Th 25 JULY 2013

BUY

(Unchanged)

Change in Numbers

TP: Bt 7.00

(Unchanged)

Upside: 65.1%

The Erawan Group Pcl

anT ahca hna rcth Aadr t HA odc HRo ecs eRae rsce har ch

(ERW TB)

HOP INN a new product line After its economy Ibis hotel chain success, ERW is entering the lowerend budget segment with its own “HOP INN” brand. This is an untapped market with low investment costs, so we see the move as worthwhile. Our DCF TP of Bt7.0 remains intact as we cut 2013-14F profits while we see HOP INN’s contribution as small but with high growth potential.

KALVALEE THONGSOMAUNG 662 – 617 4900 [email protected]

A new product line The success of ERW’s Ibis hotels has led to two key changes in the company’s strategy. First, having gained experience in the economy segment Ibis chain since 2008, ERW has decided to enter the lower-end segment or budget hotels with its own “HOP INN” brand. Secondly, from being a hotel developer letting brand owners manage its assets, ERW has become the Ibis brand franchisee. That is, ERW now pays a franchise fee to Accor (the Ibis franchise owner) rather than a management fee. To us, this implies hotel management expertise transfer. We see this as positive for ERW and believe it’s why it has decided to introduce its own brand HOP INN.

HOP INN targets an untapped market HOP INN targets business travelers in provinces such as salesmen, traders, technician, etc. Targeted provinces in the first wave of expansion are those with high commercial activity such as border provinces in the North, the Northeast and West. The idea is to introduce the first budget hotel chain in Thailand which we expect to capture market share from fragmented operators. We see this as a low-risk investment given the cost of ~Bt60m per 80-room hotel. We incorporate only 10 HOP INN hotels (land is secured) in our model in 2014 versus ERW’s target of another 20 in 2015 and a portfolio of 100 in 2020. We estimate a 20% IRR at a Bt600 average room rate (ARR) and 80% occupancy from year five of its operation. Exhibit 4 shows our estimate of budget hotels yielding higher returns than higher-end ones.

Softening 2Q13F earnings Despite improving 2Q13 ARR growth of 4% y-y and an occupancy rate of 72% (versus 71% in 2Q12), we forecast 2Q13 core earnings to weaken on higher depreciation costs of Ibis Siam and Mercure Siam hotels (opened in 1Q13), for the Grand Hyatt Erawan hotel from room refurbishment last year, and the absence of its two properties divested to its property fund (Erawan Hotel Growth Property Fund: ERWPF TB) in April 2013. Note that our norm profit forecast excludes the Bt864m gain from selling the assets to ERWPF.

Earnings revisions As we project soft 2Q13 earnings on higher depreciation than we’d expected, we cut our norm earnings forecasts by 15% in 2013 and 7% in 2014 (preopening cost of new hotels, including HOP INN). We expect HOP INN to start contributing profits from 2016 onwards which implies only a 3% profit contribution in 2016. Our 12-month DCF-based TP of Bt7.0 is unchanged despite our downward earnings revisions as we have factored in the value from 10 HOP INNs with 80 rooms each. Reaffirm BUY.

COMPANY VALUATION Y/E Dec (Bt m)

2012A

2013F

2014F

2015F

4,302

4,794

5,164

5,900

106

996

279

420

Consensus NP



1,039

322

437

Diff frm cons (%)



(4.1)

(13.3)

(3.8)

Sales Net profit

Norm profit Prev. Norm profit

101

215

279

420



252

300

376 11.5



(14.7)

(6.9)

Norm EPS (Bt)

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.2

Norm EPS grw (%)

na

101.9

29.8

50.5

Norm PE (x)

99.4

49.2

37.9

25.2

EV/EBITDA (x)

Chg frm prev (%)

14.6

13.3

12.5

10.9

P/BV (x)

2.9

2.1

2.1

2.0

Div yield (%)

0.4

3.5

1.0

1.5

ROE (%)

2.8

5.1

5.6

8.1

201.0

133.1

133.4

125.5

Net D/E (%)

PRICE PERFORMANCE (Bt /shr)

ERW

Rel to SET Index

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Jul-12

(%) 120 100 80 60

Oct-12

Jan-13

Apr-13

40 20 0 (20) Jul-13

COMPANY INFORMATION Price as of 24-Jul-13 (Bt) Market cap (US$ m) Listed shares (m shares) Free float (%)

Sector Major shareholder

2,251.2 41.6

Avg daily turnover (US$ m) 12M price H/L (Bt)

4.24 308.3

3.0 6.7/2.6 Tourism

Vongkusolkit & Wattanavekin Group 60%

Sources: Bloomberg, Company data, Thanachart estimates

This report is prepared by Thanachart Securities. Please contact our salesperson for authorisation. Please see the important notice on the back page.

