World Energy Outlook Pawel Olejarnik Energy Analyst 17 February 2010 © OECD/IEA - 2010
Mtoe
World primary energy demand by fuel in the Reference Scenario
18 000
Other renewables
16 000
Biomass
14 000
Hydro
12 000
Nuclear
10 000 8 000
Gas
6 000
Oil
4 000
Coal
2 000 0 1980
WEO-2008 total
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
Global demand grows by 40% between 2007 and 2030, with coal use rising most in absolute terms © OECD/IEA - 2009
Change in primary energy demand by fuel in the Reference Scenario, 20072007-2030 Coal
China
Oil
India
Gas
Other Asia
Nuclear
Middle East
Hydro
OECD
Other
Latin America Africa E. Europe/Eurasia - 500
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000 Mtoe
The increase in China’s demand for energy – for coal in particular – dwarfs that of all other countries & regions © OECD/IEA - 2009
World electricity generation by fuel in the Reference Scenario 2007
Oil
2015
Biomass
2030
Other renewables Nuclear Hydro Gas Coal 0
4 000
8 000
12 000
16 000 TWh
Power generation based on all types of energy except oil is projected to grow, with the biggest increases in absolute terms coming from coal- and gas-fired capacity © OECD/IEA - 2009
Number of people without access to electricity in the Reference Scenario (millions)
World population without access to electricity 2008: 1.5 billion people 2030: 1.3 billion people $35 billion per year more investment than in the Reference Scenario would be needed to 2030 – equivalent to just 5% of global power-sector investment – to ensure universal access © OECD/IEA - 2009
mb/d
Oil production in the Reference Scenario 120
NGLs
Unconventional oil
100
Crude oil – fields yet to be developed or found Crude oil – currently producing fields
80
60 40 20
0 2000
2008
2030
Sustained investment is needed mainly to combat the decline in output at existing fields, which will drop by almost two-thirds by 2030 © OECD/IEA - 2009
tcm
Impact of decline on world natural gas production in the Reference Scenario
5
100%
4
80%
Currently producing fields
3
60%
Share from fields not yet producing (right axis)
2
40%
1
20%
0
0% 2007
2015
2020
2025
Fields yet to be developed or found
2030
Additional capacity of around 2 700 bcm, or 4 times current Russian capacity, is needed by 2030 – half to offset decline at existing fields & half to meet the increase in demand © OECD/IEA - 2009
bcm
US natural gas supply in the Reference Scenario 700
70%
Net imports
600
60%
Conventional
500
50%
400
40%
300
30%
200
20%
100
10%
0
Unconventional Share of unconventional in total supply
0%
1990 1995 2000 2005 2008 2015 2020 2025 2030
Thanks mainly to shale gas, US gas output grows gradually through to 2030, outstripping demand & squeezing imports © OECD/IEA - 2009
bcm
Natural gas transportation capacity
800
73%
700 600 500
Unutilised LNG liquefaction & pipeline capacity LNG trade
88%
Pipeline trade
400
% Capacity utilisation rate
300
200 100 0 2007
2015
A glut of gas is developing – reaching 200 bcm by 2015 – due to weaker than expected demand & plentiful US unconventional supply, with far-reaching implications for gas pricing © OECD/IEA - 2009
Billion dollars (2008)
Average annual expenditure on net imports of oil & gas in the Reference Scenario 600
1971-2008 2%
500
2008-2030 % Share of GDP
2%
400
3%
300 200
1%
100
3%
1%
6% 3%
2% 1%
3%
0 European Union
United States
China
Japan
India
0.4%
ASEAN
The Reference Scenario implies persistently high spending on oil & gas imports, with China overtaking the United States by around 2025 to become the world's biggest spender © OECD/IEA - 2009
The policy mechanisms in the 450 Scenario A combination of policy mechanisms, which best reflects nations’
varied circumstances & negotiating positions We differentiate on the basis of three country groupings > OECD+: OECD & other non-OECD EU countries > Other Major Economies (OME): Brazil, China, Middle East, Russia & South Africa > Other Countries (OC): all other countries, including India
A graduated approach > Up to 2020, only OECD+ have national emissions caps > After 2020, Other Major Economies are also assumed to adopt emissions caps > Through to 2030, Other Countries continue to focus on national measures
Emissions peaking by 2020 will require > A CO2 price of $50 per tonne for power generation & industry in OECD+ > Investment needs in non-OECD countries of $200 billion in 2020, supported by OECD+ through carbon markets & co-financing © OECD/IEA - 2009
Mtoe
World primary energy demand by fuel in the 450 Scenario
