Form 3 - Public Disclosure Form This form shall be submitted by the CAB no less than thirty (30) calendar days prior to any onsite audit * . Any changes to this information shall be submitted to the ASC within five (5) days of the change and not later than 10 days before the planned audit. If later, a new announcement is submitted and another 30 days rule will apply. The information on this form shall be public * and should be posted on the ASC website within three (3) days of submission. This form shall be written to be readable to the stakeholders and other interested parties. This form should be translated into local languages when appropriate PDF 1 Public Disclosure Form PDF 1.1 Name of CAB
Bureau Veritas Certification
PDF 1.2 Date of Submission
PDF 1.3 CAB Contact Person PDF 1.3.1 Name of Contact Person
PDF 1.3.2 Position in the CAB's organisation
CAR V. 2.0 - Form 3 - Public Disclosure Form
4.8.2016
Lars Windmar
Lead Auditor
* Except unannounced audits, for which this form will be sent to the ASC and AAB without being published
1/5
PDF 1.3.3 Mailing address
BUREAU VERITAS Certification. Oldenborggade 2, 7000 Fredericia. Denmark
PDF 1.3.4 Email address
[email protected]
PDF 1.3.5 Phone number
0045 50 88 83 95
PDF 1.3.6 Other
PDF 1.4 ASC Name of Client
Fole Dambrug. Kongeåens Dambrup Aps.
PDF 1.4.1 Name of Contact Person
Christina R. Kongsted
PDF 1.4.2 Position in the client's organisation
Quality manager
PDF 1.4.3 Mailing address
Fole Dambrug. Stampemøllevej 30, 6510 Gram. Denmark
PDF 1.4.4 Email address
CAR V. 2.0 - Form 3 - Public Disclosure Form
[email protected]
* Except unannounced audits, for which this form will be sent to the ASC and AAB without being published
2/5
004575382997 / 0045 21 62 92 77
PFD 1.4.5 Phone number
PDF 1.4.6 Other
PDF 1.5 Unit of Certification PDF 1.5.1 Single Site PDF 1.5.2 Multi-site PDF 1.5.3 Group certification
Single site
PDF 1.6 Sites to be audited Site Name Fole Dambrug
GPS Coordinates
Other Location Information
Latitude: N 55° 18' 21.168'' Longitude: E 8° 57' 52.167''
Planned Site Audit(s) 8.9.2016
Date of planned audit 8.9.2016
PDF 1.7 Species and Standards Standard Freshwater Trout
CAR V. 2.0 - Form 3 - Public Disclosure Form
Species (scientific name) produced Oncorhynchus mykiss
Included in scope ASC endorsed standard Version Number (Yes/No) to be used Yes ASC Freshwater Trout Version 1.0
* Except unannounced audits, for which this form will be sent to the ASC and AAB without being published
3/5
PDF 1.8 Planned Stakeholder Consultation(s) and How Stakeholders can Become Involved Name/organisation Relevance for this audit How to involve this When stakeholder may stakeholder (inbe contacted person/phone interview/input submission) Ferskvandsfiskeriforeningen Limited email before audit When the audit is for Danmark announced on the ASC webpage Danmarks Limited email before audit When the audit is Naturfredningsforening announced on the ASC webpage Danmarks Limited email before audit When the audit is Sportsfiskerforbund announced on the ASC webpage Miljøklagenævnet Limited email before audit When the audit is announced on the ASC webpage Haderslev Municipality Limited email before audit When the audit is announced on the ASC webpage Dansk Ornitologisk Forening Limited
email before audit
WWF Denmark
email before audit
PDF 1.9 Proposed Timeline PDF 1.9.1 Contract Signed:
CAR V. 2.0 - Form 3 - Public Disclosure Form
Limited
When the audit is announced on the ASC webpage When the audit is announced on the ASC webpage
How this stakeholder will be contacted
Email sent by fishfarm Email sent by fishfarm Email sent by fishfarm Email sent by fishfarm Email sent by fishfarm Email sent by fishfarm Email sent by fishfarm
29.4.2016
* Except unannounced audits, for which this form will be sent to the ASC and AAB without being published
4/5
PDF 1.9.2 Start of audit:
8.9.2016
PDF 1.9.3 Onsite Audit(s):
8.9.2016
PDF 1.9.4 Determination/Decision:
To be performed after the farm has demonstrated conformity with the ASC requirements (deadline for closing MAJOR NCs: 3 months).
PDF 1.10 Audit Team Column1 PDF 1.10.1 Lead Auditor PDF 1.10.2 Technical Experts
Name Lars Windmar
PDF 1.10.3 Social Auditor
Lars Windmar
CAR V. 2.0 - Form 3 - Public Disclosure Form
ASC Registration Reference
* Except unannounced audits, for which this form will be sent to the ASC and AAB without being published
5/5
Nonconfomity Report Form Ref# NCF 1 NCF 2 NCF 3 NCF 4 NFC 5
Text by: CAB CAB CAB CAB
NFC 6
NC Reference Lars Windmar NC Detected by 8.9.2016 Date Detected Initial ASC Trout Audit Reference Has a variation or interpreation (Form 1) that relates to this NC been appoved by ASC. If so include the ASC variation or interperation log reference. Justification for applying the approved variation or interpretation. Status of NC
Open Closed Major Minor Observation
1
NA. Ikke aktuel
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 6 NCF 7 NCF 8 NCF 9 NCF 10 NCF 11
CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB
NCF 12
CAB
NCF 13 NCF 14 NCF 15
CAB CAB CAB
Requirement Reference Clause Number Text of Requirement
NCF 16
CAB
Description of the nonconformity
Records from regular staff trainings on escape prevention procedures are not available. Registrering af træning af medarbejdere i forebyggelse af udslip af fisk er ikke tilgængelig
NCF 17
CAB
Statement of evidence detected
Records from regular staff trainings on escape prevention procedures are not available. Registrering af træning af medarbejdere i forebyggelse af udslip af fisk er ikke tilgængelig
NCF 18
Client
Statement of any errors of fact in the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 19
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
Grade of NC
Deadline for closing the nonconformity Explanation for deadline for closing the nonconformity
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
x x
8.12.2016 See ASC Certification and Accreditation Requirements, Version 2.0. Requirement 17.10.1.1 A minor non-conformity “Within (3) three months the CAB shall: C. Close the minor non conformity once it can confirm receipt of objective evidence that demonstrates conformity.” Source Document
ASC Freshwater Trout Standard V 1 2.5.3 Maintain documentary records (e.g. minutes, attendance sheets) from regular staff trainings on escape prevention procedures.
1/21
NCF 20
Client
Statement of the root cause of the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
The farm was under the impression that the farm could be defined as a closed production system and that it therefore wasn't necessary to perform an escape risk assessment which address the risk of flooding. The farm does not think there is any risk of fish escaping. The farm does therefore not think that this requirement is relevant. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dambruget havde den opfattelse at produktionssystemet kunne defineres som et lukket produktionsanlæg og at der derfor ikke var nødvendigt at vurdere risiko for udslip af fisk som følge af oversvømmelse. Dambruget mener ikke at der er en risiko for udslip af fisk og at dette krav derfor ikke er relevant. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016
NCF 21
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair root cause analysis. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. Dette er en udmærket analyse af grundlæggende årsag.
NCF 22
Client
Statement of the corrective actions proposed and taken (include the Closed with an action plan. Training of staff in escape prevention procedures is scheduled to January 2017. Submitted by name of the author and date submitted) Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Lukket med en aktion plan. Træning af medarbejdere er planlagt til januar 2017. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016
NCF 23
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC lead auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair corrective action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket korrigerende handling.
NCF 24
Client
Statement of the preventive actions proposed and taken (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Closed with an action plan. Training of staff in escape prevention procedures will be performed every year according to the farms updated procedures. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Lukket med en aktion plan. Træning af medarbejdere vil blive foretaget hvert år iht dambrugets opdaterede procedurer. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016
NCF 25
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC lead auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair preventive action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket forebyggende handling.
NCF 26
Client
Request to extend the implemetation period for corrective action(s) NA. Ikke aktuel until
NCF 27
Justification for extention request
NA. Ikke aktuel
Extention request approval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 29
Reason(s) for approval/ disapproval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 30
Date on which the nonconformity was closed
NCF 28
CAB
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
19.10.2016
2/21
Nonconfomity Report Form Ref#
Text by:
NCF 1 NCF 2 NCF 3 NCF 4 NFC 5 NFC 6 NCF 6 NCF 7 NCF 8 NCF 9 NCF 10 NCF 11
CAB CAB CAB CAB
NCF 12
CAB
NCF 13 NCF 14 NCF 15
CAB CAB CAB
Requirement Reference
NCF 16
CAB
Description of the nonconformity
CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB
2 NC Reference Lars Windmar NC Detected by 8.9.2016 Date Detected Initial ASC Trout Audit Reference Has a variation or interpreation (Form 1) that relates to this NC NA. Ikke aktuel Justification for applying the approved variation or interpretation. NA. Ikke aktuel Open Status of NC Closed x Major Grade of NC Minor x Observation Deadline for closing the 8.12.2016 nonconformity See ASC Certification and Accreditation Requirements, Version 2.0. Requirement 17.10.1.1 A minor non-conformity “Within Explanation for deadline for (3) three months the CAB shall: C. Close the minor non conformity once it can confirm receipt of objective evidence that closing the nonconformity demonstrates conformity.”
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
Source Document Clause Number Text of Requirement
ASC Freshwater Trout Standard V 1 4.1.2 Prior to accepting a transfer of fish (whether the transfer is internal or external), ensure that the supplier has evaluated fish using the farm's health status metrics Evidence of health screening on a sub-sample of fish prior to a decision to transfer each batch of fish is not available. Evidence of training of farm staff on how to evaluate fish condition using health status metrics is not available. Der forelægger ikke tilstrækkeligt dokumentation for at hver gruppe af fisk er blevet vurderet iht. de af dambruget udvalgte fiske helse kriterier. Dokumentation for træning af medarbejdere i evaluering af fiskenes sundhedstilstand mangler.
3/21
NCF 17
CAB
Statement of evidence detected
Evidence of health screening on a sub-sample of fish prior to a decision to transfer each batch of fish is not available. Evidence of training of farm staff on how to evaluate fish condition using health status metrics is not available. Der forelægger ikke tilstrækkeligt dokumentation for at hver gruppe af fisk er blevet vurderet iht. de af dambruget udvalgte fiske helse kriterier. Dokumentation for træning af medarbejdere i evaluering af fiskenes sundhedstilstand mangler.
NCF 18
Client
Statement of any errors of fact in the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 19
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Na. Ikke aktuel
NCF 20
Client
Statement of the root cause of the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
This is initial certification and the farms experience with the ASC requirements to documentation is limited. The farm never receives fish or removes fish unless the fish are healthy. But the farm has not used the farms health status metrics to document the evaluation of fish health. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dette er første gangs certificering og dambruget kendskab til ASC standardens dokumentations krav er begrænsede. Dambruget modtager og flytter kun sunde fisk. Men dambruget har ikke dokumenteret denne vurdering af fisk ud fra de af dambruget udvalgte fiske helse kriterier. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2018
NCF 21
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair root cause analysis. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket analyse af grundlæggende årsag.
