WISCONSIN COUNTY SURVEYORS ASSOCIATION, INC. Minutes of the WCSA March 8, 2013, Board of Directors Meeting Clark County Courthouse, Neillsville, Wisconsin Board of Directors attending: Emily Pierce Marathon County Bryan Meyer La Crosse County Steve Geiger Polk County Wade Pettit Clark County Peter Kuen Fond du Lac County Jason Towne Burnett County Bruce Bowden Iowa County WCSA Members attending: Jim Hebert Outagamie County Tony Dallman Lincoln County Dave Johnson Outagamie County Todd Maki Iron County Brian Halling St. Croix County Gary Dechant Juneau/Monroe Counties

President Emily Pierce called the meeting to order at 10:00 a. m. Introductions were made and additions to the agenda were asked for. Bruce Bowden mentioned a couple items which were added under “B”, ‘Legislation 710.13’ and “C”, ‘An Abbreviation Question: HHDS’ under 11. Other Business.” Motion was made by Bryan Meyer to approve the November 2, 2012, Board of Directors meeting minutes. Second by Bruce Bowden. Motion carried. Secretary's Report: Corrections were made to the minutes for the November 5, 2012 WCSA Board of Directors meeting and the minutes were done for the January, 2013 WCSA Annual Membership Meeting. Some changes were made to the directory and an agenda for the March 8 meeting prepared. Correspondence, calls and email were handled. Treasurer’s Report: Steve Geiger gave the Treasurer’s report which showed a balance of $1,002.87 in the checking account and $4,300.09 in the savings account. The expenditures since January were $1471. He reported the dues collected so far for 2013 to be $2800. Steve will have a list of which counties have paid their dues and which have not at the May BOD meeting. Steve also welcomed Todd Maki County Surveyor from Iron County. Motion by Bryan Meyer to approve the secretary’s and the treasurer’s reports. Second by Peter Kuen. Motion carried.

Tom Carlson Joe Nelson Mike Romportl Mark Teuteberg Ted Dumke Dan Pleoger Tim Jeatran Dave Tlusty Brenda Hemstead John Ellingson Diane Arendt Terry Lueschow Chet Nowaczyk Jessica Sandry Glen Schaefer

Dunn County Buffalo/Trempealeau Counties Oneida County Oconto County Dodge County Sawyer County Jackson County Langlade County State Cartographer’s Office NGS WisDOT Seiler Instrument Pipe ‘n Sticks Vernon Co. Land Info. Council

Correspondence: Emily read a forwarded email that had been sent to Frank Thousand requesting help from WSLS by Shawano County regarding getting a County Surveyor in place. Emily answered the email and expressed willingness to help being that Marathon is an adjoining county. Mark volunteered to help as well.

EDUCATION SEGMENT NGS Advisor Report, John Ellingson: John passed out a map of Height Mod and brought us up to date on what is happening regarding the NGS adjustment. John explained that now we have moved on to Geoid 12A and a new adjustment, DOT has volunteered to hire a contractor to recompute the vertical GPS work so that they can get new ellipsoid derived elevations based on the new 2011 adjustment. So when you look up data sheets, and if you are in 1 through 6A, you will have a Geoid 12A derived orthometric height determined. Phases 6B through 7B in the Northwest: in this area, DOT was able to get the project together for the primary work and get it to NGS before the cutoff of last November 2011. So the primary in that area is a 2011 value when you look at the data sheet. If you look at the secondary, it is a 2007 adjustment because this came in that window where there was the cut off. While this is going, NGS had to make the decision...do we put it all on the shelf and not make them available or do we adjust them so the surveyors can use them? And that is what they decided to do, they took all the projects that came in after the November 11 deadline, they still went into the data base and they still were processed and adjusted. Of course the 2011 adjustment wasn’t yet available, so they only thing those projects could be constrained to was the 2007 values. To summarize: in

Wisconsin County Surveyors Association March 2013 Board of Directors Meeting Minutes

1

that northwest area, primary networks is in 2011 and the secondary networks right now are 2007 so there is a slight inconsistency you will have to deal with if you are using the 2 marks. John said the difference is very small but he wanted people to be aware if it. He has NGS/DOT meetings coming up and he hopes that very soon it will be resolved, that the whole area will be all be 2011 and consistent and in Geoid 12A, possibly even in April or May. He said that you need to be sure you are using matching ellipsoid and geoids.

through targeted investment in the form of WLIP strategic initiative grants. They realize that a good chunk of that money would go to surveying so that more accurate parcel maps are possible.

