NEWSLETTER

AUSTRALIAN BRIDGE FEDERATION INC. EDITOR: Stephen Lester Approved for Print Post S65001/00163

NO. 134 NOVEMBER 2008 ABN 70 053 651 666

Roger Penny Seniors’ Swiss Pairs, 2008

T

he Australian Bridge Federation introduced a new event to the calendar in 2005, the Tasmanian National Seniors’ Swiss Pairs. This event was renamed the Roger Penny Seniors’ Swiss Pairs in 2006, in memory of Tasmanian director Roger Penny. It takes place on the two days prior to the Australian Swiss Pairs in October, the venue alternating between Launceston and Hobart. This year we were in Hobart, and the number of entries had swelled yet again: 44 pairs in 2005 and 2006, 54 pairs in 2007 and 66 pairs this year. The format was nine rounds of 12-board matches, and as usual, slam bidding generally determined the results of most matches. My partner was Marlene Watts, and she likes to bid ‘em up, so we gained and lost many IMPs whenever she took a rosy view of her holding, which she often does. Take this one, from Match 3: Dealer: South Vul: NS

l A9876 kQ 5 jA J 9 4 iJ 4

lKJ43 kA K 9 2 j7 6 i7 6 3

l Q 10 2 k10 8 6 4 j10 8 iQ 10 8 5 l5 kJ 7 3 jK Q 5 3 2 iA K 9 2

West

North

East

Chadwick

Pass Pass Pass Pass

1l 2k 4j 6j

South Watts

Pass Pass Pass All Pass

1j 2i 3j 5i

This was the bidding with Marlene South, and me North (hands rotated for convenience).

Ted Chadwick with Convener Barry Kelly and Marlene Watts

The first three bids were normal of course, but then I introduced the fourth suit 2k to see if partner still had three-card support for my spades. With no heart stopper, Marlene had to bid 3j, so I set diamonds as trumps with my 4j bid. My intention was for us to start a cuebidding auction, hoping to stop in 5j if neither of us had a heart control. Unfortunately, my 4j turned out to be ‘Minorwood’, a form of Blackwood where you use four of your minor to ask for Key Cards rather than the normal 4NT. Marlene’s response of 5i showed two Key Cards and the queen of trumps. Unable to investigate how I would have liked, I took a shot at 6j, whereupon the opening leader gave our auction a withering look and put the two top hearts on the table. Marlene knows that I hate Minorwood – it seems to ‘get in the way’ of any constructive slam investigation type of auction, and, at least to my way of thinking, it seems to have no redeeming features. That’s my opinion, and I’m sticking to it, but I would like my convention card to read ‘I do NOT play Gerber or Minorwood’. At this stage of the event our slam bidding record was impeccable, played 3 won 0! Match 4 threw up the first of many very distributional hands.

Dealer: North Vul: All

l7 kA Q 10 6 4 3 j7 iQ 7 6 4 3 l K Q 10 l A8642 k9 7 2 k5 j10 8 6 jA K Q 9 4 3 2 iA K J 2 i--lJ953 kK J 8 jJ 5 i10 9 8 5

North opened 2j to show one of a variety of hands, this time a weak two in hearts. I overcalled 3j, yes, just 3j. I didn’t believe it myself, how could I produce such an underbid? Please, no letters from Victoria. I confidently expected to introduce the spades when the opponents bid their hearts, so I was a bit miffed when South actually passed. However, Marlene was still there for me, and she had a couple of suits stopped, so she ventured forth with 3NT. I was wondering how I could find out if partner had the right cards for me in spades, and the solution came to me after a few seconds’ consideration. Yes, the best way to discover partner’s spade holding was to have a damn good look at the dummy when it hits the table. Having reached this conclusion I made up for my previous underbid by blasting 6j. I was duly rewarded with a great dummy and a surprising 12 IMPs for my efforts. I had never held a hand of more than 27 HCP in my life, but in Match 8, this picture gallery arrived: Dealer: South Vul: EW

lJ84 kQ J 7 6 jQ 9 7 i10 7 3

l632 k10 9 8 5 j10 5 2 iJ 6 2

Articles Of Interest & Information 6th PABF Congress Results Sydney Spring Nationals Results Letter to the Editor Australian Swiss Pairs - top three NOT Format for 2009 ABF Biographies - Ivy Dahler Bringing bridge to the public eye World Mind Sports Games, Beijing New clubrooms at Geraldton Top 10 PQP awards Tournament Reports Roger Penny Seniors’ Swiss Pairs, 2008 Regular Features What Should I Bid? The New Laws Bridge in the 21st Century Coaching Cathy at Contract Important Dates Ahead NOT and SWPT Format