NCF 22
Client
Statement of the corrective actions proposed and taken (include the Closed with an action plan. All delivery notes will in the future contain a remark about the health status of the fish to be name of the author and date submitted) delivered + a signature. Training of staff will be performed by the veterinarian in accordance with the farms updated farm health plan. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Lukket med en aktion plan. Alle modtage sedler vil i fremtiden indeholde information om evaluering af fiskenes fiskesundhedstilstand. Træning vil medarbejdere vil blive foretaget iht. den opdaterede fiske sundhedsplan. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2018
NCF 23
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC lead auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair corrective action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket korrigerende handling.
NCF 24
Client
Statement of the preventive actions proposed and taken (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Closed with an action plan. All delivery notes will in the future contain a remark about the health status of the fish to be delivered + a signature. Training of staff will be performed by the veterinarian in accordance with the farms updated farm health plan. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Lukket med en aktion plan. Alle modtage sedler vil i fremtiden indeholde information om evaluering af fiskenes fiskesundhedstilstand. Træning vil medarbejdere vil blive foretaget iht. den opdaterede fiske sundhedsplan. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2018
NCF 25
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC lead auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair preventive action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket forebyggende handling.
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
4/21
NCF 26
Client
NCF 27
Request to extend the implemetation period for corrective action(s) NA. Ikke aktuel until Justification for extention request
NA. Ikke aktuel
Extention request approval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 29
Reason(s) for approval/ disapproval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 30
Date on which the nonconformity was closed
NCF 28
CAB
19.10.2016
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
5/21
Nonconfomity Report Form Ref#
Text by:
NCF 1 NCF 2 NCF 3 NCF 4 NFC 5 NFC 6 NCF 6 NCF 7 NCF 8 NCF 9 NCF 10 NCF 11
CAB CAB CAB CAB
NCF 12
CAB
NCF 13 NCF 14 NCF 15
CAB CAB CAB
Requirement Reference
NCF 16
CAB
Description of the nonconformity
The farm uses Virkon S as a disinfectant in food baths. But there is no info on Virkon S in the Farm Health Plan (FHP) Det fremgår ikke af dambrugets fiskehelseplan (FHP) at Virkon S bruges som desinfektionsmiddel
NCF 17
CAB
Statement of evidence detected
The farm uses Virkon S as a disinfectant in food baths. But there is no info on Virkon S in the Farm Health Plan (FHP). Det fremgår ikke af dambrugets fiskehelseplan (FHP) at Virkon S bruges som desinfektionsmiddel
NCF 18
Client
Statement of any errors of fact in the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 19
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB
3 NC Reference Lars Windmar NC Detected by 8.9.2016 Date Detected Initial ASC Trout Audit Reference Has a variation or interpreation (Form 1) that relates to this NC NA. Ikke aktuel Justification for applying the approved variation or interpretation. NA. Ikke aktuel Open Status of NC Closed x Major Grade of NC Minor x Observation Deadline for closing the 8.12.2016 nonconformity See ASC Certification and Accreditation Requirements, Version 2.0. Requirement 17.10.1.1 A minor non-conformity “Within Explanation for deadline for (3) three months the CAB shall: C. Close the minor non conformity once it can confirm receipt of objective evidence that closing the nonconformity demonstrates conformity.”
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
Source Document Clause Number Text of Requirement
ASC Freshwater Trout Standard V 1 4.1.4 a. Prepare written protocols for site access, disinfection and hygiene (these protocols may be incorporated into the Farm Health Plan in 4.1.1a).
6/21
NCF 20
Client
Statement of the root cause of the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
This is initial certification and the farms experience with the ASC standards requirements to documentation and juvenile suppliers is limited. This issue was forgotten. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dette er førstegangs certificering. Dambrugets erfaring med ASC standardens krav til dokumentation og krav til yngel leverandører er begrænset. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016
NCF 21
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair root cause analysis. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket analyse af grundlæggende årsag.
NCF 22
Client
Statement of the corrective actions proposed and taken (include the The farm health plan has been updated and sent to Bureau Veritas. Date of the updated Farm Health Plan 10.10.2016. name of the author and date submitted) Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dambrugets fiskehelseplan er opdateret og sendt til Bureau Veritas. Dato for opdateret fiskehelseplan 10.10.2016. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted. 12.10.2016
NCF 23
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair corrective action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket korrigerende handling.
NCF 24
Client
Statement of the preventive actions proposed and taken (include the name of the author and date submitted)
The farm health plan has been updated and sent to Bureau Veritas. Date of the updated Farm Health Plan 10.10.2016. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dambrugets fiskehelseplan er opdateret og sendt til Bureau Veritas. Dato for opdateret fiskehelseplan 10.10.2016. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted. 12.10.2016
NCF 25
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair preventive action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. Dette er en udmærket forbedrende handling.
NCF 26
Client
Request to extend the implemetation period for corrective action(s) NA. Ikke aktuel until
NCF 27
Justification for extention request
NA. Ikke aktuel
Extention request approval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 29
Reason(s) for approval/ disapproval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 30
Date on which the nonconformity was closed
NCF 28
CAB
19.10.2016
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
7/21
Nonconfomity Report Form Ref# NCF 1 NCF 2 NCF 3 NCF 4 NFC 5
Text by: CAB CAB CAB CAB
NC Reference Lars Windmar NC Detected by 8.9.2016 Date Detected Initial ASC Trout Audit Reference Has a variation or interpreation (Form 1) that relates to this NC been appoved by ASC. If so include the ASC variation or interperation log reference.
4
NA. Ikke aktuel
NFC 6 NCF 6 NCF 7 NCF 8 NCF 9 NCF 10 NCF 11
CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB
NCF 12
CAB
NCF 13 NCF 14 NCF 15
CAB CAB CAB
Requirement Reference
NCF 16
CAB
Description of the nonconformity
The farm is not able to document that national legislation with respect to transport of dead fish has been followed. See: https://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/Leksikon/Sider/Animalske-biprodukter.aspx. Dambruget kan ikke dokumentere at den Danske lovgivning vedrørende transport af død fisk er overholdt. https://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/Leksikon/Sider/Animalske-biprodukter.aspx.
NCF 17
CAB
Statement of evidence detected
The farm is not able to document that national legislation with respect to transport of dead fish has been followed. See: https://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/Leksikon/Sider/Animalske-biprodukter.aspx. Dambruget kan ikke dokumentere at den Danske lovgivning vedrørende transport af død fisk er overholdt. https://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/Leksikon/Sider/Animalske-biprodukter.aspx.
Justification for applying the approved variation or interpretation. Open Status of NC Closed Major Grade of NC Minor Observation Deadline for closing the nonconformity Explanation for deadline for closing the nonconformity
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
Source Document Clause Number Text of Requirement
NA. Ikke aktuel x x
8.12.2016 See ASC Certification and Accreditation Requirements, Version 2.0. Requirement 17.10.1.1 A minor non-conformity “Within (3) three months the CAB shall: C. Close the minor non conformity once it can confirm receipt of objective evidence that demonstrates conformity.” ASC Freshwater Trout Standard V 1 4.1.5 c. In the above protocol (4.1.5b), make explicit reference to any national regulations related to disposal of biological waste.
8/21
NCF 18
Client
Statement of any errors of fact in the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 19
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 20
Client
Statement of the root cause of the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
The farm has a licence to transport of dead fish issued by Danish Food Administration issued September 2011. This was forgotten at the day of audit. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dambruget har en tilladelse til transport af død fisk udstedt at Fødevare styrelsen september 2011. Dette blev glemt under ASC audit. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2018
NCF 21
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair root cause analysis. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket analyse af grundlæggende årsag.
NCF 22
Client
Statement of the corrective actions proposed and taken (include the The licence to transport dead fish has been sent to Bureau Veritas. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Tilladelsen til name of the author and date submitted) transport af død fisk er nu sendt til Bureau Veritas. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2018
NCF 23
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair corrective action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. Dette er en udmærket korrigerende handling.
NCF 24
Client
Statement of the preventive actions proposed and taken (include the name of the author and date submitted)
The licence to transport dead fish has been sent to Bureau Veritas. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Tilladelsen til transport af død fisk er nu sendt til Bureau Veritas. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2018
NCF 25
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair preventive action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. Dette er en udmærket forbedrende handling.
NCF 26
Client
Request to extend the implemetation period for corrective action(s) NA. Ikke aktuel until
NCF 27
Justification for extention request
NA. Ikke aktuel
Extention request approval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 29
Reason(s) for approval/ disapproval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 30
Date on which the nonconformity was closed
NCF 28
CAB
19.10.2016
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
9/21
Nonconfomity Report Form NCF 1 NCF 2 NCF 3 NCF 4 NFC 5
CAB CAB CAB CAB
5 NC Reference Lars Windmar NC Detected by 8.9.2016 Date Detected Initial ASC Trout Audit Reference Has a variation or interpreation (Form 1) that relates to this NC NA. Ikke aktuel been appoved by ASC. If so include the ASC variation or interperation log reference. Justification for applying the approved variation or interpretation. NA. Ikke aktuel Open x Status of NC Closed Major Grade of NC Minor x Observation Deadline for closing the 8.12.2016 nonconformity Explanation for deadline for See ASC Certification and Accreditation Requirements, Version 2.0. Requirement 17.10.1.1 A minor non-conformity “Within closing the nonconformity (3) three months the CAB shall: C. Close the minor non conformity once it can confirm receipt of objective evidence that demonstrates conformity.”
NFC 6 NCF 6 NCF 7 NCF 8 NCF 9 NCF 10 NCF 11
CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB
NCF 12
CAB
NCF 13 NCF 14 NCF 15
CAB CAB CAB
Requirement Reference
NCF 16
CAB
Description of the nonconformity
According to the Farm Health Plan (FHP) the maximum stock in juvenile section 1 is 100 kg per raceway. The actual biomass was not known to the farm management at the audit in raceway number 15 and 16. Ifølge FHP så er max biomasse i kummehus 1 100 kg per kummen. Den faktiske biomasse i disse kummer er ikke registreret
NCF 17
CAB
Statement of evidence detected
According to the Farm Health Plan (FHP) the maximum stock in juvenile section 1 is 100 kg per raceway. The actual biomass was not known to the farm management at the audit in raceway number 15 and 16. Ifølge FHP så er maksimal biomasse i kummehus 1 100 kg per kummen. Den faktiske biomasse i disse kummer er ikke registreret
NCF 18
Client
Statement of any errors of fact in the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 19
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
Source Document Clause Number Text of Requirement
ASC Freshwater Trout Standard V 1 4.1.8 Evidence that maximum stock density was determined jointly by the designated veterinarian and site management
10/21
NCF 20
Client
Statement of the root cause of the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
This is initial certification and the farms experience with the ASC standards requirements to documentation is limited. The farm uses the number of fish in each fish to manage the biomass in each raceway. The maximum size of juveniles in this section is 700 pieces per kg or 0.7 g per piece. The farm has records which demonstrate the numbers of juveniles in each raceway. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dette er førstegangs certificering. Dambrugets erfaring med ASC standardens krav til dokumentation er begrænset. Dambruget bruger information om antal fisk per kumme til at kontrollere biomassen. Maksimal størrelse af fisk i denne sektion er 700 stk. per kg dvs. 0,7 g per stk. dambruget har registrering af antal fisk i hver kumme. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016
NCF 21
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair root cause analysis. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket analyse af grundlæggende årsag.
