Demystifying Promotions: Instructor to Assistant Professor

Demystifying Promotions: Instructor to Assistant Professor Friday, January 27, 2012 12:00 – 1:30 PM Seminar Presenters Mary Walsh, PhD Assistant Dea...
1 downloads 2 Views 1MB Size
Demystifying Promotions: Instructor to Assistant Professor Friday, January 27, 2012 12:00 – 1:30 PM

Seminar Presenters Mary Walsh, PhD Assistant Dean for Faculty Affairs Office for Faculty Affairs, HMS

Robert Barbieri, MD Chair , Department of Obstetrics , Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, BWH Kate Macy Ladd Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Yvonne Lee, MD Department of Medicine, BWH Assistant Professor of Medicine, HMS

BWH – CFDD ‐ January 27, 2012 Mary C. Walsh, PhD Assistant Dean for Faculty Affairs Harvard Medical School

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Promotion to Assistant Professor at  Harvard Medical School 

• Instructor: “Promise” • Assistant Professor: “Demonstrated Promise” • Reputation may be “within the walls” of HMS and the local community  only

• Associate Professor: “Promise Realized” • Broader reputation outside the local area (usually national) • Significant accomplishments since promotion to assistant professor

• Professor: “Extraordinary Accomplishment”

HMS OFA - 2011

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Faculty Ranks at HMS

HMS OFA - 2011

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Creating a Promotion Profile

• • • • • •

Scholarship Reputation (Local for Assistant Professor) Role in teaching and training Evidence of developing leadership/independence Citizenship and Character Letters of evaluation

BWH 04/11/11

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Key Components of the Evaluation

• • • • • • •

How do I spend my time currently? What is the basis of my reputation? What is the focus of my scholarship? When I am invited to speak, what is the topic that I am asked to address? How do I see my role? What is the part of my work that makes me tick? How does Department leadership see my role?

HMS OFA - 2011

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Questions to Consider in Selecting Criteria for Promotion

© Dr. Mary Walsh, Havard Medical School

http://facultypromotions.hms.harvard.edu/

http://cv.hms.harvard.edu/ 

HMS OFA - 2011

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

HMS OFA - 2011

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

http://facultypromotions.hms.harvard.edu/

HMS OFA - 2011

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

HMS OFA - 2011

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Clinical Expertise and Innovation Example Metrics 

Assistant Professor 

a strong local reputation as an expert in a clinical field with a leadership role and/or a key role in activities that influence practice, such as approaches to diagnosis, treatment or prevention of disease, applications of technology to clinical care and/or development or local adoption of innovative models of care delivery, first author scholarship related to the clinical field

BWH 1.14.11

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Areas of Excellence

Teaching and Educational Leadership Example Metrics 

Assistant Professor  Strong local reputation as an active and highly effective teacher with increasing involvement and responsibility over time in developing models of teaching/teaching programs, educational materials developed by the candidate and have been adopted locally (scholarship may be blended at this level)

BWH 1.14.11

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Areas of Excellence

Investigation Example Metrics 

Assistant Professor 

a strong local reputation for contributions to research with an identified research focus or area of expertise, scholarship which most often includes publications on which the candidate is first author; may also be in another authorship position on publications from collaborative research to which he/she has made documented, substantive intellectual contributions, generally has some funding to conduct research, though not necessarily as principal investigator

BWH 1.14.11

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Areas of Excellence

• Committee established in 1999 • Promotion for faculty who have been instructors for at  least 10 years • Evidence of substantial contributions and growth as a  Clinician‐Teacher • Teaching • Clinical practice and care • Citizenship/Leadership

• No requirement for written scholarship • No requirement for external letters of evaluation (need 3  internal or external)

HMS OFA - 2011

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Promotion to Assistant Professor:  Longer Service Criteria

Institution Departmental Process

HMS Department Executive Committee

HMS Submission to Faculty Affairs Review by P&R Committee

University Review by the Provost

Governing Boards

Review by the Dean

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Assistant Professor Promotion  Process

• Letter from the Department Chair • Educational background and training • Contributions as a researcher, teacher, clinician, administrative leader • http://facultypromotions.hms.harvard.edu/docs/Department_Head_Letter_for_Appoint ment_Promotion_Proposal_asst_assoc.doc

• Approval of the Department Executive Committee • CV in the Harvard format • http://cv.hms.harvard.edu/

• Letters of evaluation/support • Obtained by the Division Chief or Department Chair • http://facultypromotions.hms.harvard.edu/docs/Eval_requests_from_Dept_head.doc • http://facultypromotions.hms.harvard.edu/docs/Evaluation_letter_requirements.pdf

• Self‐selected best scholarly contributions (e.g., research, reviews, etc.) • For Assistant Professor – 2 selections • Represent your area of excellence (your focus and impact) • no scholarship submission needed for Longer Service packages

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

What arrives at the Medical School?

