construction WTS Presentation – February 23, 2011 Domestic Terminal Redevelopment Program

1

Outline

     

Terminal 2 Renovations and Design-Build at SFO Replacement ATCT/Terminal 1/Boarding Area B Complex Redevelopment 2011/2012 Contracting Opportunities

2

Terminal 2 Renovation - Overview

 

Conversion of the former International Terminal (T2) to a domestic terminal

 

Renovation to accommodate 14 narrowbody aircraft gates

 

Program includes the renovation of approximately 640,000 sq. ft. including holdrooms, circulation, and concessions spaces, and structural/seismic upgrades

 

Replacement of mechanical, electrical, and baggage handling systems, passenger loading bridges, and ticket counters

 

Replacement of all interior and exterior surfaces and finishes

 

Airlines to occupy T2 are Virgin America and American Airlines 3

Terminal 2 Renovation – Project Status

 

Substantial Completion will be achieved on February 28, 2011

 

Airport will perform simulations for six weeks, following substantial completion

 

AA and Virgin America full flight operations to begin on April 14

 

Total 36 month schedule from start of design to substantial completion

 

Program will finish at a total cost of $437M, or $5M under budget

4

Terminal 2 Renovation – Environmental Program Highlights

 

Will use 15% less energy than Title 24 allowance, through natural light and a displacement air ventilation system

 

Dual plumbing piping system for reclaimed water use

 

Re-use of infrastructure of the existing building

 

Recycling policy to achieve a 75% recycling goal in the short term and zero waste by 2020

 

'Hydration Stations‘ to refill water bottles

 

Signage to educate on the terminal’s sustainable features.

 

Food from local, organic food vendors 5

Terminal 2 Renovations - Design-Build Implementation

             

Procurement of design-builder based on “best value”. Emphasizes collaboration, and client satisfaction. Provides for “New” pool of quality contractors interested in working for the City. 7.5% allowance for negotiated scope improves upon LBE participation, and helps meet accelerated schedules. Engages the contractor in the design process, which improves upon decision-making by providing better cost/schedule impact data. Maintains competitive pricing. Engages key subcontractors earlier in the process which improves upon field coordination and minimizes conflicts between trades.

Design-Build - Contract/Bidding Process DESIGN “Bridging Documents”

Design Builder

Awarded Cost

Civil Package

Structure Package

M/E/P Package

Systems Package

Building Package

Final GMP

CONSTRUCTION Final GMP

Time

Design-Build - Collaboration Benefits

Design-Bid-Build Cost Savings Baseline Construction Budget

Bid Begin Buyout

GMP Design/Build w/GMP Buyout Collaboration

Time

Time Savings

T2 Renovations – SF-Based/LBE Firm Participation Program

 

Implement Seven Strategies to achieve goals: –  Provide for a minimum of two SF-based bidders on each Trade Bid Package (TBP) –  Prequalify only SF-based firms on selected TBP’s –  Reduce TBP size by splitting up trades into areas/zones   Added Seventeen (17) additional TBP’s   Negotiated additional cost of $460k for oversight/administration –  Develop small General Contractor TBP’s to bid to small SF-based firms and LBE’s, who will then manage and subcontract for the work. –  Utilize a proportion of the 7.5% negotiated scope authorization for LBE participation – Goal is 50% ($10M) –  Facilitate joint ventures between SF-based larger firms and LBE firms to bid on TBP’s –  Request HRC to accelerate review of decertified firms seeking recertification

T2 Renovations – SF-Based/LBE Firm Participation Program RESULTS:

 

Anticipate achieving 22.2% LBE and 28.5% non-LBE SF-Based, for total of 50.7% All SF-Based Firm Participation.

