Marine Renewable Energy Development in Japan

2015 Business Roundtable Series Clean Energy Pathways for Japan and the U.S. Marine Renewable Energy Development in Japan Hydrodynamics on floating p...
Author: Nora Phelps
10 downloads 3 Views 2MB Size
2015 Business Roundtable Series Clean Energy Pathways for Japan and the U.S.

Marine Renewable Energy Development in Japan Hydrodynamics on floating platforms in harmony with marine environment

1st (1998): Container ship

2nd (2007): NWFSC/NOAA NET Systems

3rd (2013): Univ. Washington, PNNL

October 28, 2015 @5:00 PM – 8:30 PM Bellevue City Hall

Daisuke Kitazawa (Dept. Mechanical & Biofunctional Systems, IIS, Univ. Tokyo)

Table of Contents 1. Governmental Policy / Energy Mix in Japan

2. Marine Renewable Energy Potential 3. Marine Renewable Energy Development 4. Social Acceptance 5. Current Issues for MRE Development 2

Energy Demand in Japan

(PJ) 18,000 16,000 14,000

1973 to 2013 GDP: 2.3 times Energy: 1.26 times

(Trillion yen) 600

Collapse of bubble economy

500

Transportation

12,000

400

House

10,000

300

8,000 6,000

Industry

200

Oil shock

4,000

100

2,000 0

Service etc. 0

73 75

80

85

90

95

00

05

10

13

METI: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/about/faq/001/) 3

Energy Mix in 2030 (METI, 2015) Electricity demand

Economic growth (1.7% / year)

966.6 billion kWh

1.278 Electricity source trillion 1.065 Energy saving kWh trillion 196.1 billion Loss etc. Energy kWh kWh Saving: 17

980.8 billion kWh

Renewable 19-20

22-24

Nuclear 17-18

20-22

LNG

22

27

Coal

22

26

Geothermal 1.0-1.1 Biomass 3.7-4.6 Wind 1.7 Solar 7.0 Water: 8.8-9.2

Marine energy is NOT included in energy mix.

Oil 2 3 2013 2030 2030 (actual value) (http://www.meti.go.jp/press/2015/07/20150716004/20150716004_2.pdf) 4

Utilization of Offshore Renewable Energy

Demonstration Site Cabinet Office (2012) 5

Potential of Ocean Energy in Japan Potential within 30 km from shore-line and shallow than 100 m

Maximal Energy Production [TWh/year]

Current Technology Near Future Technology

Wind

Wave

OTEC

Oceanic Current

Tidal Current

Tide

524

19

47

10

6

0.38

723

87

156

10

6

0.38

Total Japan electricity demand ~ 1,000

(NEDO, 2010)

NEDO: New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization

6

Marine Renewable Energy Development 10000

Ten times capacity every 10 years

Commercial plant

Capacity (kW)

SeaGen

1000

Hywind

Pelamis

Pelamis

prototype Pelamis Seaflow European Pico NELHA

100

Open-Centre Turbine Free Flow System Nereus Stringray Sea Snail PowerBuoy Clean Current Blue H Tech

Mighty Whale

Imari Lab. size

Tocardo Aqua Enermar

Kensington

Wave Dragon CoRMaT

10

: Wind

WaveRoller Wave Rotor

: Wave : Tidal Current

Gorlov Helical Turbine

: OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion)

1990

1995

2000 Year

2005

2010 7

Onshore and Offshore Wind Turbine Wakkanai

Toward a commercial stage

Ishikari Bay Setana Noshiro Akita Sakata Awashima (offshore) Yasuoka (offshore) Kabeshima Omaezaki (offshore) Kitakyusyu Kabashima (offshore)

Mutsuogawara Fukushima (offshore) Kashima Choshi (offshore)

Ongoing (49.6 MW) Setana, Sakata, Kashima (commercial) Choshi, Kitakyusyu, Kabashima, Fukushima (demonstration) The others are planned (714.5 MW). (Japan Wind Power Association, Offshore Technology Investigation Working Group, 2014) 8

Marine Energy (Wave) In a stage of development and field test (2014-2016) Project

Location

Company

Multiple Resonances Unit OWC (Oscillating Water Column) Wave Power Device (NEDO)

Sakata, Yamagata

MM Bridge Co., Ltd., etc.

Blow Hole Wave Energy Conversion System (Ministry of Environment)

Echizen, Fukui

The University of Tokyo, etc.

Wave Power Generation System on the Coast (Ministry of Environment)

Oarai, Ibaraki

Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.

Pendulor Type Wave Energy Converter (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology)

Kuji, Iwate

The University of Tokyo, etc.

Point Absorber (modified from Powerbuoy) (NEDO)

Kouzushima, Tokyo

Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.