NCF 22
Client
Statement of the corrective actions proposed and taken (include the The Harm Health Plan has been updated. Information on the number of fish in each raceway in section 1 is not included in the name of the author and date submitted) FHP. Date of of the updated FHP: 10.10.2016. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dambrugets fiskehelseplan er nu opdateret. Info om maksimal antal stk i kummerne i sektion 1 er nu inkluderet i den opdaterede fiskehelseplan. Dato af opdateret fiskehelseplan er 10.10.2016. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016
NCF 23
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair corrective action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. Dette er en udmærket korrigerende handling.
NCF 24
Client
Statement of the preventive actions proposed and taken (include the name of the author and date submitted)
The Harm Health Plan has been updated. Information on the number of fish in each raceway in section 1 is not included in the FHP. Date of of the updated FHP: 10.10.2016. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dambrugets fiskehelseplan er nu opdateret. Info om maksimal antal stk i kummerbne i sektion 1 er nu inkluderet i den opdaterede fiskehelseplan. Dato af opdateret fiskehelseplan er 10.10.2016. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016
NCF 25
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair corrective action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. Dette er en udmærket korrigerende handling.
NCF 26
Client
Request to extend the implemetation period for corrective action(s) NA. Ikke aktuel until NA. Ikke aktuel Justification for extention request
CAB
Extention request approval
NA. Ikke aktuel
Reason(s) for approval/ disapproval Date on which the nonconformity was closed 19.10.2016
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 27 NCF 28 NCF 29 NCF 30
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
11/21
Nonconfomity Report Form NCF 1 NCF 2 NCF 3 NCF 4 NFC 5 NFC 6 NCF 6 NCF 7 NCF 8 NCF 9 NCF 10 NCF 11
CAB CAB CAB CAB
NCF 12
CAB
NCF 13 NCF 14 NCF 15
CAB CAB CAB
Requirement Reference
NCF 16
CAB
Description of the nonconformity
Training of workers in health and safety issues performed last time 28.1.2014 as part of an evaluation of the workplace hazards (APV). APV blev gennemført sidste gang 28.1.2014
NCF 17
CAB
Statement of evidence detected
Training of workers in health and safety issues performed last time 28.1.2014 as part of an evaluation of the workplace hazards (APV). APV blev gennemført sidste gang 28.1.2014
NCF 18
Client
Statement of any errors of fact in the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 19
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 20
Client
Statement of the root cause of the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
The APV shall be held every 3. Year according to Danish laws. The authority is Danish Working Environment Authority (http://engelsk.arbejdstilsynet.dk/en). Every year we shall have an evaluation of the workplace hazards and this had been missed. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. APV skal foretages hvert 3 år iht. til dansk lovgivning se arbejdstilsynet (http://arbejdstilsynet.dk/da). Hvert år skal der foretages en opdatering af APV og denne er blevet glemt. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016.
CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB
NC Reference NC Detected by Date Detected Audit Reference Has a variation or Justification for applying the Status of NC Grade of NC
6 Lars Windmar 8.9.2016 Initial ASC Trout NA. Ikke aktuel NA. Ikke aktuel Open Closed Major Minor Observation
Deadline for closing the nonconformity Explanation for deadline for closing the nonconformity
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
x x
8.12.2016 See ASC Certification and Accreditation Requirements, Version 2.0. Requirement 17.10.1.1 A minor non-conformity “Within (3) three months the CAB shall: C. Close the minor non conformity once it can confirm receipt of objective evidence that demonstrates conformity.” Source Document Clause Number Text of Requirement
ASC Freshwater Trout Standard V 1 6.4.1 d. Employer conducts health and safety training for all employees on a regular basis (once a year and immediately for all new employees), including training on potential hazards and risk minimization, Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) and effective use of PPE.
12/21
NCF 21
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NCF 22
Client
Statement of the corrective actions proposed and taken (include the Closed with an action plan. The employees Fole Dambrug and the management of the company have scheduled the name of the author and date submitted) evaluation of workplace hazards to 14.10.2016. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Lukket med en aktion plan. De ansatte på Fole Dambrug og virksomhedens ledelse har planlagt APV til 14.10.2016. Indsedt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016.
NCF 23
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair corrective action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. Dette er en udmærket korrigerende handling.
NCF 24
Client
Statement of the preventive actions proposed and taken (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Closed with an action plan. It is written into the agenda for the yearly tasks regarding ASC that a yearly evaluation of workplace hazards shall be held. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Lukket med en aktion plan. Det er skrevet at i dambruges årsplan at der skal foretages en årlig APV. Indsedt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016.
NCF 25
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair preventive action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. Dette er en udmærket forbedrende handling.
NCF 26
Client
Request to extend the implemetation period for corrective action(s) NA. Ikke aktuel until
NCF 27
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair root cause analysis. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. Dette er en udmærket analyse af grundlæggende årsag.
Justification for extention request
NA. Ikke aktuel
Extention request approval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 29
Reason(s) for approval/ disapproval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 30
Date on which the nonconformity was closed
NCF 28
CAB
19.10.2016
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
13/21
Nonconfomity Report Form Ref# NCF 1 NCF 2 NCF 3 NCF 4 NFC 5
Text by: CAB CAB CAB CAB
7 NC Reference Lars Windmar NC Detected by 8.9.2016 Date Detected Initial ASC Trout Audit Reference NA. Ikke aktuel Has a variation or interpreation (Form 1) that relates to this NC been appoved by ASC. If so include the ASC variation or interperation log reference. Justification for applying the approved variation or interpretation. NA. Ikke aktuel Open Status of NC Closed x Major Grade of NC Minor x Observation Deadline for closing the 8.12.2016 nonconformity Explanation for deadline for See ASC Certification and Accreditation Requirements, Version 2.0. Requirement 17.10.1.1 A minor non-conformity “Within closing the nonconformity (3) three months the CAB shall: C. Close the minor non conformity once it can confirm receipt of objective evidence that demonstrates conformity.” Source Document ASC Freshwater Trout Standard V 1 Requirement Reference Clause Number 6.4.4 Text of Requirement Workers use and have access to appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE)
NFC 6 NCF 6 NCF 7 NCF 8 NCF 9 NCF 10 NCF 11
CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB
NCF 12
CAB
NCF 13 NCF 14 NCF 15
CAB CAB CAB
NCF 16
CAB
Description of the nonconformity
Audit evidence. Eye wash solution and first aid kits expired. Eye wash solution is not available in the chemical storage room. Safety data sheets on medicine are not available. Øjeskylle væske og materiale i førstehjælpskassen er udgået på dato. Øjeskyllevæske findes ikke i kemikalie rum. Der mangler sikkerheds datablade for medicin
NCF 17
CAB
Statement of evidence detected
Audit evidence. Eye wash solution and first aid kits expired. Eye wash solution is not available in the chemical storage room. Safety data sheets on medicine are not available. Øjeskylle væske og materiale i førstehjælpskassen er udgået på dato. Øjeskyllevæske findes ikke i kemikalie rum. Der mangler sikkerheds datablade for medicin
NCF 18
Client
Statement of any errors of fact in the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 19
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
14/21
NCF 20
Client
Statement of the root cause of the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
We had overlooked the expiry dates for first aid materials and the need for safety data sheets for medicine. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dambruget havde glemt at undersøge udløbsdato for produkter i førstehjælpskassen. Dambruget havde glemt at indhente sikkerheds datablade for medicin der bruges til behandling af fisk. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016.
NCF 21
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair root cause analysis. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket analyse af grundlæggende årsag.
NCF 22
Client
Statement of the corrective actions proposed and taken (include the Outdated material has been replaced and datasheets supplied by the pharmacy. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. name of the author and date submitted) Produkter med overskredet dato for anvendelse er blevet udskiftet og sikkerheds datablade for medicin er blevet fremsendt af apotek. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016.
NCF 23
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted. Evidence has been received Submitted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar. 25.10.2016. Dokumentation for at krav 6.4.4 er fremsendt. Indsendt af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar. 25.10.2016.
NCF 24
Client
Statement of the preventive actions proposed and taken (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Outdated material has been replaced and datasheets supplied by the pharmacy. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 24.10.2016. Produkter med overskredet dato for anvendelse er blevet udskiftet og sikkerheds datablade for medicin er blevet fremsendt af apotek. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 24.10.2016.
NCF 25
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted. Evidence has been received Submitted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar. 25.10.2016. Ikke accepteret. Dokumentation for at krav 6.4.4 er fremsendt. Indsendt af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar
NCF 26
Client
Request to extend the implemetation period for corrective action(s) NA. Ikke aktuel until Justification for extention request
NA. Ikke aktuel
Extention request approval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 29
Reason(s) for approval/ disapproval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 30
Date on which the nonconformity was closed
NCF 27 NCF 28
CAB
25.10.2016
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
15/21
Nonconfomity Report Form Ref# NCF 1 NCF 2 NCF 3 NCF 4 NFC 5
Text by: CAB CAB CAB CAB
NC Reference Lars Windmar NC Detected by 6.9.2016 Date Detected Initial ASC Trout Audit Reference Has a variation or interpreation (Form 1) that relates to this NC been appoved by ASC. If so include the ASC variation or interperation log reference. Justification for applying the approved variation or interpretation. Open Status of NC Closed Major Grade of NC Minor Observation Deadline for closing the nonconformity Explanation for deadline for closing the nonconformity
8
NA. Ikke aktuel
NA. Ikke aktuel
NFC 6 NCF 6 NCF 7 NCF 8 NCF 9 NCF 10 NCF 11
CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB
NCF 12
CAB
NCF 13 NCF 14 NCF 15
CAB CAB CAB
Requirement Reference
NCF 16
CAB
Description of the nonconformity
Evidence that employees are trained in how to prevent known hazards is not adequate. Audit finding: some old underground tanks located between juvenile section 1 and juvenile section 2 are covered with old and unstable plywood. This hazard has not been fully addressed. Der forelægger ikke tilstrækkelig dokumentation for at der er blevet foretaget en gennemgang af arbejdssikkerhed på dambruget. Audit fund: Betong kummer mellem kummehus 1 og 2 er dækket med gammelt krydsfiner.
NCF 17
CAB
Statement of evidence detected
Evidence that employees are trained in how to prevent known hazards is not adequate. Audit finding: some old underground tanks located between juvenile section 1 and juvenile section 2 are covered with old and unstable plywood. This hazard has not been fully addressed. Der forelægger ikke tilstrækkelig dokumentation for at der er blevet foretaget en gennemgang af arbejdssikkerhed på dambruget. Audit fund: Betong kummer mellem kummehus 1 og 2 er dækket med gammelt krydsfiner.
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
Source Document Clause Number Text of Requirement
x x
6.12.2016 See ASC Certification and Accreditation Requirements, Version 2.0. Requirement 17.10.1.1 A minor non-conformity “Within (3) three months the CAB shall: C. Close the minor non conformity once it can confirm receipt of objective evidence that demonstrates conformity.” ASC Freshwater Trout Standard V 1 6.4.5 Evidence of a health and safety assessment of site facilities and processes
16/21
NCF 18
Client
Statement of any errors of fact in the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 19
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 20
Client
Statement of the root cause of the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
The training has been completed but the quality of the plywood has been overlooked. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2106. Træning er gennemført med kvaliteten af krydsfineren blev ikke vurderet. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016
NCF 21
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair root cause analysis. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket analyse af grundlæggende årsag.
