Covenants Not to Compete: Not the Time or Place for Boilerplate

Covenants Not to Compete: Not the Time or Place for Boilerplate Date Here Gregory L. Shelton Attorney at Law Horack, Talley, Pharr & Lowndes, P. A. ...
Author: Joella Kelly
1 downloads 0 Views 713KB Size
Covenants Not to Compete: Not the Time or Place for Boilerplate

Date Here

Gregory L. Shelton Attorney at Law Horack, Talley, Pharr & Lowndes, P. A. Florida Board Certified Construction Law Specialist Licensed in Florida, North Carolina and South Carolina

Logo

October 12, 2016

“The crowning fortune of a man… “… is to be born to some pursuit which finds him employment and happiness, whether it be to make baskets, or broadswords, or canals, or statues, or songs.” -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

www.HorackTalley.com

Covenants Not to Compete 

Competition



Solicitation of customers



Inducing employee departures

www.HorackTalley.com

Competition 

Writing (before vs. after)



Reasonable as to terms, time, and territory



Made part of employment contract



Based on something of value



Not against public policy

www.HorackTalley.com

Time and Territory 

Time  



5-year outer time boundary Look-back provision

Territory



Area of restriction Area assigned to employee Area actually worked Nature of business



Nature of employee’s duty and knowledge of operations

 



www.HorackTalley.com

Time and Territory

www.HorackTalley.com

Public Policy 

Determined by court



Business goodwill and customer relations



Restraint of trade

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Employee shall not work for, provide services for, consult with, or otherwise assist any individual or entity who is in the home health or personal care business competing with Employer.

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Employee shall not work for, provide services for, consult with, or otherwise assist any individual or entity who is in the home health or personal care business competing with Employer.

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Employee shall not work for, provide services for, consult with, or otherwise assist any individual or entity who is in the home health or personal care business competing with Employer.

Unenforceable because it restricts Employee from any type of employment with competitor, not just the same services provided to Employer. www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Worker will not compete with Employer for a period of one (1) year after Worker’s separation from Employer within a 100-mile radius

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Compete defined as “holding any ownership interest in, operating, managing, or advising a home health aide business or any other business that performs substantially the same services as SHC.”

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Worker will not compete with Employer for a period of one (1) year after Worker’s separation from Employer within a 100-mile radius Geographic limit might be reasonable, but “advising” and “having an ownership interest” not supported by sufficient allegations from Employer

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision 

Non-Compete Part II

Further, Worker agrees for a period of one (1) year from the date of Worker’s separation not to perform any work or services for any customer or account for which SHC performed work or services during the six months preceding the date of Worker’s separation.

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Further, Worker agrees for a period of one (1) year from the date of Worker’s separation not to perform any work or services for any customer or account for which SHC performed work or services during the six months preceding the date of Worker’s separation.

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Further, Worker agrees for a period of one (1) year from the date of Worker’s separation not to perform any work or services for any customer or account for which SHC performed work or services during the six months preceding the date of Worker’s separation. Unreasonable, fails to narrowly protect Employer’s legitimate business interests www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Non-Solicitation For a period of one year after termination, Worker will not solicit or attempt to procure the customers, accounts, or business that are part of the book of business of Employer at the date of separation. Worker further agrees for a period of one year after separation not to solicit any prospective customer whom Employer or Employee has solicited within six months preceding separation. 

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision For a period of one year after termination, Worker will not solicit or attempt to procure the customers, accounts, or business that are part of the book of business of Employer at the date of separation. Enforceable on its face, but evidence may show otherwise

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Worker further agrees for a period of one year after separation not to solicit any prospective customer whom Employer or Employee has solicited within six months preceding separation.

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Worker further agrees for a period of one year after separation not to solicit any prospective customer whom Employer or Employee has solicited within six months preceding separation.

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Worker further agrees for a period of one year after separation not to solicit any prospective customer whom Employer or Employee has solicited within six months preceding separation.

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision Blue Pencil Rule:

Courts may use “blue pencil” to strike unenforceable sections of a covenant that are divisible or separable

www.HorackTalley.com

Sandhills Decision For a period of one year after termination, Worker will not solicit or attempt to procure the customers, accounts, or business that are part of the book of business of Employer at the date of separation. Worker further agrees for a period of one year after separation not to solicit any prospective customer whom Employer or Employee has solicited within six months preceding separation.

www.HorackTalley.com

Enforcement      

Tortious interference Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Breach of Fiduciary Duty Conspiracy Injunctive Relief

www.HorackTalley.com

The End Gregory L. Shelton Attorney at Law Horack, Talley, Pharr & Lowndes, P.A.  

Florida Board Certified Construction Law Specialist

Licensed in Florida, North Carolina and South Carolina (704) 716-0805

[email protected]

www.HorackTalley.com

Suggest Documents