Creating the Future Through a Focus on Quality 2.16.10 Chris Schieffer
This message is part of Creating the Future
This message is part of Creating the Future
This message is part of Creating the Future
Agenda The Mayo Clinic Quality Construct Mayo Clinic’s Value Equation Applying Lean Six Sigma in healthcare Current major initiatives at Mayo Clinic
William Worrall Mayo (Father)
Select case studies in our application of Lean Six Sigma Quality as a business strategy Creating “Mayo Quality Fellows” Spreading best practice Tracking measures of strategic objectives
This message is part of Creating the Future
PRIORITIES
VISION
Mayo Clinic Strategic Plan Primary Value: The needs of the patient come first Mission: Mayo Clinic will provide the best care to every patient every day through integrated clinical practice, education, and research Vision: Mayo Clinic will be the premier patient-centered academic medical organization
Quality
Integration
Quality Individualized
Satisfy Our Patients
EXECUTION
• Achieve the highest levels of patient service and satisfaction • Demonstrate Mayo Clinic as the choice destination medical center
Medicine
Science of Health Care Delivery
Achieve Mission-Advancing Financial Performance • Achieve operating margin target • Achieve sufficient and stable sources of funding for Research and Education
Improve and Demonstrate Quality, Safety, Service, and Value • Achieve the highest levels of quality care and safety • Develop high-value care models targeted to specific patient populations
Attract, Develop, and Retain the Best People • Improve staff satisfaction, training, retention, and recognition • Increase diversity of all staff 5 11/12/07
• Strengthen leadership development • Establish a culture of innovation and discovery This message is part of Creating the Future
Mayo Clinic Quality Construct I
III
The best care for every patient every day… Culture
• Roles and expectations • Transparency • Leadership training–CALD III • Champions training • Safety competency/training • Business Case • Teamwork/Communications • Rapid Response Teams • Social Capital
II • • • •
IV
Engineering
Enterprise Accountability • Warfarin, SII, VAP-II, Pressure Ulcers, PQRI, Insulin, Surgery + Opioids, Semi-urgent Results, Rfos Department Accountability • Medication Reconciliation, Universal Protocol, Hand Hygiene, Sentinel Events, Teamwork
V
Execution
• Active visible leadership • Frontline empowerment • Process owners • Common scorecard and targets • Horizontal infrastructure • Adverse event oversight group • 100-day discipline • Business case
Infrastructure Quality Academy Quality Data Management System Health Sciences Research AHRQ patient safety indicator analysis
• • • •
Convergence of Electronic Systems Enterprise Learning System – Socrates Develop Mayo Value Management System Simulation 31 January 2008
Adapted from Bisognano, Plsek. 10 More Powerful Ideas for Improving Patient Care. This message is part of Creating the Future Chicago: Health Administration Press & Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2006.