NCF 22
Client
Statement of the corrective actions proposed and taken (include the The plywood has been replaced with new. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Den gamle krydsfiner er udskiftet name of the author and date submitted) med ny. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016
NCF 23
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted. Evidence has been received Submitted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar. 25.10.2016. Dokumentation for at krav 6.4.5 er fremsendt. Indsendt af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar. 25.10.2016.
NCF 24
Client
Statement of the preventive actions proposed and taken (include the name of the author and date submitted)
The plywood has been replaced with new. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Den gamle krydsfiner er udskiftet med ny. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016
NCF 25
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted. Evidence has been received Submitted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar. 25.10.2016. Ikke accepteret. Dokumentation for at krav 6.4.4 er fremsendt. Indsendt af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar
NCF 26
Client
Request to extend the implemetation period for corrective action(s) NA. Ikke aktuel until
NCF 27
Justification for extention request
NA. Ikke aktuel
Extention request approval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 29
Reason(s) for approval/ disapproval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 30
Date on which the nonconformity was closed
NCF 28
CAB
25.10.2016
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
17/21
Nonconfomity Report Form Ref# NCF 1 NCF 2 NCF 3 NCF 4 NFC 5
Text by: CAB CAB CAB CAB
NC Reference Lars Windmar NC Detected by 8.9.2016 Date Detected Initial ASC Trout Audit Reference Has a variation or interpreation (Form 1) that relates to this NC been appoved by ASC. If so include the ASC variation or interperation log reference. Justification for applying the approved variation or interpretation. Open Status of NC Closed Major Grade of NC Minor Observation Deadline for closing the nonconformity Explanation for deadline for closing the nonconformity
9
NA. Ikke aktuel
NFC 6 NCF 6 NCF 7 NCF 8 NCF 9 NCF 10 NCF 11
CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB
NCF 12
CAB
NCF 13 NCF 14 NCF 15
CAB CAB CAB
Requirement Reference
NCF 16
CAB
Description of the nonconformity
Written policy for disciplinary action which explicitly states that its aim is to assist the worker to improve is not available. Der mangler skriftlig politik og procedure der har som mål at forbedre medarbejdernes arbejdsindsats.
NCF 17
CAB
Statement of evidence detected
Written policy for disciplinary action which explicitly states that its aim is to assist the worker to improve is not available. Der mangler skriftlig politik og procedure der har som mål at forbedre medarbejdernes arbejdsindsats.
NCF 18
Client
Statement of any errors of fact in the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 19
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
Source Document Clause Number Text of Requirement
NA. Ikke aktuel x x
8.12.2016 See ASC Certification and Accreditation Requirements, Version 2.0. Requirement 17.10.1.1 A minor non-conformity “Within (3) three months the CAB shall: C. Close the minor non conformity once it can confirm receipt of objective evidence that demonstrates conformity.” ASC Freshwater Trout Standard V 1 6.7.2 Evidence of non-abusive disciplinary policies and procedures whose aim is to improve the workers’ performance
18/21
NCF 20
Client
Statement of the root cause of the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
This is initial certification and the farms experience with the requirements to documentation and requirement 6.7.2 are limited. Submitted by Christina Kongsted. 12.10.2016. Dette er førstegangs certificering og dambrugets erfaringer med ASC standardens krav til dokumentation og krav 6.7.2 er begrænsede. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted. 12.10.2016
NCF 21
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair root cause analysis. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket analyse af grundlæggende årsag.
NCF 22
Client
Statement of the corrective actions proposed and taken (include the The farm policy and procedures on requirement 6.7.2 has been updated. The updated policy and procedures has been sent to name of the author and date submitted) Bureau Veritas. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dambrugets politik og procedurer vedrørende krav 6.7.2 er blevet opdateret. Den opdaterede politik og procedure er fremsendt til Bureau Veritas. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted. 12.10.2016.
NCF 23
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC lead auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair corrective action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket korrigerende handling.
NCF 24
Client
Statement of the preventive actions proposed and taken (include the name of the author and date submitted)
The farm policy and procedures on requirement 6.7.2 has been updated. The updated policy and procedures has been sent to Bureau Veritas. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dambrugets politik og procedurer vedrørende krav 6.7.2 er blevet opdateret. Den opdaterede politik og procedure er fremsendt til Bureau Veritas. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted. 12.10.2016.
NCF 25
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC lead auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair preventive action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket korrigerende handling.
NCF 26
Client
Request to extend the implemetation period for corrective action(s) NA. Ikke aktuel until Justification for extention request NA. Ikke aktuel
CAB
Extention request approval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 29
Reason(s) for approval/ disapproval
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 30
Date on which the nonconformity was closed
NCF 27 NCF 28
19.10.2016
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
19/21
Nonconfomity Report Form Ref# NCF 1 NCF 2 NCF 3 NCF 4 NFC 5
Text by: CAB CAB CAB CAB
NC Reference Lars Windmar NC Detected by 8.9.2016 Date Detected Initial ASC Trout Audit Reference Has a variation or interpreation (Form 1) that relates to this NC been appoved by ASC. If so include the ASC variation or interperation log reference.
10
NA. Ikke aktuel
NFC 6 NCF 6 NCF 7 NCF 8 NCF 9 NCF 10 NCF 11
CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB CAB
NCF 12
CAB
NCF 13 NCF 14 NCF 15
CAB CAB CAB
Requirement Reference
NCF 16
CAB
Description of the nonconformity
Evidence of consultations with the local community is not available. Der forelægger ikke tilstrækkelig dokumentation for at ASC standardens krav mht. regelmæssig kommunikation med det lokale samfund er overholdt.
NCF 17
CAB
Statement of evidence detected
Evidence of consultations with the local community is not available. Der forelægger ikke tilstrækkelig dokumentation for at ASC standardens krav mht. regelmæssig kommunikation med det lokale samfund er overholdt.
NCF 18
Client
Statement of any errors of fact in the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 19
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NA. Ikke aktuel
NCF 20
Client
Statement of the root cause of the nonconformity (include the name of the author and date submitted)
The farm was under the impression that Danish system for handling relations to the surrounding community could be accepted as covering the requirements of ASC requirement 6.9.2. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dambruget havde det indtryk at det danske system for håndtering af klager og kontakt med interessenter var tilstrækkeligt for at overholde ASC standardens krav 6.9.2. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016.
Justification for applying the approved variation or interpretation. Open Status of NC Closed Major Grade of NC Minor Observation Deadline for closing the nonconformity Explanation for deadline for closing the nonconformity
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
Source Document Clause Number Text of Requirement
NA. Ikke aktuel x x
8.12.2016 See ASC Certification and Accreditation Requirements, Version 2.0. Requirement 17.10.1.1 A minor non-conformity “Within (3) three months the CAB shall: C. Close the minor non conformity once it can confirm receipt of objective evidence that demonstrates conformity.” ASC Freshwater Trout Standard V 1 6.9.2 Evidence of regular communication, engagement and consultation with surrounding communities
20/21
NCF 21
CAB
Response (include the name of the author and date submitted)
NCF 22
Client
Statement of the corrective actions proposed and taken (include the The NC is closed with an action plan. The farm will arrange annual public meetings at the farm. Invitations will be published at name of the author and date submitted) our website two week prior to the arrangement. First arrangement will held in 1st quarter 2017. Copy of invitation, agenda and list of participants will be filed for ASC-documentation. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Afvigelsen er lukket med en aktion plan. Dambruget vil arrangere offentlige møder med interessenter på dambruget. Første møde vil blive afholdt i 1. kvartal 2017. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016
NCF 23
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair corrective action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10. 2016. Dette er en udmærket korrigerende handling.
NCF 24
Client
Statement of the preventive actions proposed and taken (include the name of the author and date submitted)
The farm will arrange annual public meetings at the farm. Invitations will be published at our website two week prior to the arrangement. First arrangement will held in 1st quarter 2017. Copy of invitation, agenda and list of participants will be filed for ASC-documentation. Submitted by Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016. Dambruget vil arrangere offentlige møder med interessenter på dambruget. Første møde vil blive afholdt i 1. kvartal 2017. Indsendt af Christina Kongsted 12.10.2016
NCF 25
CAB
Evaluation by CAB (include the name of the author and date submitted)
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair preventive action. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. Dette er en udmærket forbedrende handling.
NCF 26
Client
Request to extend the implemetation period for corrective action(s) NA. Ikke aktuel until
NCF 27 NCF 28 NCF 29 NCF 30
CAB
Accepted by ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. This is a fair root cause analysis. Accepteret af ASC Lead Auditor Lars Windmar 19.10.2016. Dette er en udmærket analyse af grundlæggende årsag.
Justification for extention request
NA. Ikke aktuel
Extention request approval Reason(s) for approval/ disapproval
NA. Ikke aktuel NA. Ikke aktuel
Date on which the nonconformity was closed 19.10.2016
CAR v.2.0 - Non-conformity Report Form
21/21
ASC Audit Report - Opening General Requirements C1 Audit reports shall be written in English and in the most common language spoken in the areas where the operation is located. C2 Audit reports may contain confidential annexes for commercially sensitive information. C2.1 The CAB shall agree the content of any commercially sensitive information with the applicant, which can still be accessible by the ASC and the appointed accreditation body upon request as stipulated in the certification contract. C2.2 The public report shall contain a clear overview of the items which are in the confidential annexes. C2.3 Except for the annexes that contain commercially sensitive information all audit reports will be public. C3 The CAB is solely responsible for the content of all reports, including the content of any confidential annexes. C4 Reporting Deadlines* for certification and re-certification audit reports C4.1 Within thirty (30) days of the completing of the audit the CAB shall submit a draft report in English and the national or most common language spoken in the area where the operation is located. C4.2 Within five (5) days the ASC should post the draft report to the ASC website. C4.3 The CAB shall allow stakeholders and interested parties to comment on the report for fifteen (15) days. C4.4 Within twenty (20) days of the close of comments, the CAB shall submit the final report to the ASC in English and the national or most common language spoken in the area where the operation is located. C4.5 Within five (5) days the ASC should post the final report to the ASC website. C4.6 Audit reports shall contain accurate and reproducable results. C5 Reporting Deadlines* for surveillance audit reports C5.1 Within ninety (90) days of the completing of the audit the CAB shall submit a final report in English and the national or most common language spoken in the area where the operation is located. C5.2 Within five (5) days the ASC should post the final report to the ASC website. C5.3 Audit reports shall contain accurate and reproducable results.
