LAMAQUE GOLD PROJECT December 2016

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained on this presentation. This presentation contains "forward-looking information" concerning Integra Gold Corp.’s (“Integra“ or the “Company”) future financial or operating performance and other statements that express management's expectations or estimates of future developments, circumstances or results. Generally, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “seeks”, "believes", "anticipates", "plans", “continues”, "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "expects", "forecasts", "intends", “projects”, “predicts”, “proposes”, "potential", “targets” and variations of such words and phrases, or by statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "will", "could", "would", “should” or "might" "be taken", "occur" or "be achieved". Forward-looking statements included in this presentation include statements regarding potential mineralization and mineral resources, the potential development scenarios for the Lamaque Gold Project, including information with respect to the supporting infrastructure, the potential life of mine, rates of production and the effects of steps taken to mitigate local impacts and the expected completion dates of exploration and drilling, exploration results, estimated and future exploration and administration expenditures, the timing and results of preliminary economic assessments, other development studies, and future plans and objectives of Integra. While all forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties, these statements are based on certain assumptions that management of Integra believes are reasonable, including that it will be able to obtain financing and on reasonable terms, that its current exploration and other objectives can be achieved, that its exploration and other activities will proceed as expected, that its community and environmental impact procedures will work as anticipated, that general business and economic conditions will not change in a material adverse manner, that Integra will not experience any material accident, labour dispute or failure or shortage of equipment, and that all necessary government approvals for its planned exploration and potential development activities will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms. There can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Integra’s expectations include, among others, the actual results of current exploration activities being different than those anticipated by Integra, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, changes in estimated mineral resources, future prices of metals, increased costs of labor, equipment or materials, availability of equipment, failure of equipment to operate as anticipated, accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena, risks related to community relations and activities of stakeholders, and delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing. Although Integra has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Integra does not intend, and expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking information or statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. For further information about the Lamaque Gold Project, including information about key assumptions, parameters, risks and data verification measures relating to the mineral resource estimates and PEA referred to in this presentation, can be found in the technical report entitled “Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate Update for the Lamaque Project dated November 15, 2015 and prepared by InnovExplo, filed on Integra’s SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com.

Hervé Thiboutot, Eng., Senior Vice President, is the qualified person for the Company under National Instrument 43-101, and have reviewed and approved all of the scientific and technical information contained in this presentation.

2

Share Structure Shares Outstanding

477,427,677

Fully Diluted

500,612,502

Market Cap Cash

Marketable Securities

As of November 29, 2016

~$305.5 million ~$41 million

~$5 million

3

Strong Share Price Performance, 2 year Integra

Peers

TSXV

US$ Gold Price

GDXJ

XAU

Commence construction on Triangle Ramp

400%

Updated Resource Estimate

350%

Updated Resource Estimate incl. “C” Structures

300%

Relative Performance

250% 210.0%

Eldorado acquires 15% of ICG

200% 150%

Environmental Permits Received 114.8%

100%

27.1%

50%

11.7%

-

1.6% (2.0%)

(50%)

(100%) Dec-14

Feb-15

Apr-15

Jun-15

Aug-15

Oct-15

Dec-15

Feb-16

Apr-16

Jun-16

Aug-16

Oct-16

Source: Capital IQ. As of November 29, 2016. Note: GDXJ is the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF; Precious metal developers without current production (>3 years, or uncertain, estimated time to production). Peers consist of Richmont Mines Inc., Roxgold Inc., Osisko Mining Inc., Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd., Belo Sun Mining Corp, Dalradian Resources Inc., Victoria Gold Corp., Sabina Gold & Silver Corp., Midas Gold Corp., Eastmain Resources Inc., Treasury Metals Inc., Pretium Resources Inc. Falco Resources Ltd., Gold Standard Ventures Corp, Pure Gold Mining Inc.

4

Faces of Integra OPERATIONS

Langis St-Pierre, Chief Operating Officer

•

Holds Mining Engineering degree from Laval University. Has more than 29 years of experience in the mining industry including 27 years at Cambior/IAMGOLD During his tenure at Cambior Inc, and IAMGOLD Corp. he rose to Mine Manager and General Manager gaining experience at multiple Quebec mining operations In 2010 was appointed President and General Manager of IAMGOLD S.A. Burkina Faso, a subsidiary of IAMGOLD, where he oversaw 2,300 employees and mining operations that produced an annual average of 350,000 ounces of gold.