Peter mentioned that a concern he had heard is that DOA will do a plan without input from County Surveyors, Register of Deeds and LIO’s in which a new state system would be imposed, throwing away what has already been accomplished, starting from scratch by sending out state employees to do everything over. This is very far from John checked on the progress on the Transformation Tool. Peter’s intention...not something he would ever think about It is the major and possibly the only assigned project for doing. He foresees a planning process that is yet to kick off this year so NGS is serious about getting it done. which would be very inclusive and reach out to the county level and municipal level to figure out how the systems DOA - Peter Herried - Governor’s Initiative and what it work there and how we can best target investment at the means to County Surveyors: This presentation and local level and how we can best integrate and export what discussion was done via a conference call. He gave us has been and is being done in digital parcel data sets over some background information. This interest somewhat into a statewide system. They are looking for local originated with the Deer Trustees. James Crow, an expert expertise. The major challenge with this is not technical, it from Texas was hired to advise the governor on DNR deer is institutional. It is data sharing, building relationships hunting regulations. He came up here and did an with counties and local municipalities which may be independent study of basic state deer herd management and skeptical of a state top down approach. They would like to in the process, he identified severe deficiencies with follow what has been done the last 20 years with the WLIP Wisconsin’s state wide GIS. The deficiencies were partly and keep the bottom up approach but get a better return on the very out of date land cover layer and lack of a statewide the investment in the local level though the form of a state parcel system. So that lead to a couple of initiatives in the wide GIS system. governor’s budget. This is not only good for deer hunting (which is now a smaller part of it) there is a whole range of Mark Teuteberg expressed support for the project but reasons for creating a statewide digital parcel map cautioned that counties without a County Surveyor may including other layers such as flood plain, land use, need education and assistance so that they do not use a emergency response/services and just more efficient bidding process that may not yield the best results and governmental services. suggested WCSA could assist. Peter agreed that this was an important point. During the training process for the Peter described the information needed to develop an statewide digital parcel map, representative from the effective GIS system requiring a lot of information WCSA should be included. DOA has been charged with including on the ground surveying, based on PLSS creating an implementation plan which would be done by remonumentation. He understands digital parcel maps are local offices and state agency staff working together. How only as good as the coordinates that mark the correct points this will be done has not been determined yet. on the map. Mike Romportl asked about the earliest availability of the This has become a priority of the governor’s and he put it $100,000 base budget grant that WLIA and LION are in his budget. To make this useful, investment needs to be endorsing if it were to be approved. Peter said that it would made at the county level so we have better data to integrate depend on the language in the bill if it passes. It wasn’t in into a statewide map. A lot of the counties that have the budget bill and the administration has not taken a stance inaccurate mapping, or parcel mapping only on paper are on this or said what the timeline for base budget grants counties that have lacked funding in the past which are might be if that were part of the budget bill or separate mostly ‘base budget’ counties. Peter mentioned a wide legislation. Mike asked about the collection of the disparity in current funding methods, leaving counties such redaction fee not reaching a workable amount until 2015. as Rusk, Florence, Buffalo and other areas in western and For the bulk of the funding, all 72 counties will be sending northern counties of Wisconsin far behind. Counties such $5 in to the state for each document recorded but before as Dane, Waukesha, Brown, Milwaukee or bottom half of then some funding will be coming in because already the counties which are base budget eligible receive only Washington, Burnett and Washburn are not collecting the about 15% of the retained revenue that comes in to the fee. Next year it would be 8 or 10 counties that would not Register of Deeds document recording fees. So they would be collecting the fee so there would be a little bit of funding like to bring counties in need up to a higher state standard with the bulk of the funding coming in 2015. Mike asked Wisconsin County Surveyors Association March 2013 Board of Directors Meeting Minutes

2

about how the $2 coming into the program would be administered during the 2013-2015 budget cycle. They should be going out as WLIP grants is Peter’s hope either as base budget or strategic initiative grants. Mike asked about the status of monies for 2013 that has not been released yet. Peter said those grants have not been announced yet and will likely not be announced until the budget passes. They are hoping to get them out this year.

