LAKE SAVERS Natural Lake Restoration Results Update Fall 2010

LAKE ™ SAVERS Natural Lake Restoration™ Results Update Fall 2010 © Lake Savers 1 Contents About Lake Savers Summary of Lake Savers Natural Lake Re...
Author: Samuel Newman
6 downloads 1 Views 3MB Size
LAKE ™ SAVERS Natural Lake Restoration™ Results Update Fall 2010

© Lake Savers

1

Contents About Lake Savers Summary of Lake Savers Natural Lake Restoration™ Methods Results Working with Lake Savers

© Lake Savers

2

About Lake Savers…

Mission: To deliver ACTIONABLE strategies to restore lakes to a balanced, pristine condition for the benefit of current stakeholders and future generations. © Lake Savers

3

Lake Savers Natural Lake Restoration™

Natural Methods for Lake Restoration

© Lake Savers

4

The Need for Lake Restoration Efforts Algae Blooms Odor

© Lake Savers

Excessive Weed Growth Accumulation of Muck/ Loss of Depth

5

Five Key Points Guiding our Approach to Natural Lake Restoration 1. Most water bodies are overfed and out of balance. 2. Conventional strategies are primarily people management strategies not lake management strategies. 3. Nutrient reduction (Internal & External) is the only sustainable approach to Lake Restoration. 4. Lakes Need to Breath to Be Healthy! 5. Lake Savers can put your lake on a diet and exercise program utilizing ENGINEERED AERATION™ and BACTERIAL AUGMENTATION to restore health, balance and recreational quality. © Lake Savers

6

Summary on What’s Wrong with Traditional Approaches the Lake Management LAKE PROBLEMS Algae Blooms Excessive Weed Growth Odor

1. Most dollars are spent on Chemicals, Harvesting and/ or Dredging which only treat symptoms.

Accumulation of Muck/Loss of Depth

ROOT CAUSES Internal Nutrient Loading

External Nutrient Loading

Oxygen Depletion

2. Few, if any resources are directed at solving root causes.

3. Lake continues to deteriorate over time, treatment costs rise.

People Management not Lake Management © Lake Savers

7

Our Approach – Attack the Root Causes! Algae Blooms Excessive Weed Growth Odor

Accumulation of Muck/Loss of Depth

External nutrient loading

FLOATING ISLANDS

Internal nutrient loading ENGINEERED AERATION & BENEFICIAL BACTERIA/ ENZYME TREATMENT

Oxygen Depletion Lake Savers: A Diet & Exercise Program for Lakes! © Lake Savers

8

The Importance of Dissolved Oxygen Oxygen Depleted Lake

Oxygen Rich Lake

1. When oxygen runs out at the lake bottom phosphorus can release from the sediments and feed weed growth and algae blooms.

1. In the presence of oxygen Phosphorus stays locked in the sediments unavailable to weeds and algae.

2. Anaerobic bacteria take over producing ammonia, methane and hydrogen sulfide.

2. Aerobic bacteria thrive forming a healthy bottom environment and base for the aquatic food chain.

3. Organic muck accumulation accelerates.

3. Aerobic bacteria literally eat muck/organics converting it to carbon dioxide and water.

4. Fish Can’t feed at the bottom (where most of the food is) – stunting, fish kills possible, rough fish begin to outcompete desirable species.

4. Fish can feed all the way to the bottom creating a healthy fishery both in size and population of desirable species.

Lakes Need To Breathe To Be Healthy!!! © Lake Savers

9

Lake Savers Natural Lake Restoration™

Floating Islands – Trapping Nutrients at the points of Entry

© Lake Savers

10

Floating Islands for Reducing External Nutrient Loading What are Floating Islands? Porous mats made of a matrix of 100% recycled polyester and bonded together with a high grade marine foam for buoyancy. Highly flexible system with a multitude of design options for aesthetic and functional impact.

How do Floating Islands Work? They create a self-contained environment for vegetation that can absorb significant amounts of nutrients from the water. They mimic natural wetlands at a much lower cost than reclaiming upland areas and converting them to wetlands. They are most effective for Lake Restoration when used around storm drains and inlets to trap nutrients flowing into the lake.