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Opening
* working days
1/9
1 Title Page 1.1 Name of Applicant
Fole Dambrug
1.2 Report Title [e.g. Public Certification Report]
ASC Trout Draft Audit Report. Fole Dambrug. 2016 English and Danish
1.3 CAB name
Bureau Veritas
1.4 Name of Lead Auditor
Lars Windmar
1.5 Names and positions of report authors and reviewers
Report Author: Lars Windmar, ASC lead Auditor. Reviewer: Sølvi Skare, ASC lead Auditor
1.6 Client's Contact person: Name and Title
Christina Kongsted, Quality Manager Kongeåens Dambrug
1.7 Date
Date of onsite audit: 8.9.2016. Date of draft report 20.11.2016
2 Table of Contents 3 Glossary Terms and abbreviations that are specific to this audit report and that are not otherwise defined in the ASC glossary
4 Summary
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Opening
* working days
2/9
A concise summary of the report and findings. The summary shall be written to be readable to the stakeholders and other interested parties. 4.1
A brief description of the scope of the The audit covered all principle and criteria in ASC Trout Standard, Version 1.0. The audit included a review of documentation, processes and handling of equipment. During the initial on-site visit the auditor observed how the farm harvest fish (See 2.5.1 audit C for details). Audit covering principle number 6 are done by review of relevant documentation, interviews with the quality management and confidential interviews with employees. The interviews of the employees were performed on the farm. The interview was performed without interruption. The auditor was given access to all places, documentation and employees. Denne certificerings audit dækker alle principper og kriteria i ASC Ørred standarden version 1.0 Audit af princip 6 blev foretaget vha en gennemgang af dokumentation, interview af medarbejdere. Interview blev gennemført uden afbrydelser. Auditor fik fuld adgang til hele virksomheden herunder alt dokumentation og alle medarbejdere.
4.2
A brief description of the operations of the unit of certification
4.3
Type of unit of certification (select only Single farm
Fole Dambrug is a producer of rainbow trout from eggs / Juveniles to a size of approximately 300 g per fish. Fole Dambrug is a RAS. The farm has water abstraction permission to 80 l per sec. The farm abstracts currently 53 l per sec. The production system is based on concrete raceways, mechanical filters and biological filters. Area of the production system is 13000 m2. Production system: 1) juvenile section, 28 tanks * 2 m3; 2) Juvenile section 2, 20 tanks each 9 m3. 4) Juvenile section 3, 4 * 60 m3; 5) ongrowing tanks, 12 * 400 m3; 5) Delivery tank, 60 m3. Total 5336 m3. The farm produces approximately 700 tons of trout per year. The juvenile/ egg supplier is Troutex. Water is discharged through a plant lagoon to the River Gram. The area of the plant lagoon is 13000 m2. Fole Dambrug producerer ørred fra æg/yngel til en størrelse på ca 300 per stk. Nielsby Dambrug er et Model Dambrug dvs semi recirkuleret anlæg. Anlægget er baseret på betong damme, mekanisk og biologiske filtre. Areal af produktionssystem: 13000 m2. Produktionsanlæg: 1) Yngel anlæg 1, 28 tanke * 2 m3; 2) Yngel anlæg 2, 20 tanke, 9 m3. 3) Yngel sektion 3, 4 * 60 m3 tanke; 5) Produktions anlæg, 12 * 400 m3; + 5) leverings tank, 60 m3. Totalt 5336 m3. Dambruget producerer ca 700 tons per år. Æg leverandør et Troutex. dambrug. Dambruget har tilladelse til at bruge 80 l vand per sec. Dambruget bruger ca. 53 l per sec. Fra dambruget lede vandet gennem gennem en plante lagune og derfra ud i Gram å. Areal af plantelagune: 13000 m2
one type of unit of certification in the list)
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Opening
* working days
3/9
4.4
Type of audit (select all the types of audit
Initial
that apply in the list)
4.5
A summary of the major findings
10 minor NC was raised at the certification audit. The minor NC s was raised against 2.5.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.4, 4.1.5, 4.1.8, 6.4.1, 6.4.4, 6.4.5, 6.7.2, 6.9.2. Ved certificerings audit blev der identificeret 10 mindre afvigelser. Afvigelserne blev rejst mod 2.5.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.4, 4.1.5, 4.1.8, 6.4.1, 6.4.4, 6.4.5, 6.7.2, 6.9.2.
4.6
The Audit determination
Bureau Veritas will make the certification decision based on the audit report and evidence gathered as the result of information submitted by stakeholders. Bureau Veritas vil foretage certficerings beslutning baseret på audit resultat og information modtaget fra interessenter.
5 CAB Contact Information 5.1 CAB Name
5.2
CAB Mailing Address
BUREAU VERITAS Certification. Oldenborggade 1 B, 7000 Fredericia. Denmark
5.3
Email Address
[email protected]
5.4
Other Contact Information
Phone: +45 50 88 83 95.
[email protected]
6 Background on the Applicant Information on the Public Disclosure Form 6.1 (Form 3) except 1.2-1.3 All information updated as necessary to reflect the audit as conducted. 6.2
Bureau Veritas Certification Denmark
A description of the unit of certification (for intial audit) / changes, if any (for surveillance and
All information on Form 3- Public Disclosure Form is updated
The entire farm is the unit of certification. See 4.2 for a description of the farms and production system. ASC certificeringen dækker hele dambruget. Se 4.2 for en beskrivelse af dambruget og produktionssystem.
recertification audits )
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Opening
* working days
4/9
6.3
Other certifications currently held by the unit No other certifications are currently held by the unit of certification. Dambruget er ikke certificeret iht andre standarder of certification
6.4
Other certification(s) obtained before this audit
6.5
Estimated annual production volumes of the 700 unit of certification of the current year
6.6
Actual annual production volumes of the unit 700 of certification of the previous year ( mandatory for surveillance and recertification audits )
6.7
Production system(s) employed within the unit of certification (select one or more in the list)
6.8
Number of employees working at the unit of 3 full time employees, 2 part time employees. certification
No other certifications were obtained before this audit. Dambruget er ikke tidligere blevet certificeret iht andre standarder.
RAS
7 Scope 7.1 The Standard(s) against which the audit was ASC Freshwater Trout Standard. Version 1.0 February 2013 conducted, including version number 7.2
The species produced at the applicant farm
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Opening
Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
* working days
5/9
7.3
A description of the scope of the audit including a description of whether the unit of certification covers all production or harvest areas (i.e. ponds) managed by the operation or located at the included sites, or whether only a sub-set of these are included in the unit of certification. If only a sub-set of production or harvest areas are included in the unit of certification these shall be clearly named.
7.4
The names and addresses of any storage, processing, or distribution sites included in the operation (including subcontracted operations) that will potentially be handling certified products, up until the point where product enters further chain of custody.
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Opening
The audit covered all principle and criteria in ASC Trout Standard, Version 1.0 - June. The audit included a review of documentation, processes and handling of equipment. Including harvest of the fish. Audit covering principle 6 was done by review of relevant documentation, interviews with the quality management and confidential interviews with employees. The interviews of the employees were performed on the farm. The interview was performed without interruption. The auditor was given access to all places, documentation and employees. The farm does not consider information which is relevant to the ASC certification as confidential e.g. FFDRm, FFDRo, FCR, Mortality rates etc. The farm and Bureau Veritas has therefore decided to include all information which is relevant to the ASC certification in the report. Commercially sensitive information related to the aquaculture operation e.g. cost of juveniles, cost of feed, investments, sales price etc. was not reviewed as part of the initial audit. Commercially sensitive information related to employee salaries, workload and contracts details etc. were reviewed by the SA8000 auditor. Information on salaries, workload and contracts is not included in the report. Denne certificerings audit dækker alle krav i ASC lakse standarden, version 1.0 - juni 2011. Audit inkludere en gennemgang af dokumentation, processer og håndtering af udstyr. Udfiskning af fisk blev observeret under audit. Audit af princip 6 blev foretaget vha en gennemgang af dokumentation, interview af medarbejdere. Interview blev gennemført uden afbrydelser. Auditor fik fuld adgang til hele virksomheden herunder alt dokumentation og alle medarbejdere. Dambruget betragter ikke information som er relevant for ASC certificering som fortrolig dvs f.eks FFDRm, FFDRo, Foderkvotient, dødelighed etc. Dambruget og Bureau Veritas har derfor besluttet at inkludere al information som er relevant for ASC certificeringen i rapporten. Kommerciel akvakultur relevant information som pris af sættefisk, foder, investerings omkostninger etc. er ikke blevet auditeret under denne certificerings audit. Kommerciel information vedrørende løn, kontrakt og arbejdsforhold er blevet auditeret som en del af denne certificerings audit. Information om løn, kontrakt og arbejdsforhold er ikke inkluderet i denne rapport.
* working days
6/9
7.5
Description of the receiving water body(ies). Gram å which drains to Gels Å - Vadehavet /-North Sea. the River Gram is a medium size Danish river with good water quality downstream and upstream the farm. The flow at the farm is 1610 l sec. Wild populations of salmonids exist in the river. Dambruget har udløb til Gram å- Ribe Å- Vadehavet. Median minimums flowet i Gram å er 1610 v1 liter per sec. Der er god vandkvalitet i Gram å og der findes en naturlig bestand af laksefisk. Kongeåen løber ud i Vadehavet / Nordsøen
8 Audit Plan ASC lead auditor and SA8000 auditor: Lars Windmar. Onsite audit 8.9 2016. Date of review of Draft report 15.11.2016. Date of 8.1 The names of the auditors and the dates when each of the following were undertaken draft report 20.11.2016 or completed: conducting the audit, writing of the report, reviewing the report, and taking the certification decision.
8.2
Previous Audits (if applicable): NC reference number 8.2.1
Standard clause reference
Closing deadline - status - closing date of each NC
Initial audit - mm/yyyy Surveillance audit 1 - mm/ yyyy Surveillance audit 2 - mm/ yyyy Recertification audit - mm/ yyyy Unannounced audit - mm/ yyyy NC close-out audit - mm/ yyyyy Scope extention audit mm/ yyyy
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Opening
* working days
7/9
8.4
Audit plan as implemented including: Locations
Dates 8.4.1
Desk Reviews
8.4.2
Onsite audits
8.4.3
Stakeholder interviews and Community meetings
8.4.4
Draft report sent to client
8.4.5
Draft report sent to ASC
8.5.5
Final report sent to Client and ASC
sep-16
8.7
8.9.2016 8.9.2016
Bureau Veritas office Fole Dambrug The farm invited stakeholders to participate in the onsite audit. But no one came to the meeting / Onsite audit. Intressenter blev inviteret af dambruget til at deltage i ASC audit, men ingen dukkede op
Names and affiliations of individuals Christina Kongsted, Quality Manager. Peter Jessen Consultant. Jimmy Jensen, Assistant manager. Lukasz Zakowski, farm consulted or otherwise involved in the audit worker. Aleksander Ludwik Greczko, farm worker. Tommy Schmidt farm worker including: representatives of the client, employees, contractors, stakeholders and any observers that participated in the audit.
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Opening
* working days
8/9
8.8
Stakeholder submissions, including written or other documented information and CAB written responses to each submission.
Name of stakeholder (if permission given to make name public)
Relevance to be contacted
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Opening
Date of contact
CAB responded Yes/No
Brief summary of points Raised
* working days
Use of comment by CAB
Response sent to stakeholder
9/9
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
AUDIT MANUAL - ASC Freshwater Trout Standard Created by the Freshwater Trout Aquaculture Dialogue Scope: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss ) or any other salmonids grown in fresh water This audit manual was developed to accompany the version of the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard developed through the Freshwater Trout Aquaculture Dialogue and published at 7 February 2013. Footnote references in this Audit Manual can be found within this document and differ in numbering of the same references in the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard. PRINCIPLE 1: COMPLY WITH ALL NATIONAL AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS Criterion 1.1 Operate within the legal framework of national and local laws and regulations that are applicable and current Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
a. Maintain copies of key land and water use laws (both local and national) that apply to regulating the environmental and social impacts of aquaculture.
