The Oslo Fjord a blue jewel how to preserve it in a future mega-oslo with Climate change?

EWA Brussels Conference 2013 «Water – Investing Today for the Future The Oslo Fjord – a blue jewel – how to preserve it in a future mega-Oslo with Cl...
Author: Ella Carson
9 downloads 1 Views 3MB Size
EWA Brussels Conference 2013 «Water – Investing Today for the Future

The Oslo Fjord – a blue jewel – how to preserve it in a future mega-Oslo with Climate change ?

Haakon Thaulow NIVA Norwegian Institute for Water Research

1

Outline - • The Inner Oslofjord – a blue jewel • Water pollution abatement - a sucess story • Challenges – urban growth and climate change • Goals – the role of the Water Framework Directive • New measures needed ! • Berge, Ledang, Magnusson and Bjerkeng

2

The Inner Oslofjord

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

3

Recreation playground for 1 mill: Swimming, Boating etc.

60 N !

Haakon Thaulow

6. oktober 2011

4

Outer fjord: Mostly non-urban

The Oslofjord – Large contrasts

Inner fjord: Urban area

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng 20. november 2013

5

The Inner Oslo fjord (inside the Drøbak sill): • Area: 192 mill. m2 • Volume: 9288 mill m3 • Volume above 20 m:36 % of total volume • Volume below 20 m: 64 % of total volume • Tidal amplitude: 14 cm • Average freshwater input: 25 m3/s • Surface salinity variation: 20-30

Bathymetry of the Inner Oslofjord.

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

7

Oxygen conditions in the Inner Oslofjord 2012/2013.

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

20. november 2013

8

Calculated water reneweal in the whole Inner Oslofjord below 20 m depth.

No calculations

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

20. november 2013

9

Vestfjorden

Bunnefjorden

Forfatter

20. november 2013

10

Oxygen variations in deep water 1990-2012

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

20. november 2013

11

Total discharges of Nitrogen and Phosphorous from land to the Inner Oslofjord.

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

12

Copper and Zink in sediments Bunnefjorden High levels: 1960-1975

Forfatter

20. november 2013

13

Conditions in 1950-ties, 60-ties and 70-ties were very bad ! • Sewage: local disposal with minimum treatment • Floating debris, garbage from overflows • Excessive algae growth – not clear water • Anoxic conditions in deep water due to algae mass decay

• Recreation during summer, beaches in inner fjord «abandoned» Forfatter

20. november 2013

14

Discarges related to the human population is the main source for N and P Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

15

sewage treatment plants and tunnel systems. Discharges at 50 m depth.

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

Antrophogenic discharges of Nitrogen and Phosphorous to the Inner Oslofjord. 180

6000

P-Menneskeskapt N-Menneskeskapt

160

5000

120

4000

100 3000 80

60

2000

40 1000 20

0

0 År

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

Nitrogen (tonn)

Phosphorous (tonn)

140

Winter observations of Tot-P in The Vestfjord and in The Bunnefjord. The Vestf jord (Dk1) 0-8 meters depth. Winter time (December-Februar)

The Bunnef jord (Ep1) 0-8 meters depth. Winter time (December-Februar)

90

90 Mean v alue Mean v alue

80 70

Mean v alue

± standard error

Mean v alue

80 70

Very bad

60

Very bad

60 Bad

40 Less good 30

10

Bad

50

Good

Tot-P (µg/l)

Tot-P (µg/l)

50

20

± standard error

40 Less good 30 Good

20

Very good

Very good

10

1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0

Y ear

Y ear

Improvement over time !

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

«Clean and clear water with fish and shrimps we can eat»

Secchi depth development

Forfatter

20. november 2013

20

Semi decadal developement from 1973 to 2010 with 2012 Each sub row in a column equals one meter secchi depth.

2.16 3.39 3.95 4.39 5.24

3.00 Oslo 4.44 4.84 5.14 6.36

2.68 3.60 4.05 4.52 5.69

2.95 4.03 4.30 4.91 6.05

Ap2

Sandvika

Oslo

Each sub row in a column equals 1 µg/l.

8.40 6.00 3.01 2.57 3.00

18.00 9.60 5.27 2.92 3.80

2.57 ***

Aq3 11.90 7.00 4.41 2.08 3.60

Sandvika

Bn1

Bl4

9.70 6.60 3.61 1.82 2.90

Bn1

Bl4

Ap2

Cq1

4.12 5.16 5.40 5.71 6.70

5.60 4.40 2.61 1.93 2.60

3.51 4.99 5.13 5.57 6.96

Dk1

8.50 5.00 3.25 1.62 2.10

Dk1

Ep1

Ep1

+ (secchi depth)

Cq1

Secchi depth (m) mean values june-august 8.00

- (Chl –a)

8.00 1973-19828.00 8.00 1983-19908.00

Chlorophyll -a (µg/l) mean values june-august

0.00 1991-2001 0.00 0.00

Increased area with >1% ligh from 1973-82 til 19912001:

2002-2010 0.00

(map base: www.gislink.no)

0.00 2012 Null Maks

8.1*106m2 or 1350 football stadiums Drøbak

Drøbak

(Map base: www.gislink.no)

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

20. november 2013

21

Areas for trawling prawns (Pandalus borealis) in the Inner Oslofjord - around 1906 (Source: Wollebæk, 1906).

