Micro simulation of cyclists

Micro simulation of cyclists Niels Tørslev, Director Traffic Department Rasmus Albrink, COWI A/S Rising amount of cyclist in Copenhagen the past 40...
Author: Hilda Atkins
8 downloads 1 Views 2MB Size
Micro simulation of cyclists

Niels Tørslev, Director Traffic Department Rasmus Albrink, COWI A/S

Rising amount of cyclist in Copenhagen the past 40 years

2

Tilføj præsentationens titel i "Indsæt/ Sidehoved og Sidefod"

It is not just for fun - we have congestion on the cycle tracks

3

Micro simulation of cyclists in peak hour traffic

4

Micro simulation of cyclists Velo City 2013

The project's background •The correct capacity •Estimated volumes •No left turn •Standard cyclist behavior

5

Micro simulation of cyclists Velo City 2013

General method •

Setting the basic parameters • Vehicle characteristics • Speed distributions • Acceleration distributions

• • • • • •

Modeling bike paths Following parameters Overtaking parameters Behavior at narrowing sections Behavior at bus stops

Modeling cyclists in intersections • Behavior in waiting zones • Behavior at stop lines • Behavior at right turns 6

Micro simulation of cyclists Velo City 2013

General method •Traffic counts •Speed counts (even path, up hill, down hill, normal bikes, carrier bikes, electrical bikes) •Video material •Visual inspection •Literature Analysis of video material

7

Micro simulation of cyclists Velo City 2013

Test in VISSIM

Comparing to video

Validation in regard to traffic volumes

General method •More complex than initially assumed •Many different behavioral patterns along a bike path

8

Micro simulation of cyclists Velo City 2013

Example – Following and overtaking •Detailed understanding of the model

Parameter

Description

Expectation to the calibration

CC0

The distance between two vehicles at full stop.

Less, as cyclists keep closer together than cars in a queue.

CC1

Time distance between two moving vehicles.

Less, as two moving cyclists keep closer together than cars.

CC2

Variation in the distance between two successive vehicles

Less, as cyclists are more independent and behave more individually than drivers

CC3

The limit for when following parameters come into play

Less, as cyclists are more independent and behave more individually than drivers

CC4

Controls the negative speed variations between two successive vehicles

Less, as cyclists are less willing to (less obliged to) adjust their speed than drivers

CC5

Controls the positive speed variations between two successive vehicles

Less, as cyclists are less willing to (less obliged to) adjust their speed than drivers

CC6

The dependence in speed of variations in distance to the preceding vehicle

Less, as cyclists are less willing to (less obliged to) adjust their speed than drivers

CC7

Acceleration in responce to variations in distance to the preceding vehicle

Less, as bicycles don't accelerate as fast as cars

CC8

Desired acceleration from 0 km/h

Less, as bicycles don't accelerate as fast as cars

CC9

Desired acceleration at 80 km/h

Much smaller. A linear acceleration to 80 km/h is used in the computations

•Best guess for parameter settings •The starting point for the project was looking at CC0 and CC1 •Ended up adjusting CC0-CC9

9

Micro simulation of cyclists Velo City 2013

Example – Following and overtaking •The testing proces in VISSIM •Comparison of various settings •Calibration of the parameters •Visual validation •Validation in regard to traffic counts

10

Micro simulation of cyclists Velo City 2013

Example - Kampmannsgade/Vester Farimagsgade •COWI has conducted a bike simulation of the intersection Kampmannsgade/Vester Farimagsgade in Copenhagen close to Vesterport Station. •The primary purpose was to determine the necessary capacity in a waiting zone in front of the right turning motor vehicles from Kampmannsgade.

•Basis

•Solution

11

Micro simulation of cyclists Velo City 2013

Conclusion •It is possible to build realistic models for the bicycle traffic in Copenhagen (and other cities), but it requires a solid knowledge of VISSIM as a simulation tool. •The model build-up is more complex than in the case of motorized traffic as cyclists have a more individual behavior. •The project has determined some of the fundamental parameters, which has brought us much further. •Many intersection-specific behavioral patterns must be clarified before the simulation •Not a standard tool

12

Micro simulation of cyclists Velo City 2013

Suggest Documents