25 JULY 2013

Thanachart Ad Hoc Research

HOP INN, a new product line First move of ERW into a budget hotel chain in Thailand with its own “HOP INN” brand

First wave of expansion in provinces to target areas with lots of commercial activity

The success of The Erawan Group’s (ERW) Ibis hotels, the largest economy hotel chain in Thailand with nine properties established since 2008, has led the company to enter another untapped lower-end budget hotel segment with its own “HOP INN” brand. There has also been another key change with ERW’s successful Ibis brand. ERW has transformed from being a hotel developer to becoming the franchisee of the Ibis brand. ERW now pays a franchise fee to Accor (the owner of the Ibis franchise) rather than a management fee. This change has been effective since 1 July 2013. To us, this implies hotel management expertise transfer and we see this as positive for ERW. We believe this is a key reason for introducing its own brand HOP INN. HOP INN targets business travelers in provinces such as salesmen, traders and technicians, etc. Targeted provinces in the first wave of expansion are those with lots of commercial activity, such as border provinces in the North, the Northeast and the West. The idea is to introduce the first budget hotel chain in Thailand which we expect to capture market share from fragmented operators. Exhibit 1 shows the first 10 locations (land plots are secured) for HOP INN. Five locations are under construction in Mukdahan, Ubonratchathani, Kanchanaburi, Nong Khai and Udon Thani provinces (Nos.1-5 in Exhibit 1) and they are scheduled to open in 3Q14. The plan for the other five locations (Nos.6-10) is for them to open in 4Q14.

Ex 1: The First Wave Of HOP INN Expansion In Thailand

1. Mukdahan 2. Ubonratchathani 3. Kanchanaburi 4. Nong Khai 5. Udon Thani 6. Tak 7. Nakhon Ratchasim a 8. Lam pang 9. Sa Kaew 10. To be announced

Sources: Company data, Thanachart estimates

THANACHART SECURITIES

2

25 JULY 2013

Thanachart Ad Hoc Research

Ex 2: Budget Hotels In Thailand Hotel

Category

Locations

Room rate (Bt/night)

Budget

10 locations: Mukdahan, Ubonratchathani, Kanchanaburi, Nong Khai, Udon Thani, Tak, Nakhon Ratchasima, Lampang, Sa Kaew and to be announced for another location

600

Boutique & Budget

20 locations: 14 hotels in Chiang Mai, two in Chiang Rai, one in Bangkok, one in Lampang and two in Pattaya

300 – 6,200

Budget

4 locations including Phuket, Hat Yai, Bangkok, Pattaya

599 - 1,299

Sources: Company data, Thanachart’s compilations

Budget hotel offers higher returns than higher-end ones, on our calculations. We see HOP INN being a low-risk investment

Given the profile of each standardized HOP INN as shown in Exhibit 3, we see this as a low-risk investment based on the investment cost and room price competitiveness. We incorporate only 10 HOP INN hotels (land is secured) in our model in 2014 versus ERW’s target of another 20 in 2015 and a portfolio of 100 in 2020. We estimate a 20% IRR at a Bt600 average room rate (ARR) and a 55% occupancy rate in 2014 before improving to 80% in 2018F. We expect the Bt600 ARR to be flat for three year before a 3% rise in the fourth year of operation. Exhibit 4 shows our calculation of budget hotels yielding higher returns than higher-end ones which provide a full service range of food and beverages, banquets and conferences or meeting facilities.

