The role of rewards in enabling organization Innovation

5/11/2015 The role of rewards in enabling organization Innovation May 2015 WorldatWork Total Rewards Conference Presenters Tom McMullen Hay Group C...
Author: Ross Barton
10 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
5/11/2015

The role of rewards in enabling organization Innovation May 2015

WorldatWork Total Rewards Conference

Presenters Tom McMullen Hay Group Chicago [email protected] +1.312.228.1848

Dow Scott, Ph.D. Institute of Human Resources and Employment Relations Loyola University Chicago [email protected] +1.312.915.6597 Erik Larson Hay Group Chicago [email protected] +1.312.228.1827

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

2

1

5/11/2015

About Hay Group Hay Group consults with 9,000 clients worldwide in a wide variety of areas, including: Organizational effectiveness Managerial and executive assessment Compensation and benefits Performance management Executive remuneration and corporate governance Employee and customer attitude research

86

4,000+

10,000

Offices in 48 countries

Employees worldwide

International clients

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

3

About Dow Scott Dow Scott, Ph.D. is a Professor of Human Resources in the Quinlan School of Business Administration at Loyola University Chicago and President of Performance Development International; a management consulting firm. Dr. Scott’s consultation and research focuses upon:

    

Compensation and incentive pay Attendance improvement Team and HR development Recruiting and staffing systems HR program evaluation

Performance Development International, LLC PDI is dedicated to helping our clients create a competitive advantage through people. We are committed to providing quality and personalized service. We support our clientele through:  Customized evaluations and assessments of specific HR strategies, policies and programs.  Development of “state of the art” customized HR programs and high performance organizations.  Employee involvement at all levels, thereby fostering commitment and accountability for results.  Linking HR programs to organizational performance.

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

4

2

5/11/2015

Background

Innovation mandate Conference Board identifies top CEO challenges: Rank

2015

2014

2013

1

Human Capital

Human Capital

Human Capital

2

INNOVATION

Customer Relationships

Operational Excellence

3

Customer Relations

INNOVATION

INNOVATION

4

Operational Excellence

Operational Excellence

Customer Relationships

5

Sustainability

Corporate Brand and Reputation

Global Political / Economic Risk

Source: Conference Board CEO Challenge Survey, 2013 - 2015

“Best Companies for Leadership” are more likely to reward innovation and collaboration than other companies. (Hay Group, 2014) © 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

6

3

5/11/2015

Innovation and human capital challenges

Human Capital Priorities

Innovation Priorities

1

Improve performance management processes and accountability

Create culture of innovation by promoting and rewarding risk taking and entrepreneurship

2

Provide employee training and development

Engage in strategic alliances with customers, suppliers, and other partners

3

Enhance effectiveness of senior management team

Find, engage, and incentivize key talent for innovation

Improve employee engagement

Apply new technologies (product, process, information, etc.)

Improve leadership development progress

Adopt a user-centric approach to innovation

Rank

4 5

Source: Conference Board CEO Challenge Survey, 2015

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

7

Key research questions 

How do companies view innovation and how is it measured?



How important is innovation and who champions it?



What types of rewards are used to encourage innovation and how effective are these rewards?

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

8

4

5/11/2015

Question 1 How important is innovation to your company? 1.

Not on management’s radar

2.

Mainly “talk” and no “walk”

3.

Made a moderate investment

4.

Made a big investment

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

9

Methodology

5

5/11/2015

Data collection 

Surveyed Hay Group registered website users and WorldatWork Members



Over 166 organizations participated



Organizations primarily in North America



Respondents are primarily HR and reward professionals



Literature review and interviews

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

11

Respondents

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

12

6

5/11/2015

Industry sector

Representative mix of industries

Industry Healthcare Manufacturing Wholesale/Retail Trade Consulting Finance/Banking Insurance Business Services Education Services Government High Tech Service - Non Profit Oil/Gas/Natural Resources Utilities Communications Construction/Real Estate Publishing/Newspaper Transportation Other

Particpation 15% 13% 9% 9% 5% 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 6%

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

13

Company size

By Revenues Greater than $5B 22%

Less than $250M 32%

By Employees $1B to $5B 24%

$250M to $1B 22%

Greater than 20,000 EE's 20%

2,500 to 19,999 EE's

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

Less than 499 EE's 33%

500 to 2,499 EE's 23%

14

7

5/11/2015

Research findings

Innovation focus 66% of companies have a formal definition of innovation Function or group whose primary purpose is innovation 

R&D Department (11%)



Center of Excellence, Taskforce, etc. (31%)



No function devoted to innovation (58%)

Primary focus for Innovation 

Develop new products or services (42%)



Process improvement to enhance quality (37%)



Process improvement to enhance efficiency & lower costs (31%)



Re-tool or re-purpose current products of services (28%)

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

16

8

5/11/2015

Champions of innovation

Group Senior Leadership HR Function Marketing Function Business Unit Leadership Ad hoc, project, or process teams Operations / Manufacturing Logistics Function Cross-functional Teams External Partners R&D Function Permanent Innovation Function

Innovation Champions 99% 98% 91% 89% 78% 75% 68% 67% 61% 57% 49%

Effectiveness 76% 56% 64% 71% 65% 55% 46% 62% 62% 78% 77%

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

17

Importance of innovation

Innovation is considered everyone’s job

73%

Core Value

66%

Senior management takes advantage of every opportunity to champion innovation

54%

Clear vision and strategy for innovation

48%

We have strong processes, measures, and controls in place to manage innovation We invest more resources in research and development than do our major competitors

