' AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE UHIV.lilRSITY OF MINNESOTA - - U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURE ST

,..-MAGR December GOVS MN 2000 MISC- 1955 1955 ~ ' AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE UHIV.lilRSITY OF MINNESOTA - - U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ...
Author: Arnold Kennedy
1 downloads 0 Views 953KB Size
,..-MAGR

December

GOVS MN 2000 MISC- 1955

1955

~

' AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE UHIV.lilRSITY OF MINNESOTA - - U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURE ST. PAUL 1 MINNESOTA W. H. Dankers, Extension Economist - Marketing F. L. Olson, Extension Marketing Assistant

I

RURAL LIVING I ll

M I li li lil S 0 T A County Data - 1954 Source of U. S. Census of Agriculture Index l.

Proportion of Full-time Farms in Each Cash Farm Income Group Higher Income Groups

2.

Proportion of Full-time Farms in Each Cash Farm Income Group Lower Income Group

).

Proportion of Farm Operators Doing 11 0ff the Farm 11 Work

4.

Proportion of Farm Operators Doing or More

5.

Proportion of Farms on Which the "Off the Farm" Income of the Operator or other Members of the Family Exceeded the Cash Farm Income

6.

Farms Having Electricity

?.

Farms Having a Home Freezer

8.

rarms Having Piped Running Water

9.

Farms Having a Telephone

10.

Jarms Having a Television Set

11

0ff the Farm 11 Work for 100 days

Figure 1 Note:

1.

There was a cash farm income of $5 0 000 or more on over half of the full-time farms in Minnesota in 1954.

2o

There was a cash farm income of $5,000 or more on a much larger proportion of the farms in Southern and Western Minnesota than in esota in 1954.

Northeaster~

Minn-

Proportion of Full-time Farms• in

.~ch

Cash Farm Income Group - 1954

Top Figure- Percent with an Income of ~5000 or more Bottom Figure -Percent with an Income of from $2,500 to $4,999 48 27

Minnesota $5,000 or more = 51.3 percent $2,500 to $4,999 ~ 24.5 percent

24

J4 ______ }!ITTSON

ROSEAU

42

10 26

35 MARSHALL

27/35 KOOCHICHIN(;

41 31

7 24 CLEARHATER

HA_IINOHEN

16 38

~10

10 26

25

38

CASS26

HUBBARD

13 32

CLAY

27 37

37

AITKIN

14 40

40

TODD

DOUGLAS

17 CARLTON

22 41

33

Higher Income Group

6 26

12 32

WADENA

OTTER TAIL

Figure 1

ITASCA

BECKER

GRANT

0

BELTRAHI

36

34 NORMAN

10

9 16

29

POLK

46

r-----i

12 43

Note:

Figure 2 for Lower Income Group

18 39 KANABEC

40 42

HILLE BENTON LACS

23 40

POPE

56 28

LINCOLN

LYON

64 24

67 24

80 14

HURRAY

COTTONWOOD

PIPESTONE

72 19

76 16

ROCK

NOBLeS



u ...~~r--Bamsey 32 18

GOODHUE

60

27

76 14 JACKSON

BLUe EARTH

82 13 HARTIN

82 13 FARISAIJtr

WASECA

STEELe

69 22 FReEBORN

DOOGE

OLMSTED

56 28 MOWeR

58 27

WINONA

53 28

FILLMORe

Includes only the regular family farms. Does not include public or private institutional farms, farms used primarily for residential purposes, and part-time farms. ~~r---------

Notes of explanation on opposite page.

Fignre 2 Note:

There was a cash farm income of under $2.500 on more than half of the full time farms in 12 counties of Northeastern Minnesota in 1954.

Proportion of Full-time Farms in EP.:ch Cash Farm Income Group - 19.54 Percent with an Income of Under ~2.500

25

so

Minnesota

22.2 percent

25 42 ROSEAU

23

64

65 62

KOOCHICHING

75 POL

20 NORMAN

40 HAHNOHE

CLEAR• HArEII

64 Lower Income Group

Note:

45

See Figure 1 for the Higher Income Groupe

STEAIINS

16

15

25 10

LYON

12 PIPESTONE

9 ROCK

~

9 HURRAY

8 NOBLES

5 COT TON

Suggest Documents