Presenter Disclosure. Distal & Proximal Biceps Ruptures. Objectives. Anatomy. Demographics DISTAL BICEPS. Participants will be able to:

Faculty/Presenter Disclosure Distal & Proximal Biceps Ruptures • Faculty: Tanner Dunlop • Relationships with commercial interests: – None Practi...
2 downloads 0 Views 7MB Size
Faculty/Presenter Disclosure Distal & Proximal Biceps Ruptures



Faculty: Tanner Dunlop



Relationships with commercial interests: –

None

Practical Orthopedics-What to Do … When To Refer •

T. Dunlop PGY 5 Division of Orthopedic Surgery University of Saskatchewan

This presentation has received no support from any organization .

www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca

Objectives §

Participants will be able to: • Recognize both proximal and distal biceps tendon rupture using practical clinical tools • Appropriately manage and refer when necessary

DISTAL BICEPS www.usask.ca

Demographics

www.usask.ca

Anatomy

1.2 per 100,000 persons / year § 86% dominant elbow § 93% men in their 40’s §

• Case reports of females

Mean age 30-50 § 7.5x greater risk in smokers §

ht t p: / / www. s l i d e s hare . n e t /Or l andoOr t ho/management- of- dis t al - bic eps- inj uri es- in- athl et es

www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca ht t p: / / www. or t hobul l et s . com / anat om y/ 10017/ bi ceps - br achi i

1

Bicipital Aponeurosis (Lacertus Fibrosus) Arises from the medial aspect of the muscle belly at the junction of the musculotendinous unit and the distal biceps tendon § Passes distally and medially across the antecubital fossa §

www.usask.ca Di s t al Bi ceps Tendon

www.usask.ca

I nj ur i es . M i l l et t et al . J BJ S Cur r ent Concept s Revi ew 2010

Mechanism Rapid, unexpected Eccentric load § Elbow at 90o of flexion § §

ht t p: / / www. s l i des har e. net / Or l andoOr t ho/ m anagem ent - of - di s t al - bi ceps - i nj ur i es - i n- at hl et es

www.usask.ca Di s t al Bi ceps Tendon

www.usask.ca

I nj ur i es . M i l l et t et al . J BJ S Cur r ent Concept s Revi ew 2010

History

Examination

Sudden, sharp, tearing sensation § Painful “pop/tearing sensation” at time of injury § Intense pain subsides in few hours § Dull ache can last for weeks § Subjective weakness in supination

§

§

§ § §

Proximal retraction of muscle belly Change in contour Medial ecchymosis Loss of biceps continuity • •

Underlying brachialis tendon may also be mistaken for biceps Lacertus fibrosis may remain intact

www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca ht t p: / / www. s l i des har e. net / Or l andoOr t ho/ m anagem ent - of - di s t al - bi ceps - i nj ur i es - i n- at hl et es

2

Hook test

§

Flex elbow to 90 degrees Fully supinate forearm Index finger hooked from the lateral edge of biceps tendon When there is no cordlike structure to hook under

§

Sensitivity and specificity 100%

§ § §



The tendon is not intact

The Hook Tes t f or Dis t al Bic eps Tendon Avuls ion.

O’Dr is coll

et al. Am J Spor t s M ed Nov 2007, 35 1865- 1869

www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca Th e Ho o k Test fo r Distal Bicep s Ten d on Av ulsion . O’Drisco ll et al. Am J S p orts M ed No v 2 00 7, 35 18 65 -18 6 9

DDx §

Imaging

Other causes of antecubital pain

§

• Cubital bursitis • Bicipital tendinosis (tendon degeneration) • Partial biceps tendon rupture •

Can be hard to distinguish between complete and partial ruptures clinically

• Entrapment of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve

X-ray • Occasionally show small fleck or avulsion of bone from radial tuberosity • Rule out associated elbow injuries

www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca h ttp ://www.slid esh are.n et/Orlan d o Orth o/man ag emen t-o f-d istal-b icep s-inju ries-in -athletes

Imaging §

Ultrasound

Ultrasound • Should not be used for routine use •

§

False negative rate

MRI • • • •

When dx is unclear Complete vs partial tear Muscle substance vs tendon tear Degree of retraction •

Chronic tear www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca h ttp ://rad io p aed ia.o rg/cases/d istal-b icep s-ten d o n-ru p tu re

3

MRI §

Although all these imaging modalities are nice…

§

This is mainly a clincial diagnosis

www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca

h ttp ://rad io p aed ia.o rg/cases/d istal-b icep s-ten d o n-ru p tu re

Why is it important?