Value Creation System The best care for every patient every day… Quality Construct
n a l PExecution Culture Engineering l a •Managed Diffusion n o •Reorganize for Value •Single High Value i t Practice a •Value Metrics r •Roles and expectations e •PQRI p •Standardization •Front-line empowerment O •Grow Social Capital •Simulation 0 1 •Residency Programs 0 2 : T F Infrastructure A R Leverage Enterprise Information Management • Refine Value D Creation System •• Utilize Mayo Expert (ELS) Numerator Intensive • 30 day readmissions • Chronic disease/care mgmt • Mortality • HAI • Hand-offs (Joint Commission)
Denominator Intensive • 2 Service line lean efforts • Capture cost of poor quality (1%)
• Expand Quality Academy • Spread Specialty Councils
• Coordinate Improvement Assets This message is part of Creating the Future
Creating Greater Value for Our Patients
Quality
Goal: increasing(Outcomes value + Safety + Service)
(Outcomes + Safety + Service)
Value =
Cost
(For a span of care)
This message is part of Creating the Future
Supporting Improvement Projects
This message is part of Creating the Future
This message is part of Creating the Future
This message is part of Creating the Future
Quality Academy …not a tradeoff
IRR 217%
Cost avoidance
NPV > $17M
↑ Capacity
Define
Measure Analyze
FTE redeployed Improve
Control
Diffusion
“100 Days” This message is part of Creating the Future
Launching Improvement Projects
This message is part of Creating the Future
Project Charter
This message is part of Creating the Future
Project Prioritization
This message is part of Creating the Future
2x2 Matrix Bubble Plot of Priority Score by Feasibility Score Sized by Staffing-Project ID Project 36 34 32
Priority Score
30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 10 Circle Size
11
12
13
14
15
16 17 Feasibility Score
18
19
20
21
Bubble plot produced using JMP Statistical Analysis and Visualization software
This message is part of Creating the Future
22
Status Reports
This message is part of Creating the Future
Financial
Schedule
Scope
Owner
PM
n/a
Green
Green
B Asplin, D Brown, S Peters
J Thompson, C Berardinelli
JC Collaborative on Hand-offs
1/12/10
Status: Green Issues/challenges: • Top risks: Large scope, resources
Comments: • Goal: improve communication • ED ←→ ICUs, ICUs ←→ general care units • Kano analysis complete, Moving into design • In scope: ED, MICU, Dom 6D • Measures: reduce missing requirements by 50%,
reduce Sentinel/adverse events by XX%, improve sender/receiver sat by XX% This message is part of Creating the Future
Active Enterprise Priority Projects1 JC Collaborative on Hand-offs (12/9/09) ▼
IDOV
Identify/Define
30 Day Readmissions (12/9/09) ▼ Healthcare Assoc. Infections (12/9/09) ▼ Mortality (12/9/09) ▼ Chronic Disease/Care Mgmt Strategies ▼
DMAIC
Define
Blood Utilization ▼ PQRI (12/9/09) ▼
PMBOK
Initiating
Develop
Optimize
Verify
Implement
Portfolio Tracking…
Measure Analyze
Improve
MIDAS+ (Jan 2008)2 ▼ Mortality Review Spread ▼
Planning Executing
Key: Project Name (date charter approved) ▼
Monitoring
Control
Diffusion
Critical Tests, Critical Results + Semi Urgent Results (2/27/07) ▼
Controlling
Closing
1 MCR Component Only 2 Project launched Jan 2008 w/o charter
This message is part of Creating the Future
Dashboards
This message is part of Creating the Future
Sample of Improvement Projects
This message is part of Creating the Future
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Mayo Clinic Quality Team
This message is part of Creating the Future
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Charge: • Within 100 days, achieve and sustain performance at ≥95% on AMI core measure set using “all or none”* methodology * all patients eligible for at least 1 of the 8 measures must receive the care specified
• Promote collaboration and integration across Mayo Clinic sites
Results: • Achieved overall system-wide average performance of 97% early* * ~ 1 ½ months before end of 100 day period This message is part of Creating the Future
Heart Failure Team Mayo Clinic Quality Team
This message is part of Creating the Future
Heart Failure Charge: • The team was chartered to improve compliance to core measures for heart failure care to 95% or greater • Mayo Clinic’s performance is reported publicly to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and to Joint Commission on Accreditation Healthcare Organizations
Results : • Through effective teamwork, outstanding leadership and dedication, the team implemented changes to achieve high performance for our patients This message is part of Creating the Future
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Mayo Clinic Quality Team
This message is part of Creating the Future
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Charge: •
BPO Project to improve cycle time for reviewing key IRB applications. Project Goal: Turnaround time (from submission of application to dispatch of minute excerpt) of new full-Board Protocols and full-Board Modifications to be no more than 21 days.