1.1.1
Indicator: Presence of documents issued by pertinent authorities b. Maintain original lease agreements, land titles, concession indicating compliance with local and permits, or related official land use documents on file as national authorities on land and applicable. water use Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
The farm has updated copies of key land and water use laws of direct relevance to aquaculture impacts. The relevant laws include BEK nr 130 af 08/02/2012 (https://www.retsinformation.dk/forms/R0710.aspx?id=140333). The relevant labor laws include LBK nr 1072 af 07/09/2010. (https://www.retsinformation.dk/forms/r0710.aspx?id=133159). The environmental approval is issued by Haderslev Municipality date 22.1.2013. Discharge limit: Total P: 854 kg per year. Total N: 16.275 kg per year. Water abstraction limit: 80 l/ sec.
Kongeåens Dambrug Aps CVR 81312028. Kongeå vej 87. 6650 Brørup. Ehvervstyrelsen.P nr.1004038629 . www. erhverrsstyrelsen.dk see also environmental approval. Compliant
c. Keep records of inspections for compliance with national and local laws and regulations (if such inspections are legally required in the country of operation).
Inspections performed. Danish Working Environment Authority. Date 31.1.2014. Inspector Mr. Jan Høgh Pedersen. No critical comments. Haderslev Municipality. Environmental inspection 28. June 2016. No critical comments. Veterinary Control 2.6.2015. Farm inspected for VHS, IHN and ISA. Result: no critical comments.
d. Obtain permits and maps showing that the farm does not conflict with national preservation areas (see Indicator 2.1.1)
A map is available. The farm is not in conflict with national preservations areas.
e. Others, please describe a. Maintain copies of tax laws for jurisdiction(s) where company operates.
Indicator: Presence of documents indicating compliance with tax laws 1.1.2
Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
The farm has access to relevant tax laws on http://www.skm.dk/love/gaeldende-love .
b. Maintain records of tax payments to appropriate authorities Declaration from accountant Claus Michelsen, Dansk revision Tønder (e.g. land use tax, water use tax, revenue tax). Note that CABs https://www.danskrevision.dk/lokale-kontorer/toender/, date 30.6.2015. Period: 1.7.2014- 30.6.2015. will not disclose confidential tax information unless client is Date of report 31 August 2015. Result no critical comments required to or chooses to make it public. c. Register with national or local authorities as an “aquaculture activity" where such registration is consistent with regulations. The client is registered with national authorities https://erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/. Kongeåens Dambrug / Maintain copies of registration documents and the contact Nielsby Dambrug Aps CVR 81312028 and P number 1013222823. details for relevant authorities.
Compliant
d. Others, please describe
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
1
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Indicator: Presence of documents indicating compliance with all labor laws and regulations 1.1.3 Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
1.1.4
Indicator: Presence of documents indicating compliance with regulations or permits concerning water quality impacts, effluent and water abstraction Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
a. Maintain copies of key labor laws and regulations that are applicable to regulating the social impacts of aquaculture.
The client has access to key labor laws and regulations of direct relevance to social impacts of aquaculture through www.retsinformation.dk. The farm has a list of relevant laws in the ASC management system. Date of ASC management system 13 June 2016
b. Keep records of farm inspections for compliance with national labor laws and codes (only if such inspections are legally required in the country of operation).
Inspections performed. Danish Working Environment Authority. Date 31.1.2014. Inspector Mr. Jan Høgh Pedersen. No critical comments.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Compliant
c. Others, please describe a. Maintain copies of key regulations and permitting requirements that apply to water quality impacts, effluent discharge and water abstraction by the farm.
This is included in the farms environmental approval. The environmental approval is issued by Haderslev Municipality date 22.1.2013. Discharge limit: Total P: 854 kg per year. Total N: 16.275 kg per year. Water abstraction limit: 80 l/ sec.
b. Obtain permits for water quality impacts where applicable.
The farm has permission to discharge: Discharge limit: Total P: 854 kg per year. Total N: 16.275 kg per year. Water abstraction limit: 80 l/ sec.
c. Maintain records of monitoring and compliance with discharge laws and regulations as required.
The accredited laboratory Eurofins (www.eurofins.dk) analyses the discharged water 2 times per months. Water sampling period 24 hours. The records from Eurofins demonstrate compliance with discharge laws.
d. Obtain a statement from local authorities indicating the water abstraction limits (units given) for the farm. If local authorities do not set water abstraction limits for farms operating in the region, obtain of a statement from local authorities attesting to this fact.
The water abstraction is 53 l per sec according to the reports from Eurofins. The farm permission to 80 l/sec
e. Maintain records of water abstraction.
The water abstraction is 53 l per sec according to the reports from Eurofins.
-
The water abstraction is 53 l per sec according to the reports from Eurofins. The farm has permission to abstract 80 l/sec
Compliant
g. Others, please describe PRINCIPLE 2: CONSERVE HABITAT AND BIODIVERSITY Criterion 2.1 Siting and location of farms [2] a. Provide a map showing the location of the farm relative to nearby protected areas as defined by national laws (also see A map is included in the environmental approval. The map was seen at the audit 1.1.1d). b. If the farm is not sited in a protected area as defined above, inform the CAB. In this case, the requirements of 2.1.1c-d do The farm is not sited in a protected area not apply. Indicator: Allowance for siting in c. If the farm is sited in a protected area, review the National Protected Areas [3] Instructions for Indicator 2.1.1 (above) to determine if the farm is allowed an exception to the requirements. If yes, inform the The farm is not sited in a protected area 2.1.1 Requirement: None [4,5] CAB which exception (#1 or #2) is allowed and provide supporting evidence. Applicability: All except as noted in d. If the farm is sited in a protected area and the exceptions [4] and [5] provided for Indicator 2.1.1 do not apply, then the farm does The farm is not sited in a protected area not comply with the requirement and is ineligible for ASC certification.
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
Compliant
2
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
e. Others, please describe
Indicator: Conversion of wetlands [6] after 1999 2.1.2
a. Provide documentary evidence showing all construction Fole Dambrug was reconstructed from a traditional flow through farm to RAS 2005-2006. 13000 m2 activities and the habitat types impacted by those activities on wetland / plant lagoon was established in 2005. No conversion of wetland since 1999. The farm is not in the farm since 1999. conflict with any protected areas.
Requirement: None [7]
b. Provide a map delineating all wetlands (as defined in [6]) currently within a 5-km radius of the farm. Applicability: All except as noted in c. Prepare a map showing wetland coverage in 1999 at the [7] farm site.
Compliant A map is available. See the environmental approval from Vejen Municipality A map is available. See the environmental approval from Vejen Municipality
d. Others, please describe
2.1.3
Indicator: An assessment of the presence on the farm of species listed on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) “Red List of Threatened Species” as vulnerable, near threatened, endangered or critically endangered; an evaluation of the farm’s impact on any such species present; and clearly defined mitigation measures to reduce any negative impacts and allow existence of such species Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
a. Perform above analysis and record all IUCN red listed The assessment and evaluation of the farms impact on IUCN red listed species is included in the farms species and farm-related threats. Alternatively, farms may environmental approval. The conclusion is that the farm is not in conflict with any IUCN red listed have a qualified third-party entity conduct the assessment for species. the presence on the farm of IUCN red listed species.
b. Provide a map showing location of the farm (see 1.1.1d) relative to the known distribution of IUCN red-listed species (categories as defined in the indicator) or critical habitats in the area.
A compliant map was seen at the audit. According to the map the farm is not in conflict with IUCN red listed species or critical habitats in the area
c. If results from 2.1.3a (above) identify that IUCN Red List species occur within a 5 km radius of the farm (including upstream and receiving waters), provide a documented evaluation of the farm's impacts on such species.
Included in environmental approval issued by Haderslev Municipality
Compliant
d. Where the results from 2.1.3c indicate a potential for negative impacts, prepare a set of written and clearly-defined NA. The farm is not in conflict with IUCN red listed species or critical areas mitigation measures to reduce any negative impacts and allow existence of such species. e. Others, please describe
Criterion 2.2 Riparian buffer zones [8] a. Inform the CAB of the date when farm installation was NA this is not a new farm. The farm has existed since the 1960s. The farm was reconstructed to a semi originally completed and any farm expansions thereafter (also RAS system in 2005-2006. see 2.1.2a).
Indicator: For new farms installed on land after publication of the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard (or for b. If farm installation was completed before publication of the significant expansions), minimum ASC Freshwater Trout Standard, then indicator 2.2.1 does not NA see 2.2.1 buffer zone between the farm and an apply. Otherwise proceed to 2.2.1c. adjacent water body in which there is
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
3
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
2.2.1
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
adjacent water body in which there is no farm infrastructure that might c. Prepare a diagram of the farm showing the siting and impede wildlife’s access to the water, dimensions of buffer zones between the farm and adjacent except for inflow and outflow water body. systems
The farm has an updated diagram of the farm. The diagram was seen at the audit. All ponds and raceways are located more than 15 meter from river
Requirement: ≥ 15 meters from the d. Ensure that buffer zones are free of farm infrastructure (rescue and safety equipment is allowed as appropriate to water's edge [9] ensure worker health and welfare).
All ponds and raceways are located more than 15 meter from river
Applicability: All land-based farms constructed after publication of the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard except as noted in [9]
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
N/A
e. Others, please describe
Criterion 2.3 Introduction of exotic species [10] a. Inform the CAB if the farm uses a closed production system according to the above definition (indicator 2.3.1 does not Not a closed production system. Production species: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) apply). Otherwise, proceed to 2.3.1b.
2.3.1
Indicator: New introductions of exotic trout after the date of publication of the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard, unless in a closed production system [11] Requirement: None Applicability: All except closed production systems
b. Inform the CAB which trout species is being cultured at the farm and maintain purchase records (e.g. receipts) that identify the species by Latin name.
Production species: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
c. Compile available primary literature (e.g. scientific studies, government publications) to determine whether or not the cultured species is generally considered to be native to the region in which the farm operates.
Production species: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The species has been introduced to Danish freshwater farms more than 100 years ago. A wild population of rainbow trout is not established in Denmark.
d. If the species is considered non-native but was previously established in the area (i.e. if it is an introduced species), search the literature for a reliable estimate of the year of introduction. -
Compliant
Production species: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The species has been introduced to Danish freshwater farms more than 100 years ago. A wild population of rainbow trout is not established in Denmark. Production species: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).
f. Others, please describe Criterion 2.4 Transgenic [12] Trout
a. Maintain records for the origin of all cultured stocks The farm has records for the origin of all cultured stocks. Juvenile suppliers: Troutex + FREA. Record including the supplier name, address and contact person(s) for seen. Date 12.7.2016. 6900 kg trout. Size: 20-21 g per piece. Supplier FREA. stock purchases. Indicator: Allowance for the culture of transgenic trout, including the offspring of genetically engineered
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
4
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
2.4.1
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
offspring of genetically engineered trout Requirement: None
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Compliant b. Ensure purchase documents confirm that the culture stock is The government in Denmark provides official statements for non-allowance of transgenic fish. See: not transgenic. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/ft/201012L00138
Applicability: All
c. Others, please describe Criterion 2.5 Escapes from culture facilities a. Ensure that farm procedures (see 2.5.2a) address all the farm measures for escape prevention given in Appendix IV. Align farm procedures against requirements in Appendix IV.
