440 Selected Bibliography and Further Reading

Habermas, Jürgen, 1988. On the Logic of the Social Sciences, trans. S. W. Nicholsen and G. A. Stark (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press). Habermas, Jürgen, 1990. “Philosophy as Stand-In and Interpreter,” in Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. C. Lenhardt and S. W. Nicholsen (Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press). Habermas, Jürgen, 1992. Postmetaphysical Thinking, trans. W. M. Hohengarten (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press). Habermas, Jürgen, 1993. “Remarks on Discourse Ethics,” in Habermas, Justiªcation and Application, trans. C. Cronin (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press). Habermas, Jürgen, 1996. Between Facts and Norms, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press). Hall, J. A., 1982. “Gellner and Habermas on Epistemology and Politics. Or, Need We Feel Disenchanted?,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12: 384–408. Healy, Paul, 1987. “Is Habermas’s Consensus Theory a Theory of Truth?,” Irish Philosophical Journal 4: 145–152. Heath, Joseph, 1995. “Threats, Promises and Communicative Action,” European Journal of Philosophy 3(3): 225–241. Hesse, Mary, 1995. “Habermas and the Force of Dialectical Argument,” History of European Ideas 21(3): 367–378. Hohn, Hans-Joachim, 1989. “Vernunft—Kommunikation—Diskurs: Zu Anspruch und Grenze der Transzendentalpragmatik als Basistheorie der Philosophie,” Freie Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 36: 93–128. Honneth, Axel, 1979. “Communication and Reconciliation: Habermas’s Critique of Adorno,” Telos 39(1): 45–61. Husserl, Edmund, 1970. The Crisis of the European Sciences, trans. D. Carr (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press). Ilting, Karl-Heinz, 1976. “Geltung als Konsens,” Neue Hefte für Philosophie 10: 20–50. Ingram, David, 1982. “The Possibility of a Communication Ethic Reconsidered: Habermas, Gadamer, and Bourdieu on Discourse,” Man and World 15: 149–161. Ingram, David, 1987. Habermas and the Dialectic of Reason (New Haven: Yale University Press). Johnson, James, 1991. “Habermas on Strategic and Communicative Action,” Political Theory 19(2): 181–201. Johnson, James, 1993. “Is Talk Really Cheap? Prompting Conversation between Critical Theory and Rational Choice,” American Political Science Review 87(1): 74–93.

441 Selected Bibliography and Further Reading

Kambartel, F., and H. J. Schneider, 1981. “Constructing a Pragmatic Foundation for Semantics,” in G. Fløistad, ed., Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey, vol. 1 (The Hague: Nijhoff), pp. 155–178. Keuth, Herbert, 1979. “Erkenntnis oder Entscheidung: die Konsenstheorien der Wahrheit und der Richtigkeit von Jürgen Habermas,” Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 10: 375–393. Kissling, Christian, 1991. “Habermas et la theologie: Notes pour une discussion entre la theologie et la Theorie de l’agir communicationnel,” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie, pp. 235–244. Kolb, David, 1992. “Heidegger and Habermas on Criticism and Totality,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52(3): 683–693. Kompridis, Nikolas, 1994. “On World Disclosure: Heidegger, Habermas, and Dewey,” Thesis Eleven 37: 29–45. Kujundzic, Nebojsa, and William Buschert, 1993. “Staging the Life-World: Habermas and the Recuperation of Austin’s Speech Act Theory,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23(1): 105–116. Lafont, Cristina, 1993. La Razon como Lenguaje (Madrid: Visor). Lafont, Cristina, 1994. “Spannungen im Wahrheitsbegriff,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 42(6): 1007–1023. Lara, Maria Pia, 1995. “Albrecht Wellmer: Between Spheres of Validity,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 21(2): 1–22. Leist, Anton, 1977. “Was heißt Universalpragmatik?,” Germanistische Linguistik 5/6. Leist, Anton, 1989. “Dieseits der ‘Transzendentalpragmatik’: gibt es sprachpragmatische Argumente für Moral?,” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 43: 301–317. Levin, David Michael, 1994. “Making Sense: The Work of Eugene Gendlin,” Human Studies 17(3): 343–353. Machado, C. E. J., 1988. “The Concept of Rationality in Habermas: The ‘Linguistic Turn’ of the Critical Theory” (in Portuguese), Trans/Form/Açao, pp. 31–44. McCarthy, Thomas, 1978. The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press). McCarthy, Thomas, 1979. “Translator’s Introduction,” in J. Habermas, Communication and the Evolution of Society (Boston: Beacon Press). McCarthy, Thomas, 1980. “Reºections on Rationalization in The Theory of Communicative Action, ” in Bernstein, ed. Habermas and Modernity. McCarthy, Thomas, 1991. “Practical Discourse: On the Relation of Morality to Politics,” in Ideals and Illusions (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press).