Results:
• Improved compliance against goal from 25% at baseline to 70% at end of project
This message is part of Creating the Future
Pneumonia
Mayo Clinic Quality Team
This message is part of Creating the Future
Pneumonia Charge: Goal: To improve care processes for pneumonia to a 95% or better reliability on the 7 process measures using the all or none measurement methodology
Results: • Improved all or none score for pneumonia care measures 4Q2005: All or none score = 55% May 1, 2006: Project start date 3Q2006: All or none score = 83% 4Q2006: All or none score = 75%* This message is part of Creating the Future
Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Mayo Clinic Quality Team
This message is part of Creating the Future
Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Charge: • Goal: To improve compliance with CMS guidelines for preoperative administration of prophylactic antibiotics to 95% or better Results: Surgical patients receive prophylactic antibiotics within 60 minutes prior to incision Surgical patients receive prophylactic antibiotics consistent with current guidelines (specific to each type of surgical procedure) Prophylactic antibiotics are discontinued within 24 hours after documented surgery end time (48 hours if CABG or Other Cardiac Surgery)
This message is part of Creating the Future
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) Mayo Clinic Quality Team
This message is part of Creating the Future
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Charge: 15% of Ventilated Patients Develop VAP • Ventilated Patient Mortality – 32%
• •
Patient with VAP Mortality – 46% VAP Attributable Cost $40,000/patient
120
Results
100
80
60
40
20
0 MCJ
MCA
MCR Baseline
Actual
MHS
Mayo Clinic
Goal
This message is part of Creating the Future
Ventilator Bundle Head of bed elevation Sedation vacation DVT prophylaxis PUD prophylaxis
This message is part of Creating the Future
Change in Adherence to Ventilator Bundle vs Change in VAP
P e rc e n t In c re a s e in a d h e re n c e
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0
20
40
60
80
100
Resar et al, Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety May 2005
Change In VAP Rate This message is part of Creating the Future
Warfarin
Mayo Clinic Quality Team
This message is part of Creating the Future
Warfarin Charge: • Reduce iatrogenic harm by narrowing the proportion of Warfarin inpatients that experience INR > 5, have an unsafe discharge plan
Results (annualized): Annual # of Mayo Inpatients w/ INR > 5
Annual # of Mayo Inpatients w/ Discharge Plan Unsafe # of Inpatients with D/C Plan Unsafe (Before QI) # of Inpatients with D/C Plan Unsafe (After QI)
# of Inpatients w/ INR > 5 Before QI # of Inpatients w/ INR > 5 After QI
¹ ¹ ¹
100 50
¹
50% improvement ² 412
MCR (7500)
150
MCJ (3000)
58% improvement ²
84
45% improvement ²
45
51
MCA (3200)
46% improvement ²
28
647
MC (18700)
64% improvement ²
273 0
100
200
300
400
# of patients
500
600
700
1000 500
MHS (5000) Site (annual # of warfarin pts)
Site (annual # of warfarin pts)
MHS (5000)
¹
50% improvement ² 3900
MCR (7500)
1275
¹
MCJ (3000)
2151
81% improvement ²
420
MCA (3200)
1184 1152
MC (18700)
67% improvement ²
3% improvement ² 8235
3347 0
2000
4000
59% improvement ² 6000
8000
10000
# of patients
This message is part of Creating the Future
CP1261910-6
Mayo Clinic Vision
This message is part of Creating the Future
Quality As a Business Strategy (2009 economic crisis hits home)
This message is part of Creating the Future
Timeless values, changing times We are firmly committed to our primary value The needs of the patient come first
We need to be willing to change everything else
This message is part of Creating the Future
What Are We Doing? Overall Strategy Reducing expenses, improving revenue • Task Force led by Mike Harper, M.D.
