Renewable Energy Supply auctions the future?

Renewable Energy Supply auctions … the future? Vienna Forum on European Energy Law 13 March 2015 What is a renewable supply auction A competitive b...
Author: Brianne Hunter
0 downloads 3 Views 5MB Size
Renewable Energy Supply auctions … the future? Vienna Forum on European Energy Law

13 March 2015

What is a renewable supply auction A competitive bidding process

Renewable energy suppliers bid for either •

the sale of renewable energy supplies



a renewable subsidy

The lowest bidders are cleared (and receive a contract)

2

Frontier Economics

● Why auctions? ● How to design auctions? ● What is the experience?

3

Frontier Economics

Good economic arguments for auctions … Ability to define a standard product

Attract multiple suppliers

Uncertainty over “true” cost

Effectiveness

Cost efficiency

Transparency

● Policy makers can control how much RES capacity/generation is supported

● Productive efficiency

● Auctions are a transparent way to determine support levels for renewables

● Where desired it also controls which technology is built



Competition within technology – cheapest projects succeed



Competition between technologies – only cheapest technologies win

● Allocative efficiency – competitive pressures on prices/support levels to reflect efficient cost

● Final customers who pay the bill better understand where money is spent

… achieving policy objectives at low cost for consumers 4

Frontier Economics

… but also legal requirements Direct marketing obligation (from 1 Jan 2016) Competitive Bidding process to determine the level of support premium (operating aid)

New capacities

(124, 125)

● Most capacities > 500kW ● Wind > 3MW (126) ● clear, transparent and nondiscriminatory criteria ● Assumption of proportionality of aid in case of technology neutrality ● …but several exceptions from above conditions allowed

Guidelines increasingly require competitive tenders

(126, 127)

Transition timings to introduce competitive bidding Some discretion for member states

● in 2015-2016 – 5% of all new capacities ● From 2017 – all new capacities □ □

Wind: > 6 MW Other technologies: > 1 MW

● Type of aid: investment or operating aid ● Pre-qualification criteria for bidders

But Guidelines leave room – exceptions allowed and no need to change legacy regimes

… the EC pushes towards RES auctions through its State Aid guidelines 5

Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 (2014/C 200/01)

Frontier Economics

… but there is criticism as well Issue

Effectiveness

● International experience suggests not all contracted capacity is built

Cost efficiency

● Auctions imply more commercial risks for RES suppliers and thereby higher financing cost

Practicability

● RES auctions are very complex to design

Diversity of bidders

● Competition will crowd out smaller/less experienced players

Evaluation ● Probably one of the biggest challenges for auctions

?

● Advances in auction design help improve effectiveness ● … but important to signal that RES is capital intensive ● Overall competition tends to lower cost ● Agreed, but experience is growing internationally ● Given other benefits this complexity is acceptable ● YES. That is the nature of competition. Only the best survive. Player diversity is no energy policy objective itself

… auctions are good, but not perfect! 6

Frontier Economics

● Why auctions? ● How to design auctions? ● What is the experience?

7

Frontier Economics

A decision process for auction design

See criticism of auctions above 1

2

Understand the challenges

3

Consider the design options

Evaluate the design options

Define criteria and evaluate the expected performance of options in relation to criteria

8

Frontier Economics

Key dimensions of auction design 1 Prequalification

● Technical qualifications (e.g. required planning permissions) ● Securities/ guarantees/deposits by bidders

Lead time

● Lead time between auction and commissioning/start of support ● Fixed or latest start of support

Product definition

● ● ● ● ●

Demand side

● Frequency of auction and volume per auction ● Price inelastic vs. elastic tender volume

Other contract terms

● Penalties and securities/deposits in case of contract award ● Permission for secondary trades

Type of auction

● ● ● ●

2 3

4

5

6

9

Technology neutral vs. specific Capacity vs. Energy (or mixture) Contract duration [years] Limits on support (e.g. max amount per year or over full life-time) Investment obligation or option

Open (descending/ascending), sealed bid or hybrids Pay as bid/as cleared Min/max prices Bid size

Further detailed bidding rules also to be considered (e.g. activation rules, bid increment, etc.) Frontier Economics

● Why auctions? ● How to design auctions? ● What is the experience?

10

Frontier Economics

Auctions are widely used in infrastructure sectors … ... across sectors ● Financial markets □

Auctioning of gov‘t bonds

● Telecoms □

...and also to support RES ● Used in over 40* countries to determine the level of renewable support ● Brazil, California and South Africa count as particular successes**

Spectrum auctions

● Energy □

Spot and forward trades at various power exchanges



EU CO2-emission certificates



Exploration rights for gas and oil

RES auctions already applied RES auctions planned

… and now also to procure renewables 11

*Source: REN21, Renewables Global Status Report, 2014 and own research (the map is not aimed at providing comprehensive coverage); **In South Africa from the second auction.

