The Impact of Rewinding on Motor Efficiency Jim Custodio, GE Motors

When a motor fails, users can (1) rewind, possibly for high efficiency; (2) replace the failed motor with a new motor; or (3) invest in a premium efficiency product. Here are some advantages and disadvantages of each approach and the precautions to take to achieve the best investment.

W

hen a motor fails, the user must decide whether to repair or replace it. To make a proper decision, one must consider the cost of the repair, the availability of a replacement, the age of the motor, the electrical design required for the application, any special mechanical features, and the urgency of returning the failed motor to service. Placing the driven equipment back into service is frequently the highest priority, and users often make their decision based on this criterion alone. Plant managers tend to be less concerned if the rewound motor is less efficient when their operation’s downtime is costing thousands of dollars a minute.

Increased Profits by Energy Saving U.S. industry will continue to feel the squeeze on profits, and manufacturers who fail to implement energy reduction programs will find themselves at a competitive disadvantage. In some industries, motor operation costs may even exceed those of labor cost. It is no longer practical to view the power bill as a fixed base cost, not worth the effort it would take to reduce. The need to minimize power usage should be as important to the CFO as it is to the plant manager. Due to the improvements that have occurred in motor technology, even companies that already had energy programs ten years ago should now reevaluate their criteria.

Future Power Costs In 1970, electricity cost the average industrial user about one cent per kilowatt-hour. By 1980 that had jumped to four cents: a 300 percent increase. Power costs in some areas are

PUMPS & SYSTEMS

Motor operation costs may even exceed those of labor cost in some industries. Even companies that had energy programs 10 years ago should reevaluate their criteria due to improvements in current motor technology.

over seven cents. The cost for electricity may fluctuate with economic cycles, but long-term it will continue to increase. The nature of today’s power bill has also changed. The contract rate of the past now only covers 60 percent to 75 percent of the actual amount paid by users. In addition to taxes, today’s bill can include such additions as “fuel adjustment” and “demand charges.” The bottom line is that electric power can be a major cost element in your product.

First Cost vs. Operating Cost Manufacturers who understand their business look at the total cost of a motor, rather than simply making a decision based on

www.pump-zone.com

JUNE 2007

33

Getting the Most from Motors initial purchase price. Let’s consider the example of a pre-EPAct 75-hp, 1800rpm TEFC motor that originally sold for approximately $2700, with an efficiency of 91.7 percent. This motor, operating continuously and using power costing $.07/kW-hr, will in just one year cost $37,414 to operate – or 1,386 percent of the original purchase price! In fact, operating costs will overtake the purchase price after the first 26 days of operation. Even if the motor is only used for two shifts (assuming 4,160 hours per year), this will still occur after 55 days. For this reason, any expenditure related to repair or replacement of a failed motor should be evaluated based on a total cost of operation calculation.

An Incorrect Decision Costs Money Building on the example above, consider the impact on the operating cost of the same 75-hp motor using a more efficient motor. Let’s say the motor efficiency improves to that of an EPAct design with a nominal efficiency of 94.1 percent. The new EPAct motor would do the same amount of useful work, but use $979 less energy. In mid-2001 motor manufacturers, in cooperation with conservation groups and the DOE, introduced products with even higher efficiencies: NEMA Premium. With this new specification, the same motor rating would have a nominal efficiency of 95.4 percent and save $1,510 in the first year compared to an EPAct level efficiency motor. These savings continue to accrue as the cost of power goes up. Even without increasing the cost of a kilowatt-hour, a NEMA Premium motor would generate $10,563 in savings over seven years, compared to $6,854 for an EPAct level efficiency motor.