Steve said there is going to be a summit meeting including many different organizations including other land professionals such as the realtors. This will help to know who will support the bill and what problems some groups may have with the bill.

Concern was expressed on 2013 grants and it was pointed out that what is intended and what actually happens are 2 different things. If the law becomes $100,000 base budget Emily asked if there anything that will be put into place that grant and $1000 education grant, it doesn't mean that it is going to prevent these funds from being lapsing. Peter comes off the top first. Also, we need to be concerned said that there is no guarantee on lapses. He said that is about how the county uses grant money to be sure it is used why they want to get this planning process going as soon as for land information modernization and also that it does not possible. It is easier to make the case for all these grants get used where levy dollars were used previously. There when we can show we are working toward a tangible end needs to be some controls set on these grants. An example product and there is tangible progress toward that end would be that if a county did not have a County Surveyor, product. they could use the grant money to pay for that position. However, if a county had a County Surveyor being paid for Mark asked what Peter envisioned as a working group to with levy dollars, they could not take those levy dollars and allocate funds to get the parcel mapping done. Peter said use them to ‘buy squad cars’ and then pay for the County that WCSA will definitely be part of the discussion as will Surveyor with grant money. ROD’s and LIO’s and the money will go out to a broad base of counties. Specifics can not be given yet though. For the legislation to be successful, it must be carefully thought out. Previous disappointments with the state need Peter will be coming to Clark County to do some to be remembered to avoid future problems even though we remonumentation with Wade and he would like to visit are working with a different group who are reaching out to some other counties, as time allows, to get examples of the us, and caution must be used with the counties as well. creation of digital parcel mapping to help to get a sense of Even though mistakes were made and some low quality the whole process. He is interested in observing work done, we need to be careful with our criticism and try remonumentation in other counties if he can fit it into other to work toward improved outcomes. work trips so invitations are welcome. Mark pointed out the importance of educating your county A question was asked about counties that are already parcel board...that there will be generation 1, 2 and 3 etc. maps as mapped but they are based on 40’s and inaccurate information and technology moves ahead. Example would information. Peter said part of the process is to set a be not stopping at the WPA maps because the mapping was standard of quality accuracy (yet to be defined) and they “done.” will want to invest in bringing them up to the desired level of accuracy. Discussion continued on the handling of grant money with the endorsement of supporting a non lapsing clause in the Mike asked if examples of where some LIO’s have stitched legislation to keep the funds for their intended use. These together parcel maps and also the work done by the State types of assurances would help garner support for the Cartographer’s Office would be used as a model or would legislation. they be looking to build something independent of that? Peter said these are great models and there is a lot of respect The importance of the working group was pointed out by for the SCO and their GIS work which was identified in the Steve to help develop a good plan. Deer Trustees report. Comments and question would need to be sent to Bruce by Emily thanked Peter and then continued with an Issue Brief Friday, March 22 to take to the March 25th meeting. that was received from Ian Grasshoff, LION Chair, on the Budget Bill Amendment concerning Base Budget and Education Grants. Their proposal includes the $100,000 Wisconsin DOT, Diane Arendt: There are eleven new base budget grant and the educational grant going from stations that will be added to the network in NA2011 $300 to $1000. There was also a spread sheet showing two starting on March 10. (See information on page 7.) They scenarios, one with the LION amendment and the second are now working on getting agreements for bringing on out showing the numbers without the LION amendment. of state stations in Iowa, Minnesota and the UP.

Wisconsin County Surveyors Association March 2013 Board of Directors Meeting Minutes

3

Diane has been very active with training, putting on workshops and other outreach by attending a variety of meetings including doing a presentation with Elliot on the Wisconsin Height Mod program in Minnesota the following week. She is the WisDOT representative for the WIGICC Elevation Workgroup also.