Transforming our practice
This message is part of Creating the Future
What are we doing? Rochester Transformational Activities Hospital Census Management Manage Patient Mix/Access New Models for Internal Consults Surgical Care Redesign and Coding Critical Care of the Future Staff to Workload – Outpatient Transcription Services Redesign Manage to Reimbursement This message is part of Creating the Future
Transforming our Practice Manage to Reimbursement Practice redesign initiatives under way in CV Surgery and Ortho Value stream mapping to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps Goal to preserve and enhance quality, safety and service while reducing costs by 20% Care processes and roles will change This message is part of Creating the Future
Current Environment Factors making the case for change Economic environment • Requires immediate response from Mayo
Health care reform Demographic growth of patients of Medicare age Finances and operational implications
This message is part of Creating the Future
2009 Plan – Improving Value Effective process change increases quality and decreases cost 2009 Priority projects focused on denominator of value equation (cost over time) Lean Process Redesign of Clinical Service Lines • Identifying two clinical areas for initial focus, using Quality
Academy
Teaching leaders to lead change • Quality Academy This message is part of Creating the Future
2009 Plan – Improving Value Top MCR projects and initiatives – “fast track” efforts with the highest potential for immediate financial return Hospital Census Control Patient Mix/Access New Internal Consult Models Surgical Care Redesign & Documentation/Coding improvement Critical Care Delivery
Cost I & II: Reduce Medicare Gap Inpatient Warfarin Management Employee and Community Health International Office This message is part of Creating the Future
Short-Term Plans to Create Greater Value Achieve capacity, volume and productivity targets: each week, each month • SOPs, OPVs, Surgical Patients, Procedures, etc.
Achieve expense and cash management goals • • • • • •
Planning for 2010 budget Restrained PCC and AH staff growth; some reductions Defer salary increase for voting/consulting staff Defer capital projects by 50% Travel expense reduction Reduced remodeling and deferrable maintenance
Realize short-term gains from MCR initiatives
This message is part of Creating the Future
Mid-Term Plans to Create Greater Value Major transformational initiatives Contingency planning Fast-tracked transformational initiatives New pilots for new care management models Lean process improvement
This message is part of Creating the Future
Long-Term Plans to Create Greater Value Destination Strategy 2020 Strategy Support Enterprise Focus on wellness vs. sick care: The New Paradigm
This message is part of Creating the Future
Further Embedding QI Methodologies into Our DNA
This message is part of Creating the Future
Quality Fellows program Purpose: to provide a fellowship program to learn, develop and apply new knowledge for continuous improvement Audience: Physicians, Nurses, allied health & administrative professionals Outcome: Increased knowledge, skills and tools needed to design, improve, implement and evaluate sustainable quality improvement
This message is part of Creating the Future
CP1000000-55
Quality Fellows Program Tiered program • • • •
Bronze Silver Gold Diamond
Knowledge & application to improvement projects Teaching & publication
This message is part of Creating the Future
This message is part of Creating the Future
Quality Fellows Program Pathways Core Mayo Required Level
Bronze Silver Gold Diamond
101
Electives ASQ Certification (optional)
CQIA Green Belt Black Belt Master Black Belt
This message is part of Creating the Future
This message is part of Creating the Future
MQF Functions & Roles Matrix Position
Employees & Students
Nurse, Resident / Fellow
Consultant, Nurse, Supervisor / Manager
Level
Awareness
Bronze
Bronze
Silver
Gold / Diamond
Function
Participate in QI Teams
Improve the process
Sustain Improvements
Lead & Do Projects
Apply, Lead & Teach Improvement framework
Role (s)
QI team member
QI team member
QI team member / Team Leader
Project Champion or Process Owners
Group Facilitator
Responsibilities
Suggest process improvements, Assist with implementation of process improvements, Foster team work, seek to understand all key stakeholders' needs
Select, Initiate & Prioritize Quality improvements projects and related Charters, Assist with implementation of process improvements, guide project teams, Foster team work, seek to understand all key stakeholders' needs, close QI projects
Select, Initiate & Prioritize Quality improvements projects and related Charters, Assist with implementation of process improvements, guide project teams, Foster team work, seek to understand all key stakeholders' needs, close QI project
Knowledgeable in core QI methods. Commission teams/ projects to impact the Mayo Value Equation. Support, coordinate & monitor QI teams. Conducts project review. Receives support/guidance from QI expert.