Factors in the Rewind Decision Hundreds of thousands of older T-frame motors were manufactured well before there were any government standards. Many of these still operate in U.S. industry. Each time one fails, an opportunity is created to improve the user’s bottom line. Power costs will certainly continue to rise and further escalate motor operating expense. So the question of how repair affects motor efficiency is an important one. Some claim a rewound motor is never as efficient as the original; others say a well-executed rewind can be better than the original design. These differences in perception suggest there may be several factors involved. Armed with the right information, understanding the factors that affect rewind performance does not need to be complicated. Let’s examine the various types of motor losses and how they are influenced by engineering decisions. Keep in mind that actual motor losses may differ between two motors of the same design, depending on how the motor is used. Figure 1 shows how motor losses vary with load. As a motor approaches 100 percent of rated load, losses increase dramatically, with most of the increase found in the 34

JUNE 2007

Figure 1. How motor losses vary with load.

Hp 7 1/2 15 25 50 75 100

1944 Design

1955 U-Frame

84.5% 87.0 89.5 90.5 91.0 91.5

87.0% 89.5 90.5 91.0 90.5 92.0

T-Frame 1965 NEMA Normal Efficiency EPAct Premium 84.0% 88.0 89.0 91.5 91.5 92.0

88.5% 91.0 91.7 93.0 94.1 94.1

91.0% 93.0 93.6 94.5 95.0 95.4

Figure 2. The history of motor efficiency, TEFC, 1800-rpm.

Standard Efficiency Designs 3600 rpm 1800 rpm Motor Loss Component • No Load Losses: - Windage & Friction - Core Loss

30% 18

11% 22

Total No Load Losses

48%

33%

• Load Losses: - Stator I 2R - Rotor I 2R - Stray Load Losses

34% 8 10

47% 9 11

Total Load Losses

52%

67%

100%

100%

Total Motor Losses

Figure 3. Representative losses as a percentage of total losses.

www.pump-zone.com

PUMPS & SYSTEMS

Friction & Windage 340 Watts Core Loss 750 Watts

Stray Load 520 Watts

Motor Loss

Improvement Possibilities

Stator Loss - I 2R

Increase amount of copper wire in slot Decrease length of coil endturns Decrease turns in stator

Rotor Loss

Decrease turns in stator

Figure 5. Possible methods to reduce losses through rewinding. Stator & Rotor I 2R 1600 Watts

Figure 4. Losses in a 50-hp, 1800-rpm, TEFC Pre-EPAct motor.

form of rotor and stator losses. The age of the motor is also a factor. Figure 2 shows the progression of motor efficiencies through the years, driven by improvements in engineering design and material technologies. (Note that these ratings are for typical GE motors from 1944 up to EPAct; actual efficiencies will vary from manufacturer to manufacturer.)

The distribution of losses will also be different for various motor designs. Variations in speed, design and enclosure will all affect loss distribution, as shown in Figure 3. The ability of the repair shop to analyze and replace those parts which most influence losses, such as the stator core, the windings and the rotor, will affect the outcome of a rewind. With all that in mind, let’s take a look at losses in a typical 50-hp, 1800-rpm, TEFC standard efficiency design. The distribution of losses is shown in Figure 4. The table in Figure 5 shows how these losses can be reduced. Following that are detailed explanations of the techniques.

Mixing System Improve Water Quality in Finished Water Storage Tanks Maximize mixing and eliminate short-circuiting without major tank renovations. The Tideflex® Mixing System (TMS) is a unique fill-and-draw system that separates the inlets and outlets to eliminate short-circuiting. Multiple variable orifice Tideflex® diffusers are used on the inlets to optimize mixing during the filling operation. No additional tank penetration is required. Operation is completely passive, so there are no moving or mechanical parts and no need for an additional energy source.

NSF ®

Patent #7,104,279

Circle the reader service number to receive a CD, brochure and data sheet.

The Tideflex® nozzles used in Red Valve’s patented mixing system are based on the same priciples of design and operation that are in the standard Tideflex® Check Valves.

