HIPAA 201: EDI An Introduction to the HIPAA Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Regulations For audio dial: 1-800-749-9918
Presentation Agenda ♦ Administrative Simplification Provisions ♦ Benefits of EDI ♦ EDI Key Business and IT Impacts – Standard Identifiers – Code Sets – Transaction Sets Introduction – Transaction Sets ♦ Next Steps – Internal – External – Communication First Consulting Group
Presentation Objectives At the end of this presentation, you should: ♦ Understand why the EDI standards were
developed
♦ Understand each of the specific EDI standards
and their impact on the organization
♦ Be able to determine your own organizational
strategies and next steps for tackling HIPAA EDI requirements
First Consulting Group
Purposes of Administrative Simplification
Purposes of Administrative Simplification ♦ To improve the efficiency and effectiveness
of the health care system by standardizing the electronic transmission of certain administrative and financial transactions and protect the security and privacy of transmitted information.
♦ Over 400 formats of EDI are used in the US
First Consulting Group
Intent of the Transaction and Code Set Rule ♦ To encourage electronic commerce in
health care
♦ To simplify administrative processes ♦ To decrease the administrative costs of
health care
♦ To eliminate software adaptation for
multiple formats
First Consulting Group
Benefits of EDI ♦ Reduction in manual data entry and processing ♦ Elimination of cost and delays of postal service ♦ Improved data comparability ♦ Elimination of disparate forms and codes ♦ Improved cash flow ♦ Improved accuracy of information ♦ Fewer claims rejections First Consulting Group
Benefits of EDI (cont’d) ♦ Cost savings (including reduced labor costs) ♦ Fewer billing errors ♦ Improved accuracy, reliability and usefulness
of shared information
♦ Improved customer service ♦ Prevent inadvertent errors that could lead to
allegations of fraud and abuse
♦ Minimized risk of penalties First Consulting Group
Covered Entities ♦ Health plans ♦ Health care clearinghouses – services that
translate information between organizations
♦ Health care providers who transmit any
health information in electronic form in connection with a covered transaction
First Consulting Group
Non-Covered Entities ♦ Workers’ Compensation Programs ♦ Property and Casualty Programs ♦ Disability Insurance Programs ♦ Nursing Home Fixed Indemnity Policies ♦ Prisons
First Consulting Group
Requirements of Health Plans ♦ Must accept and process standard transactions
from any person in the same time frame in which they processed transactions prior to the implementation of the HIPAA standard
♦ May not offer an incentive to conduct a
transaction as a non-standard transaction
♦ Must be able to process earlier versions of
code sets
First Consulting Group
Requirements of Health Plans (cont’d) ♦ Must keep code sets for current billing period
and appeals periods still open to processing under terms of the plan’s coverage
♦ MAY use a clearinghouse to translate
transactions that are not in standard format
First Consulting Group
Requirements of Clearinghouses ♦ A provider submitting standard transactions
through a clearinghouse must not be adversely affected financially by doing so
♦ The cost of submission to a clearinghouse
cannot exceed the cost of direct transmission to the health plan
First Consulting Group
Requirements of Providers ♦ Must use standard transactions if conducted
electronically
♦ MAY continue to use paper media ♦ MAY use a business associate to conduct a
transaction
♦ MAY use a clearinghouse to translate non-
standard transactions
First Consulting Group
Key EDI Impacts ♦ All trading partner agreements that stipulate
data content format definitions or conditions that do not comply to the ANSI X12 standards are no longer valid agreements and will need to be modified
♦ The standardization of data elements and the
values in the data elements will eliminate proprietary codes
♦ The HIPAA standards are not required on
paper transactions, but can be used on paper to prevent dual system maintenance
First Consulting Group
Key EDI Impacts (cont’d) ♦ For on-line interactions between a server and a
browser, data content must comply with the HIPAA X12 standards, but not the data format
♦ Transmissions within a corporate entity would
not be required to comply with the standards unless it is sending electronic data from a provider portion to a health plan portion
♦ Case management is considered a health care
service
First Consulting Group
Standard Identifiers HIPAA Proposed Standard Identifiers Potential Key Impacts – Standard Identifiers
Proposed Standard Identifiers ♦ Employer Identification Number (EIN) – Format: 00-0000000 (9 digit) – Final Rule expected anytime
♦ National Provider Identifier (NPI) – Format: 10 digit – Final Rule expected anytime – Note: This number will be randomly assigned and not tied to processing logic
First Consulting Group
Proposed Standard Identifiers (cont’d) ♦ National Plan Identifier (PlanID) – Format: 10 digit – Notice of Proposed Rule Making expected anytime