Collaboration / Coordination
Collaboration / Coordination
Critical Skill
Problem Consciousness
Problem Solving
Supervisor / Manager, Administrator / Department Chair
QI Advisor / Analyst
Facilitate team , Use QI framework, develop communication / display tools, ensure data integrity, resolve team conflict, ensure process documentation, create / maintain project documentation
QI tool knowledge
This message is part of Creating the Future
This message is part of Creating the Future
Quality Review Board In 2000, the 24 Member Boards of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) agreed to evolve their recertification programs to one of continuous professional development – ABMS Maintenance of Certification ® (ABMS MOC®) ABMS MOC assures that the physician is committed to lifelong learning and competency in a specialty and/or subspecialty by requiring ongoing measurement of six core competencies: Patient Care, Medical Knowledge, Interpersonal and Communication Skill, Professionalism, Systems-based Practice, and Practice-based Learning and Improvement This message is part of Creating the Future
This message is part of Creating the Future
Specific Project Examples Surgery + Opioids = Narcan Reduce by 50% the number of adverse respiratory events requiring administration of Narcan related to Opioid-based medication administered intravenously following surgery.
VTE Spread Attempt rapid spread of proven concepts in DVT prophylaxis and implement a new system to improve ongoing use of appropriate DVT-P in hospitalized patients.
MRSA Reduction Pilot (for 6 months*) the addition of a de-colonization protocol for MRSA carriers admitted to 2 ICUs at St Mary’s hospital and to observe the change in HA-MRSA infections that result.
ICU Sepsis Management Process Simulation Use a systems engineering approach to develop a fully scalable simulation model of severe sepsis and septic shock management in the ICU.
Manage to Reimbursement Reduce cost/case by 20% for selected bypass & valve procedures by 1/1/10, resulting in annual cost savings of $10M in 2010.
Wipe out C.Diff Introduce cleaning patient rooms with bleach in an identified high risk Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) incidence patient care unit to reduce transmission.
SBAR Implement an effective means of structured communication through developed toolkits and educational resources that promote compliance with the 2009 National Patient Safety Goal
Hospital-Based Inpatient Psychiatry Services Improve core measures of Admission Screening, Discharge and Multiple Antipsychotic Medications at Mayo Psychiatry and Psychology Treatment Center (MPPTC) in adherence to the Hospital Based Inpatient Psychiatric Services (HBIPS) data set as defined by Joint Commission.
Staffing to workload Improve Mayo Clinic’s ability to staff to workload in the outpatient practice with the goal to optimize staffing resources.
This message is part of Creating the Future
Safety Focus: Communication
This message is part of Creating the Future
Universal Protocol Primary Goal: Zero sentinel events due to failed elements of universal protocol.
2004-6: 8.25 events/year (MCR) 2007: 14 events (MCR, MCA & MCF) 2008: 3 events (MCR, MCA, MCF & MHS) Most issues are currently experienced in non-surgical suite environments This message is part of Creating the Future
Daily events: ~50%
Researchers found that farmers who named their cows Betsy or Gertrude or Daisy improved their overall milk yield by almost 68 gallons annually.“ Just as people respond better to the personal touch, cows also feel happier and more relaxed if they are given a bit more one-to-one attention," Catherine Douglas of the university's School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development said in a news release.Dairy farmer: "We love our cows ... and every one of them has a name. Researchers questioned 516 dairy farmers in the United Kingdom. "By placing more importance on the individual, such as calling a cow by her name or interacting with the animal more as it grows up, we can not only improve the animal's welfare and her perception of humans, but also increase milk production.“Study out of Newcastle University in northeast England, published online Wednesday in the academic journal Anthrozoos. This message is part of Creating the Future
B teams + A system Always beat A teams + B system
This message is part of Creating the Future
Quality vs. Productivity Low error rate
Quality
(error rate) High error rate
Hotels Hotels
Airlines Airlines
Telecommunications Telecommunications
Computers Computers Retail Retail banking banking U.S. U.S. Postal Postal Service Service Auto Auto manufacturing manufacturing
Food Food services services
Health Health services services
Low
High
Productivity/efficiency
This message is part of Creating the Future
Clinical Advisory Board 2005 National Meetings for Member Executives
Spreading Best Practices (Diffusion)