• •

François Chabot, Manager of Operations and Engineering •

B. Sc. and M.Sc. Geological Engineering from Laval University. Member of the Ordre des Ingenieurs du Quebec Extensive experience in all aspects of mine development including permitting, environmental management, and project evaluation Previously worked for Placer Dome, Aurizon Mines, Golder Associates, and Richmont Mines

• •

Jean-Guy St-Jean, Mill Superintendent •

Has over 40 years of experience as a Mill Superintendent, including working as Mill Superintendent at the Sigma mill for a previous operator Previously worked as a Mill Superintendent for Osisko, Corp. Miniere, Semafo, Century Mining, Wassoulor, Dolomex Inc, AJ Persson Gold Corp, and Casa Berardi Mines

•

EXPLORATION Hervé Thibotout, Senior Vice President •

Major contributor to the co-discovery of more than 20 million ounces of gold during his 34 year career working for major, mid-tier, and junior mining companies Extensive experience in all aspects of exploration including generating, negotiating, and managing projects, as well as corporate, community, and government relations, and in liaising with mine development engineers Has held senior roles at Alamos Gold Corp., Goldcorp Inc., and Placer Dome

•

•

Jacques Simoneau, Exploration Manager •

Extensive experience working with major gold companies identifying and evaluating precious metals opportunities, and in the design, implementation, and management of exploration projects and feasibility studies in several varied geological environments both international and in Canada Has held senior positions at Goldcorp, Barrick Gold, and Placer Dome

•

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Stephen de Jong, President/CEO •

President/CEO of Integra since 2012. Mr. de Jong raised more than $110 million for Integra, at successively higher share prices since becoming CEO despite the challenges of the recent 5 year+ downturn in the mining industry Built a high caliber team of experienced and successful geologists, mining engineers, and professionals with abundant mining experience in Quebec Director of Integra, GFG Resources, Eastmain Resources. Holds B. Commerce degree from Royal Road University

• •

George Salamis, Chairman •

Mr. Salamis has over 25 years of experience in mineral exploration, mine development, and operations, including over 5 years in Val d’Or area in exploration and mining, where he was primarily employed by Placer Dome. Previously held senior management positions at Placer Dome and Cameco, and holds a degree in Geology from the University of Montreal Director of Integra, Eastmain Resources, Pinecrest Resources, and Edgewater Exploration

• •

Robert Bryce, P. Eng. •

•

Petra Decher, CPA, CA • • •

• •

Initially worked for InnovExplo before becoming a Project Geologist for Agnico-Eagle Senior Geologist for Goldcorp before joining Integra Gold

Experienced finance executive with more than 12 years of experience in the mining industry Formerly VP Finance and Assistant Secretary for Franco Nevada Corp. , and President and CFO for Geoinformatics Exploration Inc. Holds B. Commerce degree from Concordia University, and Diploma in Accounting from McGill University. Articled at Richter Usher Vineberg (Richter) in Montreal, QC

John de Jong •

•

Has held senior management positions, including CEO and CFO, at numerous public companies, and has been integral to restructuring and recapitalization of several mineral exploration companies, including Integra Gold. Oversaw the exploration, mining, and milling operations at Slocan BC for Klondike Silver 2009-11, and Klondike’s exploration and mining programs in Yukon in 2009-10

Charles Oliver, CFA, Bsc. Geology • • •

Most recently Lead Portfolio Manager for Sprott Gold and Precious Metals Fund. Previously Senior VP and Lead Portfolio Manager at AGF Funds Holds a B.Sc. Geology (Honours) from the University of Western Ontario and began his career as a field geologist in Quebec before becoming a trader and retail broker in Toronto.

