Scapular Kinematics: So how is the scapula supposed to move?

Scapular Kinematics: So how is the scapula supposed to move? Lori Michener PhD, ATC, PT, SCS Department of Physical Therapy Rm 100, West Hospital Virg...
Author: Gwen Barker
5 downloads 0 Views 495KB Size
Scapular Kinematics: So how is the scapula supposed to move? Lori Michener PhD, ATC, PT, SCS Department of Physical Therapy Rm 100, West Hospital Virginia Commonwealth University – Medical College of Virginia Richmond, VA 23298 [email protected]

Methods of measurement of scapular kinematics 1. Two – dimensional: Radiographs, goniometers, video 2. Three – dimensional: Radiographs, digitizers, magnetic tracking device Scapular Kinematics Ant / Post Tilting

Internal / External Rotation

AC

Ant / Post Tilting

Up / Down Rotation q

Normal motion q 3 Rotations: Upward Rotation (UR) / Downward rotation (DR) Internal rotation (IR) / External rotation (ER) Anterior tilt (AT) / Posterior tilt (PT) q 2 Positions / Translations: Superior / Inferior Anterior / Posterior q Translations defined by clavicular motion because the scapula is constrained at AC jt q

With GH elevation, via direct bone pins the scapula : q Rotations: q UR (Mean = 50°) q ER (Mean = 24°) q PT (Mean = 30°) q Positions / Translations: q Clavicular elevate (Mean = 10°) q Clavicular retraction (Mean = 21°)

(McClure et al, JSES, 2001):

q

Scapulohumeral Rhyt hm q 2:1 is standard q 5:4 (Poppen & Walker, JBJS, 1976); 1.7: 1 (McClure et al, JSES, 2001); 1.5 – 2.4: 1 (Graichen et al, Clin Ortho, 2000); 2.15 : 1, 0-30: 4.23 : 1 (> H), 91-120: 1.65: 1 (Padua D et al, MSSE, 2003)

Scapular Kinematic Control and Limitations by: q Scapular muscles, RC muscles, Spine (thoracic and cervical), pathology of the shoulder joint, ligaments, GH joint capsule, clavicle (via AC joint) Scapular muscle fatigue and weakness: q ↑ed UR w/ upper trap & serratus anterior fatigue (McQuade et al, JOSPT, 1998) q ↓ed UR and PT w/ upper & lower trap fatigue (McQuade et al, Clin BIomech,1995) q ↓ed PT, ER, UR w/ ↓ed serratus & ↑ed lower trap activity (SAIS) (Ludewig & Cook, Phys Ther, 2000) q

External load alters kinematics; fatigue??

(Pascoal et al, Clin Biomech, 2000; McQuade, 1995)

Rotator cuff muscle fatigue and weakness: q ↓ed PT with infraspinatus & teres minor fatigue q Same effect with RC tendonitis?

(Tsai et al, Arch Phys Med Rehab, 2003)

Muscle fatigue and weakness: scapular or rotator cuff muscles q Alters scapular kinematics q Less scapular stability? q Is it a motor control issue, rather than strength? q Altered GH kinematics?....evidence for this later q Implication: overhead athletes / workers? Spinal posture q ↑ed cervical flexion q ↓ed UR & PT (Ludewig & Cook, J Occ Rehab, 1996) q ↑ed thoracic flex (change of 12 degrees from upright ): q ↑ed (sup) position, & ↓ed posterior tilt q ↓ed GH abduction force (Kaebeatse et al, Arch Phys Med Rehab, 1999) q Slouched posture vs. upright: q ↓ed posterior tilt & ↓ed external rotation (Finley & Lee, Arch Phys Med Rehab, 2003) Others q q

q

Ligaments, Clavicle : No evidence Capsule: posterior q Simulated tightness and clinical exam: q ↓ed GH IR, limited cross-body adduction at 90 deg (PSTT), ↑ed superior translation of HH (Tyler, et al, AJSM, 2000; Harryman et al; JBJS, 1990; Branch et al; AJSM, 1995) Pathology q SAIS, RCT, instability, AC jt arthritis, Humeral head position