Frontier Economics

International experience confirms the importance of a good auction design

Technology

RES support scheme

Product

Auction design

Bidder qualification

Lead time [years] Support term

Lesson

12

DK

NL

UK

(2004 – 2010)

(2010)

(1990-1998)

ZA (2011*)

FR (seit 2011)

Offshore Wind (in defined location)

Offshore Wind

Various (auction specific by technology)

Various (auction specific by technology)

Solar PV (auction specific by technology and size)

Direct marketing obligation with “floating” market premium (MP)

Direct marketing obligation with “floating” market premium (with Cap on MP)

Feed-in tariff

Feed-in tariff

Feed-in tariff

Energy

Energy

Capacity

Energy

Capacity

First price auction

Multi criteria bidding (main criterion: price)

„pay-as-bid“

Environmental Impact Assessment; Financial guarantee + penalty threat

Planning permission; financial guarantee

ca. 3

5

Volume limit

15 years, annual volume limit

Threat of high penalty deters investors

Small design changes significantly affect outcomes

„pay-as-bid sealed-bid“ „pay-as-bid sealed-bid“ with some scoring with some scoring

Feasibility study

Several conditions; Financial guarantee

Financial deposit, planning permission, financial guarantees, etc.

5 (from 3rd round)

2-3

1.5

20 years

20 years

Technology specific volumes can be significant driver of the outturn price

Intransparencies and short lead times may reduce competition

8 years (round 1, 2) 15 years (round 3, 4) Lack of penalty lead to low realisation rate (ca 30%)

*Further auctions in SA with refined auction rules in 2012 und 2014 proved more successful.

Frontier Economics

Key dimensions of GB auction design

13

Type of auction

● ● ● ●

Lead time

● 1 to 4 years

Strike price in CfD is bid parameter Single, sealed bid Pay as clear max prices

Product definition

● Technology distinction between “pots” of established and less established technology ● CfD (related to market prices with volume according to actual production in any hour) ● 15 years contract duration

Other terms

● Penalty for not performing: exclusion of the site from future auctions) ● Penalty for delay: up to 12 months, the bidder loses remaining time of CfD; after 24 months delay, CfD lapses

Demand side

● Auction value limited per pot



Auctions are for a multiyear period – bidders can submit bids for the same project in multiple years and at multiple sizes (to help avoid the risk of bidding in a year / for a size that exceeds budget)



Budget caps apply across all years (once a project accepted, has ongoing impact on future years!)



Administrative strike price sets a cap in the auction (ASPs decline over time)

Frontier Economics

The prices achieved in the auction were well below the “price cap” (and prices previously paid by DECC) Offshore wind 700 600

Clearing price (LH axis)

70

Volume (RH axis)

500

60

Price cap (LH axis)

400

50 40

300

30

200 100

10

700

140

Clearing price (LH axis)

120

Volume (RH axis)

600 500

100

400 80

300

2015/16

2016/17

2017/18

60

100

50 Clearing price (LH axis) Volume (RH axis) ASP (LH axis)

80

40

60

30

40

20

20

10 0

0 2015/16

2016/17

2017/18

2018/19

MW

120

20

100 0 2016/17

2017/18

2018/19

● Major reductions in price relative to administered cap – particularly valuable in the case of offshore wind given the volumes purchased

Solar 70

200

2015/16

2018/19

140

40

0

0

0

£/MWh

160

60

20

14

800

Price cap (LH axis)

£/MWh

80

MW

£/MWh

90

180

MW

Onshore wind 100

● In last process, government bought 3,184MW offshore wind at administered strike price – had it been possible to procure this quantity at the lower auction clearing price, saving would have been around £350m pa ● Solar prices difficult to interpret – not easy to see how developers will be able to proceed (if they do not sign contracts, those companies are excluded from future auctions) Frontier Economics

Conclusions

Why auctions? Auctions are an effective and a cost efficient means to implementing RES support

Auctions are also required under EU State Aid law

15

How to design auctions?

But there are significant challenges in designing auctions – need to get it right

What is the experience?

Experiences exist from around the world and most recently from the UK •

Lower than anticipated prices



… but to be seen how much capacity will ultimately be built

Frontier Economics

Dr. Christoph Riechmann Frontier Economics Limited www.frontier-economics.com e-mail:

[email protected]

mobile:

+49 170 526 7339

Cologne:

Kranhaus Süd, Im Zollhafen 24, D-50678 Köln, Germany

switch: direct:

+49 221 337 13 0 +49 221 337 13 104

fax:

+49 221 337 13 130

London:

71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6DA, United Kingdom

switch: direct:

+44 20 7031 7000 +44 20 7031 7059

fax:

+44 20 7031 7001

Frontier Economics Limited in Europe is a member of the Frontier Economics network, which consists of separate companies based in Europe (Brussels, Cologne, London and Madrid) and Australia (Melbourne & Sydney). The companies are independently owned, and legal commitments entered into by any one company do not impose any obligations on other companies in the network. All views expressed in this document are the views of Frontier Economics Limited. 16

Frontier Economics

Frontier Economics Limited in Europe is a member of the Frontier Economics network, which consists of separate companies based in Europe (Brussels, Cologne, London and Madrid) and Australia (Melbourne & Sydney). The companies are independently owned, and legal commitments entered into by any one company do not impose any obligations on other companies in the network. All views expressed in this document are the views of Frontier Economics Limited. 17

Frontier Economics

FRONTIER ECONOMICS EUROPE LTD. BRUSSELS | COLOGNE | LONDON | MADRID Frontier Economics Ltd, 71 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6DA 18

Tel. +44 (0)20 7031 7000 Fax. +44 (0)20 7031 7001 www.frontier-economics.com

Frontier Economics

Suggest Documents