groups and there is one for Wisconsin Land Surveyors. If you click on that link, it takes you to a page with a discussion forum. It may be beneficial if we got a gmail account specific to WCSA that might be called [email protected]. It could be shared between 2 of us so that we could forward out issues or inquiries to appropriate county surveyors. That is a way we could track A position paper with Minnesota and Michigan is being the types of issues we are dealing with and perhaps create worked on for submittal to the National Geodetic Survey on some FAQ’s or reports from these answers. Brenda keeping state owned RTNs administered by the state. suggested that this could be a way for us to communicate and to document our issues. Six new CORS stations are to be constructed after July 1 in the northwest and remaining monumentation is to be done Brenda went on to discuss the GIS inventory (RAMONA.) in Marinette, Oconto, Florence, Forest and Shawano This is a tool to measure the status of GIS data holdings of Counties beginning after June 1. GPS work and leveling the state, local and tribal governments. County LIO’s are coming up this summer for Vilas, Oneida, Forest and annually fill in the inventory as a requirement of the WLIP. Langlade counties. Since 2008, the SCO has administered the inventory and in 2009, DOA allowed the SCO to produce an extensive report After approvals from Tribal Government, monumentation on county GIS data systems. This year they are updating can begin in Menominee County this fall. The Monroe the Wisconsin specific inventory questions along with the CORS station is being destroyed because of improvements DOA and will be revising the 2009 report. If you would to the airport so a temporary station will be set up until a like to see the 2009 report, go to the Land Information replacement is constructed. Program on the DOA website. Back in August of last year, Brenda was asking about questions regarding the PLSS so Diane also mentioned that 7C positions in northwestern now those are the questions your LIO will be answering this Wisconsin are to be published soon. year. There was mention of a user fee in the budget bill but there were no details. There are 1700 users now but Diane did not have a break down between private and public users. Mike suggested that public entities could be exempted so the the fees are primarily covered by agricultural and road builders. It was suggested that the accounting for collecting a fee would be a horrendous head ache.

The questions are: How many corners were set in the Original Government Survey? What percent of your Original Government PLSS Corners have been perpetuated by original monument evidence? Remonumentation positions perpetuated by accessories? What percentage of the original PLSS corners have survey quality (50 parts per million or better) coordinates associated with their locations? What percentage of your PLSS corners have State Cartographer’s Office, Brenda Hemstead: Brenda digital tie sheet documents? Are your tie sheets accessible gave us some FYI information regarding the status of the on line? Of those PLSS corners with survey quality WCSA website. She spoke with Frank Thousand at WSLS coordinate values, what percent has been integrated into the about them hosting the WCSA web content. He was current version of the digital parcel maps? Indicate the type receptive. She learned from Frank later that they were of spatial index system your county uses for your PLSS experiencing some problems with their system. Volunteers corners ie Romportl, Land Net, Forest Service, none, handle the WSLS web site and they agree to support WCSA unknown or other (if other, explain)? How much do you but they are in a state of change so in the mean time Brenda estimate it would cost to complete remonumentation of the and the SCO will continue to host our website. So if you PLSS in your jurisdiction? Those are the 8 questions so if want to go to the WCSA website it is linked from WSLS or you want to give that information to your LIO to make it you can type in sco.wisc.edu/wcsa. possible for them to give better answers, this gives you an advance notice. Emily suggested adding the estimated time Brenda has been keeping it up for us, she has the agendas, to complete remonumentation as an additional question. minutes etc. all there. So if you want to refer back to anything, you can, including Bryan’s award winning Brenda then described their PLSS Pilot Project that they presentation. have been working on which they call the Wisconsin Land Survey Network. When they started this 9 county project Brenda asked the group if they were familiar with the their goal was to provide an accurate state wide website “landsurveyorunited.com.” If you select tools and representation, a geo spacial data set, of the PLSS based on resources on this site, it will take to you a page that you can approved coordinates that were provided by the 9 pilot click on forums, it gives you a page of lots of surveyor counties and integrated land net where local data was Wisconsin County Surveyors Association March 2013 Board of Directors Meeting Minutes

4

unavailable. Last year, they began testing a number of methods to adjust the data from various county models into a single state wide data model. They had hoped to employ automated data import processes, they learned along the way that it was easier to use a combination of manual and automated methods. As of January of this year, they have successfully imported approximately 5500 county PLSS section corners into the geodatabase. Brenda showed some example comparisons of the data and listed some of the things they learned. The next steps are to import township quarter sections and quarter-quarter section corners into the geodatabase. The pilot project will be complete this summer and then they will be making recommendations for subsequent phases which include land and polygon features. Brenda mentioned the schedule for the ortho business plan. She had a few things in the ‘coming soon’ category including Wisconsin View, a free download website; Lidar 5’ DEMs for 17 southern counties will soon be available. Brenda also congratulated County Surveyors who are winners: 1. Bryan Meyer won the first WLIA Best Presentation Award; 2. Mike Romportl won WLIA’s most prestigious award, the Alan H. Miller Service Award; 3. Mark Teuteberg was elected to the WLIA Board of Directors. Emily mentioned that she liked the idea of a gmail account and that we should maybe consider putting together a facebook page as well.

