NOACA Transportation Asset Management Program Plan Results
presented to
NOACA Board of Directors presented by
Erik Cempel, Cambridge Systematics
July 8, 2016
NOACA Transportation Asset Management Program Development NOACA has made strides in AM, looking for long range strategy First MPO-level TAMP meeting MAP-21/FAST Act State DOT requirements Purchase and implementation of Pavement Management System is key Project funded under FHWA Accelerated Innovation Deployment (AID) Grant
Development of a Comprehensive, Long Term TAMP Key Principles: » Strategic & proactive in approach » Places a premium on data, information and collaboration » A long term and comprehensive view of infrastructure performance and cost » An explicit, visible, and transparent approach requiring effective communication among all stakeholders » Investment choices that are policy driven with tradeoffs among competing priorities
Project Tasks, Outcomes, and Schedule Sept. 2014 Asset Inventory and Condition
July 2016 Stakeholder Outreach » Risk Workshop
Select and Implement PMS TAMP Sections » Asset Inventory & Conditions » AM Objectives & Measures
» Gap Assessment Workshop » Regular Steering Committee Meetings » Interviews » Other outreach
» Performance Gap Assessment » Lifecycle Cost
Next Steps
» Risk Management Analysis
» Complete Final Report
» Financial Plan
» Finalize customized PMS features
» Investment Strategies
» Training on PMS and NBIAS for NOACA staff
» TAM Process Enhancements
Key Project Participants and Leaders Project Managed by Kathy Sarli Consultant team of Cambridge Systematics, Applied Pavement Technology, and Stantec Engineers Project Steering Committee with representation from » » » » »
NOACA ODOT (Districts and Central) Municipalities Counties FHWA
The Landscape for Regional Asset Management MPOs typically…
Don’t own or operate infrastructure
Have a stake in regional data resources
Serve as a regional policy leader
Are leaders in performance management and target setting
Help set regional priorities and policies Lead regional long range planning
Play a major role in federal fund allocation
Why Does NOACA Need Transportation Asset Management? With a surface transportation program (STP) annual allocation of only $27.5 M, a strategic framework for making cost effective decisions about allocating resources and managing infrastructure was needed Valuable assets are not receiving the attention or funding needed to achieve a state of good repair Allocates funding where it will provide the greatest return Improves performance, cost-effectiveness, communication, accountability and credibility
TAM Objectives 1.
Establish Transportation Asset Management as a regional priority
2.
Serve as a liaison for NOACA members and partners like ODOT and FHWA
3.
Achieve a state-of-good-repair for roadway assets
4.
Promote a least-life-cycle cost approach to transportation infrastructure investment
5.
Expand Transportation Asset Management program to other modes
Infrastructure Condition Performance Measures FHWA Notice of Proposed Rule Making Pavements » Percentage of pavements on the Interstate System in Good condition » Percentage of pavements on the Interstate System in Poor condition » Percentage of pavements on the NHS (excluding the Interstate System) in Good condition » Percentage of pavements on the NHS (excluding the Interstate System) in Poor condition Bridges » Percentage of NHS Bridges Classified as in Good Condition » Percentage of NHS Bridges Classified as in Poor Condition
Infrastructure Condition Performance Measures NOACA » Non NHS Pavements in good condition » Non NHS bridges in good condition
Financial Plan Findings: Regional Average Historical Project Spending on Non-Transit Infrastructure
Total (2017-2026) Highways
Traffic Operations 2%
Federal Funds Controlled by NOACA Administered by ODOT State Funds Local Matching Funds Total Highway
Others 7%
$545
Bridge 20%
$2,170 $1,225 Capacity/Expansion 23%
$215 $4,521
Transit Federal Funds State Funds (GO Bonds)
$455 $5
Local Funds
$1,023
Total Transit
$1,506
TOTAL HIGHWAYS AND TRANSIT
$6,028
Notes: (1) $ millions, nominal dollars (2) Totals may not add up due to rounding
