Natural Gas Supply Issues and Challenges Michigan State University, Institute of Public Utilities 2015 Grid School March 10, 2015
David E. Dismukes, Ph.D. Center for Energy Studies Louisiana State University
Reminder – The Way Things Were
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
2
Historic Trends Long Term US Crude Oil Production Forecast (2006)
Relatively uninspiring U.S. crude oil production forecast. 6.0
Remember this number 5.0 MMBbls Million Barrels per day
5.5 5.0 4.5
4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2004
2008
2012 Onshore (Lower 48)
Source: USDOE/EIA, Annual Energy Outlook, 2006
2016
2020
2024
2028
Offshore (Lower 48) © LSU Center for Energy Studies
3
Historic Trends Long Term US Natural Gas Production Forecast (2006)
Natural gas production forecasted to decrease starting in 2016. Remember this number 18.5 TCF
20.5 18.5
Trillion cubic feet
16.5
14.5 12.5 10.5 8.5 6.5 4.5 2.5 2004
2008
2012 Onshore (Lower 48)
Source: USDOE/EIA, Annual Energy Outlook, 2006
2016
2020
2024
2028
Offshore (Lower 48) © LSU Center for Energy Studies
4
Historic Trends Historic Monthly Rig Counts and Gas Production (1997-2006)
The maturing nature of US basins reflected in drilling productivity. 2,000 1,800
68
4 percent decrease in production (Feb-04 to Aug-06)
3 percent increase in production (Aug-99 to Sep-01)
Number of Operating Rigs
1,600 66
1,400 1,200 1,000
158 percent increase in rigs (Apr-99 to Jul-01)
65 64
800 131 percent increase in rigs (Apr-02 to Aug-06)
600 400
63
12-Month Moving Average (Bcf/d)
67
62 200 0 Dec-96
61 Dec-97
Dec-98
Dec-99
Dec-00
Dec-01
Dec-02
Rig Count Source: Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy; and Baker-Hughes Inc.
Dec-03
Dec-04
Dec-05
Dec-06
Production © LSU Center for Energy Studies
5
Historic Trends Resource Estimates: Restricted Areas (Percent Restricted)
Policy advocacy focused on restricted areas as a potential solution to the resource constraint problem.
ANWR = 3.5 TCF ANS = 35 TCF
Source: Natural Gas: Can We Produce Enough?” Independent Petroleum Association of America, website: http://www.ipaa.org/govtrelations/factsheets/NaturalGasProdEnough.asp.
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
6
Historic Trends NPC Forecast North American Supply Disposition
LNG provides 14% of the U.S. supply of natural gas by 2025.
Source: National Petroleum Council
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
7
Historic Trends Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices
Prices reflected the state of, and outlook for, energy markets. $160
$16
Recession
$140 First energy price crisis
$12
$100
$10
$80
$8
$60
$6
$40
$4
$20
$2
$0 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Crude Oil (WTI) Source: Federal Reserve Bank
Natural Gas ($/Mcf)
Crude Oil ($/Bbl)
$120
$14
$0
Natural Gas (Henry Hub) © LSU Center for Energy Studies
8
Unconventional Resources
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
9
Overview Shale, Horizontal Drilling, and Fractionation
• Shale (unconventional) wells differ from “conventional” wells since they are drilled horizontally and not vertically.
• Horizontal segments are then “fractured” with higher pressure water, chemicals and silica to break up the formation. • The fractionation process releases/liberates the hydrocarbons.
• Some environmental and water use concerns expressed in some areas of the country on this drilling process. Source: Energy Tomorrow.