Raynald Vézina, P. Eng •

Luc Theberge, Senior Exploration Geologist

A mining engineer with over 43 years of experience in the industry, including all aspects of operations, and management of various mines. Previously VP of Mining Operations for Aur Resources and currently Chairman and President of XEMAC Resources Mr. Bryce is a member of the Ordre des Ingenieurs du Quebec and a member of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (CIM)

• •

Mr. Vézina has over 40 years of experience in the mining industry and has overseen the construction of 8 mines, including 7 in Quèbec Former General Manager of Kiena Gold Mine, the sister mine to the historic Sigma Mine Mr. Vézina is a member of the Ordre des Ingenieurs du Quebec and a Fellow of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (CIM)

5

Learning from the past

5 km 6

Sigma Mill

MILL SPECS: THROUGHPUT:

Currently, 2,400 tonnes per day (Previously 5,000 tonnes per day) 2012

LAST OPERATED:

Crush, Grind, CIL

SIMPLIFIED FLOW:

C$98 million

EST. REPLACEMENT COST:

OCT. 2014 ACQUISITION SHARES:

CASH: WASTE ROCK SALE:

25 million shares at a deemed price of $0.23 paid to the receiver (since placed with institutional investors) C$1.8 million C$1 million received from Fournier for sale of Sigma waste rock 7

Integra approach to growth

1

TRIANGLE DEPOSIT

2

SATELLITE DEPOSITS No. 4 Plug, No. 6 Vein, Sigma Resource, Parallel Deposit

3

EXPANDING EXPLORATION Lamaque Deeps, Gold Rush, New Targets

THE SIGMA MILL 100% Owned, Fully permitted 2,400 tpd

8

Triangle Deposit: Evolution of a Model

C1

C2

C3

C4

Triangle (5 g/t cut-off)

•

Tonnes

Grade

Ounces

Indicated

2,014,600

8.96

580,150

Inferred

2,668,700

9.03

774,880

C5 C6

Approximately 105,000 m of drilling to be in updated resource estimate Q1 2017 9

C2 Longsection

10

C4 Longsection

11

Drills turning 2016 Drill Stats: • 103,938 m drilled • 23,500 m in assays pending • 6 drills turning

1 Drill at Lamaque Deeps 5 Drills at Triangle

5 km 12

Advancing underground

13

Triangle Infastructure

14

Driving the ramp

RAMP DEPTH: OCTOBER 31, 2016

• The ramp has progressed approximately 400 metres • Bulk sample expected to be complete in Q3 2017 • $26 million budget, Fully Financed 15

Satellite Deposits Sigma

1

Tonnes

Grade

Ounces

Indicated

3,674,000

5.0

586,000

Inferred

9,159,000

6.3

1,853,000

Sigma Resource 2 No. 6 Vein

Tonnes

Grade

Ounces

Indicated

201,300

7.90

51,280

Inferred

239,800

7.50

58,080

Parallel

Tonnes

Grade

Ounces

Indicated

426,800

10.29

141,210

Inferred

184,100

7.70

45,560

No. 6 Vein

Parallel Deposit

Sixteen

No. 4 Plug

Sixteen

Tonnes

Grade

Ounces

Indicated

41,800

6.90

9,250

Inferred

400

6.40

90

5 km 1. 2. 3.

Parallel Deposit, No. 6 Vein, No. 4 Plug Shears calculated using 5 g/t cut-off, see page 24 for additional dislosures on P4 Clusters Using a 1.0g/t cut-off grade, except for 19,000 ounces in the Indicated category and 6,000 ounces in the Inferred category for Lamaque No.2 Mine for which the cut-off grade is 2.1 g/t. Mineral Resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

No. 4 Plug

Tonnes

Grade

Ounces

Indicated (P4 Shears)

184,100

7.70

45,560

Inferred (P4 Shears)

398,700

8.43

108,100

Indicated (P4 Clusters)

1,468,500

3.93

185,720

Inferred (P4 Clusters)

1,881,000 16

3.12

188,900

Lamaque Deeps

Pilot Hole Complete November 2016 1,800 m depth

17

Exploration Targets

SIGMA MINE

Two historic intercepts on the outside of the anomaly returned:

20.04 g/t Au over 4.42 m 9.12 g/t Au over 4.37 m

18

Next Steps: Updated Resource Estimate, Q1 2017

Deposit

Metres in Current Resource

Metres to be Incorporated in Q1 2017 Update

Triangle

139,800 m

105,000 m

Sigma Deposit

Complete remodel of resource 0m to 400m vertical 19

The road ahead: PEA FEBRUARY 2015 PEA:

Q1 2017 PEA:

• 105,000 ounces / year

• Increased throughput

• < 40% long hole mining

• > 80% long hole mining

• C$731 AISC

• Incorporation of ‘C’ structures

• C$85M Capex

• Triangle Deposit now over 1M ounces and continuing to grow

• Only 240,000 ounces total recovered from Triangle Deposit • One of the lowest capex to annual production ratios in the entire industry

20

Timeline Catalyst:

Expected Completion:

Updated Resource Estimate Triangle, No. 6 Vein, Parallel and No. 4 Plug

Preliminary Economic Assessment

Q1 2017

Updated Resource Estimate

Q1 2017

Triangle and Sigma

Triangle Deposit Bulk Sample

Q3 2017

Drill Results

Monthly

10k metres pending from Triangle, 7 drills turning 21

Resource Estimate, November 2016 1,2 5 g/t cut-off Au Deposit

Indicated Resources Tonnes

Grade

Ounces

Tonnes

Grade

Ounces

2,014,600

8.96

580,150

2,668,700

9.03

774,880

No. 4 Plug (P4 Shears)

143,700

8.08

37,340

398,700

8.43

108,100

Parallel

426,800

10.29

141,210

184,100

7.70

45,560

No. 6 Vein

201,300

7.90

51,280

239,800

7.50

58,080

Fortune

155,000

6.30

31,620

9,400

6.60

1,990

Sixteen

41,800

6.90

9,250

400

6.40

90

Subtotal

2,983,200

8.87

850,850

3,501,100

8.78

988,700

No. 4 Plug (P4 Cluster)

1,468,500

3.93

185,720

1,881,000

3.12

188,900

Total

4,451,700

7.24

1,036,570

5,382,100

6.80

1,177,600

Triangle

3 g/t cut-off Au Deposit

Indicated Resources

Inferred Resources

Tonnes

Grade

Ounces

Tonnes

Grade

Ounces

3,273,000

7.01

737,590

4,500,400

6.94

1,004,170

No. 4 Plug

268,600

6.13

52,930

650,100

6.66

139,230

Parallel

761,100

7.48

182,920

382,100

5.72

70,290

No. 6 Vein

462,800

5.60

83,450

362,000

6.40

74,240

Fortune

330,200

5.10

53,660

28,100

4.60

4,160

Sixteen

91,700

5.20

15,440

1,800

4.20

250

Subtotal

5,187,400

6.75

1,125,990

5,924,500

6.79

1,292,340

No. 4 Plug (P4 Clusters)

1,468,500

3.93

185,720

1,881,000

3.12

188,900

Total

6,655,900

6.12

1,311,710

7,805,500

5.90

1,481,246

Triangle

1. 2.

Inferred Resources

2

Mineral Resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Please see page 24 for important disclosures.

23

Technical Information 1.

Triangle: Specific gravity of 2.8 g/cm3; geologically constrained model with hard boundary; capping of 20 g/t Au on composites when estimated cells are more than 15 m from drill hole otherwise uncap; composited to 1 m before geostatistical analysis; 2 m minimum true thickness, if required diluted with in situ grade when assay results are available otherwise diluted with “zero” grade; ordinary kriging; 3 g/t cut-off calculated for official resource numbers

2.

No. 4 Plug (“P4 Shears” - high angle shear veins structures outside vein clusters): Specific gravity of 2.80 g/cm3; geologically constrained model with hard boundary; capping of 20 g/t Au on composites when estimated cells are more than 15 m from drill hole otherwise uncap; composites are 1 m in downhole length); 2 m minimum true thickness, if required diluted with in situ grade when assay results are available otherwise diluted with “zero” grade; ordinary kriging; 3 g/t cut-off calculated for official resource numbers

3.

