The experience of the Pomerania Region in Poland Katarzyna Grecka

Riga, 28th January, 2011

Location

2

1

Latvia

&

Poland

Pomorskie Region: area: 18 293 km 2 (5,6%) population: 2,2 mln (5,6%)

Latvia:

Poland:

area: 64 598 km 2

area: 322 577 km 2

population: 2,23 mln

population: 38,7 mln

density: 35 pers/ km 2

density: 121 pers/ km 2 3

2

Sustainable Energy Action Plan 1. 2. 3.

Regional/local development (available technology; RE) Energy market (energy prices, energy carriers: RES) Final consumer market (RUE)

SEAP = RE+RES+ RUE

3

Sustainable Energy Action Plan

Key to successful implementation of SEAP: !!!

Full acceptance for RES&RUE by decisionmakers as a gurantee to START & STABLE implementation

!!

Involvement of stakeholders including local community (mission, vision, expectations, experience)

!

Clerks rediness to co-operate with energy consultants

4

Steps for SEAP development (1) 1. -

Check and verify political obligations, e.g. „3 x E” (ecology, economy, energy at commune/region/state level) define goals verify priorities define scope of SEAP

2. ! Build good working team! team structure appoint co-ordinator ensure participation of the public

5

Steps for SEAP development (2) 3. Assessment of commune/region energy state of the art !!! identify persons responsible for the data collection assessmet of heat, energy demend and energy mix RES and RUE potential 4. Commune vision stakeholders involvement development of commune/region (increase vs decerease of energy demand) check/adjust goals set up

6

Steps for SEAP development (4) 5. Create a list of supporting measures fiscal tools promotion campaign for SEAP seminars on RES & RUE education of architects, construction companies available funds 6. Development of SEAP transformation of goals, priorities, indexes into technical solutions, actions

7

MONITORING

IMPLEMENTATION

SEAP

8

Monitoring of SEAP

Production of electricity

unit

PV

kW

Base year

2010

2015

2020

kW/1000 inh

WF

kW kW/1000 inh

CHP biomass

kWe kW/1000 inh

CHP biogas

kWe kW/1000 inh

SWE

kWe kW/1000 inh

Total RES-EL

MWh/year

RES share in EL

%

9

Heat production

unit

Solar collectors

m2

Base year

2010

2015

2020

m2/1000 inh GJ/year

Biomass boilers

kW kW/1000 inh GJ/year

Biogas boilers

kW kW/1000 inh GJ/year

Geothermal en.

kW kW/1000 inh GJ/year

Total RES

GJ/year

RES share in heat production

%

10

Fuels for transportation

unit

Bioethanol

l

Base year

2010

2015

2020

l/reg. cars

Biodiesel

l l/reg. cars

Total RES fuels

l/year

RES share in tran. fuels

%

11

Thermomodernization

unit

Housing

m2

Base year

2010

2015

2020

GJ/rok reduced

Public buildings

m2 GJ/rok reduced

Production buidings

m2 GJ/rok reduced

Other buildings

m2 GJ/rok reduced

Total

GJ/rok reduced

12

Ustka

Case study: USTKA

13

Case study: Ustka

Mission: Ustka as a spa resort
elimination of coal
rehabilitation of the city centre

14

USTKA Community vision and target setting

• spa, leisure centre • fish harbour • fishing industry

• Environmental protection

15

Energy market -

connection of Old Town to DH connection of hotels to DH thermomodernization new buildings as low energy new buildings connected to DH energy prices cost of investments

16

Euro/GJ

Energy market 40,00 Electricity day tariff

35,00

Electricity night tariff Propane

30,00

Heating oil

25,00 Gas W3

Coke

20,00

Coal

15,00 Pellets

10,00

Log wood

Wood chips

5,00

Straw

0,00 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010 2011 (January)

16

Energy prices (Jan 2011)

Euro/ GJ (MWh) 40,00

37,08

27,27 22,95 19,57

20,00 11,38 6,22

14,32

14,15 11,66 8,85

3,91

0,00

16

Ustka target – Energy planning

Elimination of low emission Looking for financial support

17

USTKA: Pre-conditions

Reduction of green gasses – 20% till 2020 Reduction of primary heat demand – 20% till 2020 Increase of RES up to 20% till 2020 Increase of electricity from CHP up to 18% till 2020 Poland: RES share – 7,5% (2010) and 15% (2020) National goal – reduction of energy demand of 2% up to 2010 and 9% up to 2016 16% CHP electricity (2010) 18

Wielka Brytania 49%

Szwecja 38%

Finlandia Słowacja

EU RES goals

Słowenia Rumunia Portugalia 15% Polska Austria Holandia Malta Węgry Docelowy udział energii ze źródeł odnawialnych w ostatecznym zuŜyciu energii, 2020 r.