2.5.1
Indicator: Evidence of a welldesigned, maintained and managed culture system, infrastructure and farm management to prevent escapes during grow-out and at harvest, as demonstrated through the requirements in Appendix IV Requirement: Yes
The farm Procedure on escape prevention is ASC compliant. The date of the farms ASC procedure is August 2016.
The nets screens and barriers on the farm are well maintained. The distance from production raceways b. Ensure proper maintenance of the culture system and /channel, where the fish is pumped into the truck for live transport to the river is approximately 100 infrastructure to prevent escapes during grow-out and harvest. meters. The risk of fish escaping is very limited.
Compliant c. For initial audits, arrange for the auditor to witness the farm's method of harvesting during the on-site visit.
Harvest was observed at the audit. Harvest was found ASC compliant.
Applicability: All except closed production systems
d. Others, please describe
2.5.2
a. Prepare a written SOP that incorporates an escape risk assessment (see 2.5.1a). For farms that operate closed Indicator: Presence of trout farming production systems, SOPs do not need to incorporate an standard operating procedures (SOP) escape risk assessment. that incorporate an escape risk assessment [14] b. Ensure that the SOP is implemented on the farm. Requirement: Yes
The SOP includes an escape risk assessment. Procedure 16.8.2016.
The SOP is implemented. This was confirmed at the audit.
Compliant
Applicability: All c. Others, please describe
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
5
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
2.5.3
Indicator: Evidence of farm staff capacities and capabilities, including training of staff prior to starting work and regular training during employment to understand and address risks from escapes and follow the defined SOP
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
a. In the SOP for reducing escapes (see 2.5.2a), provide a The SOP was reviewed at the audit and found compliant. The farms production records demonstrate that description of how the farm ensures adequate staff capacity to there has been no escapes within the past 5 years. Staff trained as part of Job. address risks from escapes. b. Maintain documentary records (e.g. minutes, attendance sheets) from regular staff trainings on escape prevention procedures.
Minor. Records from regular staff trainings on escape prevention procedures are not available
-
The workers are trained as part of the job. The workers understand and address the risk of escapes.
Minor
Records from regular staff trainings on escape prevention procedures are not available
Requirement: Yes Applicability: All except closed production systems
d. Others, please describe
a. For each production cycle, maintain detailed records of the following: - stocking count; - harvest count; - mortalities; and - recorded escapes.
2.5.4
NA. The farm is land based. The farm has detailed records for each production cycle. The records are managed by PC program Dambase.
Indicator: Estimated unexplained loss [15] of farmed trout in net pens b. Calculate the estimated unexplained loss as described in the instructions (above) for the most recent full production cycle. is made publicly available NA. The farm is land based. For first audit, farm must demonstrate understanding of calculation and the requirement to disclose EUL after harvest Requirement: Yes of the current cycle. Applicability: All
N/A
c. Make the results from 2.5.4b publicly available (e.g. by publishing information on the farm's website). Keep records of NA. The farm is land based when and where the results were made public for all production cycles. d. Others, please describe
2.5.5
Indicator: All fish in net pens are counted during each grading
a. Prepare a written procedure for grading which describes the NA. The farm is land based frequency and methodology for obtaining counts.
Requirement: Yes
b. Keep records of counts obtained at each grading.
Applicability: All
NA. The farm is land based
N/A
c. Others, please describe
Criterion 2.6 Predator control [16] Indicator: Intentional use of lethal predator control 2.6.1
a. Prepare a list of all predator control devices used on the farm and their locations.
b. Provide a description of farm procedures for managing predators (e.g. in the SOP identified in 2.5.2) which explains Applicability: All except as noted in how the farm ensures that all actions are non-lethal. [17]
There is no intentional use of lethal predator control.
Requirement: None [17]
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
Compliant There is no evidence of lethal predator control.
6
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
[17] c. Others, please describe PRINCIPLE 3: MINIMIZE NEGATIVE EFFECT ON WATER RESOURCES Criterion 3.1 Water Use/Abstraction Levels
a. Inform the CAB if the farm seeks an exemption to 3.1.1. and provide supporting evidence (see Instructions). Otherwise, The does not seek an exemption to 3.1.1 proceed to 3.1.1b.
b. Maintain records of all water abstracted by the farm and use Indicator: Maximum amount of these values to calculate the total volume of water abstracted The farm maintains records of water abstraction. The water abstraction is currently 53 l per sec water that a farm can abstract from a on an annual basis. natural flowing water body (such as a river or stream) 3.1.1
c. Provide the CAB with reliable estimates of water flow Requirement: 50% of the natural immediately above the farm (e.g. scientific studies, water body’s flow immediately above government publications). Use these values to calulate the the farm [18] total volume of water flow on an annual basis.
The estimates for water flow immediately above the farm is included in the environmental approval. The flow in the River Gram at the farm is 1610 l/sec according to the environmental approval.
Compliant
Applicability: All farms utilizing surface water (such as water from a river) except as noted in [18] d. Use the results of 3.1.1b divided by 3.1.1c multiplied by 100 The farm is compliant with 3.1.1. The flow in the river is 1610 l/sec and the water abstraction is 53 l per to determine the percent abstraction of the natural water sec. body's flow.
e. Others, please describe Indicator: Demonstration that >90% a. Retain records to show how the farm ensures that > 90% of Records are available. Outflow is measured. On an annual basis the records demonstrates that beyond abstracted water is returned to the abstracted water is returned to the natural water body. 95% of abstracted water is returned to the natural water body. natural water body 3.1.2
Requirement: Yes
-
During the onsite audit, the outflow was 99-100% of the abstracted water.
Compliant
Applicability: All farms utilizing surface water (such as water from a c. Others, please describe river)
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
7
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Indicator: All use of underground pumped water has been permitted by regulatory authorities 3.1.3
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
a. Identify any use of underground pumped water by the farm The map and permits are included in environmental approval. The farm has 7 wells. Name of wells: DGU and include in the farm map or diagram (see 1.1.1d and 141.896. DGU 141.1181, DGU 141.847, DGU 141.1182. DGU 141.1102, SGU 1411101 DGU 141.895. 2.1.1a).
Requirement: Yes Applicability: All farms utilizing groundwater (such as water from a well)
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Compliant b. Obtain permits from regulatory authorities.
The map and permits are included in environmental approval
-
groundwater sources was inspected at the audit
d. Others, please describe
a. Ensure that well tests are conducted at a similar time each year [19] using an appropriate methodology.
3.1.4
Indicator: Well depths are tested at b. Maintain records of results from all tests of well depth. least annually, and results made publicly available [19] c. Make the results from 3.1.4b available publicly (e.g. by posting on the farm's website). Keep records of when and Requirement: Yes where results were made public. Applicability: All farms utilizing groundwater (such as water from a well)
The farm has records of well depth date 30.8.2016.
Results from tests of well depth is available on http://kongeaaensdambrug.dk/media/docs/nielsbydraen.pdf
Results from tests of well depth is available on http://kongeaaensdambrug.dk/media/docs/nielsbydraen.pdf
Compliant
d. Others, please describe
Criterion 3.2 Land-based systems—Water Quality/Effluent a. Maintain records showing the amount and type of feeds used during the past 12 months.
Period: 1.1 2016- 30.6.2016. Feed used 282788 kg. Feed suppliers Biomar and Aller aqua. Biomar supplier of juvenile feed
b. For all feeds used (result from 3.2.1a), keep records showing phosphorus content as determined by chemical The phosphorus content in feeds is 0.9% analysis or based on feed supplier declaration (Appendix II-A).
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
8
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Indicator: Maximum total amount of phosphorus released into the environment per metric ton (mt) of fish produced over a 12-month c. Using equation #1 from Appendix II-A and results from period (see methodology in 3.2.1a and b, calculate the total amount of phosphorus added P added as feed: 2545 kg. Appendix II-A) as feed during the last 12 months of production.
3.2.1
Requirement: 5 kg/mt of fish produced over a 12-month period; within three years of publication of the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard (from 7 February 2013 to 7 February 2016), 4 kg/mt of fish produced over a 12-month period (after 7 February 2016)
Compliant
d. Maintain records for stocking, harvest and mortality which are sufficient to calculate the amount of biomass produced (equation #2 in Appendix II-A) during the past 12 months.
Fish produced in period: 271030 kg (dead fish and live fish). Dead fish: 75000 kg. bFCR: 1.04 (282788/ 271030). eFCR: 1,44 (282788 / (271030-75000)
e. Calculate the amount of phosphorus in fish biomass produced (result from 3.2.1d) using equation #3 in Appendix II- P in fish produced: 1165 kg (271030 * 0,43/100) Applicability: All land-based systems A. Sludge quantity 440 tons. Sludge quantity recorded by farm. Analyse report from Højvang laboratories f. If applicable, maintain records showing the total amount of P (DANAK Accredited) date 8.6.2016. % dry matter: 6. P in dry sludge 28000 mg per kg dry sludge. Quantity removed as sludge (equation #4 in Appendix II-A) during the of Dry sludge: 26.4 tons. P in sludge: 739.2 kg. past 12 months. g. Using the formula in Appendix II-A and results from 3.2.1a-f (above), calculate total phosphorus released per ton of fish 2.4 kg P is released per ton of fish produced: (2545- 1165-739.2) / (271.030)): produced. h. Others, please describe a. Provide monthly monitoring records of DO percent saturation in outlfow water for the previous 12 months. For first audits, farm records must cover ≥ 6 months.
3.2.2
Indicator: Minimum oxygen saturation in the outflow, measured b. If any single value from 3.2.2a is < 60%, initiate daily monthly (see methodology in continuous DO monitoring with an electronic probe and Appendix II-B) recorder for > 1 week. Maintain a record of the results.
Monthly records seen for period January- June 2016. Results 81-89% DO
NA all recorded results on DO was above 60% Compliant
Requirement: 60% [20] Applicability: All land-based systems
c. During the on site visit, make arrangements for the auditor to observe calibration of equipment and measurements.
Result of DO in the outflow at the audit 8.9.2016: 71 %. Temperature 16.2 C
d. Others, please describe
a. Have a scientific assessment done in the area downstream of the outlet to identify the zone most likely to be impacted by The scientific assessment is the DVFI method. farm discharge. This assessment must consider water mixing and distance from farm outlet.
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
9
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
3.2.3
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
b. Prepare a map showing the upstream and downstream transects and sampling stations used for macroinvertebrate surveys (see Appendix II-C).
A compliant map is available
c. Collect benthic samples along transects in accordance with Appendix II-C and maintain records of all sample collections.
The DVFI method used is ASC compliant.