Ex 3: HOP INN’s Investment Factsheet Investment cost

Bt60m

No. of rooms

80

Floors

6 floors

Land

1.5 rai or 0.59 acre

Construction period

12-15 months

Source: Company data

Ex 4: We Calculate Budget Hotels Yield The Highest Returns (%) 60

53

50

42

40

39 34

30 20 10 0 Budget hotel

Economy hotel

Mid-scale hotel

Luxury hotel

Sources: Company data, Thanachart estimates

THANACHART SECURITIES

3

25 JULY 2013

Thanachart Ad Hoc Research

Earnings revisions 2013-14F earnings cut by 15% and 7% to reflect higher-than-expected costs despite an improving performance

We see ERW’s capex as manageable with its balance sheet strengthening

Reaffirm BUY with a DCF TP of Bt7.0/share

We revise down our normalized earnings forecasts by 15% in 2013 and 7% in 2014 as we expect soft 2Q13 earnings and higher pre-opening costs for the new hotels scheduled to be opened in 2014 including the HOP INNs. Despite an improving 2Q13 ARR growth of 4% y-y and an occupancy rate of 72% (versus 71% in 2Q12), we expect 2Q13 core earnings to weaken on the back of higher depreciation costs for its Ibis Siam and Mercure Siam hotels (opened in 1Q13), for the Grand Hyatt Erawan hotel from room refurbishment last year, and the absence of its two properties divested to its property fund (The Erawan Hotel Growth Property Fund: ERWPF TB) in April 2013. Note that our normalized profit forecast excludes the Bt864m gain from selling the assets to ERWPF. We believe ERW’s project enhancement and expansion are on track as shown in Exhibit 5. We expect ERW’s capital expenditure of Bt2.0bn p.a. over 2013-14F to support its plan for asset enhancement at the Grand Hyatt Erawan (scheduled to be completed in 2013), two new mid-scale hotels – the Mercure and Holiday Inn in Pattaya (due to open in 2014), one new economy hotel – the Ibis Krabi (2014) and 10 new budget HOP INN hotels (2014). ERW plans to finance this capex via short-term borrowings and the proceeds from selling its assets into the property fund. We still view ERW’s capex plan as manageable and we see D/E falling to 1.4x in 2013F and 2014F from 2.1x in 2012 (see exhibits 6 and 7). We expect HOP INN to start contributing profits from 2016 onwards which implies only a 3% profit contribution in 2016F. Our 12-month DCF-based TP of Bt7.0 is unchanged despite our downward earnings revisions as we have factored in the value from 10 HOP INNs with 80 rooms each. We reaffirm our BUY rating on ERW.

Ex 5: ERW’s Asset Enhancement And New Hotels In 2013-14 - Open five HOP INN hotels - Open Holiday Inn hotel in Pattaya (200-room extension)

4Q13

3Q14

4Q14 - Open 200-room Mercure Hotel in Pattaya

Finish refurbishment of Grand Hyatt Erawan Hotel

- Open five HOP INN hotels - Open Ibis Krabi Source: Company data

Ex 6: Capex On Asset Enhancement & New Projects (Bt m) 2,000

Ibis Krabi

1,500

Maintenance HOP INN

1,000

Mercure and Holiday Inn Pattaya Grand Hyatt Eraw an hotel's room renovation

500 0 2013F

2014F

Source: Company data

THANACHART SECURITIES

Ex 7: Stronger Balance Sheet With Lower D/E (x) 2.5

2.1

2.0 1.5

1.4

1.4

1.3

2013F

2014F

2015F

1.0 0.5 0.0 2012

Sources: Company data, Thanachart estimates

4

25 JULY 2013

Thanachart Ad Hoc Research

Ex 8: Key Assumptions And Earnings Revisions 2013F

2014F

2015F

53.4

54.2

54.1

Gross margin (%) New Old

53.6

54.6

54.1

Change (%)

(0.2)

(0.5)

(0.0)

New

1,910

2,088

2,286

Old

1,919

2,055

2,265

(0.5)

1.6

1.0

New

671

716

726

Old

646

678

690

Change (%)

3.7

5.7

5.2

215

279

420

SG&A expenses (Bt m)

Change (%) Depreciation cost (Bt m)

Normalized profit (Bt m) New Old Change (%)

252

300

376

(14.7)

(6.9)

11.5

Source: Thanachart estimates

Ex 9: ERW’s Major Shareholding Structure

Others 40%

Vongkusolkit group 30%

Ex 10: ERW’s Board of Directors ERW’s board of directors consists of 13 members and includes six independent directors. There are five directors who represent two groups of major shareholders – the Vongkusolkit group and the Wattanavekin group. The board has appointed four committees, namely the Audit Committee, the Investment Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Wattavekin group 30% Source: Company data

THANACHART SECURITIES

and

the

Management

Development

and

Compensation Committee.

