Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects BRUNO SICILIANO
www.prisma.unina.it
Università di Napoli Federico II Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
3/33
City
1,200,000 inhabitants Pole of Mediterranean culture Historical and holiday sites 5 universities + several science institutions
University Founded in 1224 by Emperor Federico II (oldest public university in Europe) 100,000 students School of Engineering founded in 1811 by King Murat (oldest in Italy) 15,000 students (5,000 graduate) Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
The PRISMA Team Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
3/33
Bruno Siciliano • Luigi Villani • Vincenzo Lippiello • Alberto Finzi • Silvia Rossi Fanny Ficuciello • Fabio Ruggiero • Agostino De Santis • Antoine Petit Jun Nishiyama • Alejandro Donaire • Alejandro Gutierrez • Mariacarla Staffa • Daniela D'Auria Luca Buonocore • Jonathan Cacace • Diana Serra • Riccardo Caccavale Andrea Fontanelli • Valeria Federico • Jonathan van der Meer Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Our Research Portfolio Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
4/33
Aerial Robotics Assistive Robotics
Funding of 8.5 M€
Cognitive Control of Robotic Systems Dual-Arm/Hand Manipulation Force Control
Human−Robot Interaction Inspection Robotics
Lightweight Flexible Arms
Mobile Dynamic Non-prehensile Manipulation Motion Generation and Biomechanical Analysis for Human Figures Redundant Manipulators
Robotic Surgery Technology
Sensory-Motor Synergies of Anthropomorphic Hands Service Robotics Visual Servoing Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
World Statistics Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
5/33
Data up to 12/2013 (2014 report by International Federation of Robotics)
1.3÷1.6 million of robots at work worldwide Most successful year for industrial robots since 1961 Total market of 9.5 billion $ (+12%) Estimated market of 29 billion $ Largest markets: Japan, China, USA, Korea, Germany (70%)
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Robots for Non-industrial Applications Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
6/33
Service robots for professional use Military applications and hostile environments 21.000 new installations in 2013
Service robots for personal/domestic use 2,700,000 robots for domestic applications 1,200,000 robots for entertainment
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Market Prospects Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
7/33
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
From Factories to Our Homes Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
Industry
Field
Service
Automotive Chemical Electronics Food
Aerial Space Underwater Search and rescue
Domestic Edutainment Rehabilitation Medical
8/33
Level of Autonomy Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Springer Handbook of Robotics Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
9/33
B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Editors) A
PROSE Awards for Excellence in Physical Sciences & Mathematics + Engineering & Technology Robotics (February 2009) Foundations (D. Orin)
9 B
D
C
Sensing and Perception (H. Christensen)
Robot Structures (F. Park)
F
Manipulation and Interfaces (M. Kaneko) 7
9
E
Mobile and Distributed Robotics (R. Chatila) 9
8
VII G
Field and Service Robotics (A. Zelinsky)
Human-Centered and Human-Centered and Life-Like Life-Like Robotics Robotics (D.(Rus) Rus) 14
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
8 Bratislava • 25 May 2016
2nd Edition Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
10/33
To appear in Summer 2016 Multimedia portal: http://handbookofrobotics.org
A
Robotics Foundations (D. Orin) 14 B
D
C
Sensing and Perception (H. Christensen)
Design (F. Park)
F
Manipulation and Interfaces (M. Kaneko) 8
12
E
Moving in the Environment (R. Chatila) 9
9
VII G Human-Centered
Robots at Work (A. Zelinsky)
Robots Humans andand Life-Like Robotics (D. Rus) (Rus)
13 Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
14 Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Development of Robotics in Last 15 Years Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
11/33
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Industrial Robotics Evolution Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
12/33
Mobile manipulators
Innovation
3rd Robotics wave
Compliant robots Industrial robots - PC - Off-line programming
- Mechatronics
- Combined mobility & manipulation - Intelligence - Intuitive operation
2nd Robotics wave
- Safety - Simple programming & operation
1st Robotics wave
Time Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Human–Robot Interaction Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
13/33
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Mobile Manipulation Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
14/33
8x Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Intuitive Operation Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
15/33
Smartphone
Scalability Arm as haptic input device Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Use-Case Driven R&D Work Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
Shelf logistics (collect empty SLCs, fill shelf with full SLCs)
Transport parts / SLCs between workstations and to/from part supermarket
Unloading machines and putting parts into bins
16/33
Simple assembly (pre-assembly)
In almost all use cases: Sharing workspace and cooperating with ordinary workers!