Impingement Syndrome and scapular kinematics q Kinematics (during glenohumeral elevation): q ↓ed PT (Ludewig & Cook, Phys Ther, 2000., Lukasiewicz et al, JOSPT, 1999.,

McClure et al, JOSPT, 2002;

Endo et al, J Orthop Sci, 2001 (x-ray))

↓ed ER (Ludewig & Cook, Phys Ther, 2000; Hebert, LJ et al, Am Phys Med Rehab, 2002) q ↓ed UR (Ludewig & Cook, Phys Ther, 2000; Endo et al, J Orthop Sci, 2001 (x-ray)) Position: q ↑ed winging (AT & IR) (Warner JJ et al, 1992) q ↑ed Sup & Med trans (Lukasiewicz et al, JOSPT, 1999) Adequate scapular motion required for “maintenance” of adequate SA space Pattern of decreased UR, ER, and PT has been demonstrated to decrease the area of the SA space (Solem-Bertolf, Clin Ortho, 1993) q

q

q q

Rotator Cuff Full- thickness tears and scapular kinematics q ↑ed humeral head superior translation during simulated or active GH elevation; in patients or cadavers with FT RCT (Thompson, AJSM, 1996; Poppen & Walker, 1976; Deutsch, 1996; Paletta, 1997; Yamaguchi, 2000) q q

No evidence of altered scapular kinematics This may cause altered scapular position or kinematics with RC weakness

Glenohumeral instability and scapular kinematics q Position: ↑ed winging (AT & IR) (Warner JJ et al, 1992) q Abnormal scapular DR disrupts the “shelf mechanism” of the inferior glenoid fossa support of the humeral head…resulting in inferior instability (Itoi et al; JSES; 1992) Adhesive capsulitis and scapular kinematics q Patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis (n=10) q Altered SHR, increased contribution of scapular upward rotation q Altered in elevation in scaption, flexion, and abd (Vermeulen HM et al, Ann Rheum Dis, 2002) q With a stiff GH joint, the ST articulation appears to be able to compensate to allow for total shoulder ROM Altered scapular kinematics q Can we capture differences? q With treatment or comparison to healthy? q Consider the “robustness” of the neuromuscular system q Is the “best” measure to examine kinematics with a combination of all 3 rotations or 3 rotations and 2 positions q Is a larger insult needed to see “obvious” measurable differences?

Scapular Dyskinesis: Examination and Intervention in Patients with Upper Quarter Dysfunctions Clinical Evaluation of the Scapula: Phil McClure PhD, PT Arcadia University -1Existing Literature Kibler Am J Sp Med 981 Sobush et al JOSPT 96 (Lennie Test)2 Odom et al Phys Ther 20013 Johnson et al JOSPT 20014 Basic Problem: Attempts to capture a 3-dimensional, dynamic phenomenon with static, 2dimensional measurements are likely to fail Judgements Based on Visual Observation Kibler et al. JSES 20025 Type 1 (Inf angle prominence) TypeII (medial border prominence) Type III (early scap elevation) Intertester K=(0.31-0.42) Intratester Κ=(0.40-0.59) McClure et al JOSPT 2003 (abstract)6 7 prescribed tasks Winging (medial or inf angle) OR Dysrhythmia (abnormal upward rot or elevation) Intertester Kappa=0.6, 72% agreement Tate et al JOSPT 2004 (abstract)7 -validation of visual judgements using 3D motion analysis -Dyskinesia group showed ant tilt, internal rotation, protraction Our Current Approach Scapular Dyskinesia Test - 5 test movement (flexion, abduction with and without weight, flip test) - Winging OR Dysrhythmia - posterior and superior view Scapular Reposition Test - alteration of symptoms during provocative tests by repositioning scapula - move scapula toward posterior tilt and external rotation by grasping shoulder girdle from behind and bringing forearm obliquely across medial border - look for decreased pain or increased strength for + test Other Important Considerations Specific muscle testing - Trapezius - Serratus Anterior - Distinguishing between true weakness (palsy) vs motor control deficit Key Areas of Hypomobility - upper thoracic extension - pec minor - posterior capsule

Scapular Dyskinesis: Examination and Intervention in Patients with Upper Quarter Dysfunctions Clinical Evaluation of the Scapula: Phil McClure PhD, PT Arcadia University -2References 1.