     

Eleven LBE 1st Tier firms participating - Total of $25M Additional LBE participation at 2nd Tier – Total of $29M Twelve additional SF-based firms participating - Total of $34M

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

TERMINAL 1 REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM – SITE MAP

19

TERMINAL 1 REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM – PHASE 1 PHASING PLAN

New FAA Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT)

Existing ATCT

New ATCT Location

Terminal 1 Terminal 2

21

TERMINAL 1 REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM – PHASE 2

TERMINAL 1 REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM – PHASES 3 THRU 5

23

2010/2011 – UPCOMING CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES

 

CM Services –  New RFP – March 2011   Replacement Air Traffic Control Tower/Integrated Facility ($4M)   Terminal 1 to Terminal 2 Secure Connector ($1M)   Demo of Old Tower/Arch. Enclosure ($1.5M) –  Pool List – March 2011   Checkpoint C Reconfiguration ($500k)   Terminal 3 Checkpoint Improvements ($1.5M)   Runway Safety Areas ($2M)   Support of Master Architect – Task 1 (Terminal 1 - 15% Design) ($500k)   Industrial Waste Treatment Facility ($800k)

24

CM POOL LIST (Effective Through 4/2013)

             

The Allen Group, LLC/Cornerstone, A Joint Venture URS/ECS, A Joint Venture F.E. Jordan/Hill International PGH Wong Engineering, Inc. EPC/CM West Joint Venture AECOM PMA/NBA, Joint Venture

25

2010/2011 – UPCOMING CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES

 

A/E Services –  RFP A/E Services – April 2011   Checkpoint C Reconfiguration ($500k)   Terminal 1 to Terminal 2 Secure Connector ($600k)   Demo of Old Tower/Arch. Enclosure ($1M)

  Design-Build Services (or Construction Services)   Replacement ATCT/Integrated Facility ($70M)   Checkpoint C Reconfiguration ($8M)   Terminal 1 to Terminal 2 Secure Connector ($10M)   Terminal 3 Checkpoint Improvements – ($20M)

26

“Best Airport in North America” -- Skytrax

FAA Typical Tower Elevation

28

Recent ATCT Designs in the U.S.

New York LaGuardia (LGA) Chicago O’Hare (ORD)]

Washington Reagan (DCA)

Port Columbus, OH (CMH)

Washington Dulles (IAD) Indianapolis, IN (IND) Atlanta HartsfieldJackson (ATL)

29

Examples of Alternative ATCT Design

Philadelphia

Bahrain

Heathrow 30

Terminal 1 Redevelopment

 

Two redevelopment alternatives under consideration for the replacement of Boarding Area B and renovation of the terminal building

 

Terminal renovation necessary to accommodate increased passenger facilities requirements (e.g., circulation and queuing areas, passenger screening, baggage screening and handling, and post-security concessions)

Terminal 1 – Existing Conditions

31

Terminal 1 Redevelopment - Finger Pier Alternative

         

1.2 million sq. ft. 43 aircraft gates Maintains T1 and T2 as separate unit terminals Boarding Area C remains Redevelopment of Boarding Area B in two finger piers (B1 and B2)

 

Sterile connection between Boarding Areas B and A

 

Secure connection between Boarding Areas (A, B1, B2, C, D, and E)

 

Provides aircraft hardstand/remote staging area between B/A A and B

 

Dual taxilanes between all boarding areas

32

Terminal 1 Redevelopment - Modified Linear Alternative

     

1 million sq. ft. 40 aircraft gates Replaces Boarding Areas B and C with a linear concourse

 

Provides a centralized terminal complex and unified curbside at T1/T2

 

Sterile connection between Boarding Area A and B

 

Secure connection between Boarding Areas (B1, B2, C, D, and E)

 

Dual taxilanes between boarding areas A and B and D and E, and new taxilanes parallel to Taxiway A for aircraft pushback and taxiing

33

Terminal 1 Redevelopment – Conceptual Plan

 

Replacement of Terminal 1 to address operational and level of service deficiencies

 

Replacement of Boarding Area B with a new double loaded concourse (22 gates)

 

Retention of the existing Boarding Area C

 

New Taxilane AA parallel to Taxiway A

 

Single ADG VI/Dual ADG IV taxilanes between Boarding Areas A and the new B

34

Terminal 1 Redevelopment – Major Project Elements

35

Terminal 1 Redevelopment - Phasing

36