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
10
Overview How the Hydrofracturing Process Works
Video Link: Horizontal Drilling: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYQcSz27Xp8&feature=relmfu
Hydro-fracturing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73mv-Wl5cgg
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
11
Overview Domestic Shale Gas Basins and Plays Unlike conventional resources, shale plays (natural gas, liquids, and crudes) are located almost ubiquitously throughout the U.S. and are the primary reason for the decrease in overall and regional natural gas prices. Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
12
Unconventional Natural Gas
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
13
Natural Gas Changes in Reserves and Production Natural gas production and reserves are at levels not seen since the 1970s and both U.S. natural gas production and reserves are now at an all time recorded peak.
400
30
25
300 20
250 200
15
150
2012 reserve estimates mark the first decline in 14 years.
100 50 0
10 5
U.S. Natural Gas Marketed Production (Tcf)
U.S. Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Tcf)
350
0 1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
Natural Gas Reserves Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.
1995
2000
2005
2010
Natural Gas Production © LSU Center for Energy Studies
14
Natural Gas Annual Changes in U.S. Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Shale and Other) Expanded exploration and development of unconventional resources in increases in natural gas proved reserves in recent years. And, while net additions in shale outpaced the overall decrease in natural gas reserves from all other sources, reserve estimates fell in 2012 due to a 34 percent decrease in the average natural gas price. 40
Shale’s Share of Reserves 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Annual Change (Tcf)
30 20
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
10 0 2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
-10 -20 -30 Shale
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.
Other © LSU Center for Energy Studies
15
Natural Gas Annual Energy Outlook, Natural Gas Reserves
Unconventional resources are not a “flash in the pan” and are anticipated to continue to increase over the next two decades or more. 450
Reserves, Tcf
400
350
300
250
200 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
16
Natural Gas Forecast U.S. Natural Gas Production
Shale availability will drive U.S. natural gas supply. 30
25 Shale Gas Production
Tcf
20 15
Associated Gas Production 10 5 0 1990
1995
2000
Shale gas Alaska Non-associated onshore
2005
2010
2015
Tight gas Coalbed methane
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
2020
2025
2030
2035
Non-associated offshore Associated with oil
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
17
Recent Trends Changes in AEO Natural Gas Price Forecasts
Shale availability has significant impact on future price outlook. 16
Anticipated price outlook in 2009.
(2010 $/MMBTU)
14
12 10 8 6 4
Anticipated price outlook today.
2
0 1997
2002
2007
Actual Henry Hub AEO-2010
2012 AEO-2007 AEO-2011
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
2017
2022
AEO-2008 AEO-2012
2027
2032
AEO-2009
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
18
Recent Trends Changes in Well Costs and Productivity
Encana reports a reduction in well costs of 15-30% through use of multi-pad drilling, improved rig efficiencies, and lower hydraulic fracturing costs. The use of higher water volumes, increased frac stages, and enhanced pay selection have resulted in 100-150% increases IP rates. Well Cost (million $)
Well Performance (MMcfe/d)
$18
$25 15.6
$16
$20
$14 $12 $10
23.6 23.6
17.7
11.9 10.3 9.9
9.3
9.0
9.6
9.0
18.9 15.0
$15
$8 $10
8.0
$6
$4
10.5
9.5
$5
$2 $0
$0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
2008 2009 2010
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
2008 2009 2010
East Texas Deep Bossier
Haynesville
East Texas Deep Bossier
Haynesville
Source: U.S. Natural Gas Resources and Productive Capacity: Mid-2012, Prepared for Cheniere Energy, Advanced Resources International, Inc. August 23, 2012.
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
19
Unconventional Crude Oil Development
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
20
Unconventional Development U.S. Natural Gas Rig Count and Henry Hub Price
1,800
$16
1,600
$14
1,400
$12
1,200
$10
1,000 $8 800 $6
600
400
$4
200
$2
0 Jan-97
Jan-99
Jan-01
Jan-03
Jan-05
Jan-07
Natural Gas Rigs
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy; and Baker Hughes.
Jan-09
Jan-11
Jan-13
Natural Gas Price ($/Mcf)
Number of Rigs
Natural gas rigs closely follow the natural gas spot price. Price decrease that started in 2007 has reduced gas drilling attractiveness.