• HMS sends a letter to the faculty member  • Promotion material has been received • Expected timeline for review  • COMING SOON – Milestones site – anticipated Spring 2012 

• Review of the CV to be sure the format is correct and the  essential information is present and clear • Department is contacted if changes needed

• Search material present if needed (determined with Department) • Confirm the number/ types of letters are appropriate

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Review in the Office for Faculty Affairs

• There are 2 P&R committees (AM & PM)  • Meet each month • Each committee composed of about 20‐30 professors from across HMS • Representative from each HMS Dept. on agenda attends the meeting (generally the chair of HMS Executive Committee) • Longer Service committee is a Subcommittee of the P&R committee – meets every other month – all cases discussed

• Three reviewers from a different department and institution • Pre‐approved or selected for discussion at the P&R meeting • If case selected for discussion: • Comments by a Department Representative • Committee discussion and vote

• All aspects of this process are confidential  • Recommendation advisory to the Dean 

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

P&R Process for Review of Candidates

• Sent to the Provost for review • Once approved by the Provost , the Department Head is  notified • generally 4‐6 weeks following P&R meeting • appointment is considered ‘official’ once the Department Head is  notified

• Department notifies the candidate • Letter from the University 

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Final Steps



http://www.fa.hms.harvard.edu/  The Office for Faculty Affairs at Harvard Medical School



http://facultypromotions.hms.harvard.edu/  Overview of all ‘Area(s) of Excellence’  Create “customized” criteria for rank and activities  Format your CV using templates and detailed instruction guide  http://cv.hms.harvard.edu/



Dedicated e‐mail and phone line for questions  E‐mail: [email protected]  Phone: 617‐432‐7112

BWH Resources 

BWH Center for Faculty Development and Diversity (CFDD)   

(p) 617‐525‐7646 (e) [email protected] (w) http://www.brighamandwomens.org/medical_professionals/career/cfdd/default.aspx

HMS OFA - 2011

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

HMS Resources

Demystifying the Promotion Process: Promotion to Assistant Professor

Demystifying Promotions at HMS Instructor to Assistant Professor

The Process Perspective: Steps For Promotion Bob Barbieri [email protected]

The Artist, The Portfolio, The Curator • You- the creative artist. • The Harvard CV- a summary of your portfolio of work • Faculty advocate- The Curator

The Portfolio The Curator’s Perspective

Your Portfolio The Curator’s Perspective • The portfolio of every individual is extremely complex and embedded in a broader context. • Many hours of contemplation and analysis are necessary to fully appreciate the beauty, meaning and connectivity of each portfolio. • The same portfolio may be perceived in many different ways. Differences of opinion may occur. • Think deeply about an individual’s portfolio, its many facets, and help others to understand the meaning of the case.

• How would you advise an Instructor as they begin the process of building a regional and national reputation?

Developing a Regional (and then National) Reputation • Focused area of excellence • Scholarly writing and speaking- A Novel Idea can go viral. • Citations of work • H-index (Google Gadget, Web of Science)

• • • •

Networking National societies, national meetings Consensus conferences (NIH, initial review groups)

Developing the Portfolio • • • • •

Creativity- Novel approaches and insights. Protected time to develop a body of work. Fiscal support. Surrounding support-systems. Mentors. – Lois Zachary- The Mentor’s GuideFacilitating Effective Learning Relationships

The Portfolio- The Harvard CV and the Outside Letters • Take the time to carefully develop the Harvard CV. • Focus on completing the Teaching and Training section. This section includes lists of formally supervised trainees and local, regional, national and international invited teaching and presentations. • Begin to reflect on people who could be asked to write about your promotion.