Source: Company data

5

25 JULY 2013

Thanachart Ad Hoc Research

Ex 11: 12-month DCF-based TP Calculation (Bt m)

2013F

2014F

2015F

2016F

2017F

2018F

2019F

2020F

EBITDA

1,320

1,425

1,634

1,802

1,953

2,058

2,234

Free cash flow

(580)

142

284

435

959

1,043

1,226

PV of free cash flow

(231)

132

244

347

710

717

782

Risk-free rate (%)

8.0

Beta

0.9

WACC (%)

7.8

Terminal growth (%)

2.0

Net debt (2013F)

2023F

2024F

2,343

2,465

2,592

2,718

2,853



1,468

1,619

1,776

1,933

2,106

59,220

868

887

903

912

922

17,568

24,761 6,977

Minority interest

271

Equity value

17,513

# of shares

2,501

Target price/share

2022F

4.0

Market risk premium (%)

Enterprise value - add investments

Terminal Value

2021F

7.00

Source: Thanachart estimates

THANACHART SECURITIES

6

25 JULY 2013

Thanachart Ad Hoc Research

COMPANY DESCRIPTION

COMPANY RATING F ina nc ia l m a na ge m e nt

The Erawan Group Public Company Limited (ERW) was established 32 years ago on 29 December 1982. ERW’s core businesses are investment, development and management of diversified hotel properties and segments (luxury, mid-scale, economy and budget) across Thailand’s key destinations.

M a na ge m e nt

5 4 3 2 1 0

Rating Scale

R is k m a na ge m e nt

Currently, ERW owns 14 hotels and operates other business including retail space rental, and management of office Liquidit y

buildings.

Source: Thanachart

*C o rp. go v e rna nc e

Very Strong

5

Strong

4

Good

3

Fair

2

Weak

1

None

0

Source: Thanachart; *CG Awards

THANACHART’S SWOT ANALYSIS S — Strength

W — Weakness

ƒ

ƒ

Well-received with strong hotel chains i.e. Hyatt, Marriott, Accor, IHG and Starwood as ERW’s business allies in Thailand.

ƒ

Assets are strategically located in popular Thai tourist

Geographical diversification of its hotel footprint is an issue as all its assets are located in Thailand.

ƒ

Seasonal impacts from Thailand’s tourism industry.

ƒ

Thailand’s luxury hotel oversupply.

destinations.

O — Opportunity

T — Threat

ƒ

ƒ

Fiercer competition among hotel operators

ƒ

ERW requires significant capital expenditure and

Focused on high-growth segments; mid-scale and economy and budget hotels.

ƒ

We see extra gains from its assets-to-fund story.

ƒ

Strong growth in Thailand’s tourism industry.

financing sources to support its hotel investments and developments.

CONSENSUS COMPARISON

RISKS TO OUR INVESTMENT CASE

Consensus Thanachart Target price (Bt)

Diff

6.35

7.00

10%

Net profit 13F (Bt m)

1,039

996

-4%

Net profit 14F (Bt m)

322

279

-13%

BUY: 13

HOLD: 1

SELL: 1

Consensus REC

ƒ ƒ

Thailand’s political situation and natural disasters. Slower domestic and global economies and consumption.

HOW ARE WE DIFFERENT FROM THE STREET?

ƒ

Our 2013-14F earnings forecasts are lower than the consensus as we factor in higher depreciation costs in 2013 and a bigger impact from the pre-operating costs of 13 new hotels scheduled to open in 2014.

ƒ

Our TP is higher than the Street’s as we are confident in ERW achieving growth in the non-luxury segments.