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
The EuRoC Project Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
17/33
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
European Robotics Challenges Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
18/33
The project has launched three industry-relevant challenges aimed at sharpening the focus of European manufacturing through a number of application experiments, while adopting an innovative approach which ensures benchmarking and performance evaluation Within an open call framework, three stages of increasing complexity and financial support for competing teams level the playing field for new contestants, attract new developers and new end users toward customisable robot applications, and provide sustainable solutions for future challenges
Reconfigurable Interactive Manufacturing Cell Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Shop Floor Logistics and Manipulation
Plant Inspection and Servicing Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Motivations Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
19/33
European robotics industry needs competitive solutions to keep or gain global leadership in robotics products and services Robotic products and services are based on the product visions and sector-overarching strategic application scenarios of the robotics industry and the manufacturing industry Robotics and manufacturing communities need to become aware of the core RTD issues to be solved to effectively realise these application scenarios Competitive solutions are in the longer term created in close collaboration among end users (SME/industry), system integrators (SME/industry), technology suppliers (industry/SME) and research experts (academia), i.e. all the actors along the value chain Developing suitable benchmarks and supporting comparative performance evaluation will facilitate the development of new approaches, products and services Needs for particular standards should come from industry, yet academia has to be involved in the definition of benchmarks Showcase potential of challenges in Europe, increase public awareness, demonstrate the stimulating factors of such initiatives, set the scene for more open innovation programmes Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Production Challenge (Co-workers) Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
20/33
Reconfigurable Interactive Manufacturing Cell Motivation: to develop a new generation of flexible, adaptable, collaborative robotic work cell RTD issues: multi-role multi-arm cooperative robot systems, perception and cognitive skills, safe and effective human−robot collaboration Research experts: CREATE-PRISMA Lab, CNRS-LAAS, DLR, IPA Technology supplier: Open, as IPA can provide support to a range of different robot models and components System integrator: IPA / Open, as teams can recruit their own system integrator Platform host: IPA Benchmark environment: ARENA 2036 research factory with multiple robot cell setups for different production operations, as well as a mechanical workshop and an electronics lab for engineering of different tools and grippers Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Logistics Challenge (Mobile Manipulation) Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
21/33
Shop Floor Logistics and Manipulation Motivation: value creation beyond mere logistics of goods RTD issues: navigation on dynamic shop floor, coping with uncertainties by means of 3D vision and compliant manipulation and grasping, true mobile manipulation to improve cycle time Research experts: DLR, KUKA Roboter, CNRS-LAAS Technology supplier: KUKA Roboter (omniRob with Light-weight robot) System integrator: KUKA Roboter, KUKA Systems Platform host: DLR Benchmark environment: realistic factory set-up with elements from manufacturing of real end users
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Services Challenge (Aerial Robotics) Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
22/33
Plant Servicing and Inspection Motivation: inspection through micro aerial robots (MAV) opens absolutely new applications in servicing of large plants and infrastructures RTD issues: highly reliable vision-only navigation, dynamic control of MAVs in challenging industrial environments, high-level task allocation by mission expert, e.g. "follow this wall" Research experts: ETHZ, CREATE-PRISMA Lab, DLR Technology supplier: Ascending Technologies System integrator: Alstom Inspection Robotics Platform host: ETHZ Benchmark environment: realistic set-up on an industrial infrastructure, e.g. pipework and infrastructure for energy-/fuel-/operating material supply, tanks and storages
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Competition Chart Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
23/33
Cumulative sum of € 7M grant money available to the Challengers
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Calls Statistics Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
24/33
Comparison of applicant numbers per challenge Challenge 1
Challenge 2
Challenge 3
Actual submitted proposals 2/11 SMEs End Users 6/8 SMEs System Integrators
1/12 SMEs End Users
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
8/14 SMEs End Users 1/1 SME Technology Developer Bratislava • 25 May 2016
The 15 (out of 103) Selected Challengers Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
25/33
Challenge 1 (Production) PIROS: Cooperative, safe and reconfigurable robotic companion for CNC pallets load/unload stations FLA2IR: FLexible Automotive Assembly with Industrial Co-WorkeRs ITRXcell: FLEXICOIL – Learning-based approach for robotized coils winding in the electric machines manufacturing industry NimbRo: Manufacturing: robolink® feeder – Flexible energy chain assembly automation with a lightweight cable-driven robot EUSMART: Reconfigurable assembly cell for highly dexterous and intelligent operations Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