$0 Jan-15
Henry Hub Price
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
21
Unconventional Development U.S. Oil/Gas Rig Split Drilling emphasis over the past 20 years has almost exclusively concentrated on developing new natural gas wells. This has shifted to crude oil drilling emphasis over the past two years. 100%
90% Percent of Total (%)
80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Crude Oil Source: Baker Hughes
Natural Gas © LSU Center for Energy Studies
22
Unconventional Development Changes in Crude Oil Reserves and Production
4.0
40
3.5
35
3.0
30
2.5
25 2.0 20 1.5
15
1.0
10
0.5
5 -
Millions
45
U.S. Crude Oil Production (Million Bbl/d)
U.S. Crude Oil Proved Reserves (Billion Bbl)
Crude oil production and reserves are climbing back to levels not seen since the 1980s.
0.0 1970
1975
1980
1985
Crude Oil Reserves Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
Crude Oil Production © LSU Center for Energy Studies
23
Unconventional Development Annual Energy Outlook, Crude Oil Reserves
Crude oil reserves are expected to increase 15 percent by 2020. percent by 2016 and then gradually increase by another 12 percent another to 2040. 40
Reserves, Billion Barrels
35 30 25 20 15
10 5 0 2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
24
Unconventional Development Forecast U.S. Crude Oil Production U.S. production of crude oil is expected to increase at an average annual rate of 6 percent through 2019, and decreases thereafter at a average annual rate of 1.2 percent through 2040. 12
Million Bbls per day
10
8
6
4
2
0 2011
2016
2021
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
2026
2031
2036 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
25
Unconventional Development Net Import Share of U.S. Petroleum and Liquid Fuels, 1990 – 2040 The share of U.S. net crude oil and product imports has been falling since 2005. The EIA expects the net import share to decrease to 26 percent in 2023. If however, high prices encourage U.S. development, the share of net imports could drop to zero by 2036. 70% 60%
Percent
50%
40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% 1990
1995
2000
2005
Reference High Oil and Gas Resource
2010
2015
2020
High Oil Price Low Oil and Gas Resource
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.
2025
2030
2035
2040
Low Oil Price
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
26
Natural Gas Supply Impacts From Unconventional Crude Drilling
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
27
Natural Gas Supply Natural Gas Prices and Rigs
$12
1,800 1,600
$10
1,400 $8
1,200 1,000
$6 800 $4
600 400
$2 200 $0 Dec-04
0 Dec-05
Dec-06
Dec-07
Dec-08
Natural Gas Price
Dec-09
Dec-10
Dec-11
Dec-12
Dec-13
Natural Gas Rigs (6-month Rolling Average)
Natural Gas Price (6-month Rolling Average)
Natural gas drilling rigs activity is very responsive to price, both of which started to decrease rapidly post-recession.
Dec-14
Number of Natural Gas Rigs
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy; Baker Hughes, Inc.
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
28
Natural Gas Supply Natural Gas Prices and Rigs
50,000
1,800
45,000
1,600
40,000
1,400
35,000
1,200
30,000
1,000
25,000
800
20,000
600
15,000 10,000
400
5,000
200
0 Jan-07
Natural Gas Rigs (6-month Rolling Average)
Natural Gas Production (6-month Rolling Average)
Interestingly, natural gas production continued to rise in the face of rapid decreases in rig activity (pre-cursor/corollary for crude oil?)
0 Jan-08
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
Natural Gas Production
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy; Baker Hughes, Inc.