Lake Savers: A Diet & Exercise Program for Lakes! © Lake Savers

11

Lake Savers Natural Lake Restoration™

Engineered Aeration & Biological Augmentation – Complete Water Body Oxygenation and Reduction of Internal Nutrient Loading

© Lake Savers

12

Engineered Aeration & Beneficial Bacteria/Enzyme Treatments How Engineered Aeration & Beneficial Bacteria/Enzyme Treatments Work A system of underwater air diffusers connected to shorebased compressor units by self-sinking airline. Each system is custom engineered based on the specific needs and requirements of each lake. Water picks-up oxygen at the surface and is circulated back to the bottom maintaining a continuous supply of oxygen throughout the entire water column. High oxygen levels and “off-gassing” reduce nutrient levels, reducing weed and algae growth. Beneficial bacteria and enzyme products are added to restore balance to the aquatic eco-system. Beneficial bacteria that require oxygen, literally eat the organic muck on the bottom.

Lakes Need To Breathe To Be Healthy!!! © Lake Savers

13

How Engineered Aeration Restores Lake Health & Balance Toxic Gases removed

CO2

Aerobic benthic bacteria break down organics

N

H 2S

O2

Oxygenated surface water moves to the bottom.

Phosphorus stays locked in sediment

Nutrients removed through the food chain

Lakes Need To Breathe To Be Healthy!!! © Lake Savers

14

Accelerating a Lake’s Natural Cleaning Mechanism

Lakes Need To Breathe To Be Healthy!!! © Lake Savers

15

The Power of Engineered Aeration & Beneficial Bacteria/Enzyme Treatment

2 feet of organic muck prior to treatment

Aerobic bacteria can breakdown organic muck 30 times faster than anaerobic bacteria. Lake Savers: A Diet & Exercise Program for Lakes! © Lake Savers

16

CLEAN-FLO… Engineered Aeration in Action

Lake Savers: A Diet & Exercise Program for Lakes! © Lake Savers

17

CLEAN-FLO… Engineered Aeration in Action

© Lake Savers

18

Lake Savers Management Strategies for Healthier Lakes

Engineered Aeration & Biological Augmentation Results Update

© Lake Savers

19

Greenwood Lake Greenwood Lake, New York About the Lake 80 Treatment area in 9 mile lake – Maximum Depth 12 feet. Treatment area focuses on parts of the lake that are the focal point of the community. Milfoil and algae growth out of control. Water in the treatment area fetid with frequent odor problems in the summer.

Management Program Clean-Flo Engineered Aeration installed in June of 2010. Clean-Flo bacteria and enzyme treatment applied in July of 2010. 5 days of Harvesting.

© Lake Savers

Results Estimated 50% reduction in Milfoil growth in 60 days! No re-growth of milfoil following harvesting. Milfoil reductions not just the result of harvesting. Major improvements in water clarity and quality 20

Greenwood Lake Treatment Area

© Lake Savers

21

Greenwood Lake Results: Before – Upper Eastern Arm Area

© Lake Savers

22

Greenwood Lake Results: After – 45 Days after Installation

© Lake Savers

23

Greenwood Lake Results: Before – Upper Eastern Arm Area

© Lake Savers

24

Greenwood Lake Results: After – 45 Days after installation

© Lake Savers

25

Greenwood Lake Water Quality Data Phosphorus & Nitrogen LOCATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Avg.

Total Phosphorus mg/l 2008 (Before)

0.03

0.07

0.11

0.20

0.19

0.21

0.11

0.17

0.18

0.06

.133

.15

.18

.17

.07

.07

0.06

Total Phosphorus mg/l June 2010 (Before)

.17

.13

.22

Total Phosphorus mg/l Sept 2010 (After)

.06

.06

.05

.05

More than a 50% Reduction in Total Phosphorus in the Treatment Area in less than four months! © Lake Savers

26

Greenwood Lake Season One Results Bottom Sediment Organic Composition Improvement LOCATION

1 2

3

4

5

% Organic 2008 Sample (Before)

45%

% Organic Sept. 2010Sample (After)

24.9%

6

7

43%

18.8%

13.6%

.4%

8

9

10

Avg

38%

35%

40%

25.1%

10.7%

15.6%

“Muck” Accumulation Improvement LOCATION

2

4

5

6

7

8

9

Avg.