Promotion Checklist • Annual faculty review – Update CV in HMS format – Discuss timing of next promotion

• • • • •

Professional development plan Defined goals and milestones Mentors and guides Feedback and advice from multiple sources. Check a citation index to see the impact of your work.

Appendix

Investigator • • • • • • • • •

Creative, novel and high-impact ideas. Identifiable research focus. Relative independence from mentors. Basic, clinical, population, method science. Publication of first author, data-based original research that contributes new knowledge. Extramural, peer-reviewed funding. Evidence of teaching. Invitations to speak locally, regionally, etc. Participation in IRB committee.

Clinical Expertise and Innovation • Creative, novel and high-impact ideas. • Strong local reputation as a clinical expert. • Publication of first author original research related to area of expertise, may also involve reviews and chapters. • Developing and implementing the use of new approaches to understanding pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of a medical problem. • Invitations to speak locally, regionally, etc. • Role in professional organizations. • Participate in the development of clinical algorithms, guidelines. • Peer reviewer for high impact journals. • Extramural funding.

Longer Service • 10 years of service at the rank of Instructor. • Significant and sustained contributions to the teaching mission. • Didactic teaching of students, trainees and peers. • Mentorship. • Administrative leadership role in teaching. • Education role in professional organization. • Service on education committees.

Teaching and Supporting Activities • Teaching and Education • Significant Supporting activities – Clinical expertise – Investigation – Education of patients and service to the community. – Administration and institutional service.

Overview • Academic promotion is an important recognition and milestone that is part of a continuous process of personal and professional development. • Portfolio development. The Harvard CV. • Recognized area of excellence and focus. • Develop a local and regional, and then a national reputation. • Nurture regional and national senior academic relationships. • Work that you love. Patience and persistence. • Mentoring, guidance, support, resources, encouragement.

The Experience Perspective: Top 10 Tips for Success

YVONNE LEE, MD, MMSC ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF MEDICINE DIVISION OF RHEUMATOLOGY, IMMUNOLOGY AND ALLERGY JANUARY 27, 2012

#1: Start now  Never too early to familiarize yourself with the

process and the criteria  Never too early to set goals

#2: Know the criteria  “Strong local reputation”

Depends on your department/division  Depends on area of excellence  First author publications – no set number  Funding – no set amount 

#3: Take the initiative  Don’t wait for your mentors or division chief to tell

you when you are ready  Make an appointment  Tell them it’s on your mind  Tell them it’s important to you  Ask them to clarify criteria  Set timeline

#4. Follow the directions  Detailed instructions on Harvard Medical School

Office for Faculty Affairs: 

http://www.fa.hms.harvard.edu/administratorresources/appointment-and-promotion/promotion-policies

 Specific instructions for BWH Medicine on the

Department of Medicine Intranet: 

http://www.bwh-medicine.org/Default.aspx?page_id=50

#5: Learn from those who came before  Ask colleagues if they are willing to share their

materials  Ask colleagues for advice

#6: Highlight the significance and innovation  Annotated bibliography 

How do you choose? Preferably first author  Quality of the journal (doesn’t have to be NEJM, Science, Nature or JAMA)  Science citation index  “Thematic link” to your niche 



What gap is filled by the information in this paper?



Does filling this gap have a direct clinical impact? If not, how does filling this gap lead you closer to the impact?

#7: Select referees carefully  Consider  How well they know you/can advocate for you  Response time/Reliability (especially since you’re not supposed to contact them)  Rank (should at least be an assistant professor, preferably associate professor or full professor)  Provide the maximum number of names possible

#8: But don’t fixate on impartial referees  Think about people you’ve met at conferences, heard

you talk, etc.  Ask mentors, division chief for recommendations.  It’s not so much how well these people know you.

It’s more the impression you made and how much these people support junior investigators.

#9: Stay involved and participate  When materials are returned for edits/input, address

them right away  Keep track of your progress  Credentialing Appointments and Promotions System (CAPS)  If forward motion seems stagnant, contact the

Promotions Administrator for your Department 

It’s a fine line between being assertive and pestering

#10: Enjoy the ride!

SPECIAL THANKS TO MY DIVISION CHIEF, MENTORS AND SUPPORTERS!!!

Michael Brenner Beth Karlson Dan Solomon Jon Coblyn Michael Weinblatt Simon Helfgott

Suggest Documents