Tideflex Technologies • 700 N. Bell Avenue • Carnegie, PA 15106 • 412-279-0044 • Fax 412-279-7878 • www.tideflex.com circle 133 on card or go to psfreeinfo.com PUMPS & SYSTEMS

www.pump-zone.com

JUNE 2007

35

Getting the Most from Motors Stator Losses 2

Stator losses are primarily I R losses, released in the form of heat as current passes through the stator windings. When rewinding a motor, smaller diameter wire will increase the resistance and therefore I2R losses; larger diameter will have the opposite effect. If the original wire was aluminum, changing to the same size copper wire will also reduce

resistance and loss. Obviously, using a larger diameter copper wire will affect the best reduction. Another option for reducing stator losses is to reduce the number of wire turns. Use this method with caution. While full load efficiency may be increased, starting current will go up and power factor will be reduced. Both starting and maximum torques will be increased. A change from ten turns to nine turns would increase starting current by as much as 23 percent.

Core Loss

Pioneer Pump, Inc. Be Green - Buy Green! Pioneer Pump has standardized on the use of bearing isolators in our heavy duty bearing frame assembly to: xSave Energy xEnhance Reliability Bearing Isolator

xReduce Maintenance xSave Money

x

Heavy Duty Construction

x

Superior Workmanship

x

Reliability

“Pride in Performance” Quality People · Quality Service · Quality Products

503-266-4115 · www.pioneerpump.com

Core loss is the sum of the eddy current and hysteresis losses that occur while energizing the motor’s magnetic field. Motors are insulated between the core laminations to minimize eddy currents, but the process of stripping can destroy this insulation. When stripping a motor for rewinding, insulation burnout must be done at carefully controlled temperatures. Otherwise it’s easy to overheat the laminations, breaking down the core insulation and actually increasing core loss. Not all repair shops use the same insulation burnout techniques; investigate them thoroughly before deciding where to have the motor rewound. Another item that is often ignored is the condition of the core after motor failure. Failures caused by excessive loading, extended stall conditions, single phasing, or bearing failure leading to rotor striking can all cause increases in the core loss. It is very unlikely that the original core loss data would be available from a ten year old T-frame motor. Repair shops may have equipment to evaluate the core in its failed condition, but are unable to relate the results to original factory core loss specifications. Applying even the best techniques to improve the efficiency may be inappropriate without the original core loss information. The repair shop would have to conduct a full efficiency test using a dynamometer, which takes two to three hours depending on frame size, in order to validate the finished motor. Manufacturers do this on every motor they design and have programs registered with the DOE to assure

circle 132 on card or go to psfreeinfo.com

36

JUNE 2007

www.pump-zone.com

PUMPS & SYSTEMS

that design efficiencies are maintained throughout production. The DOE requires that testing laboratories be third-party certified to assure compliance with the testing procedure defined in IEEE 112 B. This process was written into the Federal Energy Act to prevent overly optimistic efficiency claims. Repair shops have no such requirement.

No single aspect of the rewind process is as important as preserving the electrical integrity of the stator core.

The intelligent choice

Rotor Loss 2

Rotor losses are I R losses, released as heat through the rotor slots and endrings. It is unlikely that a repair shop will be able to improve rotor losses.

IntelliBoost Constant Pressure Variable Speed Booster Systems

Efficiency vs. Time You have undoubtedly heard or read more than once that motor efficiency naturally decreases through motor life as a result of “heat aging.” This argument says that as the motor starts and stops the core temperature increases and decreases, causing deterioration in the core steel’s electrical properties and a resulting increase in internal losses. In fact, this is only a problem if an aging type of steel is used in the core. Most manufacturers use non-aging steel that does not lose its electrical properties over time.

Designed to meet the ever-increasing needs and complexity of today’s water systems. Specifically tailored to fresh water applications in commercial, industrial and municipal locations.

Installation  Fast

 Touch

screen HMI with intuitive start-up/menu/help



Rewind vs. a New Motor Now that you know some of the pitfalls of rewinding, let’s reexamine our options in the face of a motor failure. Provided that downtime isn’t the critical factor, a user now has these choices: 1. Rewind the motor to the original efficiency. 2. Rewind the motor to a higher efficiency. 3. Replace with a new motor of same efficiency. 4. Replace with a premium-efficiency motor.