Jan-12
Jan-13
Jan-14
Active Natural Gas Rigs © LSU Center for Energy Studies
29
Natural Gas Supply Shale Oil and Gas Production (7 Major Plays)
Considerable amount of “free” natural gas (“associated gas”) coming from unconventional crude oil production. Helps to explain (in part) the continued strength in natural gas production in the face of rapid rig count decreases. 50 45 5
40 35
4
30 3
25 20
2
15 10
1
5 0 Jan-07
Jan-08
Jan-09
Jan-10
Crude Oil
Jan-11
Jan-12
Jan-13
Jan-14
Natural Gas Production, Bcf per day
Crude Oil Production, MMBbl per day
6
0 Jan-15
Natural Gas © LSU Center for Energy Studies
30
Natural Gas Supply Relationship of Shale Oil and Gas Production
Growth in “free gas” has already started to slow, once crude oil rig, and then production activity slows.. It could have implications for natural gas markets. 16 14
Bcf / MMBbl
12 10 8
6 4 2 0 Jan-07
Jan-08
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
Jan-12
Jan-13
Jan-14
Jan-15
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
31
Challenges with Unconventional Development
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
32
Unconventional Challenges Energy & Environmental Issues with Unconventional Drilling/Production
• Number of challenges with unconventional activities: • Decline curve characteristics • Well integrity/migration issues (chemicals/methane) • Water Use issues • Seismic issues • Land Use/Infrastructure
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
33
Unconventional Challenges Decline curves – Conventional v. Unconventional
Unconventional declines are much faster in early years – what happens in the “tails” is not yet clear.
Unconventional Conventional
????
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
34
Unconventional Challenges Decline curves – AEO Outlook by Shale Play
AEO suggests “fat” tails.
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
35
Unconventional Challenges Production from a Typical Well and Shale Well Illustrative production decline from a convention vs. shale producing well. As much as 80 percent of total production thought to occur in the first two to three years.
Q Unconventional Shale Well
Conventional Well
0
T © LSU Center for Energy Studies
36
Unconventional Challenges Well integrity issues – typical well configuration
Industry argues considerable protection from well integrity failures.
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
37
Unconventional Challenges Well integrity issues – typical well configuration
Concerns about multiple pathways to ground and surface water.
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
38
Unconventional Challenges Well Integrity Issues – Chemical Components in Fluids
Fluids are overwhelmingly water (input), but there are small amounts of serious chemical components. Output from process and disposal is challenge.
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
39
Unconventional Challenges Well Integrity Issues – Methane
Now that’s a fire!!!
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
40
Unconventional Challenges Well Integrity Issues – More Methane
I’m cooking burgers in the sink tonight.
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
41
Unconventional Challenges Well Integrity Issues – Seismic
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
42
Unconventional Challenges Water Use Issues
Increasing water use per well across shale plays.
Shale Barnett Marcellus Haynesville Eagle Ford Source: Cooley & Donnelly (2012) estimates
Average Water Use (million gallons per well) 2.6 5.4 5.5 – 6.0 6.0 - 6.5 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
43
Unconventional Challenges Water Use Issues – Haynesville Shale
Most water used for fracturing comes from surface water sources, not ground water.
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
44
Unconventional Challenges Water Use Issues – Estimated Haynesville Totals
Several billion gallons worth of water are estimated to have been used each year for fracturing in the Haynesville share area (Louisiana only).
Year
Reported Wells (FracFocus)
Cumulative New Active Wells Wells in Drilled HS
Average Reported Water Use Wells as per Well Share of (Gallons) New Wells 433 0.6 4,444,262
Estimated Total Annual Water Use (Gallons) 1,924,365,446
2009
2
333
2010
24
672
1105
4
5,386,897
3,619,994,784
2011
494
784
1889
63
5,691,966
4,462,501,344
2012
364
373
2262
97
5,941,717
2,216,260,441
© LSU Center for Energy Studies
45
Unconventional Challenges Relative Water Use
However, fracturing is only a small part of total large-scale water use. This use does, however, differ since most water used in the hydraulic fracturing process cannot (generally) be reused or re-injected into aquifers.
Paper Products, 3% Chemicals, 26% Irrigation, 4% Power Generation. 62% Aquaculture, 5% Hydraulic Fracturing *Frac Focus,