IT-OT Organizational Design Theory and Practice

IT-OT Organizational Design Theory and Practice February 8-11, 2016 Renaissance Hotel at SeaWorld Orlando, FL Mike Williams ARC Associate ARC Advisory...
2 downloads 1 Views 260KB Size
IT-OT Organizational Design Theory and Practice February 8-11, 2016 Renaissance Hotel at SeaWorld Orlando, FL Mike Williams ARC Associate ARC Advisory Group

Introduction MISSION: Managing people, work process and technology is the collective responsibility of an IT organization focused on manufacturing information and control systems.

 As time marches onward

technology, culture and the people who support it must inevitably adapt and change.  Managing change can be very difficult for an organization and its people. This is because change challenges the very fiber of an organizations reason to exist and the livelihood of its members.  This presentation addresses the issues of how to detect and address the need for organizational design change within your company.

VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 2

Reason for Organizational Change in IT-OT • It should be clear from this simplified analysis that if an organization cannot

adapt to change the overall effectiveness to service its customers declines. This results in client dissatisfaction and potentially disintegration of the organizations existence.

• To prevent an organization’s declining performance one must assess its maturity

or ability to evolve and change due to the situation and terrain. The situational change could be for technology, economic, strategic, geo-political or for yet to be revealed reasons in the future.

• Whatever the cause, organizations need to periodically refresh their thinking and modify their organization design to adapt and thrive

VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 3

Summary of Organization Design Attributes • Mission – The prime directive of an IT organization which supports manufacturing is serving the information technology needs of Operations. A secondary but highly important mission is to provide reliable information flow to and from the real-time environment to support other Enterprise stakeholders

• Activities- To be effective the organization must efficiently Identify, Implement,

Operate, Maintain, and Improve OT-IT tasks collaboratively. The determination of who should manage and perform these activities is driven by the organizations unique strengths, value system and culture.

VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 4

Summary of Organization Design Attributes • Capabilities –an effective IT-OT organization must possess the basic capabilities of : Know-How, Human Element, Relationship Management, Work Process Discipline, and Geographical Presence. The degree of self-determinant capabilities depends on the organization’s maturity and value systems. • Competitive Advantage- in IT-OT organizations people, their skills, experience and associated work processes, are viewed as the unique value proposition of an effective organization. True competitive advantage differentiates an organization’s performance over the alternative.

“Attracting, rewarding and retaining scarce IT-OT talent is therefore a key part of any organizational redesign.”

VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 5

Summary of Organization Design Attributes Common Metrics for Success: •An organization must measure and benchmark its performance against reference targets to determine if they are successful in achieving their mission objectives.

•Measurements should be a collection of both internal efficiency and external effectiveness with the primary emphasis on the client.

•Performance measurement against recognized benchmarks determines where you are Today and gives you insight into what it will take to be more competitive Tomorrow..

VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 6

Where do I start? • There is not a generic organizational design which is universally compatible with requirements of an effective IT-OT organizational. Where you are on the organizational maturity curve and where you want to eventually be must be determined.

• Each individual company must address the unique culture and value systems

or situation and terrain which drives their company. One should avoid jumping into an organizational design solution by simply “filling the names in the box” of an org chart.

• To be successful an effective organization serving the real-time computing

environment of a manufacturing client, one must first reassess client needs, then prioritize needs based on situation and terrain, and finally assign roles and responsibilities to people into a structure. VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 7