Management §

§

Non-operative • •

What function do you loose? • Up to 50% loss of supination • Up to 40% loss of flexion strength • Significant loss of endurance

§

ht t ps : / / www. googl e. ca/ s ear ch?q=hand+t ur ni ng+door +handl e ht t ps : / / www. googl e. ca/ s ear ch?q=s cr ewdr i ver

Low-demand or medically unfit Painless function with weakness and early fatigue in supination associated with nonsurgical tx

Operative •

Ideally occur within few weeks from injury

• •

Superior flexion strength (30%) Superior supination strength (40%)



Superior endurance

S u rg ical treatmen t o f d istal b icep s ru p ture. JAAOS 2 01 0; 18 : 13 9-1 48

www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca

When to Refer?

Operative Treatment Techniques

Refer all complete or questionable distal biceps for consideration of surgery via ACAL § While surgery within a ‘few weeks’ is technically ok – if these referrals all start coming by fax to people’s offices it will be difficult to get them in

§

§

One-Incision • Interference Screw • Button • Suture anchor

§

Two-Incision • Imbedded in trough

www.usask.ca

h ttp ://www.slid esh are.n et/Orlan d o Orth o/man ag emen t-o f-d istal-b icep s-inju ries-in -athletes

www.usask.ca

4

Post Op Care §

Partial Biceps Rupture

Generally:

§

• +/- Immobilized in flexion with the forearm in neutral rotation x 1-6 weeks •

Many do not immobile if good quality repair

§ § §

• Early controlled ROM • No resistance until >3 months

§ §

Painful and require prolonged recovery Initial treatment = NSAIDs + PT If failure of non-surgical = consider surgery Tears 50% tear = detachment of partial tear with repair of the distal biceps insertion If any question regarding partial vs complete…refer!

www.usask.ca

Chronic Ruptures

www.usask.ca

Chronic ruptures

Often result of missed diagnosis Rarely report pain § Present with loss of supination strength § MRI – location of tear and amount of retraction § Surgically challenging §

§

Management • Extensile anterior approach to localize stump • Interposition grafting may be required

§



Autograft (semitendinosus tendon)



Allograft (achilles tendon)

• Tissue retraction • Loss of elasticity • Early atrophy

www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca h ttp ://www.slid esh are.n et/Orlan d o Orth o/man ag emen t-o f-d istal-b icep s-inju ries-in ath letes

Complications § §

PIN palsy (1-4%) LABCN palsy (0-11%) •

§ § §

Summary § §

Occurs most commonly in 30-50 year old males Have a high clinical suspicion given classic history and physical •

Classically one incision technique

Symptomatic HO (4-7%) Re-rupture (1-2%) All complications are higher in surgical repair of chronic tears

§ §

• § §

Physical exam is key for diagnosis

Consider imaging modalities to help with diagnosis Healthy, active persons with distal biceps tendon ruptures may benefit from early surgical repair Thus needs referral in necessary in a timely fashion (ACAL)

Loss of forearm rotation, HO, radioulnar synostosis, and nerve injury can occur with surgical management Chronic ruptures are more difficult to manage

C o mp l i cati o n s fo l l o wi ng d i stal bi cep s rep ai r. J Han d Su rg Am. 20 1 2 Oct;3 7(1 0):2 11 2-7

www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca

5

PROXIMAL BICEPS h ttp s://www.g o o g le.ca/search ?q = jo h n+ elway + su per+ b o wl&esp v

www.usask.ca

Shoulder Girdle

www.usask.ca

Function of LHB §

Cadaveric and anatomic studies • •

Contributes to glenohumeral stability in all directions Restraining abnormal translations