442 Selected Bibliography and Further Reading

McCumber, John, 1985. “Critical Theory and Poetic Interaction,” Praxis International 5: 268–282. McGuire, R., 1977. “Speech Acts, Communicative Competence and the Paradox of Authority,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 10: 30–45. Merrill, Sarah A., 1990. “Linguistics as a Borderline Case,” in Merrill, ed., Abeunt Studia in Mores: A Festschrift for Helga Doblin on Philosophies of Education and Personal Learning or Teaching in the Humanities and Moral Sciences (New York: Lang). Mertens, T., 1986. “Habermas en Searle: Kritische Beschouwingen bij de Theorie van het Communicatieve Handelen,” Tijdschrift voor Filosoªe 48: 66–93. Misak, Cheryl, 1994. “Pragmatism and the Transcendental Turn in Truth and Ethics,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30(4): 739–775. Misgeld, Dieter, 1977. “Discourse and Conversation: The Theory of Communicative Competence and Hermeneutics in the Light of the Debate between Habermas and Gadamer,” Cultural Hermeneutics 4: 321–344. Murphy, Peter, 1985. “Meaning, Truth, and Ethical-Value,” Praxis International 5: 225–246. Nagl, Ludwig, 1984. “Die Wahrheitsfrage zwischen sprachanalytischer Transformation und historisch-systematischer Dimensionierung,” Philosophische Rundschau 31: 85–94. Nielsen, Kai, 1994. “How to Proceed in Philosophy: Remarks after Habermas,” Thesis Eleven 37: 10–28. Nordquist, Joan, 1986. Social Theory: A Bibliographic Series, no. 1: Jürgen Habermas: A Bibliography (Santa Cruz: Reference & Research). Nordquist, Joan, 1991. Social Theory: A Bibliographic Series, no. 22: Jürgen Habermas II: A Bibliography (Santa Cruz: Reference & Research). Nusser, Karl-Heinz, 1985. “Totalität ohne Subjekt,” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 39: 590–599. Oehler, Klaus, 1995. “A Response to Habermas,” in K. L. Ketner, ed., Peirce and Contemporary Thought: Philosophical Inquiries (New York: Fordham University Press). Pettit, Philip, 1982. “Habermas on Truth and Justice,” in G. H. Parkinson, ed., Marx and Marxisms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 207–228. Pickard, Dean, 1993. “Habermas, A Postmodern Critique,” Auslegung 19(1): 1–21. Power, Michael, 1993. “Habermas and Transcendental Arguments: A Reappraisal,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23(1): 26–49. Rasmussen, David M., 1990. Reading Habermas (Oxford: Blackwell). Redding, Paul, 1989. “Habermas’s Theory of Argumentation,” The Journal of Value Inquiry 23: 15–32.

443 Selected Bibliography and Further Reading

Roderick, Rick, 1985. “Habermas on Rationality,” Man and World 18: 203–218. Roderick, Rick, 1986. Habermas and the Foundations of Critical Theory (New York: St. Martin’s Press). Rorty, Richard, 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press). Rorty, Richard, 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press). Rorty, Richard, 1991a. Philosophical Papers I: Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Rorty, Richard, 1991b. Philosophical Papers II: Essays on Heidegger and Others (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Rorty, Richard, 1994. “Sind Aussagen universelle Geltungsansprüche?,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 42(6): 975–988. Rosenberg, J. and C. Travis, eds., 1971. Readings in the Philosophy of Language (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall). Saiedi, Nader, 1987. “A Critique of Habermas’s Theory of Practical Rationality,” Studies in Soviet Thought 33: 251–265. Schatzki, Theodore, 1986. “The Rationalization of Meaning and Understanding: Davidson and Habermas,” Synthese 69: 51–79. Scheit, Herbert, 1991. Wahrheit—Diskurs—Demokratie: Studien zur “Konsensustheorie der Wahrheit” (Freiburg: Karl Alber). Schiller, Hans-Ernst, 1990. “Zur sozialphilosophischen Bedeutung des Sprachbegriffs Wilhelm von Humboldts,” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 44(2): 253–272. Schmidt, James, 1979. “Offensive Critical Theory: Reply to Honneth,” Telos 39(1): 62–70. Schnädelbach, Herbert, 1977. Reºexion und Diskurs (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp). Schnädelbach, Herbert, 1992. “Thesen über Geltung und Wahrheit,” in Schnädelbach, Zur Rehabilitierung des animal rationale (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp). Schneider, Hans J., 1982. “Gibt es eine ‘Transzendental-’ Universalpragmatik’?,” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 36: 208–225. Schurz, Gerhard, 1980. “Soziale Erwartungen und ideale Sprechsituation: ein formales Modell,” Conceptus 14: 47–57. Searle, J. R., 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