6 7 10 11 11 13 15 16 17 18 1 8 12 14 20 22 22

clearly short of the normal values for an opening bid. I thought I had enough for a takeout double, to which partner responded 1l. I counted my tricks thus: given that partner has four spades, we have four spades, two hearts, two diamonds and three clubs. That comes to 11 tricks that I can see, plus a heart ruff in the dummy. So it had to be spades, not 6NT, because there is no ruff in that contract. It is also well known in Sydney that Chadwick never bids 6NT because it rarely makes. I always try to find my fit. I closed the auction with a violent leap to 6l, which Marlene made easily enough. I was unlucky that partner had had to bid 1l with only three, but we were compensated by the 3-3 break in the suit. OK, so 6NT was also cold! Surprisingly, this slam brought in 9 IMPs.

l AKQ5 kA K jA K 6 iA K Q 4 l 10 9 7 k4 3 2 jJ 8 4 3 i9 8 5

Yes, I had picked up my first ever 32-count. After two passes, Kevin Hume opened the North hand 1k, 2

1

INDEX

How can that be? I guess that a lot of the field had been taught, somewhere in the deep and distant past, that you need 33 HCP to consider bidding a slam; as they only had 32 they stopped in game. I know it was a seniors’ event and we should behave accordingly, but that is ridiculous. As on my previous exhibit, the best way to discover if partner has the right jack to enable you to make 12 tricks is to bid the slam and have a damn good look at the dummy when it goes down. Also from this match:

Dealer: South Vul: Nil

With one match to go the leader board looked like this:

l J 10 6 2 kA 9 4 3 j3 iK 10 9 8

l83 lQ7 kK 8 5 2 k10 7 jA 9 8 7 6 5 jK J 10 2 i6 iJ 7 4 3 2 l AK954 kQ J 6 jQ 4 iA Q 5 Our auction may require some explanation, maybe justification. West North East South Chadwick

Pass Pass Pass Pass

3j1

4k3 4NT5 6l

Watts

Pass Pass Pass All Pass

1l 4i2 4l4 5j

1. 3j showed a limit raise in spades with four trumps (Bergen). OK, I should have a little more than this but I liked my hand. and I did have an eight-loser, which is normal for an invitational raise. 2. Marlene had a six-loser hand, so 4l should make opposite my expected eight-loser. However, as I said before, Marlene likes to take a rosy view of life, so she made a slam try with 4i! 3. Once I’ve chosen to bid 3j, rather than the weaker 3i Bergen raise, then I am compelled to stick it out and not back down from this decision, so I cooperated with my 4k cuebid. 4. Marlene now signed off, having already overbid with that 4i cuebid. 5. Partner’s cuebid of 4i followed by a signoff in 4l shows a concern about the diamond suit. I had a singleton diamond, so that suit was under control, and my iK was a huge card. I felt compelled to continue, and did so. That’s my justification, anyway, When partner showed 3 Key Cards, I didn’t bother to ask about the queen of trumps; we must have been running out of time, I just bid the slam. A club lead would have picked up that suit for declarer, but Kevin Hume essayed his singleton in favour of a trump lead. Marlene drew trumps, ran the queen of hearts, which held the trick, and continued with the jack. Happiness was the fall of the ten and an undeserved 10 IMPs for another piece of overbidding.