Kibler WB. Role of the Scapula in Athletic Shoulder Function. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(2):325337.

2.

Sobush DC, Simoneau GG, Dietz KE, Levene JA, Grossman RE, Smith WB. The Lennie Test for Measuring Scapular Position in Healthy Young Adult Females: A Reliability and Validity Study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;23(1):39-50.

3.

Odom CJ, Taylor AB, Hurd CE, Denegar CR. Measurement of scapular asymetry and assessment of shoulder dysfunction using the Lateral Scapular Slide Test: a reliability and validity study. Phys Ther. Feb 2001;81(2):799-809.

4.

Johnson MP, McClure PW, Karduna AR. New method to assess scapular upward rotation in subjects with shoulder pathology. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;31(2):81-89.

5.

Kibler WB, Uhl TL, Maddux JW, Brooks PV, Zeller B, McMullen J. Qualitative clinical evaluation of scapular dysfunction: a reliability study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Nov-Dec 2002;11(6):550-556.

6.

McClure P, Tate A, Egner M, Greenberg E, Yops R, Neff N. Development and Inter-rater Reliability Testing of a System of Classification for Scapular Dysfunction. Journal Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2003;33(2):A23-24.

7.

Tate A, McClure P, Neff N. Validity of a Visual Classification System for Scapular Motion. J Orth Sport Phys Ther. 2004;34:A42.

SCAPULAR DYSKINESIS: EXAMINATION AND INTERNVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER EXTREMITY DYSFUNCTION REHABILITATION CONSIDERATIONS Tim L. Uhl PT, PhD, ATC Division of Athletic Training, Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, [email protected]

Description: Rehabilitation goals following shoulder injury is to implement a continuum of exercises that restores optimal function while protecting the anatomic integrity of the injured or repaired tissues. The exercises should allow a progression of intensity and load that is within the healing tissue’s capabilities. A key element in rehabilitation is the successful transition in the flow of exercises from the protected exercises of the acute phase to the functional phase. Emphasis of this presentation will be on the component of scapular muscle exercises. The scapular muscles are not exercised in isolation of the other shoulder musculatures but need to work synergistically with the other shoulder girdle musculature for upper extremity function. Exercise selection for scapular musculature strengthening exercises based on EMG research is readily available. 7-9,26 This presentation attempts to organize the previous available information along with new information obtained by the presenter into logical progression from low to high demand exercises in order to better rehabilitate your patients. Objectives: To describe treatment interventions to facilitate mobility, strength and neuromuscular control of the shoulder. To provide evidence and or scientific rationale that is available to support these interventions. Key Points: •

Therapeutic Exercises are beneficial in rehabilitation of patients with • Shoulder instability11 • Rotator cuff pathology 12,25 • Appear to be helpful in recover of associated scapular dysfunctions long thoracic neuropathy and snapping scapula35



Proximal Stability • Without proximal control distal structures are moving on poor foundation • Motion and force applied by distal upper extremity initiates proximally 17,37 • Strength and endurance of upper extremity is dependent on trunk16



Posture of spine effects scapular position, motion, and shoulder strength14



Position and motion of the scapula effects glenohumeral joint function and subacromial space • Impingement patients have decreased scapular mobility19,21 • Tight pectoralis major decreases scapular motion 4



Neuromuscular Control of scapular musculature is diminished in the presence of pathology 19,29,30 • Diminished force production of scapular musculature6 • Scapular muscular activation diminished due to imbalance and pain27,29,30

