Passenger transport: challenges, trends & opportunities

Passenger transport: challenges, trends & opportunities Matthias Gather Transport and Spatial Planning Institute Erfurt University of Applied Science...
Author: Fabian Hofer
0 downloads 2 Views 1MB Size
Passenger transport: challenges, trends & opportunities

Matthias Gather Transport and Spatial Planning Institute Erfurt University of Applied Sciences

www.verkehr-und-raum.de

EIONET meeting on Environment and Transport European Environment Agency 12th June 2014 Copenhagen

Contents • Forecasts and trends of mobility • Challenges of a sustainable transport system

• Long distance rail and modal shift • Evaluation of European rail connections • Conclusions

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

1

Forecasts of mobility

Source: OECD / ITF (2012): Transport Outlook Seamless Transport for Greener Growth, p. 22

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

2

Forecasts of mobility

Source: OECD / ITF (2012): Transport Outlook Seamless Transport for Greener Growth, p. 26

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

3

Forecasts of mobility

Source: OECD / ITF (2012): Transport Outlook Seamless Transport for Greener Growth, p. 26

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

4

Trends in mobility • In the U.S., U.K., Germany, Netherlands, Scandinavia … Significant decline of car possession and car use amongst younger (urban) people More multimodality and intermodality More deliberately non-motorized trips More multi-locality More long-distance travel Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

5

Challenges and questions … … concerning a sustainable transport system Social justice Mobility for all (elderly, disabled, poor people ... )?

Multimodality in all parts of the country? Sufficient supply in all parts of the country?

Environment Containing energy demand and traffic growth? Promoting „green“ means of transportation?

Mitigating existing and avoiding future environmental damages?

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

Economic efficiency Free and efficient (international) exchange of goods?

Secure financing of transport infrastructure? True cost in the transport system?

6

Challenges and objectives • De-coupling of transport and economic growth (Traffic and transport are not synonymous with mobility > securing mobility with less traffic!) • Modal shift towards environmentally friendlier means of transport • Improving the environmental impact / mitigating the environmental costs of transport

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

7

CO2 - Emissions of transport modes in passenger transport in g/Pkm – 2009 200

187 180 160

150

Alternative fuels? Electric vehicles?

CO2 – Emissions in g/Pkm

140 120 100 76

80

71

60 46 40

31

20 0

0

Flugzeug Airplane

Pkw Car

Bahn - NV Rail (reg)

Linienbus Bus (reg)

Bahn - FV Rail (long)

Transport mode Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

Reisebus Coach

Fahrrad Bicycle

Quelle: Umweltbundesamt

Long distance rail and modal shift „High-speed rail as an alternative for air transport • … • On the links Paris-Brussels, Paris-Marseille and Madrid-Seville the share of rail transport has increased by a factor 2-3 following introduction of high-speed rail services. On the links Paris-London and Madrid-Barcelona rail had a share of respectively 70 and 60% in 2010. On some of the links (e.g. Paris-Brussels) air services were discontinued after introduction of the high-speed rail services. • High-speed rail is a proven alternative for air transport with travel times up to 4 hours. Data for the HSL-Est connection that was finished in 2007 show that air transport on the ParisStrasbourg link has been reduced from 1 million flights to 400,000 flights.” Source: CE Delft (2011): Potential of modal shift to rail transport, p. 54

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

9

Selected European metropolises (116) Larger Urban Zones (Agglomerationen) > 1 Mio. Einw. + LUZ (500.000 - 1 Mio. Einw.) mit starker Metropolfunktion (Metroindex > 7,5) + LUZ mit wichtigen politischen Funktionen (Politik-Index > 2,5) +LUZ 500T-1M mit Metroindex > 2,5 und Luftlinienentfernung zu bestehendem LUZ > 150 km

Perm

Ufa Sankt-Peterburg

Helsinki Oslo

Kazan

Tallinn

Niznij Novgorod

Stockholm Samara Göteborg

Glasgow Edinburgh Belfast

Moskva Riga

Arhus

Newcastle-u.-T.

Saratov

Kobenhavn-Malmö Dublin

Vilnius

Leeds Manchester-Liverpool Sheffield

Randstad

Lille

Berlin Hannover Bielefeld Rhein-Ruhr Leipzig Maas-Rhein

Luxembourg

Frankfurt a. M.