444 Selected Bibliography and Further Reading

Searle, J. R., 1971a. “Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts,” in Rosenberg and Travis, eds., Readings in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 262–275. Searle, J. R., 1971b. “What Is a Speech Act?,” in Rosenberg and Travis, eds., Readings in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 614–628. Searle, J. R., 1977. “Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida,” Glyph 1: 198–208. Searle, J. R., 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Searle, J. R., 1981. “Intentionality and Method,” Journal of Philosophy 78: 720–733. Searle, J. R., 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Searle, J. R., 1984. Minds, Brains, and Science (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press). Searle, J. R., 1986. “Meaning, Communication, and Representation,” in R. E. Grandy and R. Warner, eds., Philosophical Grounds of Rationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Searle, J. R., 1989. “How Performatives Work,” Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 535–558. Seebaß, G., and R. Tuomela, eds., 1985. Social Action (Dordrecht: Reidel). Skirbekk, Gunnar, 1983. “Pragmatism in Apel and Habermas,” in G. Fløistad, ed., Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey (The Hague: Nijhoff), pp. 387–416. Skjei, Erling, 1985. “A Comment on Performative, Subject, and Proposition in Habermas’s Theory of Communication,” Inquiry 28: 87–104. Southgate, David, 1995. “Insanity Ascriptions: A Formal Pragmatic Analysis,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 25(3): 219–235. Speranza, Jorge L., 1991. “Un Grice aleman? En torno de las estrategias conversacionales: acercade Habermas acerca de Grice,” Revista Latin de Filosofía 17(1): 133–148. Sullivan, William M., 1978. “Communication and the Recovery of Meaning: An Interpretation of Habermas,” International Philosophical Quarterly 18: 69–86. Swart, H. A. P., 1979. “Kritiek van Habermas’ Consensus-Theorie van de Waarheid,” Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 71: 167–172. Swindal, James, 1994. “The Problem of Problematization in Discourse Ethics,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 20(3): 1–18. Tejera, Victorino, 1996. “Has Habermas Understood Peirce?,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32(1): 107–125. Thompson, John B., 1982. “Universal Pragmatics,” in Thompson and Held, eds., Habermas: Critical Debates (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press), pp. 116–133.

445 Selected Bibliography and Further Reading

Tietz, Udo, 1994. “Transformation der Sprachanalyse,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 42(5): 861–881. Trans, Van-Doan, 1989. “On Human Rationality. Habermas’s Theory of Consensus,” Philosophical Review (Taiwan) 12: 389–430. Tugendhat, Ernst, 1982. Traditional and Analytical Philosophy, trans. P. A. Gorner (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Tugendhat, Ernst, 1985. “J. Habermas on Communicative Action,” in Seebaß and Tuomela, eds., Social Action. Tugendhat, Ernst, 1986. Self-Consciousness and Self-Determination, trans. P. Stern (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press). Turski, George, 1979. “Some Considerations on Intersubjectivity and Language,” Gnosis 1: 29–44. Umhauer, Gerd, 1983. “Zum normativen Fundament sprachlicher Verständigung in der Konzeption einer ‘idealen Sprechsituation,’” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 37: 88–101. Van Nieuwstadt, J., 1983. “De Relatieve Zelfstandigheid van Taalhandelingen,” Kennis en Methode 7: 356–367. Van Zyl, Albert, 1995. “The Dilemma of Grounding in the Modernity-Postmodernity Debate,” South African Journal of Philosophy 14(4): 168–174. Visker, Rudi, 1992. “Habermas on Heidegger and Foucault: Meaning and Validity in the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity,” Radical Philosophy 61: 15–22. Wagner, Gerhard, and Heinz Zipprian, 1991. “Intersubjectivity and Critical Consciousness: Remarks on Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action,” Inquiry 34(1): 49–62. Ware, Robert X., 1982. “Habermas’s Evolutions,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12: 591–620. Weber, Max, 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, ed. G. Roth and C. Wittich, 2 vols. (Berkeley: University of California Press). Weber, Max, 1981. “Some Categories of Interpretive Understanding,” Sociological Quarterly 22: 151–180. Wellmer, Albrecht, 1991. The Persistence of Modernity: Essays on Aesthetics, Ethics, and Postmodernism, trans. D. Midgely (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press). Wellmer, Albrecht, 1992. “What Is a Pragmatic Theory of Meaning?,” in A. Honneth, T. McCarthy, C. Offe, and A. Wellmer, eds., Philosophical Interventions in the Unªnished Project of Enlightenment (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press). Wellmer, Albrecht, 1998. Endgames: Essays and Lectures on the Irreconcilable Nature of Modernity (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press).