Overtopping Type Wave Energy Converter (NEDO)

Omaezaki, Shizuoka

Ichikawa Doboku, Co., Ltd., etc.

9

Marine Energy (Tidal Current) In a stage of development (2016~) Project

Location

Company

Savonius Keel & Wind Turbine Darrieus (NEDO)

Kabeshima, Saga

MODEC Inc.

Interior Permanent Magnet Type Vertical Axis Turbine (NEDO)

Yobikonoseto, Nagasaki

Oshima Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., etc.

Pier Utilized Turbine (NEDO)

Obatakeseto, Yamaguchi

The Chugoku Electric Power Co., Inc., etc. Kyowa Engineering Consultants, Co., Ltd., etc.

Contra-Rotating Propeller Type Turbine (NEDO) Double Rotor & Twin Nacelle Turbine (NEDO)

Gogo, Nagasaki

Sasebo Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., etc.

Vertical Axis Turbine (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology)

Sabusawa, Miyagi

The University of Tokyo, etc.

Horizontal Axis Turbine (Ministry of Environment)

Gogo, Nagasaki

Toa Corporation, etc.

TBD (Ministry of Environment)

Awaji, Hyogo

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd

10

Marine Energy (Oceanic Current / OTEC) In a stage of development (Ocean Current) Project

Location

Company

A Floating Type Turbine (NEDO)

IHI Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, etc.

A Floating Type Turbine (NEDO)

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.

Field Test of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (NEDO)

Kumejima, Okinawa

Japan Marine United Corporation, Saga University

In a stage of field test (OTEC)

11

Economical Expect Solar Wind (Land) Wind (Ocean) Solar Heat Wave OTEC

Current 48

2015 23

2020 14

2025

2030 7

9-15

7-11

5-8

(9-15)

12-17

8-11

10-15

5-17

20 15-25

5-10 8-13

13-30 (30-50)

40 40-60

Reducing cost is necessary.

Unit: yen kWh-1 (NEDO, 2010) 12

Access Boat (Marc Costa Ros, 2014) Vision: Increase accessibility to improve availability on R3 sites

Competition • 1,500 info packs • 450 entries • 30 countries • 13 finalists

13

Issues Specific to the Offshore Sector

Demonstration sites Social acceptance Cost Legal issues

Cabinet Office (2012) 14

Environmental Impact Assessment History of EIA 1993: Enactment of the “Basic Environment Law” 1997: Enactment of the “Environmental Impact Assessment Law” 1999: Implementation of “Environmental Impact Assessment Law” The environmental impacts of the following projects must be assessed. 1. Road, 2. River, 3. Railway, 4. Airport, 5. Power plant, 6. Waste deposal site, 7. Landfill and reclamation, 8. Land readjustment project, 9. New residential area development project, 10. Industrial estate development project, 11. New town infrastructure development project, 12. Distribution center complex development project, 13. Residential or industrial land development by specific organizations

EIA is required for the specific project. EIA is always required or the necessity of EIA is judged by project based on the scale of the project. (Ministry of Environment) 15

EIA of Power Plant Hydraulic power plant

Output: 30,000kw or over

Output: 22,500 – 30,000kw

Thermal power plant

Output: 150,000kw or over

Output: 112,500 – 150,000kw

Geothermal power plant

Output: 10,000kw or over

Output: 7,500 – 10,000 kw

Nuclear power plant

All

Wind power plant

Output: 10,000kw or over Output: 7,500 – 10,000 kw From October, 2012 (Ministry of Environment)

If marine energy (wave, tidal or oceanic current, thermal, etc.) developments are accelerated, they will be included in EIA project.

16

Collaboration with Stakeholders Wide Variety of Fisheries

Permitted by Cabinet Minister (Tuna, a Pacific saury, etc., 18 fisheries) Navigation

Recreation

Permitted by Prefectural governor (Gill net, etc., 26 fisheries) Fishery rights (many) Land

a few km

Fisheries Adjustment Committee 17

Demonstration Sites Hokkaido (Tidal)

Yamagata (Wave) Niigata (Wind, Wave, Oceanic)

Aomori (Tidal, Wave) Iwate (Wind, Wave)

Shizuoka (Wind, Wave) Saga (Wind, Tidal) Tokyo (Wave) Nagasaki Wakayama (Wind, Tidal) Ehime (Oceanic) (Wind) Kagoshima (Tidal, Oceanic)

7 sites in 5 areas were selected as a demonstration site.

How are demonstration sites developed?

Okinawa (OTEC, Wave) 18

Current Issues for MRE Development 1. Technological development

Cost 2. High efficiency and low cost 3. Social acceptance 4. Utilization for isolated islands

5. Large scale / Array 19

Thank you for your kind attention!

Tacoma Narrows Bridge

Floating Bridge

20