Bruxelles

Paris

Genève Lyon Milano

Charkiv Kyjiv

Wroclaw Katowice-Krakow

Wien-Bratislava

Chisinau Odesa

Budapest

Ljubljana Zagreb Venézia-Padova

Tbilisi

Yerevan

Sarajevo Sofia

Zaragoza Barcelona

Skopje

Roma

Lisboa Nápoli Valencia

Bucuresti

Beograd

Nice Marseille

Madrid

Donetsk Rostov-na-Donu Dnipropetrovsk

Lviv

Ostrava

Bologna

Toulouse

Porto

Volgograd

Warszawa Lodz

Praha

Stuttgart Strasbourg Linz Basel München Zürich Bern

Torino

Poznan

Nürnberg

Rhein-Neckar

Nantes

Bordeaux

Voronez

Hamburg Bremen

Cardiff-Bristol London

Bilbao

Minsk

Gdansk

Birmingham

Bari

Istanbul

Tiranë Bursa

Thessaloniki

Palma

Sevilla

Izmir Málaga

Ankara

Palermo

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

Gaziantep

Konya Adana

Athina

10

Baki

Selecting European connections Triangulation of metropolitian areas (adopted): 306 metropolitan connections

LUZ mit Triangulation plus Korrekturen

Ufa

Sankt-Peterburg

Helsinki Oslo

Perm

Kazan

Tallinn

Niznij Novgorod

Stockholm Samara Göteborg

Glasgow Edinburgh Belfast

Moskva Riga

Arhus

Newcastle-u.-T.

Saratov

Kobenhavn-Malmö Dublin

Vilnius

Leeds Manchester-Liverpool Sheffield

Randstad

Lille

Berlin Hannover Bielefeld Rhein-Ruhr Leipzig Maas-Rhein

Luxembourg

Frankfurt a. M.

Bruxelles

Paris

Genève Lyon Milano

Charkiv Kyjiv

Wroclaw Katowice-Krakow

Wien-Bratislava

Chisinau Odesa

Budapest

Ljubljana Zagreb Venézia-Padova

Tbilisi

Yerevan

Sarajevo Sofia

Zaragoza Barcelona

Skopje

Roma

Lisboa Nápoli Valencia

Bucuresti

Beograd

Nice Marseille

Madrid

Donetsk Rostov-na-Donu Dnipropetrovsk

Lviv

Ostrava

Bologna

Toulouse

Porto

Volgograd

Warszawa Lodz

Praha

Stuttgart Strasbourg Linz Basel München Zürich Bern

Torino

Poznan

Nürnberg

Rhein-Neckar

Nantes

Bordeaux

Voronez

Hamburg Bremen

Cardiff-Bristol London

Bilbao

Minsk

Gdansk

Birmingham

Bari

Istanbul

Tiranë Bursa

Thessaloniki

Palma

Sevilla

Izmir Málaga

Ankara

Palermo

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

Gaziantep

Konya Adana

Athina

11

Baki

Evaluation of connections Evaluation criteria for level of service: • Travel time  • Frequency  • Number of transfers () • Fares  • Comfort  • Punctuality 

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

12

Evaluation: Frequency

Fahrthäufigkeit pro Legende Richtung Metropolen und Tag Häufigkeit Anzahl

0 F E D C B A

0 1 2-4 5 - 12 13 - 24 25 - 36 37 - 92

Basel - Zürich

92

Edinburgh - Glasgow

66

Sheffield - London

53

Rhein-Neckar - Frankfurt

79

Manchester-Liverpool - Leeds

63

Rhein-Ruhr - Bielefeld

52

Bern - Zürich

74

Linz - Wien-Bratislava

60

Manchester-Liverpool - Birmingham

52

Basel - Bern

72

London - Birmingham

56

Bern - Geneve

51

Evaluation: Travel Speed (Beeline)