Organizational Maturity

- Determine the current state and future destination Level 1 Very Low

Level 2 Low

Level 3 Moderate

Level 4 High

Level 5 Very High

People 35%

Individual  Metrics

Individual Metrics,  Management  Reports

Teams Work  Together ‐ integrated unit

Collaboration,  Delegation of  Responsiibility internally, externally

Strong Sense of  Teamwork across org  and partners

Blank

Adversarial  Siloed

Goals Understood,  Highly Supervised

Success Measured  Collectively

People Self‐directed

People feel  empowered

Work Process  20%

Adhoc Process,  no governance

Documented  Process, Full  Compliance Lacking

Work Process  Followed  Autocratically

Integrated  Management  Systems Deplouted X‐Functionally

Continuous  improvement of  work process

Technology  30%

Maintenance,  Weak  Technology

Stable but  introduction of  technology is risky

New Technology  Evaluated Adhoc

New Tech Prioritized  By Value

Leading edge  technology deployed  as competitive  advantage

Measurement  15%

No Performance  Metric other  than cost

Internal metrics  collected reviewed  adhoc

Internal Metrics  collected ‐ used by  managment rule

Internal Metrics  Mapped To Customer  Satisfaction

Collaboration  metrics, aggregated  internal and external

VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 8

Organizational Design Options • • • • •

The structure can be aligned by Functional, Geographical, Program, Business or a Matrix combination of two or more. Regardless of the chosen design, a RACI diagram is required to clearly delineate lines of Accountability and Responsibility. Shared Accountability is the hallmark of a high effective organizational design where all members understand the overall mission and execute seamlessly across functional boundaries to deliver high performance to the customer. In the domain of Manufacturing IT, the most valued metric is rapid and reliable response to “realtime” IT/OT issues. Such a capability will generate trust, confidence, customer loyalty and superior customer satisfaction. Building an organization to address this key metric is the objective.

VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 9

Exploiting IT-OT Alignment Options Objective

Metrics

Capabilities

24/7 Break Fix

Activity

Organizational Alignment

Support and Sustain Technology

Geographical

Software Support

Geographical

HW Support & Sustain

Geographical

Response Time Acquire Talent Natural Language support

Skilled Human Resources in Geography

Functional

Train Talent Functional

Low Cost to  Serve

Leverage Knowledge and People

Allocate & Supervise Talent

IT DEPENDS

Manage OT & IT services Effectively

Predictable Project Delivery

Execute Project Flawlessly

Build and Configure Manufacturing IT Projects

Project

Reliable  Systems

Proven in use, Hig Availability

Secure systems

Tech fit for use

Protect Process IP

Dependencies Size of the Company Supported Geographical Breadth Technology Deployed Unique Skills Retquired

Quality & Timely Workmanship

Identify & Validated New Technology

Investigate Most Effective Technology

Manage New Technology Globally by Discipline

Packaged  Most Effective  Technology

VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

Functional

Business

© ARC Advisory Group • 10

Seek Optimize Align – Accountability and Responsibility Organizational Design RACI Matrix Organization Criteria

Manage Productivity

Lead People

Support Technology

Deliver Solutions

Performance Measurements

People utilization IP Utilization Cost to Serve Cost to Implement Recruit & Retain Reward & Recognition Train Cyber security Corporate Level Business Level Facility Level Defect Free On Time On Budget Leveraged

Client Operations

OT Support

IT Support

Third Party Support

Biz Tech Ctr.

Project Program Office

Functional Mgmt

I

R

R

R

I

A

R

R

R

R

I

A

C

C

I

R

R

C

C

I

A

I

I

I

R

C

R

A

I

R

R

C

C

R

A

I

R

R

C

C

R

A

R

R

R

C

C

I

A

R

R

R

R

R

R

A

A

R

R

C

C

A

A

R

R

R

C

A

C

C

A

R

R

C

A

I

I

I

R

R

R

R

A

C

I

R

R

R

R

A

C

I

R

R

R

R

A

C

I

R

R

R

A

R

A

Responsible Those who do the work to achieve the task. There is at least one role with a participation type of responsible, although others can be delegated SHARED Responsibility Shared Responsibility as an attribute of a High Performance Team and indicative of a Matrix organizational design. Accountable (also approver or final approving authority ) The singular person ultimately answerable for the correct and thorough completion of the deliverable or task, and the one who delegates the work to those responsible . Consulted (sometimes counsel ) Those whose opinions are sought, typically subject matter experts; and with whom there is two-way communication. Informed Those who are kept up-to-date on progress, often only on completion of the task or deliverable; and with whom there is just one-way communication.

VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 11

Shared Responsibility: At Point of Delivery Organizational Design RACI Matrix Organization Criteria

Manage Productivity

Lead People

Support Technology

Deliver Solutions

Performance Measurements

People utilization IP Utilization Cost to Serve Cost to Implement Recruit & Retain Reward & Recognition Train Cyber security Corporate Level Business Level Facility Level Defect Free On Time On Budget Leveraged

Client Operations

OT Support

IT Support

Third Party Support

Biz Tech Ctr.

Project Program Office

Functional Mgmt

I

R

R

R

I

A

R

R

R

R

I

A

C

C

I

R

R

C

C

I

A

I

I

I

R

R

A

I

R

R

C

C C

R

A A

I

R

R

C

C

R

R

R

R

C

C

I

A

R

R

R

R

R

R

A

A

R

R

C

C

A

A

R

R

R

C

A

C

C

A

R

R

C

A

I

I

I

R

R

R

R

A

C

I

R

R

R

R

A

C

I

R

R

R

R

A

C

I

R

R

R

A

R

A

Responsible Those who do the work to achieve the task. There is at least one role with a participation type of responsible, although others can be delegated SHARED Responsibility Shared Responsibility as an attribute of a High Performance Team and indicative of a Matrix organizational design. Accountable (also approver or final approving authority ) The singular person ultimately answerable for the correct and thorough completion of the deliverable or task, and the one who delegates the work to those responsible . Consulted (sometimes counsel ) Those whose opinions are sought, typically subject matter experts; and with whom there is two-way communication. Informed Those who are kept up-to-date on progress, often only on completion of the task or deliverable; and with whom there is just one-way communication. VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 12

Highly Effective Organization: Multi-Disciplined Shared Responsibility Organizational Design RACI Matrix Organization Criteria

Manage Productivity

Lead People

Support Technology

Deliver Solutions

Performance Measurements

People utilization IP Utilization Cost to Serve Cost to Implement Recruit & Retain Reward & Recognition Train Cyber security Corporate Level Business Level Facility Level Defect Free On Time On Budget Leveraged

Client Operations I

OT Support IT Support

Third Party Support

Biz Tech Ctr.

Project Program Office

Functional Mgmt

R R

R R

R I

I

A

R

A

C

R C

I

R

R

C

C

I

A

I

I

I

R

R

A

I

R

R

C

C C

R

A

I

R

R

C

C

R

A

R

R

R

C

C

I

A

R A

R R

R R

R C

R C

R A

A

R

R

R

C

A

C

C

A

R

R

C

A

I

I

I

R

R

R

R

A

C

I

R

R

R

R

A

C

I

R

R

R

A

C

I

R

R

R

R A

R

A

A

Responsible Those who do the work to achieve the task. There is at least one role with a participation type of responsible, although others can be delegated SHARED RESPONSIBILITY Shared Responsibility as an attribute of a High Performance Team and indicative of a Matrix organizational design. Accountable (also approver or final approving authority ) The singular person ultimately answerable for the correct and thorough completion of the deliverable or task, and the one who delegates the work to those responsible . Consulted (sometimes counsel ) Those whose opinions are sought, typically subject matter experts; and with whom there is two-way communication. Informed Those who are kept up-to-date on progress, often only on completion of the task or deliverable; and with whom there is just one-way communication.

VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 13

SUMMARY • Defining the most effective and efficient organizational design for IT/OT is collaborative process.

• High Performance Teams composed of multi-discipline members tend to perform better than traditional vertically aligned organizations

• Success IT / OT organizations must address changing roles and responsibilities • To achieve

multi-discipline alignment, one should consider a matrix design structure to accommodate multiple stakeholder groups

• Structural design needs to fit your own situation, there is not one best answer VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 14

Call to Action • The 2015 ARC Forum mini-workshop explored the topic of Organizational

Change within IT-OT. Output of the group workshop was a list of key organizational design elements which were deemed key to the future success of an IT organization supporting manufacturing.

• It is hoped that ARC attendees with participate in an upcoming 2016

Organizational Design Survey , which is a follow through from the workshop, to benchmark current trends in organizational structures which support changing IT/OT client needs.

VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 15

Questions & Answers VISION, EXPERIENCE, ANSWERS FOR INDUSTRY

© ARC Advisory Group • 16