Sources: Bloomberg consensus, Thanachart

THANACHART SECURITIES

Source: Thanachart

7

25 JULY 2013

Thanachart Ad Hoc Research

FINANCIAL SUMMARY Incom e State m e nt FY ending Dec (Bt m)

(consolidated) Quarte rly Earnings

2011A 2012A

2013F

2014F

2015F

Sales

3,756

4,302

4,794

5,164

5,900 Sales

Cost of sales

1,790

1,966

2,235

2,367

2,706 Cost of sales

1,966

2,336

2,560

2,796

1,707

1,775

1,910

2,088

259

561

650

709

Gro ss pro f it SG&A Operating pro f it Depre & amortization EB IT D A

646

641

671

716

3,195

Gro ss pro fit

2,286 SG&A 908

Operating pro f it

726 Depre & amortization

3Q12

4Q12

1Q13

1,168

998

939

1,198

1,300

489

464

476

536

678

534

463

661

444

430

420

482

484

235

104

44

179

274

541 759

158

159

160

164

164

393

263

203

343

438

1,202

1,320

1,425

65

57

82

87

0

0

0

0

(407)

(393)

(383)

(371)

(377) Interest expense

(83)

225

349

424

629 Pre-tax profit

53

63

66

72

(137)

162

283

352

0

0

0

0

M inority interests

(39)

(61)

(68)

(73)

Extraordinary items

667

5

781

0

491

106

996

279

420 N ET P R OF IT

98

4

(54)

86

148

(176)

101

215

279

420 N o rmalized pro fit

98

(25)

(54)

82

148

0.2

0.0

0.4

0.1

0.2 EPS (Bt)

0.0

0.0

(0.0)

0.0

0.1

(0.1)

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.2 Normalized EPS (Bt)

0.0

(0.0)

(0.0)

0.0

0.1

2013F

2014F

2015F

112.8

29.8

50.5 50.5

Other expenses Interest expense Pre-tax profit Income tax After-tax profit Equity income

N ET P R OF IT N o rmalized pro fit EPS (Bt) Normalized EPS (Bt)

Balance She e t FY ending Dec (Bt m)

EB IT D A

2Q12

904

Other income

1,634

(consolidated)

1Q12

98 Other income

6

8

7

32

5

0

0

0

0

0

(100)

(98)

(98)

(98)

(98)

142

15

(47)

114

182

126 Income tax

23

20

3

17

16

503 After-tax profit

119

(4)

(50)

98

166

0

0

0

0

0

(20)

(21)

(3)

(16)

(17)

0

29

0

5

0

0 Other expenses

0 Equity income (84) M inority interests 0 Extraordinary items

(consolidated) Financial Ratios And V aluations

2011A 2012A

2013F

2014F

2015F

2011A 2012A

Cash & equivalent

450

410

300

250

250 Norm profit (y-y%)

na

A/C receivables

134

195

207

223

255 Normalized EPS (%)

na

na

101.9

29.8

53

49

61

64

na

(78.5)

840.7

(72.0)

50.5

134

165

184

198

na

(78.5)

792.3

(72.0)

50.5

36.6

40.1

37.0

37.0

37.0

2,594 Gross margin (%)

52.3

54.3

53.4

54.2

54.1

14,909 Operating margin (%)

6.9

13.0

13.6

13.7

15.4

Inventories Other current assets Investment Fixed assets Other assets

3

2

2

2

9,494

10,122

10,952

11,235

2,107

2,270

12,238

12,834

13,813

14,242

S-T debt

773

1,082

1,000

1,021

A/C payables

175

228

239

253

T o tal assets

1,970

1,891

74 Net profit (y-y%) 226 EPS (%) 2 Dividend payout (%) 11,509

EBITDA margin (%)

Other current liabilities L-T debt Other liabilities T o tal liabilit ies

M inority interest

1,032 Net margin (%)

27.6

27.7

5.9

6.8

8.5 2.9

710

712

809

901 ROA (%)

na

0.8

1.6

2.0

6,794

6,277

6,409

6,480 ROE (%)

na

2.8

5.1

5.6

8.1

295

306

341

367

1.9

2.0

1.3

1.3

1.3

8,468

9,120

25.2

181

203

8,570

271

8,861

344

419 Net D/E (x) 9,122 Norm PE (x)

na

99.4

49.2

37.9

427 Norm PE at TP (x)

na

164.1

81.3

62.6

41.6

20.4

94.8

10.6

37.9

25.2

18.9

14.6

13.3

12.5

10.9

2.8

2.9

2.1

2.1

2.0

1.8

0.4

3.5

1.0

1.5

1.5

1.5

2.0

2.0

2.1

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.1

5,360 PE (x)