♦ Individual – Format – On hold due to privacy concerns
First Consulting Group
Potential Key Impacts: Standard Identifiers ♦ Business processes related to issuance of
new identification cards will be impacted
♦ Identify field availability, field format and
field length of HIPAA identifier fields in existing IT applications ♦ Choose to “crosswalk” old and new identifiers
or migrate to new identifiers and use throughout systems
First Consulting Group
Potential Key Impacts: Standard Identifiers (cont’d) ♦ Produce and maintain new business
directories tables to include mapping to older identification numbers
♦ Provide education to familiarize providers
with new identification numbers and formats for data transmission
♦ Business process related to handling of paper
(no standard ID required) and electronic (standard ID required)
♦ Dual processes may be required First Consulting Group
Code Sets What is a Code Set? HIPAA Code Sets Key HIPAA Impacts - Code Sets Key IT and Business Impacts Code Sets
What is a Code Set? ♦ Any set of codes used to encode data
elements, such as tables of terms, medical concepts, medical diagnostic codes or medical procedures
♦ Includes codes and descriptors ♦ Includes modifiers ♦ For ICD-9-CM, it includes the Official
Guidelines for Coding & Reporting
First Consulting Group
HIPAA Medical Code Sets ICD-9-CM, Volumes 1 & 2:
Coding for diseases, injuries, impairments, causes of injury, other health problems
ICD-9-CM, Volume 3:
Coding for prevention, diagnosis, treatment, management of hospital inpatients
CPT-4:
Coding for professional services, clinical lab tests, diagnostic procedures, hearing and vision services
First Consulting Group
HIPAA Medical Code Sets (cont’d) HCPCS:
Coding for medical equipment and supplies as well as injectable drugs
NDC:
Coding for drugs and biologics (replaces “J” codes)*
CDT-3:
Coding for dental services (replaces “D” codes)
These Code Sets do away with all local codes. * An Notice of Proposed Rule Making will be released to remove NDC Code requirements First Consulting Group
HIPAA Non-Medical Code Sets Codes valid at the time the transaction is initiated ♦ Claim Status Reason Codes ♦ Claim Adjustment Reason Codes ♦ Codes used in the Implementation Guides,
such as: – – – – – –
UB92 Revenue Codes Value Codes Condition Codes Place of Service Codes Type of Service Codes Provider Taxonomy Codes
First Consulting Group
Key HIPAA Impacts: Code Sets ♦ Will capture data elements not currently captured ♦ Adjustment reason codes and claim status
codes will change
♦ Work to eliminate all proprietary codes – may
mean requesting new standard codes
♦ Future claim submissions may require code
plus modifier for services
♦ Number of diagnosis codes allowed on a
submission will increase from 4 to 8 with 4 pointers per diagnosis for each service line on the claim
First Consulting Group
Key IT and Business Impacts: Code Sets ♦ Identification of all proprietary codes to
determine their applicability
♦ Require mapping of proprietary codes to
HIPAA code sets
♦ Develop plan on how to handle elimination of
proprietary codes
♦ Require providers to insure vendors plan to
include all HIPAA modifiers and applicable codes in new software releases
♦ Require an update to policies and procedures First Consulting Group
Transaction Sets Introduction Implementation Guides Transaction Sets Pharmacy Claims
Implementation Guides ♦ Implementation Guides include: – Data elements required or conditionally required – Definition of each data element – Technical transaction formats for the transmission of the data – Code sets or values that can appear in selected data elements
First Consulting Group
Downloading Implementation Guides ♦ Where to download Implementation Guides: – www.wpc-edi.com – www.ncpdp.org
♦ Implementation Guides are in PDF format ♦ X12N Implementation Guide downloads are
free
♦ NCPDP Implementation Guides require a fee
First Consulting Group
Pharmacy Claims National Council for Prescription Drug Programs ♦ The final standards for electronic health care
transactions, and for code sets, adopt the NCPDP Telecommunication Standard Format, Version 5.1 and the NCPDP Batch Standard, Version 1 Release 0 for pharmacy claims
♦ Health plans, health care clearinghouses and health
care providers who utilize electronic transactions will be required to use these standards beginning October 2002
♦ Application for an extension until October 2003
available from the DHHS website (due Oct 2002)
First Consulting Group
Standard Transaction Types Type
Purpose
270/271
Eligibility inquiry/response
278
Authorization/referral
837
Claim submission, 3 types: Institutional, Professional, and Dental
276/277
Claim status inquiry/response
835
Claim payment remittance
834
Enrollment
820
Premium payment
First Consulting Group
Transaction between Providers and Health Plans Providers Eligibility Verification Pretreatment, Authorization, and Referrals Service Billing / Claim Submission Claim Status Inquiries Accounts Receivable First Consulting Group