& Easy start-up

Efficiently meets facilities demands

 Ability

to communicate via remote contacts/Ethernet



Fits through a 36” door

Reliability  

Built at an ISO 9001 Facility Designed and supported by 88 year industrial leader in pump manufacturing

A fifth option that no one should knowingly choose is to rewind the motor to a lower efficiency – but many users unwittingly make this decision. As explained above, it is very easy to

800 Airport Road, North Aurora, Illinois 60542 (630) 859-7000 FAX: (630) 859-7060

www.aurorapump.com E-mail: [email protected]

circle 122 on card or go to psfreeinfo.com PUMPS & SYSTEMS

www.pump-zone.com

JUNE 2007

37

Getting the Most from Motors damage the stator core insulation while stripping out High-Fill Rewind the old winding and so increase core loss by three times PremiumPoor 1/2 Full Efficiency or more. Hp Quality Rewind Wire Size Wire Size Motor Figure 6 compares the typical results of each of the choices, with assumptions for the “poor quality rewind” 10 -6.0 +0.6 +1.1 +4.2 figured at three times the original core loss. 50 -3.7 +0.5 +0.8 +2.8 100 -2.1 +0.4 +0.7 +4.5 The high-fill rewind produces some efficiency gains 200 -1.9 +0.3 +0.6 +2.1 when a larger wire size is used. As would be expected, the greatest efficiencies are realized by retrofitting with new premium-efficiency motors. Figure 6. Efficiency Gain (Losses): Rewind vs. Premium-Efficiency Motor Figure 7 shows the annual operating cost difference for each of the options listed above. Note that motor that operated well for years before initial failure, but operating cost can be increased by a poor rewind just as much failed again shortly after being rewound. The failure is more as it can be decreased by a new, premium-efficiency motor. often the result of temperature rise than of defective materials The conclusion is obvious: either replace failed motors or faulty workmanship in the new windings. with new, premium-efficiency motors, or else exercise extraorThe obvious question is “what is a safe insulation burnout dinary care in the rewinding process. temperature?” Unfortunately, there is no simple answer. Manufacturers Protecting the Stator Core in a Rewind use a wide variety of materials for the core. Steel may be supNo single aspect of the rewind process is as important as preplied with either organic or inorganic insulation coatings, or serving the electrical integrity of the stator core. with no coating at all. If uncoated steel is used, the motor manNot only can insulation damage increase core loss, but ufacturer will add an oxide insulation coating while annealing. the resulting rise in motor temperature could also then cause Each of these lamination insulations has a different limit in the motor to fail prematurely. You’ve probably had at least one temperature that it can withstand before deteriorating, so it’s

WE STOCK BOILER FEED PUMPS

INSTALL ANYWHERE ACCESS EVERYWHERE

• 10 SIZES AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVENTORY • 10 - 1000 GPM @ HEADS UP TO 1000’ • CAST IRON AND STAINLESS STEEL IN STOCK ALSO AVAILABLE – • UP TO 4800 GPM @ HEADS UP TO 2100’

AlarmAgent.com — wireless, web-based alarm notification — from RACO, the name you trust. • Monitor equipment from anywhere through a secure online interface • Configure WRTUs on your own through easyto-use templates

CONTACT US TODAY! – WILL SHIP TODAY! QUALITY MANUFACTURING:

• View and export alarm and performance reports in real time — anytime

LOCAL SERVICE:

Shanley Pump & Equipment, Inc. 2525 South Clearbrook Drive Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005 Phone: 847-439-9200 • Fax: 847-439-9388 Visit our Website at www.shanleypump.com

Call RACO to learn more and experience this ondemand system for yourself with a 60-day free trial! RACO Manufacturing & Engineering Co. 1400 62nd St. Emeryville, CA 94608 800.722.6999 | www.racoman.com | www.alarmagent.com

circle 160 on card or go to psfreeinfo.com

38

JUNE 2007

circle 169 on card or go to psfreeinfo.com www.pump-zone.com

PUMPS & SYSTEMS

High-Fill Rewind Hp 10 50 100 200

Poor Quality Rewind +$404 + 1050 +1148 +2241

1/2 Wire Size -$37 -135 -215 -312

Full Wire Size

PremiumEfficiency Motor

-$68 -215 -375 -621

-$239 -739 -2334 -2122

the winding insulation. Inorganic insulation can withstand temperatures up to 700-deg F, allowing the old winding to be burned out safely if the oven temperature is carefully controlled. Uncoated semi-processed steel laminations will stick together if they get too hot, increasing eddy current losses dramatically. Motors built with this type of steel can be stripped at oven temperatures of 700-deg F or below.