This message is part of Creating the Future
Why? Increase the utilization of successful changes Impact a larger number of patients Reduce redundancy and “re-invention” Increase efficiency, momentum, knowledge Enhance quality and safety of care
This message is part of Creating the Future
Some Key Theories of Spread Agenda setting and change agents, Attributes of an innovation, Adopter categories, communicationEverett Rogers Content, context, community- John Seely Brown Tipping point, key messengers- Malcolm Gladwell Stages of Change - James Prochaska Social Marketing- Philip Kotler Motivators for behavior change, incentives, support for adopters- Albert Bandura Modified from Qualis Health, Overview of the Spread Model, Sharon Eloranta, MD
This message is part of Creating the Future
Past approaches: 2006 – 2008 Measures based – give each site a numeric target and
expect them to achieve; any sharing would be based on local sites seeking out best practices from others with better scores (Top 5 Safety Initiatives)
Enterprise teams – organizing groups with representatives
from each site to work collectively to develop and implement a common set of best practices (pneumonia, AMI, SSI, warfarin, etc)
Alpha/Beta –
one site will develop “best practice” with a defined expectation that other sites will follow implementation (VAP II, mortality review)
Grass roots – sharing of efforts either formally or informally
with the hope that others will adopt (plus one, specimen labeling) This message is part of Creating the Future
Key Elements of Spreading Leading Practices
Establish Leading Practices •Process Owner •Define expectations •Provide supporting evidence
Approval Process •Define approval authority •Provide feedback loops •Timely review
Implementation •Staff education •Hardwire practice into standard process •Aligned incentive
Monitoring •Ability to track compliance •Hold staff accountable •Continuously review results and modify practice
Communication and Change Management Principles This message is part of Creating the Future
Establish Leading Practices Prioritize targeted practices for improvement Identify spread model as a part of the chartering process Define what is meant by leading practice (i.e. advisory, guideline or standard) Articulate expectations and value of proposed practice to our patients (i.e. why should I do this?) • What is expected outcome and cost over time? • Identify value of care to our patients This message is part of Creating the Future
Establish Leading Practices Clearly define the expected practice • Identify common measures and how data is collected • Provide description, protocols, orders sets, consults, etc
Summarize supporting evidence (e.g. national guidelines, internal research, expert opinions, etc.
This message is part of Creating the Future
Approval Process Clearly identify the “process owner” and use the ARCIVD model to articulate roles Acknowledge there will be different approval groups at various levels based on: • Enterprise, site and department • Global, service line or local dept/division practice
Publish minority opinions so it is clear what perspectives have been considered Allow for a feedback loop so those with concerns regarding the practice have a venue to be heard This message is part of Creating the Future
Implementation Making “the right thing to do, the easy thing to do” Educate staff regarding evidence supporting the practice and expectations; acknowledge varying compliance based on specific patient needs (Intermountain Health experience shows 5 – 15 % variance)
Building the practice into the clinical work flow using standard order sets, clinical worksheets, templated notes, etc Aligning incentives with expectations This message is part of Creating the Future
Monitoring Further develop measures, outcomes and patient tracking systems (i.e. Midas, EDT and GDMS) Utilize these systems to monitor compliance and results of leading practices Identify organizational structure that is responsible for monitoring data and holding practitioners accountable Establish monthly review and improvement discussions This message is part of Creating the Future
Potential 2010 Goals Deliver world-class, outstanding, trusted and affordable care (“highest value care”) Transform Mayo Clinic’s healthcare delivery system while influencing the national health care system Execute a proactive business strategy to deliver medical care, to generate medical knowledge, to manage that knowledge and deliver what we know to new people, groups and places Create the medical workforce of the future This message is part of Creating the Future
The glory of medicine is that it is constantly moving forward, that there is always more to learn. The ills of today do not cloud the horizon of tomorrow but act as a spur to greater effort. Dr. William J. Mayo This message is part of Creating the Future
This message is part of Creating the Future