Transaction Sets 270/271
Health Plans Enrollment
278
Pre-certification / Adjudication
837
Claim Acceptance
276/277
835
Adjudication
Accounts Payable
270/271:Eligibility Transaction ♦ 270 Eligibility Inquiry - A request sent by a
provider for determination of eligibility
♦ 271 Eligibility Response - An information
source that responds to the request with either an acknowledgement that the patient has active or inactive coverage, or that the patient was not found within their system
First Consulting Group
Business Considerations: 270/271 Transaction ♦ Requires a revision in eligibility policies and
procedures
♦ Requires a change in how eligibility information
is received, stored, and transmitted
♦ Requires a change in how eligibility information
is interpreted
♦ Will result in fewer telephone calls ♦ Includes both batch and real-time bi-directional
EDI transactions
First Consulting Group
278: Health Care Services Review Transaction ♦ 278 – Pre-certification/Authorization/Referrals ♦ The 278 is the only transaction that has both
request and response within the same Implementation Guide
♦ The 278 is used to request that a utilization
management organization review a proposed or actual procedure or admission and provide approval or authorization of that service
♦ Although not mandated within the transaction,
the 278 should be used for one patient for one service
First Consulting Group
Business Considerations: 278 Health Care Services Review ♦ Transaction will effect Medicare and
Medicaid work flow
♦ Requires a change to operating procedures
and policies relating to timeliness of referral and response ♦ Medicare and Medicaid will establish and
direct operating protocols
First Consulting Group
837: Institutional, Professional, Dental Claims ♦ Used to submit health care claim billing
information, encounter information, or both from providers of health care services to payers, either directly or via intermediary billing agencies and clearinghouses
♦ It can also be used to transmit health care
claims and billing information between payers with different payment responsibilities where coordination of benefits is required or between payers and regulatory agencies to monitor the provision, billing and payment for health care services
First Consulting Group
837: Institutional, Professional, Dental Claims (cont’d) ♦ Implementation Guides have no recommended
limit to the number of claims transaction submissions within one ISA-IEA (outer envelope) transmission
♦ For translation processing, it is recommended
to limit the number of claims per transmission
♦ When a provider submits the complete data
set of claims information, the health plan cannot request the data at a later date First Consulting Group
IT and Business Considerations: 837 Transaction ♦ Requires education on new electronic claims
format
♦ Requires a change to policies and procedures ♦ Eliminates all proprietary codes not contained
within the transaction
♦ Involves mapping of existing claims transaction
formats such as NSF, UB92, and HCFA 1500 to the 837 X12N Implementation Guides First Consulting Group
IT and Business Considerations: 837 Transaction (cont’d) ♦ Requires a change in how claim information
is entered and processed
♦ Requires a change to reason codes used today ♦ Contains additional required data fields that
current claims transactions do not include
♦ A uni-directional, batch EDI transaction set First Consulting Group
835: Remittance Transaction ♦ Remittance information is provided as
justification for the payment received by the 837 transaction, as well as input to the provider’s accounts receivable system
♦ Remittance information consists of two
separate levels
– Level 1 - consists of claim and service information packaged with detail information – Level 2 - consists of remittance information that is not specific to claims and services contained in Level 1; this information relates to the Provider Adjustment Segment which provides for reporting increases and decreases in the amount remitted First Consulting Group
835: Remittance Transaction (cont’d) ♦ The transmission of any of the following from
a health plan to a health care provider’s financial institution: – Payment – Information about the transfer of funds – Payment processing information
♦ The transmission of either of the following
from a health plan to a health care provider: – Explanation of benefits – Remittance advice
First Consulting Group
IT and Business Considerations: 835 Transaction ♦ Requires a change in policies regarding
financial transaction processing
♦ Requires review of electronic funds transfer
(EFT) procedures as the 835 allows direct EFT
♦ Review of workflow process to ensure that all
processes are documented
♦ Contains additional required data fields that
current claims transactions do not include
♦ A uni-directional batch EDI transaction set First Consulting Group
276/277: Claim Status Transaction ♦ The 276 Claim Status Request is the inquiry