• •

Exercises that facilitate posterior tilting and external rotation (retraction) of scapula are critical for overhead function Exercise that facilitate lateral translation and internal rotation (protraction) of scapula are critical for accelerating sport implements and absorbing energy

• •

Therapeutic Interventions need to address: Proximal stability and posture • Flexibility to reverse anterior tilt and internal rotation posture • Shoulder mobility associated with improved function23 • Rehabilitation programs may positively effect posture and scapular position34 • Integrate the kinetic chain to facilitate activation of trunk24 • Transmission of force along kinetic chain typically incorporates rotation (Serape muscles) • Rehabilitation of the shoulder should incorporate exercises to promote erect trunk posture and stable scapular position.31



Strengthening exercises should progress from low to high demand22 • Progressive resistive exercises can increase shoulder strength and improve patient function23,34 • Avoiding inflaming healing tissues • Pain inhibits muscle activation at a central level 5,28 • Altering central motor drive may effect muscle activation patterns for movement • Arm supported activities diminishes muscular demand36 • Progression of muscular demand can be monitored by load placed through arm33



Re-establish neuromuscular control of shoulder musculature • Closed kinetic chain exercises promote joint compression and activation of proximal musculature to provide stabilization1 • Scapular re-education can be accomplished through several tasks • Consider upper trapezius/serratus anterior EMG ratio during exercise selection to minimize superior scapular translation (shrug) and facilitate medial scapular border control20

Clinical Application Incorporation of rehabilitation techniques that address trunk, scapular, and humeral mobility and control appear to effectively address impairment of diminished strength, motion, and pain commonly seen in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Gradual introduction of therapeutic exercises while minimizing inflammation of healing tissue and restoring neuromuscular control is the ultimate goal of re-establishing function.

Acute Phase Exercises graded by (%MVIC + S.D.) Exercise Deltoid Supraspinatus

N.A. = Not available

Up. Trap.

Ser. Ant.

Low. Trap.

Supine PROM15

3+1

1+6

1+2

2+2

2+2

Forward Bow15

2+1

5+6

2+3

5+4

2+2

Sidelying Elevation10

10 + 6

2+6

2+3

11 + 7

8+5

Towel Slides10

12 + 7

7+7

4+3

7+4

1+1

Supine Pressup 1#15

11 + 4

3+7

1 +3

16 + 8

1+1

T-Bar10

24 + 9

9+9

9+8

17 + 6 10 + 10

Sub-acute Phase Exercises graded by (%MVIC + S.D.) Exercise Deltoid SupraUp. spinatus Trap.

Ser. Ant.

Low. Trap.

Wedge Press-up15

20 + 9

8 + 11

11 + 11

17 + 8

2+1

Ball Rolls10

25 + 8

11 + 10

9+3

21 + 7

5+4

Ipsilateral Step- up15

21 + 7

22 + 20

21 + 8

15 + 5

13 + 6

Active Elevation10

32 + 8

19 + 12

19 + 9

23 + 7

19 + 8

Standing Press-up15

30 + 11

30 + 17

24 + 8

29 + 13

9+5

PK 39 + 16

PK 34 + 23

PK 10 + 6

Rows with elastic tubing7,13

N.A.

N.A AVG 9+2

AVG 9+6

AVG 5+4

Shrugs with elastic tubing13

Forward Punch13

PK 44 + 25

PK 53 + 29

PK 31 + 24

AVG 10 + 6

AVG 13 + 8

AVG 5+4

N.A.

PK 39 + 23

PK 48 + 83

AVG 9+4

AVG 8+3

N.A.

PK 49 + 14 N.A.

N.A. AVG 10 + 3

N.A. = Not available PK = peak amplitude during phase AVG = average amplitude during phase

Functional Phase Exercises graded by (%MVIC + S.D.) Exercise Deltoid SupraUp. spinatus Trap.

Ser. Ant.