Muck Depth 2008 Sample (Before)

12”

18”

36”

24”

12”

18”

18”

19.71”

Muck Depth Sept. 2010Sample

0”

12”

6”

12”

0”

12”

24”

9.42”

(After)

More than a 50% Organic Content of Sediment AND muck depth in less than 4 months © Lake Savers

27

Greenwood Lake Season One Results Lake Bottom in area of Sample 4

June 2010 (Before)

© Lake Savers

Lake Bottom in area of Sample 4

September 2010 (After)

28

Greenwood Lake Season One Results Lake Bottom in area of Sample 8

June 2010 (Before)

© Lake Savers

Lake Bottom in area of Sample 8

September 2010 (After)

29

Turnberry Lakes Lakewood, Illinois About the Lakes 100 Treatment area in 4 community lakes mile lake. Hyper-Eutrophic System. Aggressive herbicide program eliminated aquatic plants and led to algae dominated lakes. Algae mats have been so thick that saplings have been seen growing on top of the algae mats.

Management Program Clean-Flo Engineered Aeration installed in May of 2009. Extremely aggressive beneficial bacteria treatment program implemented in 2009 and 2010. Innovative Harvesting program implemented in conjunction with the system. Commitment to ZERO herbicide/algaecide use. © Lake Savers

Results Muck reductions ranging from 6” to 11” in 2009. Lakes largely clear of algae mats in August of 2010 for the first time in over five years.

30

Turnberry Lakes Treatment Area Max Depth 6 feet Max Depth 16 feet

Max Depth 7 feet

© Lake Savers

Max Depth 8 feet

31

Turnberry Lakes Results Turnberry Lake 3 (Biggest problem lake) July 2010

© Lake Savers

32

Turnberry Lakes Results Turnberry Lake 3 August/September 2010

© Lake Savers

33

Turnberry Lakes Results Turnberry Lakes 2010 “Secret Weapons” Lake Clear Bacteria

© Lake Savers

Weedoo Harvester Boat

34

Turnberry Lakes Muck Reduction Results

Lake 1 (40 Acres, 15 Sample Sites) Lake 3 (8 Acres 10 Sample Sites) Lake 4 (4 Acres 5 Sample Sites) © Lake Savers

April 2009 Baseline

September2009 (Season 1 Result)

Average Muck Depth

Avg. Muck Depth

Net Avg. Reduction Muck Depth

Net Reduction

40.00”

29.07

10.93”

22.80”

6.27”

17.20”

37.10”

32.73”

5.47”

29.25”

2.48”

8.95”

24.80”

16.20”

8.60”

14.80

1.40”

10.00”

September 2010 (Season 2 Result)

2 Season Cumulative Reduction

35

Turnberry Lakes Muck Reduction Results Gravel exposed near shore on Lake 1 September 2010 These areas had more than 12” of muck above the gravel prior to system implementation

© Lake Savers

36

Collins Lake Scotia, New York About the Lake 60 acre lake with public beach. Beach closed for two years due to fecal bacteria issue. Milfoil and pondweed growth out of control. Watershed management strategies and herbicide treatment were not producing adequate results.

Management Program One-time herbicide treatment for milfoil and pondweed (2006). Clean-Flo Engineered Aeration installed in June of 2006. Clean-Flo bacteria and enzyme treatment applied in July of 2006.