The 15 Selected Challengers Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
26/33
Challenge 2 (Logistics) RSAII: FLECOOP – Flexible robotized unitary picking in collaborative environments for order preparation in distribution centers MTC-LU-UoB-Airbus: Joint robot−human logistics and assembly in aerospace AutoMAP: AUTOnomous mobile MAniPulation system TIMAIRIS: Autonomous blank feeding for packaging machines NimbRo Logistics: KittingBot – Mobile manipulation for part sequencing and kitting in automotive logistics
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
The 15 Selected Challengers Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
27/33
Challenge 3 (Services) TUM Flyers: Vision-based MAV navigation for systematic inspection of structures GRVC-CATEC: ARCOW – Aerial Robot CO-Worker in plant servicing NimbRo Copter: ChimneySpector – Inside/outside chimney and smoke pipe inspection by aerial robots Eiffel Team: Autonomous damage inspection in power substation BladeHunters: EOLO – Wind generator remote inspection system
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Open Problems in Mobile Manipulation Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
Transformable and scalable logistics
to model and recognise industrial objects to be manipulated to detect and avoid obstacles in 3D to navigate in dynamically changing industrial environments to navigate in narrow production spaces with a mobile manipulator to pick and place various objects of interest
Beyond logistics
28/33
Industrial requirements Setup time Cycle time Dependability Technology Readiness Cost
to develop generic manipulation skills utilising active compliance needed by numerous higher level manipulation tasks to solve application-specific, higher-level, value-creating manipulation tasks to integrate sensing of the environment with reactive planning to link the visual quality control process intelligently with planning
Mission instruction, planning and control
to realise intuitive and efficient ways for humans to instruct robots to enable workers to handle basic problems to provide interfaces to warehouse management systems “task planning” to control the complex kinematic chains of mobile manipulators (from wheels to fingers)
Safety
humans and robots sharing workspaces
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Core Technologies for Mobile Manipulation Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
Safety
End effectors
Real-time communication
29/33
Planning
Power and methods should Learning be used? Which concrete technologies
How to Materials
manageintegrate ment them
Navigation
into a complete system?
How to achieve reliability? System architecture
Sensors Control
Further R&D is needed! Actuation Locomotion
Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
System engineering tools
Human– machine interface
Sensing & Perception
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Technology Combinations Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
30/33
Mobile manipulation in human workspace The goal is to develop systems which can support a human worker with manipulation tasks For seamless and flexible operation, the system has to be able to execute complex manipulation tasks in unstructured and dynamic environments Need to bring together technology targets in motion planning + safety + collaboration and interaction + learning and adaptation Development of new safety concepts for human−robot interaction based on existing industrial standards and regulations
Analysis of workspace sharing systems The goal is to define ergonomics requirements for safe human−robot interaction Functioning as guidance for development of the mobile manipulator and workspace for collaborative manufacturing. The design process will be validated against the defined Serving as one of the objectives to be optimised with motion planning, through e.g. use of intrinsic kinematic redundancy or task redundancy of the manipulator arm Relevant technology targets are collaboration and interaction + cognitive abilities + sophisticated sensing Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Technology Combinations [cont’d] Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
31/33
Rapid deployment in industry The goal is to quickly deploy robotic systems in realistic industrial environments Current deployment strategies rely on a long set-up process by experienced system operators and are generally not automated A key will be reducing the time and effort spent by operators in configuring a perception system to operate in a new application domain or a new operational environment The major technological advance is expected to come from better learning capabilities and more robust solutions for interpretation, as well as synergies with more robust mapping and localisation systems in semi-structured dynamic environments Important directions to investigate include limiting dependence on costly infrastructure solutions, increased transferability of experience, life-long learning as well as learning by demonstration
Robotics 2020 Multi-Annual Roadmap For Robotics in Europe Horizon 2020 Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
The Bottom Line Industrial robotics in Europe – Status quo, ongoing challenges and future prospects
32/33
Research is important Many of the technologies identified in the European Strategic Research Agenda are needed to realise mobile manipulation for the factory of the future Develop use-case driven work Reach out new market domains
Integration is important Use standard platforms to avoid re-invention of the wheel Combine innovative technologies according to systems engineering approach Safety and dependability are key abilities
Challenges and competitions are important Drive innovation Better awareness Benchmarking Re-Industrialisation of the European Union 2016
Bratislava • 25 May 2016
Thank You very much indeed for Your kind attention
Questions?
[email protected]