Low. Trap.

Scaption > 120°9,32

72 + 13

64 + 28

79 + 19

96 + 24

61 + 19

Scaption < 80°2,9

91 + 26

82 + 27

72 + 19

62 + 18

50 + 21

Unilateral Rows9,32

72 + 20

N.A.

63 + 17

14 + 6

45 + 17

N.A.

N.A.

79 + 18

43 + 17

97 + 16

Prone Flexion @ 135° ABD9

Diag Flex/ Horiz Add/ Ext. Rot.9

N.A.

N.A.

66 + 10

100 + 24

39 + 15

72 + 24

56 + 48

64 + 26

82 + 36

N.A.

N.A

N.A

7+ 3

62 + 19

11 + 5

N.A.

N.A

50

140

30

79 + 20

78 + N.A.

66+ 18

9+3

74 + 21

N.A.

50 + N.A.

20+ 18

57 + 22

79 + 21

Military Press26,32

Unilateral shoulder press supine w/plus9

Push up w/plus18

Prone Horizontal ABD3,9

Prone ER @ 90°3,9

N.A. = Not available

References 1. Alexander CM, Harrison PJ. Reflex connections from forearm and hand afferents to shoulder girdle muscles in humans. Exp Brain Res 2003; 148:277-282.

2. Alpert SW, Pink MM, Jobe FW, McMahon PJ, Mathiyakom W. Electromyographic analysis of deltoid and rotator cuff function under varying loads and speeds. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000; 9(1):47-57. 3. Blackburn TA, McLeod WD, White B, Wofford L. EMG analysis of posterior rotator cuff exercises. J Athl Train 1990; 25:40-45. 4. Borstad JD, Ludewig PM. The effect of pectoralis minor length on scapular kinematics in subjects without shoulder pathology. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 34[1], A16. 2004. Ref Type: Abstract 5. Brox JI, Roe C, Saugen E, Vollestad NK. Isometric abduction muscle activation in patients with rotator tendinosis of the shoulder. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78(11): 1260-1267:-1267. 6. Cools AM, Witvrouw E, Declercq GA, Vanderstraeten GG, Cambier DC. Evaluation of isokinetic force production and associated muscle activity in the scapular rotators during a protraction-retraction movement in overhead athletes with impingement symptoms. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2004; 38:64-68. 7. Decker MJ, Hintermeister RA, Faber KJ, Hawkins RJ. Serratus anterior muscle activity during selected rehabilitation exercises. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27(6):784791. 8. Ekstrom RA, Bifulco KM, Lopau CJ, Andersen CF, Gough JR. Comparing the function of the upper and lower parts of the serratus anterior muscle using surface electromyography. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004; 34(5):235-243. 9. Ekstrom RA, Donatelli RA, Soderberg G. Surface electromyographic analysis of exercises for the trapezius and serratus anterior muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2003; 33(5):247-258. 10. Gaunt B, Uhl TL, Humphrey L, Calico RM, McCluskey GM. Electromyography of shoulder and scapular musculature during exercise strengthen progression. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004. 11. Gibson K, Growse A, Korda L, Wray E, MacDermid JC. The effectiveness of rehabilitation for nonoperative management of shoulder instability:a systematic review. Journal of Hand Therapy 2004; 17:229-242. 12. Grant HJ, Arthur A, Pichora DR. Evaluation of interventions for rotator cuff pathology. Journal of Hand Therapy 2004; 17:274-299. 13. Hintermeister RA, Lange G, Schultheis J, Bey MJ, Hawkins RJ. Electromyographic activity and applied load during shoulder rehabilitation exercises using elastic resistance. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26(2):210-220.