Figure 7. Annual Operating Cost Difference: Rewind vs. Premium-Efficiency Motor Continuous Operation @ $.07/kW-h

impossible to name a temperature that is safe for all motors. But there are some guidelines. In all cases, the stripping operation must control the core temperature to prevent damage to the interlamination insulation. Damage can occur even in a low temperature oven when several cores are stacked, and fire from the burning organic materials results in increased temperature beyond the oven setting. If the motor has an organic lamination insulation, it will begin to deteriorate rapidly at around 500-deg F and may actually change its chemistry at higher temperatures. Organic insulation can be damaged in any oven hot enough to burn out

Stripping Methods In the past few years, awareness has grown among users that poor quality motor rewinds can cause an increase in losses. Users have demanded an end to the practice of burning out the old windings at uncontrolled temperatures. Motor repair shops that have kept pace with technology have switched to temperature-controlled ovens and have discontinued the practice of softening varnish with a handheld torch. Ask your rewind shop if they can perform any of the following non-injurious stripping techniques: • Mechanical stripping • Chemical stripping • High-pressure water jets

RUN DRY, AND KEEP ON RUNNING. Pumps fitted with GRAPHALLOY® wear parts survive upsets. GRAPHALLOY® bushings and case rings: • Run hot, cold, wet or dry • Reduce maintenance • New pumps or retrofits • Non-galling • Self-lubricating • -400°F to 1,000°F 240°C to 535°C+ • Corrosion resistant

GRAPHITE METALLIZING CORPORATION Yonkers, NY 10703 U.S.A. ISO 9001:2000

PS07b

TEL. 914.968.8400 • WWW.GRAPHALLOY.COM/PS

circle 171 on card or go to psfreeinfo.com PUMPS & SYSTEMS

circle 156 on card or go to psfreeinfo.com www.pump-zone.com

JUNE 2007

39

• Freezing process • Ultrasonic stripping Regardless of the process used, make sure your rewinder can follow the motor manufacturer’s recommended safe burnout temperature limits. Some do and some don’t – which is probably the main reason for one shop’s reputation over another for better quality rewinds. There is really only one way to make sure that losses have not been increased in the process, and that’s to perform a qualitative core loss test before and after rewinding (assuming the core is okay to begin with). This can also help you screen the motor population to determine if any given motor is even repairable. More repair shops now offer this service, so ask yours.

In all cases, the stripping operation must control the core temperature to prevent damage to the interlamination insulation.

Establish a Repair/Replace Policy

circle 135 on card or go to psfreeinfo.com

In response to the rising cost of electrical power, every company should establish a repair/replace policy to help make intelligent decisions. Give every motor-driven machine in your plant a repair/ replace priority, and consider investing in spare motors for any continuous process machines that are critical to plant operation. These “critical” machines are excellent candidates for retrofitting with premium-efficiency motors; the existing standard-efficiency motor should not be kept as a spare. There is a good deal more to comparing relative inuse costs between motors than simple energy usage. The local power company may offer rebates on new premiumefficiency motors. Extended warranties may be available to reduce MRO costs. A new motor could be installed with a variable speed drive to maximize the process productivity (the drive may also be covered under a rebate). Inventory costs can be reduced by not storing repaired motors that could become obsolete before they are needed again. These are only a few of the possibilities. Many motor distributors are willing to assist you in evaluating a program. Check the Internet for the one nearest you. P&S Jim Custodio is the product support manager for GE Motors, 1635 Broadway 19-5, Fort Wayne, IN 46802, 260-439-3245, 260-439-3338, [email protected], www.gemotors.com.

40

JUNE 2007

www.pump-zone.com

PUMPS & SYSTEMS