Best-Practice Sharing: Sales Performance & Incentive Compensation Management

Best-Practice Sharing: Sales Performance & Incentive Compensation Management Alexandra Hartung, Solution Sales Representative Gaston Russi, Sales Mana...
Author: Sara Brauer
3 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size
Best-Practice Sharing: Sales Performance & Incentive Compensation Management Alexandra Hartung, Solution Sales Representative Gaston Russi, Sales Manager Austria and Switzerland

© 2013 IBM Corporation

Agenda

2

1

Heutige Vorgehensweisen

2

SPM Technologie Benefits

3

IBM Cognos SPM - Lösungselemente

4

Unterscheidungsmerkmale

5

Best Practices

6

Kundenreferenz TCS

nf u uk Z n. e nk e rd e Qu

en k n e l t

Wie wird Sales Performance Management (SPM) heute betrieben?

Eigenentwicklung (22%) Excelsheets (54%)

Kommerzielle Software (14%) Manuell (7%) Unbekannt (3%)

3 Slide 3

Warum sich Unternehmen für SPM entscheiden

Effizienz & Genauigkeit

4

Strategieumsetzung

Risikominimierung

Reduzieren von Fehlern

Implementieren neuer Pläne und Strategien

Interne Audits

Optimieren der Vertriebszyklen

Steuern des Verhaltens

Compliance

Ersetzen veralteter Technologien

Mergers & Acquisitions

Regulatorisches

Slide 4

Effizienz und Genauigkeit Effizienz & Genauigkeit

Warum sich Unternehmen für SPM entscheiden

Effizienz & Genauigkeit

6

Strategieumsetzung

Risikominimierung

Reduzieren von Fehlern

Implementieren neuer Pläne und Strategien

Interne Audits

Optimieren der Vertriebszyklen

Steuern des Verhaltens

Compliance

Ersetzen veralteter Technologien

Mergers & Acquisitions

Regulatorisches

Slide 6

Cognos Sales Performance Management — Lösungselemente Incentive Compensation

 Dokumentation und Kommunikation der Vergütungsmodelle

 Steuerung von

Freigabeprozessen

Channel Management

Territory Management

Quota Management

 Für den Eigen- und

 Verwalten der

 Planung pro

 Verwaltung der

 Gebietszuweisung,

Fremdvertrieb Verträge

Hierarchien

permanent & temporär

Partner, Team, Region, Produkt, Kanal

 Quoten

Neuzuordnungen

ERP 7

CRM

Other

HR

BI

Unterscheidungsmerkmale der IBM Lösung Business oriented Konfigurieren vs. programmieren Visueller Comp Design Ansatz Zugriff über Web

Integrated Solution Kalkulations-Engine, Workflow, Reporting, etc. Flexibles Datenmodell Nachweisbare CRM & ERP Integration

Business Flexibility

Performance & Scalability

Adressierung sich ändernder Anforderungen

Insbesondere für hohe Transanktionsanzahl– Importe, Kalkulationen etc.

Simulation und schnelle Umsetzung Commissions, MBOs, long term incentives etc.

8

Cloud oder on premise deployments 10 – 350.000 payees 1.500.000.000 Transaktionen / Monat

Weitere mögliche Schritte im Thema SPM  Workshop von 14.00 – 14.35 Uhr im Raum 3.9  Vor-Ort-Präsentation / Industriespezifisches best-practice sharing  Kundenindividuelle Demo    

Mit Ihren Incentive Plänen Ihren Transaktionsdaten/ Produkten und Dienstleistungsinformationen Ihren Vertriebsgebieten / -hierarchien Ihrem CRM

„Wer nichts verändern will, wird auch das verlieren, was er bewahren möchte.“ Gustav Heinemann

9

It’s not just about Sales

Drivers Incentive Plan •Route efficiency (units per hour) •Customer satisfaction •Safety (hurdle for participation)

Incenting based on controllable profits

“a lot of things that go into that profit margin are outside of the territory manager’s control… such as the cost of raw materials” “But they can have an immediate impact on profitability by focusing on pricing” “Now that we have moved to a net-based sales plan a territory manager can see a direct relationship between his behavior and the amount of his check.” Carla Clark, Project Manager for Commissions

Enabling a business model change

New head of sales redesigned compensation to help the rental company become “more sales-friendly” Customers formerly had to rely on a different sales rep for every line of business, from corporate sales to tours Now customers “can get everything done through one salesperson” Lynn Ferrara, Sr Director of compensation and HRIS

12

Enabling a business model change

Enabling a business model change

Payout process reduced from

2 weeks to 2 days

14

Flexibility to Adapt to Changes

“Our legacy process… did not have the flexibility to change our incentive compensation plans mid-year, but now with Varicent, we have significant flexibility.”