from the provider to the health plan regarding the status of a specified claim(s)
♦ Status information can be requested at the
claim or line level
♦ The 277 Claim Status Response is the reply
from the health plan to the provider on the status of the claim(s) within the adjudication process
First Consulting Group
Business Considerations: 276/277 Transaction ♦ Change business structure in how requests
for claims information are processed
♦ Develop data file to capture and retain claims
information for specified periods of time
♦ Upgrade claims data to capture requirements
in 276/277 to provide comprehensive information
♦ Both batch EDI and real-time, bi-directional
transactions
First Consulting Group
834: Enrollment / Disenrollment Transaction ♦ One of two transactions not processed by the
provider; NOT required since employers/ sponsors are not covered entities
♦ The 834 transaction was developed for transfer
of enrollment information from a sponsor of insurance coverage, benefits, or policy to a payer
♦ The 834 deals with three types of transactions: – Initial enrollment – Changes to enrollment benefit information – Reconciliation to ensure accuracy of data First Consulting Group
Business Considerations: 834 Transaction ♦ Enrollment process must be reviewed to
ensure all transaction data is available
♦ Requires a change in policies and procedures ♦ Status inquiries must be enhanced to handle
an automated process
♦ EDI agreements must be reviewed
First Consulting Group
820: Premium Payment Transaction ♦ The 820 transaction is not required since
employer/sponsor is not a covered entity; 820 is sent from employer/sponsor to payer
♦ Used to initiate an electronic payment that
includes the remittance detail needed by the receiver to properly apply the payment
♦ Payment can be initiated without the remittance
detail, and send the remittance detail separately to the plan
♦ Payment can be made electronically or by paper First Consulting Group
Covered Transactions: Standards Not Yet Determined ♦ First report of injury – Workers’ Compensation ♦ Health claims attachments – following
electronic claims with paper attachments does not make sense
First Consulting Group
Planning for Implementation ♦ Strategic approach ♦ Enhance EDI capabilities to realize savings ♦ Recognize data and information as an asset ♦ Identify HIPAA as an opportunity ♦ Map HIPAA compliance to the organization’s
strategic plan
First Consulting Group
Next Steps
Next Steps ♦ Educate your staff ♦ Define an organizational EDI strategy and
determine which transactions you want to process electronically using the standard formats
♦ Conduct a comprehensive analysis – Evaluate transactions and code sets currently in use – Identify information systems and feeder systems – Identify and begin discussions with trading partners and vendors – Review contracts – Identify process changes necessary First Consulting Group
Next Steps (cont’d) ♦ Select implementation recommendations
based on alternatives identified during the analysis
♦ Develop transition and conversion plans ♦ Establish a training plan ♦ Establish monitoring and reporting
mechanisms
First Consulting Group
Industry Collaboration ♦ WEDI - Workgroup for Electronic Data
Interchange: www.wedi.org ♦ SNIP - Strategic National Implementation Process: www.wedi.org/snip – SNIP is a collaborative health care industry-wide process resulting in the implementation of standards and furthering the development and implementation of future standards – Many white papers available, written by industry collaborative effort: ! Direct Data Entry (DDE) ! Coordination of Benefits (COB) ! Testing and certification First Consulting Group
Requesting Changes to Standards ♦ Requesting Changes to the HIPAA X12N or
NCPDP Implementation Guides:
– HHS named consortium consisting of X12N, NCPDP, HL7, NUBC, NUCC, ADA – Consortium is the Designated Standards Maintenance Organizations (DSMO) – December 2000 – current: approximately 300 changes requested
♦ Go to www.hipaa-dmso.org to request changes
First Consulting Group
Questions and Discussion
Press 1 on your touch tone phone for questions.
Resources American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA):
http://www.ahima.org/hipaa.html
–Benchmark information and case studies –Interim Steps for Getting Started
Computer-Based Patient Record Institute (CPRI):
http://www.cpri-host.org
–CPRI Security Toolkit
Department of Health and Human Services HIPAA Administrative Simplification:
http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/index.ht m
–Latest News on Regulations –Current proposed and final rules
For the Record: Protecting Electronic Health http://www.nap.edu Information (National Academy Press, 1997) 800-6246242 –Full Report
HIPAA Transaction Implementation Guides from the Washington Publishing Company
http://www.wpc-edi.com
Links to federal HIPAA sites
http://www.hcfa.gov/medicare/edi/hipaa edi.htm
Subscribe to email release of HIPAA documents (such as notice of proposed rule making)
http://www.hcfa.gov/medicare/edi/admn list.htm
First Consulting Group