The next topic was concerning providing a workshop for new County Surveyors including a discussion on Map Reviews. The reason that topic was included here is that some guidelines may have to be developed to help separate what could be considered personal preferences being imposed by the County Surveyor or contracted map reviewer rather than what is stated in the Statutes or A-E 7. This may cause delays in recording maps or other difficulties so a clarification may be helpful in giving guidance as a part of the workshop. There were some experiences described by members that substantiated stories of inconsistencies. Another aspect is the liability of the person doing the checks. Emily said that Renee volunteered to be a part of the workshop. Going through the County Surveyor’s Handbook could be a structure for the workshop. Emily asked the group if doing such a workshop is something we want to do? Bryan said it is important to do but what forum would work and where would it take place? Bruce said that the WCSA quarterly meetings might be all that is needed for assisting County Surveyors. It was explained that the reason this topic came up was that there are quite a few new County Surveyors and it could be a helpful way to educate and assist them. A suggestion was made that it could be a 2 part format with some issues covered in the morning and something like plat review in the afternoon. Then they could just go to one or the other as they saw fit.

The discussion went on to the County Surveyor’s OLD BUSINESS Handbook and the question if the incoming County Under Status of County Surveyor Offices, it is believed that Surveyors know it exists. A welcome letter should be put Ben Klitzke will be the new Douglas County Surveyor. together to be sent to new County Surveyors with mention of the Handbook so if they don’t have one, it could be sent Emily explained the comments on the Administrative Code to them. Changes (on the current code) and she will be sending them out next week to the contact person at DSPS. She will also Glen suggested that a workshop could be done in the be attending their meeting on March 18th representing afternoon after a quarterly meeting in the morning. That WCSA. A printed handout of the comments was passed out way there would not be extra travel. and some suggestions were taken and Emily asked the group if they liked the format or if she should send it in the form of a letter. NEW BUSINESS Bryan introduced Jessica Sandry who serves on the Vernon Mike said that the Northern Lakes chapter of WSLS is County Land Information Council. She has been trying to going to send out a memo asking them to suspend action on encourage Vernon County to have a County Surveyor for this until we get the Professional Surveyor bill through. sometime now. The Council needs education as to what a They feel this is bad timing. There was additional County Surveyor does, a job description and definition of discussion on the topic. what authority the County Surveyor has, how the surveyor is chosen, they need to know how a County Surveyor would A paper by Knud Hermanson was mentioned as having help with their Land Information Modernization efforts, etc. some good insights. Emily will send it to Kathy to be sent She had many very good questions about how the County out for the membership to read if they don’t have it already. Surveyor fits into the scheme. It was thought that a county of similar size and budget could be a good source of information that Vernon County could identify with. Wisconsin County Surveyors Association March 2013 Board of Directors Meeting Minutes

5

Vernon County is about 800 square miles with a population of 30,000. Dave Tlusty will send some information to Jessica as Langlade is similar in size. Funds are being expended for developing their GIS but Surveying is seen as an annoyance to the county board because of the cost and the time it takes slows down their parcel mapping. The County Board also has questions as to the value of a County Surveyor after the remonumentation is done. And Vernon County has had some bad experiences with surveyors. They tried having a County Surveyor and it failed. They have experienced 2 surveyors arguing over corner positions which lead to concerns over liability. At present, county staff administrate contracts when survey work is needed.

The question was asked if all members would be allowed to vote, including sustaining and affiliate members? Chet thought we should see what people think, give them some time to make suggestions and then vote on it at the annual meeting. After more discussion, the motion did not pass with Bruce, Peter and Steve voting for the motion and Bryan, Jason and Wade opposed. Emily cast the tie breaking vote of “nay” saying we need to carefully read the bylaws before we proceed.