Humeral head depressor



LHB is a secondary stabilizer for the above functions* Lo n g h ead o f the b icep s ten din op ath y: diag n osis an d man ag emen t. Nh o et al., JAAOS 2 01 0; 1 8: 64 5-6 56

www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca

h ttp s://www.sh o u ld erd oc.co .u k/article/1 4 31

LHB Tedinopathy

LHB Tendon Rupture

Spectrum from inflammatory tendinitis to degenerative tendinosis § Arises secondary repetitive traction, friction and GH rotation § Correlated with rotator cuff tendinopathy § Isolated biceps tendinitis in younger

§

§

Rupture mostly commonly at tendon’s origin and at exit of bicipital groove near musculotendinous junction § Most common > 50 yo § Associated with biceps tendinitis

• Overhead sports Lo n g h ead o f the b icep s ten din op ath y: diag n osis an d man ag emen t. Nh o et al., JAAOS 2 01 0; 1 8: 64 5-6 56

www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca

6

Causes §

Risk Factors Age Heavy overhead activities § Shoulder overuse § Smoking § Corticosteroid medications §

Two main causes: •

Injury • •



§

Fall hard on an outstretched arm Sudden biceps flexion against stronger apposing force

Overuse •

Wearing down and fraying of the tendon • • •

Rupture with little or no trauma Occurs slowly over time It can be worsened by overuse

www.usask.ca

History § § § § § § §

www.usask.ca

Physical exam

Sudden, sharp pain in the upper arm Audible pop or snap Cramping of the biceps muscle Bruising from the middle of the upper arm Pain or tenderness at the shoulder and the elbow

§ § § §

Pain with AROM of shoulder and elbow Bruising and discoloration Popeye sign Weakness with elbow flexion •

Will resolve with time

Weakness in the shoulder and the elbow Difficulty turning the arm palm up or palm down www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca h ttp s://www.sh o u ld erd oc.co .u k/article/1 4 31

Imaging §

Plain radiograph shoulder • •

§

Rule out other conditions Seldom helpful in diagnosis of LHB tendonitis and rupture

U/S – highly accurate for detection of full thickness ruptures •

§

Imaging

Also rule out other pathologies

MRI allows visualization of biceps tendon, bicipital groove and bony osteophytes

www.usask.ca

Imaging for proximal biceps tendon ruptures is also used to assess for concomitant rotator cuff or other pathology § As in the case of distal biceps ruptures, this is mainly a clinical diagnosis §

www.usask.ca

7

Treatment §

Nonsurgical Management

Nonoperative

§

Most middle aged and older patient • Should be considered for all

§

Rest NSAIDs § Activity modification § PT

Reconstructive/Tenodesis

§ §

www.usask.ca

Management §

Indications for surgical Management

Conservative treatment usually results in relatively little function impairment of the shoulder •

www.usask.ca

No difference at elbow joint in forearm supination or elbow flexion strength when comparing tenotomy, tenodesis and nonsurgical

§ § §

• §

vs •

Mostly for cosmetic deformity Unresolved weakness / cramping / pain Those who require complete recovery of strength

Some suggest tenodesis results in less strength loss of supination, less risk of cramping and improved cosmetic result

Manual laborers / athletes

Consists of: • Arthroscopy • Separate incision to find ruptured tendon stump • Tenodesis • • •



Biciptal groove Suprapec Subpec

Multiple fixation methods h ttp s://www.sh o u ld erd oc.co .u k/article/1 4 31

www.usask.ca

www.usask.ca

Post op protocol

Summary

Sling x 4-6 weeks § Progress to full active and passive shoulder ROM during first 6 weeks § Active elbow flexion and suspiration exercises after 6 weeks

§

§

www.usask.ca

LHB tendinopathy common source of shoulder pain and can lead to tendon rupture § Treated non-operatively once diagnosis established § Operative treatment mainly for cosmesis

www.usask.ca h ttp s://www.g o o g le.ca/search ?q = jo h n+ elway + su per+ b o wl&esp v

8

Summary PROXIMAL

References

DISTAL

§

AGE

>50

Suggest Documents