Seminar on IT, BIM, Innovation and FM Centre for Facilities Management – DTU
Innovation in FM: BIM in Building Operations Francisco Forns-Samso PhD Candidate - Aalto University Consultant Granlund Oy
Copenhagen – 28.10.2014
Doctoral Research Project Objective: To investigate the value of BIM in building operations
Introduction • Background & motivation • Scope & research questions & research process
Literature Review
Theoretical background
• Value of BIM for FM
• Disruptive Innovation • Asset Management • Service Innovation Business Models Innovation Strategies
Research Design • Case study design
Granlund Oy – Company shortly Consultancy •
MEP design
•
Facilities management
•
Energy and sustainability
Software •
Manager – facilities management
•
Designer – MEP Design
•
RIUSKA – energy analysis
•
BSPro – IFC middleware
Statistics •
515 persons, 43 MEUR
•
R&D 3,5 MEUR / 40 PY
Background and Motivation • M.Sc. in Civil Engineering – University of New Mexico (USA) Master Thesis : Perceived Value of Using BIM in O&M (2010)
• PhD Candidate at Aalto University • Consultant in Innovation & Development – Granlund Oy
Concept of Integrated Environment
Technical Analysis Management Consultancy Special Calculations Carbon Footprint Data centers Sustainability Environment Due Diligence Energy Efficiency Facility Management Management and Supervision
Requirement Management – RoomEx Comfort simulation – RIUSKA Energy simulation – RIUSKA Cost analysis – LIFEST Life cycle – BSLCA CFD – Ansys Technical FM - RYHTI MEP data – RAISU MEP modelling – MagiCAD Model Auditing – Solibri Combined models – Navisworks Lighting simulation - 3ds Max
Provision for voids
Heating and cooling
Water and sewing
Hospital gases
Air-conditioning
Structural
Architectural
Electrical
Hospital equipment
Steam
Sprinkler
Pneumatic mail
Meilahti hospital,
renovation, 36.000m2
Object number in BIM models 500000 450000 400000 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0
BIM Initiatives around the world Country
Public Organization
Initiative
Finland
Senate Properties + Others
COBIM – COBIM Guidelines, 2012*
Norway
Statsbygg
Statsbygg - BIM Manual 1.2.1, 2013
Denmark
National Agency for Enterprise and Construction ‘Palaces and Properties Agency’
Digital Construction, 2010
USA
- General Service Administration - BuildingSmart North America
GSA BIM Initiatives, 2012* National BIM Standards V3, 2013
UK
Cabinet Office
Government Construction Strategy, 2011Demand 3D-BIM by 2016
Singapore
Building and Construction Authority (BCA)
CORENET, Singapore BIM Guide V2, 2013
Australia
Australian Government
National BIM Initiative – National Guidelines for Digital Modelling, 2012
Netherlands
Dutch Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations
Rijksgebouwendienst – 2013, (Not available in english yet)
Mandatory Implementation of 3D models
*Contain guidelines and requirements for Facilities Management
Governmental demand for BIM Government will require fully collaborative 3D BIM (with all project and asset information, documentation and data being electronic) as a minimum by 2016.
http://www.bimtaskgroup.org/
School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2014
Research on BIM – FM related topics
Volk, et al 2014
BIM in FM: Case Manchester Town Hall Complex
Delay: 4 weeks Man hours: 14
1 day =- 96% 3 =- 79%
Conclusions from the case study • Significant reductions in the man hours (-57...-80%) • Because of relatively small tasks individual savings per task quite small (8...13 hours), but because of repetitive nature of maintenance operations significant annual savings • Main benefit is huge reduction in wating time to fix the problems (-96...-99%) Reduced disruption and inconvenience for the users helping to avoid reputational damage • BIM has significant, measurable value in operational FM
Potential Value in BIM for Facilities Management As-Built/Record Model
Energy Management
Building Maintenance
Asset Management
Space Management
Use as a reference model for renovation and refurbishment. Including historical documentation.
Facilitate the analysis and comparisons of various energy alternatives to reduce environmental impacts and operating costs.
Develop a maintenance plan by virtually analyzing components and systems.
Access and maintenance of operations and maintenance documentation for building systems.
Easily identify and allocate space for appropriate building use
Ability for embedding future data based upon renovation or equipment replacement
Compare measured and predicted energy performance in Operating Building
Increase productivity response to service requests by visualizing location of equipment/system.