© Lake Savers

Results Beach opened in August of 2006, remained open all of 2007. No significant re-growth of milfoil or pondweed. Dissolved oxygen maintained throughout water column all winter despite shutting down the system for 3 months. Noticeable reduction in dead plant material and muck in 2007. 37

Collins Lake “Before” Pictures 2006

© Lake Savers

38

Collins Lake “After” Pictures 2008 (Similar View of the Lake)

© Lake Savers

39

Collins Lake “Before” Pictures 2006

© Lake Savers

40

Collins Lake “After” Pictures 2008 (Similar View of the Lake)

© Lake Savers

41

Collins Lake “After” Pictures 2008

© Lake Savers

42

Collins Lake “After” Pictures 2008

© Lake Savers

43

Lakes Bridgeport & Benbrook Fort Worth, Texas Area About the Lakes Two large water supply and recreational reservoirs. High levels of manganese and hydrogen sulfide resulting in taste and odor issues as well as increased treatment costs. Represent two of the largest lake aeration projects in the country. 800 to 1000 acre treatment areas on 13,000 acre Lake Bridgeport and 4,400 acre Lake Benbrook

Management Program Clean-Flo System installed in 2010

© Lake Savers

Results Data shows the ability to oxygenate to a depth of 16 meters in 1 month of continuous operation. Natural turnover interrupted the process in 2010. We anticipate sustaining a minimum of 4 mg/l DO continuously.

44

Lakes Bridgeport & Benbrook Systems Lake Bridgeport

© Lake Savers

45

Lakes Bridgeport & Benbrook Systems In Action

© Lake Savers

46

Lake Bridgeport Destratification Progress after 30 Days Continuous Operation BP Intake Area Profiles 8/13/2010 BP Intake Area Profiles 8/19/2010

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

0 2

0 BP Intake Area Profiles 8/27/2010

2 0

Depth (m)

4

8 10

14 16 18 20 0

5

10 15 20 25 30 35 DO (mg/l)/Temp (oC)

10

6

12

8

14

10

16

12

18

14

20 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 DO (mg/l)/Temp (oC) DO BP-01 Temp BP-01

BP Intake Area Profiles 9/10/2010

2 0

4

2

6

4

8

6

10

8

12

16 0

DO BP-01 Temp BP-01

0

4

8

12

BP Intake Area Profiles 9/01/2010

2

6

Depth (m)

6

Depth (m)

4

10

14

18

16

20

18 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 DO (mg/l)/Temp (oC)

12 14 16

20 0

DO BP-01 Temp BP-01

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 DO (mg/l)/Temp (oC) DO BP-01 Temp BP-01

18 20 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 DO (mg/l)/Temp (oC) DO BP-01 Temp BP-01

© Lake Savers

47

Tarrytown Upper Reservoir Tarrytown, New York About the Lake 25 Acre lake, max depth 12 feet Completely over-run with milfoil and coontail. Significant Blue-Green Algae through-out entire lake and Filamentous Algae near the shoreline. 12” to 18” of organic muck accumulation on the lake bottom.

Management Program Clean-Flo System installed in July of 2010. Bacteria and Enzyme treatment applied in July of 2010.

© Lake Savers

Results Milfoil and coontail uprooted from the bottom and starting to fail in 30 days. Most weeds decomposed and gone within 60 days. Sand/gravel exposed at shoreline in 60 days. Filamentous Algae eliminated and Blue-Green Algae reduced in 60 days. 48

Tarrytown Upper Reservoir System Design Rotary Claw Unit Location housed in shed (not to scale will be much smaller) Diffusers (placed on the bottom, not to scale they will be much smaller)

© Lake Savers

49

Tarrytown Upper Reservoir – Day of Installation (Before)

Reference Points

© Lake Savers

50

Tarrytown Upper Reservoir – After 60 Days

Reference Points

© Lake Savers

51

Tarrytown Upper Reservoir – Results View from Dock Area Along Southeast Shore

Installation Day (Before)

© Lake Savers

After 60 Days

52

Tarrytown Upper Reservoir – Results View from Dock Area Along Southwest Shore

Installation Day (Before)

© Lake Savers

After 60 Days

53

Tarrytown Upper Reservoir – Results Google Earth Image June 18, 2010 (before)

© Lake Savers

60 Days after Installation

54

Bel Marin Keys Novato, California About the Lake 114 Acre man-made lake 30 Acre Paddle Boat Lagoon selected as pilot treatment area Blue-Green Algae dominated Highly anoxic environment with DO near zero 15 feet from the bottom

Management Program Clean-Flo System installed in June of 2007. Results independently monitored by CLE Engineering

© Lake Savers

Results DO concentrations restored throughout the water column in 60 days. Dramatic improvements in Total Phosphorus and many other water quality parameters. Expanding deployment of Clean-Flo System to other areas of the lake.