Hutton & Hutton 164 Beck & Chung 157 Watts & Chadwick 142 We were to play the Huttons in the last round, and by my calculations we would need to beat them 25-2 to overtake them, virtually impossible. We would have to be on the right side of a lot of swingy boards. The ABF dealing machine obliged, the next hand being the first of many outrageously distributional hands in this last match. Dealer: East Vul: NS

lKJ742 kK J 8 4 j--iK Q 8 6

l9653 l A Q 10 8 k7 k10 6 3 jJ 9 3 jK 7 iA 10 9 7 2 iJ 5 4 3 l --kA Q 9 5 2 jA Q 10 8 6 5 4 2 i--I had already been treated to my first 32-count, now I was given my first ever ‘all red’ hand. I considered opening 6j, and I understand that a few players did just this; I also heard that there were those who opened 5j, a truly seniors’ bid. I saw no reason to rush things so I contented myself with 1j. Partner responded 1l and I reversed into 2k. I got some form of heart raise from partner and jumped to 6k, a tired bid given that 13 tricks are there for the taking. Our 1460 gave us 3 IMPs for some reason, the smallest swing in the match. I discovered a more successful auction to the top spot, names withheld to protect the guilty. West North East South Pass 1j Pass 1l Pass 2k Pass 4j1 Pass 7j2 3 Pass 7k All Pass The explanations of this auction are: 1. A splinter in agreement of hearts, completely forgetting that partner had opened 1j. 2. Wow, you have such good support for my diamonds; I’ll worry about the heart king after you’ve put down the dummy in 7j. 3. Ooops, a sheepish retreat to 7k and await the lash.

1

3

An aceless North was both surprised and rather pleased with the happy ending that transpired. Sometimes it pays to be lucky rather than good; witness this one: Dealer: North Vul: EW

lJ7654 kA 8 4 jQ iA J 4 2

l9 l A Q 10 2 kK J 9 6 5 3 2 k10 jJ 10 7 3 jA K 8 6 5 4 2 i8 i10 lK83 kQ 7 j9 iK Q 9 7 6 5 3 West

North

East

South

T Hutton

Watts

H Hutton

Chadwick

5j

1l 6i

3j Dbl

4i All Pass

3j from Helena was not the weak variety; it showed a good hand, intermediate plus. My 4i was a serious overbid, but I did have a sevencard suit and I felt the need to mention them. Tony jumped to 5j, and Marlene contented herself with ‘only’ 6i. We had bid this contract ‘to make’, and we were both a little surprised when we were doubled. Our score of -300 was a little embarrassing: we had bid it ‘to make’. But wait, their 5j contract was making, so 6i doubled gave us 7 IMPs against the datum of -600. We waited till later to congratulate ourselves for finding the good save! Well, if you thought that was lucky, this one is obscene: (hands rotated for convenience): Dealer: West Vul: All

4

North

East

South

H Hutton

Chadwick

T Hutton

4k Pass All Pass

Dbl 5l

Pass Pass

5k 7l

I’m not sure of the Huttons’ methods, so can’t tell you if Helena’s double of 4k is penalty-oriented, or for takeout. Regardless, Tony’s 5k got 5l from Helena, and he leapt spectacularly to 7l. There seemed to me to be little point in my leading a heart; dummy was clearly void in that suit, and I certainly wasn’t going to lead a trump holding Q-7 there. So it was down to a diamond or a club. Reluctant to remove a potential club guess from declarer, I led a neutral diamond, with a spectacular result. Partner ruffed this for one down and 14 IMPs to our side. This was a cruel result for the Huttons; on any other lead they pick up 16 IMPs, a turnaround of 30 IMPs on a blind opening lead. It transpired that we had indeed achieved the virtually impossible, and had won this match 25-2. The final leader board looked like this: Beck & Chung Watts & Chadwick Hutton & Hutton

179 167 166

The winners had won their last match 22-8, and finished with a huge 12 VP lead over the second placegetters. This was a very popular win by a couple of Taswegians, Phil Beck and David Chung, who had been high on the leader board throughout the event. Many congratulations to them. Ted Chadwick

l A432 kA 6 3 jK J 7 4 iK 4

lJ lQ7 kK Q 10 9 8 5 2 kJ 7 4 j--j9 6 5 2 i10 9 8 6 2 iJ 7 5 3 l K 10 9 8 6 5 k--jA Q 10 8 3 iA Q

1

West Watts

2008 Roger Penny Seniors’ Swiss Pairs winners, David Chung - Phil Beck

7+(%5,'*(6+23 3HQVKXUVW6WUHHW:,//28*+%