Luksemburg Litwa 42%

Łotwa Cypr Włochy Francja Hiszpania Grecja Irlandia Estonia Niemcy Dania

30%

Czechy Bułgaria Belgia 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00%

Udział energii ze źródeł odnawialnych w ostatecznym zuŜyciu energii, 2005 r.

Type of energy Demand for carrier energy carriers

EMPEC- fine coal

Energy balance 2006

End-user energy (heat)

Primary energy (heat)

Share

[GJ]

[GJ]

%

t

8 286

138 370

205 634

32,2%

EMPEC- heating oil EMPEC- natural gas

t

11

386

455

0,1%

m3

36 693

1 027

1 284

0,2%

coal

t

1 514

29 804

40 615

6,4%

wood

m3

2 246

14 413

19 575

3,1%

heating oil

t

2 244

76 611

94 243

14,7%

natural gas

m3

3 491 440

99 313

122 200

19,1%

electricity

MWh

23 572

83 162

84 859

13,3%

solar panels

m2

396

656

1 457

0,2%

electricity for technological processes

MWh

19 129

67 487

68 864

10,8%

511 230

639 187

100,0%

Total

EMPEC share – 32,5% Coal share – 38,6% RES share - 3,1%

Demand for heat (space heating, h.t.w. production and cooking) - present situation technological processeselectricity solar panels 10,8% 0,2%

electricity 13,3%

EMPEC- coal 32,2% EMPECnatural gas 0,2%

natural gas 19,1% heating oil 14,7%

wood 3,1%

coal 6,4%

EMPECheating oil 0,1%

19

RES potential

• solar collectors

3 600 m2

-holiday houses, camping sites, guest houses, hotels -public buildings -hospitals -multifamily houses -family houses • biomass : pellet/wood log/straw • energy plants

ca. 70 000 GJ/a ca. 8 400 GJ/a

•small wind turbines (1-20 kW)

20

Consumers’ energy market

-

Raising of consumers’ awareness on:

- building exploitation - how to start thermomodernization - how to finance z słuŜb miejskich

21

Energy balance 2015-2025 [GJ/rok]

/biogaz

/biogaz

22

Emission reduction

35 000

420

30 000

360

25 000

300

20 000

t/ro k

t/r o k

480

15 000

240 180

10 000

120

5 000

60

0 CO2

0 SO2

NO2

CO

Pyły

emisje

emisje rok 2006

rok 2015

rok 2025

rok 2006

rok 2015

rok 2025

23

DH development 2007-2009 2007

2008

2009

increase of heated area

m2

8959

25585

37787

increase of DH network

m2

148

405

1198

40000 of new connections number

pcs

11

26

47

35000 30000 increase of heated area m2

25000 20000 15000

1400 10000 1200

5000

1000

0 2007

2008

2009

800

increase of DH network m2

600

number of new connections pcs

400 200 Source: MPEC Ustka

0 2007

2008

2009

23

DH development 1997-2009

Source: MPEC Ustka

23

SEC-Tool-box

24

SEC-Tool-box

25

Twinning region within ENNEREG Good practice

32

26

Hospital in Olsztyn (Warmia-Mazuria)

33

27

Hospital in Olsztyn (Warmia-Mazuria)

Scope of the works: 6 400 m2 of wall insulation 4 350 m2 of roof insulation 375 psc of windows 20 doors Woodchips boiler 840 kW Results: Costs reduction: 2 500 € /month (40%) Emission reduction: CO2 – 100% SO2 - 96,4% NO2 – 11,3%

34

28

Why IEE projects?


exchange of experience





new tools self-development „green” image presentation of local good practices to international public

35

29

Take a chance to exchagne experience! Katarzyna Grecka [email protected]

36