Capture service life and maintenance costs for long term planning.
Increase the efficiency of transition planning and management
Verification of requirements at turnover (e.g avoid turnover dispute)
Perform energy simulations over operations to optimize performance
Facilitate the development and implementation of a Maintenance Program
Allow to perform an inventory of assets for financial purposes including historical and up to date data.
Proficiently track the use of current space and resources
Provide owner accurate information for further analysis with other BIM uses
(Becerik-Gerber 2012;Messner 2014;Kiviniemi 2013)
Assist in planning future space needs for the facility
Why is BIM not used as a standard practice in the FM industry? BIM
Challenges
Focus of the project
Technical/Process
Organizational
Value Proposition
Unclear roles and responsibilities for loading data into the model or databases and maintaining the model
Cultural barriers toward adopting new technology
Lack of strategic direction for FM (value for the organization)
Lack of interoperability Diversity in BIM and FM software tools.
Organization-wide resistance: need for investment in infrastructure, training, and new software tools
Lack of clarity regarding FM BIM assembly. Lack of clarity regarding what problem BIM is solving.
Lack of effective collaboration between project stakeholders for modeling and model utilization.
Undefined fee structures for additional scope
The management is missing from the model: i.e. performance reports that lead to continuous improvement, early warning systems, supplier lead times
Necessity yet difficulty in software vendor’s involvement, including fragmentation among different vendors, competition and lack of common interests
Lack of sufficient legal framework for integrating owners’ view in design and construction
Lack of real-world cases and proof of positive return of investment.
Data Management
Becerik-Gerber et al 2012; Kiviniemi et al 2013
The added value of FM or CREM for core business (Gerritse, et al 2014) Cost Strategy
Differentiation Strategy Risk Management
Optimal core business
Employer attractiveness
Sustainability Corporate Results
Reduce and control cost
Increase Productivity
Increase customer satisfaction
Support image
Risk Control
Increase sustainabilty
Increase values of assets
Support Culture
Increase Innovation
Increase flexibilty
t
Value Adding Strategies of FM
Space
Services
Relations/Developments
FM provision of Basic Needs
Value Proposition – BIM for FM Future Needs
Value
Current Focus
Data
Information
Knowledge
Applications
Adapted from DIKW – Sharma 2004
Solutions
Doctoral Research Project Objective:
• Investigate of the value of BIM in building operations How could BIM bring value to building operations? How will its use modify current business models for FM service providers? What new business models could be developed in case BIM is used in O&M?
Defining the Capabilities, Needs and Current Limitations of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in O&M for HVAC&R Use Cases
Preparation of O&M Documentation for Building Systems
Service Life and Maintenance Cost Database
Document O&M Inspection and Maintenance Program Data
Work Processes & Data Exchange Requirements
Actors
Activities
Transactions
Data Groups Report measured Energy Use in Operating Building
Compare Measured and Predicted Energy Performance
Data Elements
Design Research Methodology (DRM) Basic means Literature Review
Stages
Main Outcomes
Research clarification
The need for value proposition in BIM for FM
Empirical Data Analysis
Descriptive Study I
The FM providers view on BIM for FM value proposition and current business model
Assumption Experience Synthesis
Prescriptive Study I
Formulation of a business model supporting BIM in FM
Empirical Data Analysis
Descriptive Study II
Validation of the value of BIM based on the proposed BM
Assumption Experience Synthesis
Prescriptive Study II
Results from BIM-FM framework and business model
Thanks! Any questions? francisco.forns-samso @granlund.fi
Backup slides
Staff
Facility Manager
Executive Management
Pre-planning
Analysis
Strategic business objectives
Start
Planning No
Team Organization
•Executive committee •Senior Manager •Facility Manager •Design Authority •BIM Manager/BIM consultants •Functional Department •Etc
Key Performance Indicators
Benchmarking
•Thermal Comfort •Indoor Air Quality •Energy Efficiency •O&M Cost per building area •Work Order response rate •Failure Frequency •Greenhouse gas emission
Key Information Identification
Approval & Recommendation
Implementing Yes
Review Evaluate Benefits Use Case Scenarios
Implementation
Report
Evaluation Documents
Tactical facility plan development
Finish Data Collection
Data Management
Data
Monitor
Data Update Evaluation Update