Subdivision Paving Local Improvement District Advisory Committee. Thursday, February 20, :00 PM

Subdivision Paving Local Improvement District Advisory Committee Thursday, February 20, 2014 – 6:00 PM Boulder County Subdivision Roads Subdivisi...
Author: Alaina Bradley
1 downloads 2 Views 2MB Size
Subdivision Paving Local Improvement District Advisory Committee

Thursday, February 20, 2014 – 6:00 PM

Boulder County Subdivision Roads

Subdivision Roads Pavement Quality is Deteriorating

Good

Fair

Poor

What is Needed Boulder County will continue to provide routine maintenance, but what all roads need eventually regardless of their condition, is rehabilitation.

ASSUMPTIONS • 15-year timeframe for improvements • Contingency – 20% based upon engineering judgment and experience • Inflation Factor – 5%/year. Estimated from historic data • Construction cost estimates based upon current (2013) construction and material costs for similar county projects • 20% county participation is already included in costs

2014 Revenue Forecast Total LID Assessments

$3,940,682

Budget Uncollectable (1%)

($39,407)

Assessment Revenue to be budgeted

$3,901,275

County 20% share

$955,159

Total Budget Revenues

$4,856,434

Expenses (Admin, Staff)

$145,010

Total Budgeted Expenditures

$4,661,311

2014 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance

$200,000

Subdivision Paving Program Policy Options* a. Least Cost over Life of Program b. Pave the Worst Roads First c. Geographical Focus d. Regional Approach e. County 20% Match *variations and combinations can be developed from these

Road Ratings • Roads are evaluated every 3 years, given a Pavement Quality Index (PQI) rating of 1-10; 1 being worst, 10 being best • Poor < 5 • Fair 5 – 7 • Good > 7 • Subdivisions are given a combined rating , based on average weighted PQI of Subdivision Roads within the subdivision.

Least Cost over Program Life • Overlay and Chip-seal the better of the fair roads to minimize the quality slip. Reconstruct one or two miles of subdivision roads / year. • Delay construction of remaining poor roads 3-4 years. • Roads that need full reconstruction can’t get any worse- their cost stays the same • Subdivisions at lower end of fair rating can avoid deterioration to poor and associated more costly structural repair by paving earlier.

Least Cost over Program Life Miles of Reconstruction

2

Miles of Overlay

15

Miles of Chip Seal

10

Program Budget

$4.5 Million

Advantages: • Can Resurface more roads the first few years of the program • Can pave more miles/dollar of the fair roads than the poor roads

Disadvantage: • Poor road reconstruction is delayed 3-4 years

Pave the Poor Roads First • Under this option the worst rated roads would be reconstructed first. • Most of these roads will require full replacement

Advantages: • Provides a systematic approach to resurfacing

Disadvantages: • Fair roads become worse and may slip to poor too early

Pave Worst Roads First Program Miles of Reconstruction

11

Miles of Overlay

2

Miles of Chip-seal

10

Program Budget

$4.5 Million

Geographically Focused • Assemble projects by grouped subdivisions or areas • Attempt to achieve initial cost savings by close proximity (economy of scale)

Advantages: • Increase in Paving Production (Initially) • Ability to serve high number of residents if focused on dense subdivision areas

Disadvantages: • Somewhat selective process

• Later years of this program may not be cost effective

Geographically Focused Program Miles of Reconstruction

4

Miles of Overlay

8

Miles of Chip-seal

10

Program Budget

$4.5 Million

Regional Approach • Complete projects in every area of the County • Select subdivision in N,S,E,W, regions of the County – beginning with Poor /fair Roads

Advantages: • County Wide Benefit • Addresses multiple areas for broadest application

Disadvantages: • May not reconstruct many poor roads • May not be as cost effective

Regional Approach Program Miles of Reconstruction

2

Miles of Overlay

9

Miles of Chip-seal

10

Program Budget

$4.5 Million

County 20% Match • Only spend the County 20% match the first year • Focus only on residential collectors

Advantages: • Repairs the Collector and extra-subdivision roads • Uses County participation up front

Disadvantages: • selective process – less systematic process • Not as cost effective; remainder of roads will go to poor quickly

County 20% Program Miles of Reconstruction

0

Miles of Overlay

1-2

Miles of Chip-seal

10

Program Budget

$862,000

Subdivision Paving Program Options 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Least Cost over Life of Program Pave the Worst Roads First Geographical Focus Regional Approach County 20% Match

Suggest Documents