55

Bel Marin Keys System Design

Phase 3

Phase 2 Phase 1

Compressor (not to scale much smaller) © Lake Savers

Diffusers (placed on the bottom, not to scale they will be much smaller) 56

Bel Marin Keys Results – Phase I

© Lake Savers

57

Bel Marin Keys Results – Phase I

© Lake Savers

58

Willow Lake Kalamazoo, Michigan About the Lake 7 Acre lake/pond. Completely over-run with milfoil, filamentous algae, lily pads, and coontail Seven foot max depth with 4 foot average depth

Management Program Clean-Flo System installed in June of 2007. One-time herbicide treatment for milfoil. Harvesting program for lily pads. Bacteria and Enzyme treatment applied in July of 2007.

© Lake Savers

Results Filamentous algae problem eliminated. No significant re-growth of milfoil. Coontail significantly reduced. Lily pads did grow back after harvesting, however, we are starting to see tubers “pop” to the surface. Clear signs of breakdown of organics in the lake.

59

Willow Lake “Before” Pictures June 18, 2007

© Lake Savers

60

Willow Lake “After” Pictures June 23, 2007 (5 days after installation of the CLEAN-FLO System)

© Lake Savers

61

Willow Lake May 15, 2007 (Last Year. Notice How bad the Lake looked)

© Lake Savers

62

Willow Lake May 12, 2008 (Just under One Year Later)

© Lake Savers

63

Lake Brown – Kissimmee Florida About the Lake 60 Acre Lake on at a Florida Resort. 5 – 6 feet average muck accumulation. Beach closed for several weeks per year. Virtually a “dead” lake due to overuse of herbicides over a 10 year period.

Management Program Clean-Flo System Installed July 1, 2008

© Lake Savers

Results Aquatic weed growth under control without the use of chemical herbicides. Average muck reduction of 2’4” in 13 months. Swimming beach remained open for full season for the first time in 6 years.

64

Lake Brown Muck Reduction Results Water Depth Measurement Points

5.5’ 7 5.5’

Muck Measurement Reference Points for future assessment

5.5’ 8’

9’ 5.5’

8

5.5’

8’

8’

A

2

1

5.5’

3

C 5.5’ 7’

2’6” muck remaining

2’6” muck remaining

5.5’

5.5’

10

8’ 11

8’ B

9’

5.5’

5.5’

9

5.5’

5

4

9’

© Lake Savers

6

8’

5.5’

7’ More than 9’ muck remaining

4.5’ 6’

7/01/2008 Measurement

15’

6/08/2009 Measurement

8’

65

Lake Brown – Florida

© Lake Savers

66

Lake Powai, India About the Lake 500+ acre lake in India. Hydrilla and Water Hyacinth had taken over the lake. Lake heavily polluted from watershed

Management Program Clean-Flo Engineered Aeration installed with bacteria and enzyme treatment. Harvesting program initiated to reduce Water Hyacinth.

© Lake Savers

Results Nutrient levels in the lake reduced by 90% in the first year. Hydrilla and Water Hyacinth reduced to non-nuisance levels. Significant improvement in all water quality indicators.

67

Lake Powai, India – Results

Dissolved Oxygen at Bottom

Clean-Flo system Installed

© Lake Savers

68

Lake Powai, India – Results

Phosphorus at Bottom

CLEAN-FLO system Installed

© Lake Savers

69

CLEAN-FLO System Anticipating Questions and Concerns Will the system create a safety hazard for boats? •

No, there is nothing at the surface of the lake. The diffusers and airline are located on the lake bottom.

Will the system create a safety hazard for swimmers? •

No, the diffuser boils are very gentle and do not pose a hazard for swimmers.

Will the system harm the lake in any way? •

No, the system is simply putting air into the water. The bacteria and enzyme products used do not even require DEQ Permit Approval – unlike herbicides.