Parallel: Specific gravity of 2.80 g/cm3; geologically constrained model with hard boundary; capping at 100 g/t Au then capping of 20 g/t Au on composites when estimated cells are more than 15 m from drill hole otherwise uncap; composited to 1 m before geostatistical analysis; 2 m minimum true thickness, if required diluted with in situ grade when assay results are available otherwise diluted with 0 grade; ordinary kriging; 3 g/t cut-off calculated for official resource numbers

4.

No. 6 Vein: Specific gravity of 2.80 g/cm3; geologically constrained model with hard boundary; capping of 20 g/t Au on composites when estimated cells are more than 15 m from drill hole otherwise uncap; composited to 1 m before geostatistical analysis; 2 m minimum true thickness, if required diluted with in situ grade when assay results are available otherwise diluted with 0 grade; ordinary kriging; 3 g/t cut-off calculated for official resource numbers

5.

Fortune: Specific gravity of 2.82 g/cm3; geologically constrained model with hard boundary; individual gold values uncap; composited to 1 m before geostatistical analysis; 2 m minimum true thickness, if required diluted with in situ grade when assay results are available otherwise diluted with 0 grade; ordinary kriging; 3 g/t cut-off calculated for official resource numbers

6.

Sixteen: Specific gravity of 2.80 g/cm3; geologically constrained model with hard boundary; individual gold values capped at 35 g/t Au; composited to 0.7 m before geostatistical analysis; ; 2 m minimum true thickness, if required diluted with in situ grade when assay results are available otherwise diluted with 0 grade; ordinary kriging; 3 g/t cut-off calculated for official resource numbers

7.

No. 4 Plug vein clusters (P4 Clusters): Part of No. 4 Plug deposits that correspond to areas containing multiple gold bearing shear and tension veins arrays varying in dip from flat to up to 65 degrees, details available below; it is anticipated that some of these resources could be developed using bulk mining methods. A Monte Carlo approach involving a bootstrapping (is this a proper geologically defined term…?) average procedure that can be applied to a specific volume of rock if the number of samples inside the reference volume is sufficient to reasonably capture the sample distribution pattern, samples must be reasonably equally distributed within the reference volume; up to a certain point, a proper de-clustering process may address a lack of uniformity, lithology inside the volume not need to be unique but the proportionality and relation between them must be constant; the bootstrapping average can be considered as representative of the entire volume of reference; this method is non-parametric; it does not relay on any assumption about the shape of the distribution; it allows for properly estimating intervals of confidence for non-parametric distribution; average estimation is verified only for the entire volume of reference; it does not allow for subsequent mining selectivity.

24

Analyst Coverage Share Price (C$)

$2.00

$1.50 $1.00

Analyst Price Range = $0.90 - $1.75 Consensus Analyst NAV PS = $1.18 Consensus Analyst Target Price = $1.17

$0.50

$0.00 Oct-15

Nov-15

Dec-15

Jan-16

Feb-16

Mar-16

Apr-16

May-16

Jun-16

Jul-16

Aug-16

Sep-16

Lauren McConnell Date: 17/11/2016 Target Price: $1.30 NAVPS: $1.04

Pierre Vaillancourt Date: 14/10/2016 Target Price: $1.30 NAVPS: $1.43

Stuart McDougall Date: 09/11/2016 Target Price: $1.75 NAVPS: $1.74

Ingrid Rico Date: 16/11/2016 Target Price: $1.25 NAVPS: $1.52

Michael Gray Date: 11/11/2016 Target Price: $1.00 NAVPS: $1.44

Andrew Mikitchook Date: 23//2016 Target Price: $1.25 NAVPS: $0.99

Michael Curran Date: 16/11/2016 Target Price: $1.25 NAVPS: $1.24

Tyron Breytenbach Date: 17/11/2016 Target Price: $1.10 NAVPS: $1.02

Kerry Smith Date: 16/11/2016 Target Price: $0.90 NAVPS: $0.80

Barry Allan Date: 19/09/2016 Target Price: $1.00 NAVPS: $0.98

Joseph Reagor Date: 06/09/2016 Target Price: $1.00 NAVPS: $0.58

Phil Russo Date: 16/11/2016 Target Price: $1.10 NAVPS: $1.15

Source: Capital IQ. As of November 29, 2016.

25