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

43% 27%

18

9

5/11/2015

Process innovation metrics Usage of Metric

Metric Used to Reward *

Effectiveness of the Metric

83%

81%

68%

75%

68%

76%

67%

44%

62%

67%

60%

63%

66%

58%

72%

54%

50%

71%

Financial results of patented ideas

30%

24%

67%

Development of patentable ideas

29%

28%

85%

Number of approved patents

28%

24%

79%

Metrics for Measuring Innovation Level of internal customer engagement, satisfaction, or retention Potential or actual revenue/profit of innovative initiatives Level of employee engagement, satisfaction, or retention Number of innovative initiatives implemented Quality/value of innovative initiatives in the pipeline Number of innovative initiatives in the pipeline

*Percentage is of those that use the metric as a measurement for innovation © 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

19

Product / service innovation metrics Usage of Metric

Metric Used to * Reward

Effectiveness of the Metric

68%

76%

68%

46%

61%

88%

44%

53%

71%

39%

44%

76%

37%

48%

70%

Development of patentable ideas

24%

33%

77%

Number of approved patents

24%

26%

77%

Financial results of patented ideas

24%

30%

77%

Metrics for Measuring Innovation Level of external customer engagement, satisfaction, or retention Potential or actual revenue/profit of innovative initiatives Quality/value of innovative initiatives in the pipeline Number of innovative initiatives implemented Number of innovative initiatives in the pipeline

*Percentage is of those that use the metric as a measurement for innovation

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

20

10

5/11/2015

Question 2 Which reward program most effectively encourages innovation? 1.

Incentives: innovation focused

2.

Incentives: include innovation

3.

Smaller periodic spot awards

4.

Non-financial recognition

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

21

Effectiveness of reward programs in encouraging innovation Reward Program Used Promotional consideration Bonuses or incentives Non-financial recognition Spot cash Base-pay or merit increases Rewarding for patentable ideas Rewarding for patentable ideas and patents obtained Equity awards

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

Usage 67% 62% 61% 60% 37% 31% 28% 20%

Effectiveness 53% 73% 66% 59% 50% 71% 67% 65%

22

11

5/11/2015

Particularly effective programs Annual incentives and bonuses

Annual incentives and bonuses 

“Our Share our Savings Program-employees make suggestions for cost saving improvements and if implemented they are awarded a cash bonus.” (Traditional Suggestion Program)

Spot awards 

“Upton Bonus (after Upton Sinclair): cash or vacation bonus given to employees who demonstrate unconventional application of expertise to come up with new services, processes, or clients.”

Non-financial rewards 

“If an employee develops an idea, the company provides marketing support & the product becomes theirs to own & take accountability for. Employees feel like product owners.”

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

23

Question 3 How will your company invest in innovation? 1. More: in new programs

2. More: in existing programs 3. Same: keep current programs 4. Less: scaling back programs

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

24

12

5/11/2015

Future focus on encouraging innovation 

Increasing the current level of innovation investment and development (56%)



Maintaining the current level of innovation investment and development (41%)



Decreasing the current level of innovation investment and development (3%)

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

25

Specific future focus areas Half of respondents said they are currently developing a reward strategy or program to encourage innovation

The other half mentioned greater usage, adoption and/or retooling of: 

Incentive and bonus programs



Spot bonus rewards



Non-financial / recognition awards



Talent management programs emphasizing innovation/collaboration

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

26

13

5/11/2015

Conclusion and recommendations

Rewarding innovation The performance model and desired work culture should drive the design of the reward program as it relates to innovation

Performance measures should be balanced between: 

Hard (e.g., financial results) & soft (e.g., behaviors, perceptions) metrics



Process, product, service innovation



Short-term and long-term objectives



Individual, team and corporate objectives

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

28

14

5/11/2015

Rewarding innovation

(con’t)

Innovation cultural attributes – includes experimentation, interaction, collaboration, time to play, tolerance for failure Rewarding innovation is about signaling priorities and reinforcing performance via multiple rewards (i.e., financial and non-financial) It is easier to develop rewards that encourage process improvement than those that stimulate/reinforce breakthrough ideas or risk taking

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

Rewarding innovation

29

(con’t)

Spot awards 1. Align your recognition program with 3. Use recognition insights for culture & core values talent management 2. Gain executive participation and 4. Invest in the program to get an ROI accountability 5. Open it up – let everyone recognize everyone Source: The Business Impact of Recognition Systems (Hay Group, Globoforce, 2013)

Management / professional plans  Innovation is an increasingly used metric within existing plans  R&D and innovation COE’s often have unique incentive plans focused on more direct measures (e.g., patents) Scanlon / Gainsharing plans  Productivity improvement plans – focus on process innovation  Formal employee engagement process  Rigorous evaluation and implementation of suggested improvements  Research demonstrates these plans are effective © 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

30

15

5/11/2015

Implementing & sustaining reward programs Effective reward programs are more about effective implementation than superior design 

Effective communication, ongoing engagement of employees, etc.,



Leveraging the value of total rewards via the role of line managers

Ongoing monitoring and measurement of reward ROI to ensure the organization is optimizing its reward spend 

Quantitative / qualitative measures



Refining reward and performance programs based on assessment

Source: Reward Next Practices (Hay Group, D. Scott, 2013) © 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

31

Thoughts, comments, or questions?

16

5/11/2015

Presenters Tom McMullen Hay Group Chicago [email protected] +1.312.228.1848 Dow Scott, Ph.D. Institute of Human Resources and Employment Relations Loyola University Chicago [email protected] +1.312.915.6597 Erik Larson Hay Group Chicago [email protected] +1.312.228.1827

© 2015 Hay Group. All rights reserved; Dow Scott, PDII, LLC

33

Visit us at booth #324! And download our event app at startmp.com/WAW code:HGWAW15

17

Suggest Documents