Will the system deplete the lake entirely of plants and algae? •

No, the system will gradually bring the lake back into a healthy balance of aquatic vegetation.

Will the system harm fish and other wildlife? •

© Lake Savers

No, fish benefit as will the entire food chain in the lake.

70

Lake Savers Management Strategies for Healthier Lakes

Working with Lake Savers

© Lake Savers

71

How we work with our Customers… Information Required Identification of goals and areas of focus. Depth profile. Flow rates on outflows/retention time. Weed and algae assessment. Water quality data.

© Lake Savers

72

How we work with Customers

Cost 1. Gather necessary data on your lake

Nothing! In most cases

2. Engineer a Clean-Flo System Design and Quote for your lake

Nothing! In most cases

3. Present Design and Quote

Nothing!

4. Install & Manage System (Unique Lake Savers Leasing Program)

As quoted

© Lake Savers

73

Lake Savers Leasing Program (Optional) Installation:

$XXXX

Shipping:

At cost

System Leasing: Years 1 – 5

$XXXX per year

Years 6 – 10

$XXXX – 20% per year

Years 10+

$XXXX – 30% per year

Includes: Installation System Maintenance and performance monitoring Bacteria and Enzymes for year one FULL replacement/repair of equipment at no additional cost. (Exceptions for vandalism, lightening strikes/power surge and storm damage/flooding.)

© Lake Savers

74

Advantages of Leasing vs. Purchase of a Clean-Flo System Lake Savers is responsible for ALL maintenance and repair. The leasing agreement includes strict performance criteria for maintaining the equipment in peak operating condition. The customer is not making a capital investment in equipment that sits outdoors and at the bottom of a lake 365 days a year. Under the leasing agreement the equipment is guaranteed to be working in “as new” condition for the life of the lease. Results and performance monitoring is included in the lease. The leasing agreement offers an “out clause” after 30 months if the system is not delivering results as specified at lease inception. NOTE: Lake Savers will quote a purchase option with a minimum 4 year service contract if requested. Lake Savers will NOT sell a Clean-Flo System without a service contract.

© Lake Savers

75

Additional Costs Other Costs: Installation of Electrical service to compressor locations – customer responsibility.

Ongoing Costs: Electricity Costs – We can provide estimates as designs are developed.

© Lake Savers

76

Lake Savers – Partial Track Record 2007 Willow Lake Kalamazoo, MI – 8 acres Willowridge Lake , Kokomo, IN – 8 acres Sherman Lake Channel, Kalamazoo, MI – 5 acres 2008 Lake Brown Kissimmee, FL – 60 acres Several additional ponds – 4 – 6 acres 2009 Turnberry Lakes – 100 acres Chippewa Lake (Channel) – 6 acres 2010 Scheduled Installs Lake Bridgeport Reservoir Fort Worth, Texas – 700+ acre treatment area – DONE Lake Benbrook Reservoir Fort Worth Texas – 800+ acre treatment area – DONE Indian Lake Dowagiac, MI – 86 acre treatment area – DONE Greenwood Lake Greenwood Lake, NY – 40 acre treatment area – DONE Upper Tarrytown Reservoir, Tarrytown, NY – 30 acres – DONE Little Lakes, Frankfort, Indiana – 30 acres – Scheduled October 2010 Massabesic Reservoir, Manchester, NH – 225 acres – Scheduled October 2010 © Lake Savers

77

Why Lake Savers!! Traditional Approaches Alone

Deteriorating Water Body

Cost Engineered Aeration/ Beneficial Bacteria & Enzyme Treatments and Floating Islands

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Healthy Water Body

10

Time (years) © Lake Savers

78

Summary 1. Most water bodies are overfed and out of balance. 2. Conventional strategies are primarily people management strategies not lake management strategies. 3. Nutrient reduction (Internal & External) is the only sustainable approach to Lake Restoration. 4. Lakes Need to Breath to Be Healthy! 5. Lake Savers can put your lake on a diet and exercise program to restore health, balance and recreational quality. © Lake Savers

79

Questions & Comments…

Contacts: John Tucci President [email protected] (269) 383.3400

© Lake Savers

80