15

Vorstellung der Kundenreferenz TCS

16

Backup

Sales Performance Management Process

Strategy & Plan Design

Plan Setup & Administration

Compensation Processing

Reporting, Analysis & Correction

Sales Strategy

Quota Administration

Compensation Calculations

Results vs Objectives

Sales Coverage Model

Hierarchies

Credit Assignment

Earnings Estimation

Incentive Measures

Territory Definitions

Payment

Forecasting & Modeling

Budgeting

Crediting Rules

Dispute Resolution

Audit Trail

Territory Optimization

Plan Distribution

Adjustments

Coaching

Slide 18

Architektur Cognos SPM

Cognos ICM Adminstrationskonsole

WEB Browser - Front-End für Anwender - Desktop / Mobil)

• Entwicklung • Anpassungen • Betriebsführung

WEB Applikation Server - Apache Tomcat / Websphere / JBOSS - Server für alle Anwender-Interaktionen

Database Server (Microsoft SQL Server) - Speicherung Repository der Applikation - Speicherung der Anwendungsdaten

Integration von Cognos ICM in die etablierte Systemlandschaft ERP • Informationen über Verkaufsabschlüsse • Zielerreichungen • Produktinformationen • Mitarbeiterinformationen • Quoten (falls nötig)

Cognos ICM - Operativ -

ERP HRIS

CRM

• Exakte Berechnung von commissions (jährlich) und incentives (unterjährig) in Abhängigkeit vom Produktverkauf • Berechnung des übrigen Budgets für mögliche incentives • Anpassung von incentives in Abhänigigkeit von ihrem Erfolgsbeitrag

optional

Cognos ICM - Dispositiv• Quota Management • Territory Management • Channel Management

BI

IBM Incentive Compensation Management (ICM) ist ein Hybrid System, das aus einem operativen Teil und einem dispositiven/ analytischen Teil besteht. Informationen und Ergebnisse können in existierende Systeme zurückgespielt werden.

Projekt Methodik Project Governance

Project Planning, Project Review, Budgetary Management, Issue and Risk Mitigation

Project stages

Deliverables

Project Scoping

Project Kickoff

Project Budgets

Functional & Technical Requirements

Project Staffing Executed Contracts

Training / Enablement

Design Specifications

Application Configuration

Test Plans

Unit Testing

Test Scripts

Deployment plan

Project Plan

User Acceptance Testing

Production initialization Parallel run Transition to client support

Shadow Activities Core Product Training

Shared Build Effort Advanced Product Training

Technical Governance

Systems Integration Testing

Solution Training End User Training

Phase Reviews, Best Practices, Scalability and Optimization

Seamless CRM Integration

 Single Sign-On to access SPM & CRM information from a single screen  Data synchronization is automated  Easy access to plan documents, team reports and quota & territory management tools

Varicent Successfully Integrates with SAP at Many Customers • Integration commonly needed to leverage transaction, people, product and quota data • SAP CRM • SAP HR / HCM / ECM • SAP Payroll • SAP FI • SAP BO • SAP BPC • Successfactors.com • Integration with SAP (ERP, R/3, BW, etc.) most often achieved via 2-stage process

Most Common Varicent-SAP Integration Approach

IT Owned • • • •

IT controlled Strict process No edit Optimized for realtime transaction processing

SAP SAP

24

Shared • Clear demarcation between systems • Multiple data sources • Data augmentation

Transactions Transactions Payees Payees Products Products etc. etc.

Business Owned • Comp and Sales team controlled • Flexible • Adjustable • Optimized for rules execution and summary creation Varicent Varicent

Extract from existing SAP ERP Integrations

Gartner MarketScope for Sales Performance Management (Published October 2012)

 “SAP ICM lacks considerable functionality to support client demand for feature-rich SPM.”

 Gartner has not seen strong movement from SAP to

support what best-of-breed vendors are doing to meet the needs of customers' objectives, quota management and coaching.

 The complexity of SAP often creates longer

implementation timelines than those for many of its ICM competitors.

 The level of effort to implement SAP ICM appears to be

significant for deployment. It has been noted that the user interface can be overly complicated. The amount of customization that some insurers choose to add into the system can also create expensive and time-consuming upgrades.

 Is only available for on-premises deployment

26

Suggest Documents