OTHER BUSINESS Requesting HMP data from NSRS - Glen Schaefer: Glen pointed out that when you go to the NGS database and start Emily will send Jessica the County Surveyor Handbook extracting data, and you ask for Wisconsin Height Mod which has a lot of useful information for her. Bryan will data, you no longer get Wisconsin Height Mod data as it pare back his presentation and is willing to go to Vernon was originally defined. The original intent was that the County to give the presentation to them. Other presentations prepared by members may be helpful. Tony’s Wisconsin Height Mod data which was surveyed recently and adjusted recently, and in some cases in a different county had a similar situation years ago and their Register of Deeds was an advocate for a County Surveyor so he may datum than other monuments in our system, and it would give you data from the newer and most recent survey. Now be able to send some helpful information. you get other information that was not part of the program. He is not sure why this was changed. Mostly Glen wanted Jessica needs our help so if there are ideas or information to ask a question of the group...When you ask for geodetic that will be useful for her, she can be contacted at control, are you interested in getting only Wisconsin Height [email protected]. Mod data, or do you want everything? If not having the We moved on to the Board of Directors meetings becoming information separated is an issue for you, let Glen know. membership meetings. The next agenda item was Legislative Bill 710.13 which requires written notification, including copies of documents Bruce made a motion to allow a bylaw change to and attachments, to adjoining property owners 30 days incorporate all dues paying members to vote at before the recording of any instrument that is done by a quarterly meetings with the Board of Directors calling land surveyor which changes any property line. This bill special meetings as needed. Seconded by Steve. came to Bruce’s attention just the day before the meeting. It is not only an added burden for the surveyor but presents Jason suggested that we could send out an email to the membership to see if they would be more inclined to come difficulty for the Register of Deeds. There were no sponsors or author listed. to meetings if they had a vote before making a change. Jim recalled that years ago, there were only 5 or 6 attending the BOD meetings so the bylaws fit those times but now it is changed and perhaps the membership should have a vote. He also said that he would like to see the membership invited to attend any special meetings that might be called by the BOD.

There was discussion as to what the bill really meant or how it would be interpreted.

Tony said that possibly the BOD meeting could take place in the afternoon after the membership meeting to act on issues suggested at the morning meeting.

Bruce will find out who the sponsor is and then Emily and Kathy will put a letter together expressing our opposition.

Steve felt that people who come to the meetings should have a vote and agreed with Jim that it has changed from the 5 or 6 that were attending then.

Motion by Bruce that the WCSA strongly opposes this legislation in its current form. Second by Jason. Carried.

The last agenda item was a request from Bruce. He needed information on what the definitions of abbreviations in the CREP program are. Emily has information she will send that may be their minimum standard for putting together a CREP easement.

Wisconsin County Surveyors Association March 2013 Board of Directors Meeting Minutes

6

Bruce had another question dealing with researching in Iowa County. In the original entries, there is a list of entries including section, town and range. Then there is a column for HHDS. Bruce’s question is, does anyone know what that is? Some suggested that it could stand for hundredths as in hundredths of acres? Emily asked Bruce to scan it so

we could send it out to the membership to see if anyone knows what it means. Motion by Steve Geiger to adjourn the meeting, second by Wade Pettit. Carried. Meeting adjourned at 1:15 p.m.

WCSA QUARTERLY MEETING, MARCH 8, 2013 ELEVEN NEW STATIONS COMING ONLINE MARCH 10, 2013 THE POSITIONS WILL BE ADDED TO THE NETWORK IN THE NA2011 DATUM. AT THE SAME TIME THE EXISTING NETWORK WILL BE ADJUSTED. EXPECT SHIFTS OF 1.5cm PRIMARILY TO THE EAST.

DOWNLOADING REFERENCE DATA: EMAIL [email protected] AND REQUEST ACCESS TO REFERENCE DATA. IF YOU WISH TO DOWNLOAD GPS AND GLONASS DATA, CHOOSE THE .tdg OR RINEX FILE. IF YOU ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN GPS DATA, CHOOSE THE .dat FILE. CAN NOTIFY YOU OF ANY WISCORS ISSUES THAT MAY AFFECT WORK IN YOUR COUNTY!!! PLEASE KEEP YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS UP TO DATE SO WE TO REPORT AN ENDANGERED OR DESTROYED MONUMENT, PLEASE CALL 866-568-2852 OR EMAIL [email protected]. Wisconsin County Surveyors Association March 2013 Board of Directors Meeting Minutes

7