Legende

Metropolen

V_max V-Max

0 F E D C B A

km/h

0 1 - 25 26 - 50 51 - 75 76 - 100 101 - 150 151 - 219

Madrid - Zaragoza

219

Paris - Lille

192

Zaragoza - Barcelona

173

Madrid - Barcelona

202

Madrid - Valencia

191

Málaga - Madrid

172

Paris - Lyon

201

Milano - Bologna

186

Milano - Torino

172

Brüssel - Paris

198

London - Lille

178

Lille - Bruxelles

171

km/h

Evaluation: Overall connecting quality Legende Metropolen

Verbindungsqualität Wert

0 F E D C B A

0 1 - 100 101 - 350 351 - 750 751 - 2000 2001 - 5000 5001 - 14361

f

vRIN gesamt

f

vRIN gesamt

f

vRIN gesamt

Basel - Zürich

92

(156)

14361

London - Birmingham

56

(184)

10303

Rhein-Ruhr - Bielefeld

52

(178)

9235

Rhein-Neckar - Frankfurt

79

(167)

13197

Basel - Bern

72

(138)

9904

Manch.-Liv. - Leeds

63

(143)

9033

Bern - Zürich

74

(161)

11915

Linz - Wien-Bratisl.

60

(163)

9784

Roma - Bologna

47

(185)

8708

Edinburgh - Glasgow

66

(166)

10933

Frankfurt - Rhein-Ruhr

49

(192)

9389

Bruxelles - Maas-Rhein

49

(162)

7957

Cluster very often

CH

Frequency

A

UK B

PL/CZ

IT

C

D

FR

ES C

B

A Speed quality (abstract value)

very fast

Cluster very often

CH

DE

Frequency

A

UK B

PL/CZ

IT

C

D

FR

ES C

B

A Speed quality (abstract value)

very fast

Conclusions • The overall aim of a sustainable transport system is to secure individual mobility under fair prices with no damage to the natural environment. • There are already good examples and good solutions for a sustainable multimodal local passenger transport system in urban areas. • It is much more difficult to identify good examples and good solutions for a sustainable local passenger transport system in rural areas in Europe. • Electric (individual) vehicles are likely to play an important role in securing sustainable mobility in rural areas. Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

18

Conclusions • Concerning interregional travel the respective environmental strengths and potentials of each transport mode should be made use of. • On a regional and inter-regional scale railways are a well established transport mode with comparably little environmental impact. • Furthermore between neighbouring metropolises railways are generally highly competitive with all other modes.

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

19

Recommendations • Rather promote railways than air travel or coaches. • Focus on minimising barriers of interoperabilty. • Focus on international lines between major metropolises. • Stronger European concept of networks than EU corridors. • Don‘t focus only on speed, also improve frequency. • Provide the administrative and financial framework for ordering publicly funded services on long distance railway connections. Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

20

Sources •

CE Delft (2011): Potential of modal shift to rail transport. Study on the projected effects on GHG emissions and transport volumes. Eelco den Boer, Huib van Essen, Femke Brouwer, Enrico Pastori (TRT), Alessandra Moizo (TRT). Delft, March 2011 http://www.cedelft.eu/publicatie/potential_of_modal_shift_to_rail_transport/1 163



Gather, Matthias; Lüttmerding, Attila (2013): Level of service on passenger railway connections between European metropolises. = Berichte des Instituts Verkehr und Raum, Bd. 15. Erfurt. http://www.fherfurt.de/fhe/fileadmin/Material/Institut/Verkehr_Raum/Download/IVR_Berich te/IVR_Bericht_LevelOfServices_v8.pdf



OECD / ITF (2012): Transport Outlook - Seamless Transport for Greener Growth. http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/pub/pdf/12Outlook.pdf



UBA – Umweltbundesamt (2010): CO2-Emissionsminderung im Verkehr in Deutschland. Mögliche Maßnahmen und ihre Minderungspotenziale. Ein Sachstandsbericht des Umweltbundesamtes. Texte 05/2010. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/ubainfomedien/mysql_medien.php?anfrage=Kennummer&Suchwort=3773

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

21

Forschung • Anwendung • Wissenstransfer

Prof. Dr. Matthias Gather Verkehrspolitik und Raumplanung

Prof. Dr. Florian Heinitz Transportwirtschaft

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich H. Kill Verkehrssystemgestaltung

Passenger transport: challenges, trends and opportunities (Gather)

Institut Verkehr und Raum Fak. Wirtschaft-Logistik-Verkehr Fachhochschule Erfurt Altonaer Str. 25, D-99085 Erfurt Tel. +49 (361) 6700 - 758 www.verkehr-und-raum.de