446 Selected Bibliography and Further Reading White, Stephen K., 1988. The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, Justice and Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Whitton, Brian J., 1992. “Universal Pragmatics and the Formation of Western Civilization: A Critique of Habermas’s Theory of Human Moral Evolution,” History and Theory 31(3): 299–312. Wood, Allen, 1985. “Habermas’s Defence of Rationalism,” New German Critique 25: 145ff. Zimmermann, Rolf, 1984. “Emancipation and Rationality: Foundational Problems in the Theories of Marx and Habermas,” Ratio 26: 143–166. Zimmermann, Rolf, 1985. Utopie—Rationalität—Politik (Freiburg: Karl Alber).

Index

Acceptability conditions, 8–9, 11, 82– 83, 132–133, 139, 200, 225, 233, 269, 297, 312, 339–340, 367. See also Speech acts, acceptability of; Truth conditions; Validity claims, acceptability of Accountability, 186, 267, 310 Action, 114–118, 217, 313. See also Discourse, vs. action analytic theory of, 105–107 as purposive activity, 105, 112–114, 121–123, 126, 163, 170, 203, 215, 217–219, 221, 224, 298, 301, 314 (see also Communicative action; Strategic action) communicative (see Communicative action) coordination of (see Verständigung, as action-coordinating mechanism) instrumental, 118, 226, 299, 377 linguistic vs. nonlinguistic, 59–60, 216– 220 oriented toward reaching understanding (see Verständigung) oriented toward success (see Strategic action) purposive-rational (zweckrational), 114, 117–118, 234, 332 (see also Rationality, purposive) social, 2, 21, 62–63, 93n2, 106, 113– 119, 169, 205, 207, 213n47, 220, 233– 235, 326, 334 sociological theory of, 105–106, 111– 112, 132, 227, 234 strategic (see Strategic action) symbolic, 63

teleological (see Action, as purposive activity) Adorno, T. W., 346, 410, 412, 414, 425– 426, 429 Aesthetic experience, 245–246, 412– 415, 420 Aesthetic modernity, 410 Agreement. See Consensus. See also Verständigung, vs. Einverständnis in a strict sense (Einverständnis), 17– 18, 321–324, 328–329 Alexander, J., 27, 199, 201, 203, 207 Alston, W. P., 67 Analytic philosophy, 25, 51, 144, 344– 348, 405 Apel, K.-O., 21–22, 25, 43, 110, 197, 207, 352, 365–366, 404, 429 Argumentation, 4, 14–15, 164, 170– 171, 240, 307, 311, 334, 362–371, 406, 420–423. See also Communicative Action; Discourse idealizing suppositions of, 4–5, 14–15, 367–368, 370 Art, 18, 171, 246, 389–390, 395–397, 411–415, 420, 433n24. See also Aesthetic experience; Criticism; Expert cultures; Validity, aesthetic; Validity claims, aesthetic autonomy of, 388, 391, 393, 396, 411, 413–414, 420 and lifeworld, 396–397, 412–415 Austin, J. L., 3, 6–7, 15, 56, 66–82, 101n86, 110–111, 122–123, 125, 128–129, 155, 195–196, 217, 232, 282, 289–291, 294, 383–386, 408