5,038

12

15

29

34

Total debt

7,501

7,876

7,277

7,431

7,512 Dividend yield (%)

Net debt

7,051

7,466

6,977

7,181

7,262

EV/EBITDA (x)

Year End Shares (m)

27.5

3.8

497

4,972

Free cash flow

27.9

6,728

3,511

Working capital

24.1 (3.6)

290

3,589

Shareho lders' equity

na

609

(326)

(580)

142

2,368

2,368

2,496

2,496

39 P/BV (x)

284 BV/share (Bt) 2,496 DPS (Bt)

Sources: Company data, Thanachart estimates

THANACHART SECURITIES

8

DISCLAIMER

Thanachart Ad Hoc Research

General Disclaimers And Disclosures:

This report is prepared and issued by Thanachart Securities Public Company Limited (TNS) as a resource only for clients of TNS, Thanachart Capital Public Company Limited (TCAP) and its group companies. Copyright © Thanachart Securities Public Company Limited. All rights reserved. The report may not be reproduced in whole or in part or delivered to other persons without our written consent. This report is prepared by analysts who are employed by the research department of TNS. While the information is from sources believed to be reliable, neither the information nor the forecasts shall be taken as a representation or warranty for which TNS or TCAP or its group companies or any of their employees incur any responsibility. This report is provided to you for informational purposes only and it is not, and is not to be construed as, an offer or an invitation to make an offer to sell or buy any securities. Neither TNS, TCAP nor its group companies accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or its contents. The information and opinions contained herein have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed reliable. However, TNS, TCAP and its group companies make no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to their accuracy or completeness. Expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice. The use of any information, forecasts and opinions contained in this report shall be at the sole discretion and risk of the user. TNS, TCAP and its group companies perform and seek to perform business with companies covered in this report. TNS, TCAP, its group companies, their employees and directors may have positions and financial interest in securities mentioned in this report. TNS, TCAP or its group companies may from time to time perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from, any entity mentioned in this report. Therefore, investors should be aware of conflict of interest that may affect the objectivity of this report.

THANACHART SECURITIES

DISCLAIMER

Thanachart Ad Hoc Research

Recommendation Structure: Recommendations are based on absolute upside or downside, which is the difference between the target price and the current market price. If the upside is 10% or more, the recommendation is BUY. If the downside is 10% or more, the recommendation is SELL. For stocks where the upside or downside is less than 10%, the recommendation is HOLD. Unless otherwise specified, these recommendations are set with a 12-month horizon. Thus, it is possible that future price volatility may cause a temporary mismatch between upside/downside for a stock based on the market price and the formal recommendation. For sectors, we look at two areas, ie, the sector outlook and the sector weighting. For the sector outlook, an arrow pointing up, or the word “Positive”, is used when we see the industry trend improving. An arrow pointing down, or the word “Negative”, is used when we see the industry trend deteriorating. A double-tipped horizontal arrow, or the word “Unchanged”, is used when the industry trend does not look as if it will alter. The industry trend view is our top-down perspective on the industry rather than a bottom-up interpretation from the stocks we cover. An “Overweight” sector weighting is used when we have BUYs on majority of the stocks under our coverage by market cap. “Underweight” is used when we have SELLs on majority of the stocks we cover by market cap. “Neutral” is used when there are relatively equal weightings of BUYs and SELLs.

Thanachart Securities Pcl. Research Team 28 Floor, Siam Tower Unit A1 989 Rama 1, Pathumwan Road, Bangkok 10330 Tel: 662 617-4900 Email: [email protected]

Pimpaka Nichgaroon, CFA Head of Research Economics & Strategy

Supanna Suwankird Energy, Utilities

Siriporn Arunothai Ad Hoc Research, Healthcare

[email protected]

[email protected]

Sarachada Sornsong Banks, Telecom

Saksid Phadthananarak Electronics, Construction, Transportation

Noppadol Pririyawut Senior Technical Analyst

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Phannarai Tiyapittayarut Property, Retail

Kalvalee Thongsomaung Food, Hotel, Media

Adisak Phupiphathirungul, CFA Retail Market Strategy

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

THANACHART SECURITIES