4 500 4 000
36% 32%
3 500
28%
3 000
24%
2 500
20%
2 000
16%
1 500
12%
1 000
8%
500
4%
0 1990
Coal Oil Gas Nuclear Hydro Biomass Other renewables Share of zero-carbon fuels (right axis)
0% 2000
2010
2020
2030
In the 450 Scenario, demand for fossil fuels peaks by 2020, and by 2030 zero-carbon fuels make up a third of the world's primary sources of energy demand © OECD/IEA - 2009
Trillion dollars (2008)
Cumulative OPEC oil export revenues by scenario
28 24 20 16 12 8 4 0 Reference Scenario
1985-2007
450 Scenario
2008-2030
Though slightly lower than in the Reference Scenario, OPEC revenues in the 450 Scenario are over four times as high as in the last 20 years © OECD/IEA - 2009
Gt
World abatement of energyenergy-related CO2 emissions in the 450 Scenario 42 Reference Scenario
40
World abatement by technology, 2030
38 OECD+ 36 34
13.8 Gt 3.8 Gt
32
OME Renewables & biofuels - 23%
30 OC
28
26 2007 2010
Efficiency - 57%
CCS - 10%
450 Scenario 2015
2020
2025
Nuclear - 10%
2030
An additional $10.5 trillion of investment is needed in total in the 450 Scenario, with measures to boost energy efficiency accounting for most of the abatement through to 2030 © OECD/IEA - 2009
TWh
Incremental world electricity production in the Reference and 450 Scenarios, 20072007-2030 7 000
Reference Scenario
6 000
450 Scenario
5 000 4 000 3 000 2 000
1 000 0 -1 000 Coal
Gas
Oil
Nuclear Hydro Wind Biomass Solar Other renewables
Renewables, nuclear and plants fitted with CCS account for around 60% of electricity generation globally in 2030 in the 450 Scenario, up from less than one-third today © OECD/IEA - 2009
100%
250
80%
200
205 60%
150
40%
100
125 90
20% 0%
Grammes per kilometre
Share of sales
World passenger vehicle sales & average new vehicle CO2 intensity in the 450 Scenario
Electric vehicles Plug-in hybrids Hybrid vehicles ICE vehicles CO2 intensity of new vehicles (right axis)
50
0 2007
2020
2030
Improvements to the internal combustion engine & the uptake of next-generation vehicles & biofuels lead to a 56% reduction in new-car emission intensity by 2030 © OECD/IEA - 2009
1 200
Other Countries
1 000
Other Major Economies
800
OECD+
Financing in 2020
600
With OECD+ co-financing of 50% of non-OECD investment
400 200 0 2015
2020
2025
2030
$ billion (2008)
Billion dollars (2008)
Additional investment in the 450 Scenario relative to the Reference Scenario
400
300
Non-OECD Non-OECD
200 100 0
OECD+ OECD+
2020
The 450 Scenario sees $10.5 trillion of additional investment to the Reference Scenario, costing 0.5% of GDP in 2020 and 1.1% of GDP in 2030 © OECD/IEA - 2009
The benefits of the 450 Scenario Avoiding the worst impacts of climate change
Lower energy bills for consumers: in industry, transport & buildings
fuel costs are reduced by a total of $8.6 trillion between 2010 and 2030, compared to additional investment of $8.3 trillion > Savings in transport alone account for $6.2 trillion
Energy-security benefits and reduced oil & gas imports > For OECD countries, oil imports are 6 mb/d lower in 2030 than in 2008 > In China & India, oil imports are around 10% and 15% lower, respectively, by 2030 than in the Reference Scenario; China's gas imports are 23% lower by 2030
Sharp reduction in air pollution relative to the Reference Scenario > In 2030, SO2 emissions are 29% lower than in the Reference Scenario; NOx emissions are 19% lower & emissions of particulate matter 9% lower
© OECD/IEA - 2009
42 Reference Scenario
40
Gt
Gt
World abatement of energyenergy-related CO2 emissions in the 450 Scenario 35
Reference Scenario Current Pledges
33
38 31
36
450 Scenario
34
13.8 Gt
29
3.8 Gt
32
27 2007
2010
2015
2020
30 28
26 2007 2010
450 Scenario 2015
2020
2025
2030
Current pledges point direction but further efforts would be needed to reach the 450 Scenario © OECD/IEA - 2009
Conclusions Meeting a 450 Scenario is achievable but requires a wholesale
transformation of the way we produce & use energy The investment needs are substantial, but there would be major
benefits through fuel savings, enhanced energy security & reduced pollution – as well as reduced climate change Financial support holds the key, as many of the abatement options
are in non-OECD countries Natural gas can play a key role as a bridge to a cleaner energy future The challenge is enormous – but it can and must be met > Improved energy efficiency & technology deployment are critical > Each year of delay adds $500 billion to mitigation costs © OECD/IEA - 2009