14. Kebaetse M, McClure P, Pratt N. Thoracic position effect on shoulder range of motion, strength, and three-dimensional scapular kinetics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80:945-950. 15. Lawson L, Klare K, Uhl TL. Electromyographic assessment of 13 shoulder rehabilitation exercises. 2003. Ref Type: Unpublished Work 16. Le Bozec S, Bouisset S. Do bimanual isometric push efforts in humans stop as a consequence of postural muscle exhaustion? Neuroscience Letters 2004; 356:6165. 17. Le Bozec S, Lesne J, Bouisset S. A sequence of postural muscle excitation precedes and accompanies isometric ramp efforts performed while sitting in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters 2001; 303:72-76. 18. Lear JL, Gross MT. An Electromyographical Analysis of the Scapular Stabilizing Synergists During a Push-up Progression. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28(3):146-157. 19. Ludewig PM, Cook TM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther 2000; 80(3):276-291. 20. Ludewig PM, Hoff MS, Osowski EE, Meschke SA, Rupp S. Relative balance of serratus anterior and upper trapezius muscle activity during push-up exercises. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32(2):484-493. 21. Lukasiewicz AC, McClure P, Michener L, Pratt N, Sennett B. Comparison of 3dimensional scapular position and orientation between subjects with and without shoulder impingement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1999; 29(10):574-586. 22. McCann PD, Wootten ME, Kadaba MP, Bigliani LU. A kinematic and electromyographic study of shoulder rehabilitation exercises. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1993; 288:179-188. 23. McClure PW, Bialker J, Neff N, Williams G, Karduna A. Shoulder function and 3dimensional kinematics in people with shoulder impingement syndrome before and after a 6-week exercise program. Phys Ther 2004; 84(9):832-848. 24. McMullen J, Uhl TL. A kinetic chain approach for shoulder rehabilitation. J Athl Train 2000; 35(3):329-337. 25. Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Burnet EN. Effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome:Subacromial impingement syndrome. Journal of Hand Therapy 2004; 17:152-164.

26. Moseley JB, Jobe FW, Pink M, Perry J, Tibone J. EMG analysis of the scapular muscles during a shoulder rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med 1992; 20((2)):128-134. 27. Reddy AS, Mohr KJ, Pink MM, Jobe FW. Electromyographic analysis of the deltoid and rotator cuff muscles in persons with subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000; 9(6):519-523. 28. Roe C, Brox JI, Saugen E, Vollestad NK. Muscle activation in the contralateral passive shoulder during isometric shoulder abduction in patients with unilateral shoulder pain. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 2000; 10(2): 69-77:77. 29. Ruwe PA, Pink M, Jobe FW, Perry J, Scovazzo ML. The normal and the painful shoulders during the breastroke, electromyographic and cinematographic analysis of twelve muscles. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22((6)):789-796. 30. Scovazzo ML, Browne A, Pink M, Jobe FW, Kerrigan J. The painful shoulder during freestyle swimming, an electromyographic cinematographic analysis of twelve muscles. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19((6)):577-582. 31. Smith J, Kotajarvi BR, Padgett DJ, Eischen JJ. Effect of scapular protraction and retraction on isometric shoulder elevation strength. Archieves of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 83, 367-370. 2002. Ref Type: Abstract 32. Townsend H, Jobe FW, Pink M, Perry J. Electromyographic analysis of the glenohumeral muscles during a baseball rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19:264-272. 33. Uhl TL, Carver TJ, Mattacola CG, Mair SD, Nitz AJ. Shoulder musculature activation during upper extremity weight-bearing exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2003; 33(3):109-117. 34. Wang C-H, McClure P, Pratt N, Nobilini R. Stretching and strengthening exercises: their effect on three-dimensional scapular kinematics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80:923-929. 35. Warner JJ, Navarro RA. Serratus anterior dysfunction. Recognition and treatment. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1998;(349):139-148. 36. Wise MB, Uhl TL, Mattacola CG, Nitz AJ, Kibler WB. The effect of limb support on muscle activation during shoulder exercises. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13(6):614-620. 37. Zattara M, Bouisset S. Posturo-kinetic organisation during the early phase of voluntary upper limb movement. 1 Normal subjects. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1988; 51:956-965.