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

22

Number of individuals/100 m3

Prawns (Pandalus borealis) in the deep water in the Inner Oslofjord 1 mg/ O

350

2

300 250 200 150 100

50 0 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Oxygern (ml/L) in bottom water

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

20. november 2013

23

Generally higher concentrations of contaminants in fish (cod liver) from the Inner fjord than from the outer part the Oslofjord PCB-7 Torsk liver 36B Færder area

Trend: / I

1800

µg/kg(v.v.)

1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1989

1994

1999

2004

PCB-7 Torsk liver 30B Indre Oslofjord

2009

Trend: / III

4500

µg/kg(v.v.)

4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1989

1994

1999

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

2004

2009

20. november 2013

24

Status for soft bottom macrofauna 2009

Improvements: Good benthic quality status is not achieved at most localities in the Inner Oslofjord

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

20. november 2013

25

Increase in connection to treatment plants

Population Growth

Forfatter

20. november 2013

26

Increased temperature Vestfjorden deep waters

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson and Bjerkeng

27

More frequent and heavier hourly rainfalls - -

Forfatter

20. november 2013

28

August precipitation - - - -

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson and Bjerkeng

29

Status • The Oslo-fjord i clean- but not clean enough! Not all environmental conditions are satisfactory. • Capasity at large treatment plants exceeded • Increasing stormwater overflow episodes also in the summer season: recommendations to avoid swimming • Oxygen situation detoriating; depending on increased discharges, rainfall and wind • Increased demand for clean water in the inner harbour areas the «Fjord City» • Water Framework Directive – a new driver for new abatement measures Berge, Ledang, Magnusson and Bjerkeng

30

sewage treatment plants and tunnel systems. Discharges at 50 m depth.

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson, Bjerkeng

Bekkelaget treatment plant to Capasity to be extendet 550

Bekkelaget ra. Årlig tilrenning /forurensningstilførsel som PE (personekvivalenter)

Optimaliseringsprosjekter 2011-12

500

 Sum tiltak 86,5 mill kr,

450

Utvidelse Bekkelaget renseanlegg Etter KS2:

 P50 2 350 mill. kr.  P85 2 660 mill. kr.

1000 pe

400

350

tilknytt…

Tilkobling Midgardsormen

300

Dimensjonerende kapasitet, etter oppgradering

250

Dimensjonerende kapasitet, opprinnelig

200

VEAS

• I 2020 27% increase • 0,7 mill p.e.

«Sewage, inleaking water and rain water at VEAS 2010» 5

4

3

Mill m3 pr uke 2

1

0

Snitt to tørreste uker 2010

Snitt to våteste uker 2010

Overvann pga nedbør Fremmedvann (innlekket drikkevann, sigevann) "Ekte" avløpsvann (180 l/p*d)

Året 2010

«The Fjord City»

Forfatter

35

Goals for the Oslo fjord Goal relevant to

Goal element

Recreation – outdoor activities

Acsess, estetics, bathing water quality

Commercial Fishing and Catch (prawns)

Good –ecology , micropollutans ,stock management

Water Framwork Directive

Good ecological status Good chemical status - Chl a - Lower algae growt limit - Bottom fauna - O2 and Secchi dept/sediment s are Berge, Ledang, Magnusson and Bjerkeng supporting criteria

36

Oslo fjord and the WFD • Not good ecological status because of micropollutants and chemical status in sediments • Recreation relevant criteria; good status • Natural anoxic conditions in deep waters in Bunnefjorden and other deep water pockets • WDF – back to near «natural conditions» • Less focus on deep water oxygen conditions, more on recreational criteria - - ?

Berge, Ledang, Magnusson and Bjerkeng

37

Strategy -measures • Increased capasity treatment plants • Upgrading/rehabilitation of sewers • Good stormwater management-separation sewage/stormwater,treatment • Outlets from treatment plants and large overflows in deep water • Water saving • Micropollutants – control at sources • Warning system city-near beaches • Fish stock management Berge, Ledang, Magnusson and Bjerkeng

38

Good Water Management IWRM • Knowledgebased • Problemdriven • Solution-oriented

Haakon Thaulow

6. oktober 2011

39

Thank you for your attention

40

Suggest Documents