Indicator: Macroinvertebrate surveys downstream from the farm’s effluent discharge demonstrate benthic health that is similar to or better than surveys upstream from d. Have an accredited laboratory analyze the samples for the discharge (see methodology in benthic invertebrate fauna including characterization of Appendix II-C) species composition, abundance, diversity, and presence of key sensitive indicator species. Requirement: Yes Applicability: All land-based systems
The laboratory is not accredited for analysis of benthic samples. The national accreditation body in Denmark is DANAK (www.danak.dk). DANAK is appointed by The Danish Safety Technology Authority, under the Ministry of Business and Growth. DANAK is responsible for accreditation of laboratories and companies in Denmark. DANAK’s field of accreditation does not include analysis of benthic samples. There are therefore no laboratories in Denmark that are accredited for analysis of benthic samples. ASC approved a variance request (number 122) from Denmark submitted by Bureau Veritas concerning the use of a non- accredited laboratory for analysis of benthic samples upstream and downstream Mølbak freshwater farm. ASC approved VR number 122 because the laboratory is appointed by the responsible authority and the scientific method (DVFI) is well defined. In accordance with ASC Certification and Accreditation Requirements, Version 2.0 - 23 FORM 1 – REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION OR VARIANCE: “3. Variations that have been approved may be applied when similar circumstances are present. “ The laboratory that analysed the benthic samples upstream and downstream Fole Dambrug is appointed by the responsible authority and use the DVFI method. The circumstances are therefore very similar. Bureau Veritas has therefore decided that it is not necessary to submit a VR to ASC concerning requirement 3.2.3 d for Fole Dambrug.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Compliant
e. Using survey results from 3.2.3d, compare the benthic The Macroinvertebrate survey i.e. DVFI. DVFI analysed by Haderslev Municipality 26.8.2016. Results health of areas downstream from the discharge to those areas DVFI 5 opstream and down stream. Responsible Mr. David Klint. The benthic health status downstream upstream of the discharge to assure no change. the farm is similar/identical to the benthic health status upstream the farm.
See 3.2.3 E g. Others, please describe
a. Prepare a biosolids (sludge) management plan that addresses all requirements in Appendix II-D.
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
The bio solids management plan is ASC compliant. Name of procedure the farms QMS system: "Håndtering af slam" date of procedure: September 2016.
10
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
3.2.4
b. Prepare a process flow diagram of the key steps taken to Indicator: Evidence of implementation of biosolids (sludge); responsibly manage sludge identifying treatment, transfer, Best Management Practices (BMPs) storage, utilization and disposal. (see Appendix II-D)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
A compliant process Flow diagram is available Compliant
Requirement: Yes c. Maintain records of biosolid (sludge) cleaning, maintenance, The bio solid management plan is implemented. Applicability: All land-based systems and disposal as described in Appendix II-D.
-
No community interviews were performed because no stakeholders came to the audit. The farm had invited local stakeholders. There is no evidence of discharge of bio solids into natural water bodies.
e. Others, please describe a. Conduct ≥ 6 months of water quality monitoring before first audit. Thereafter, monitoring should be part of production Compliant info sent to ASC. 15.82016 practices for certified farms. b.Complete the Water Quality Monitoring Matrix (Appendix IICompliant info sent to ASC. 15.8.2016 B) and submit to CAB.
c. Calibrate all equipment at the frequency and by the method Calibration of DO meters was witnessed on the farm at the audit. The other analyses are done by an recommended by the manufacturer. Calibrate daily if there is external accredited laboratory (Eurofins) no manufacturer's recommendation.
3.2.5
Indicator: Water-quality monitoring matrix completed and submitted to d. During the audit of the farm, arrange to conduct water ASC (see Appendix II-B) quality monitoring. The auditor will witness water sampling. Requirement: Yes
e. Collect water samples and prepare them for shipment to a laboratory (if applicable). Applicability: All land-based systems f. Perform routine analysis of water samples (i.e. done in the same manner as for previous months of water quality monitoring).
Compliant see 3.2.5 c Compliant Compliant see 3.2.5 c Compliant see 3.2.5 c
g. Record values for each parameter and submit results to CAB. Compliant see 3.2.5 c h. Submit data on water quality monitoring to ASC in a suitable format (required parameters are shown in Appendix II-B) at Data submitted to ASC 15.8.2016 least once per year. i. Others, please describe Criterion 3.3 Cage-Based Systems—Water Quality/Benthic Community a. Determine the surface area of the water body where the farm operates (see Instructions above). Indicator: For cages located on
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
NA. The farm is land based
11
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
3.3.1
Indicator: For cages located on water bodies with a surface area less than 1,000 km2, evidence that farm production levels reflect the results of an assimilative capacity study (see Appendix II-E) Requirement: Yes Applicability: Cage-based systems operating on water bodies with a surface area < 1000 km2
3.3.2
Indicator: For cages located on water bodies with a surface area of 1,000 km2 or greater, evidence that cages are located at sites that are classified as “Type 3” sites, as defined in Appendix II-F
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
b. Inform the CAB if results from 3.3.1a indicate that the water body is less than 1,000 km2 surface area and proceed to 3.3.1c. NA. The farm is land based Otherwise, go to 3.3.2. c. Obtain a documentated assimilative capacity study for the water body where the farm operates. The assimilative capacity NA. The farm is land based study must address all requirements described in Appendix IIE.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
N/A
d. Provide evidence that the farm production levels reflect the NA. The farm is land based results of the assimilative capacity study in 3.3.1c. e. Others, please describe a. Determine the surface area of the water body where the farm operates (see 3.3.1a). If the surface area is 1,000 km2 or greater, proceed to 3.3.2b. Otherwise, go to 3.3.1
NA. The farm is land based
b. Provide evidence that the water body classification was performed by a regulatory agency as required under Appendix NA. The farm is land based II-F. If no regulatory agency has classified the water body, proceed to 3.3.2c. N/A
Requirement: Yes
c. If applicable, hire a qualified independent consultant to analyze and classify the site where the farm operates in accordance with the definitions in Appendix II-F.
NA. The farm is land based
Applicability: Cage-based systems operating on water bodies with a surface area ≥ 1000 km2
-
NA. The farm is land based
e. Others, please describe a. Conduct ≥ 6 months of water quality monitoring before first NA. The farm is land based audit and submit to CAB. b. Calibrate all equipment at the frequency and by the method recommended by the manufacturer. Calibrate daily if there is NA. The farm is land based no manufacturer's recommendation.
3.3.3
c. During the audit of the farm, arrange to conduct water Indicator: Water quality monitoring quality monitoring at location of auditor's choice. matrix completed (see Appendix II-G) e. Collect water samples at the same location as 3.3.3a and obtain analysis from a water quality laboratory at least once Requirement: Yes annually. Applicability: All cage-based systems
NA. The farm is land based
NA. The farm is land based N/A
f.Assure that values from laboratory are consistent with values obtained from laboratory results. If values differ by >5%, NA. The farm is land based demonstrate how equipment has been recalibrated, replaced, or how procedures have been modified. g. Submit data on water quality monitoring to ASC as per Appendix II-B.
NA. The farm is land based
h. Others, please describe
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
12
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Indicator: Maximum baseline total phosphorus concentration of the water body (see Appendix II-H) 3.3.4
Requirement: ≤ 20 µg/l [21] Applicability: All cage-based systems
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
a. Provide CAB with a description of the farm's TP monitoring program (e.g. sampling station, sampling protocol, name of NA. The farm is land based laboratory used). b. Implement monitoring of TP as described in the instructions NA. The farm is land based for Indicator 3.3.3. c. Identify the baseline TP concentration of the water body (see Instructions above) and provide the CAB with evidence to NA. The farm is land based show how this value was established. d. Provide monthly TP monitoring data to the CAB as indicated NA. The farm is land based in Appendix II-B NA. The farm is land based
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
N/A
f. Others, please describe
3.3.5
Indicator: Minimum percent oxygen saturation of water 50 centimeters above bottom sediment (at all oxygen monitoring locations described in Appendix II-G)
a. Provide CAB with a description of the farm's oxygen saturation monitoring program (see Indicator 3.3.3). b. Implement monitoring of oxygen saturation according to the methods described above. c. Provide oxygen monitoring data to the CAB.
NA. The farm is land based
Requirement: ≥ 50%
-
NA. The farm is land based
Applicability: All cage-based systems
e. Others, please describe a. Obtain documentary evidence stating the trophic status of water body if previously set by a competent authority (if applicable). If not, got to 3.3.6.b
3.3.6
NA. The farm is land based NA. The farm is land based
NA. The farm is land based
Indicator: Trophic status classification of water body remains b. If the trophic status of the water body has not previously been classified, use the baseline TP concentration (result from unchanged from baseline (see NA. The farm is land based 3.3.4c) to assign a trophic status to the water body according Appendix II-H) to the table in Appendix II-H. Requirement: Yes Applicability: All cage-based systems
c. Compare the current trophic status of the water body (results from either 3.3.6a or 3.3.6b) to the trophic status reported in all previous audits. For first audits, this requirement is not applicable.
N/A
N/A
NA. The farm is land based
d. Others, please describe
Indicator: Maximum allowed increase in total phosphorus concentration in lake from baseline
3.3.7
a. Use the result from Indicator 3.3.4 (above) to identify the baseline TP concentration that will be used to calculate percent NA. The farm is land based change from baseline.
b. Use the result from Indicator 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 (above) to NA. The farm is land based Requirement: 25% for water bodies identify the size of the water body in which the farm operates. with a surface area of less than 1,000 c. Use TP monitoring data from the reference station taken km2 over the past 12 months to calculate the current annual NA. The farm is land based average concentration of TP. 15% for water bodies with a surface d. Calculate the difference between 'baseline TP' and the area of 1,000 km2 or greater annual average TP concentration over the most recent 12 NA. The farm is land based months according to the instructions given above. Applicability: All cage-based
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
N/A
13
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
systems as specifed according to size of water body in which the farm f. Others, please describe operates a. Maintain records showing the amount and type of feeds used during the past 12 months.
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
NA. The farm is land based
NA. The farm is land based
b. For all feeds used (result from 3.3.8a), keep records showing phosphorus content as determined by chemical NA. The farm is land based analysis or based on feed supplier declaration (Appendix II-A).
3.3.8
Indicator: Maximum total amount of phosphorus released into the c. Using equation #1 from Appendix II-A and results from environment per metric ton (mt) of 3.3.8a and b, calculate the total amount of phosphorus added NA. The farm is land based fish produced over a 12-month as feed during the last 12 months of production. period (see Appendix II-A) d. Maintain records for stocking, harvest and mortality which are sufficient to calculate the amount of biomass produced Requirement: 5 kg/mt of fish NA. The farm is land based (equation #2 in Appendix II-A) during the past 12 months. produced over a 12-month period; within three years of publication of Value taken from 3.2.1.d the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard e. Calculate the amount of phosphorus in fish biomass (from 7 February 2013 to 7 February produced (result from 3.3.8d) using equation #3 in Appendix II- NA. The farm is land based 2016), 4 kg/mt of fish produced over A.
N/A
a 12-month period (after 7 February f. If applicable, maintain records showing the total amount of P 2016). removed as sludge (equation #4 in Appendix II-A) during the NA. The farm is land based past 12 months. This compliance criteria valid for flowApplicability: All cage-based through systems but does not apply for cage systems. systems g. Using the formula in Appendix II-A and results from 3.3.8a-f (above), calculate total phosphorus released per ton of fish NA. The farm is land based produced. h. Others, please describe PRINCIPLE 4: PROACTIVELY MAINTAIN THE HEALTH OF CULTURED FISH AND MINIMIZE THE RISK OF DISEASE TRANSMISSION Criterion 4.1 Farm health management a. Prepare a Farm Health Plan (FHP) that is site-specific and addresses biosecurity, veterinary health, crisis management, and risk assessment
4.1.1
Indicator: Presence of a site-specific farm health plan that is reviewed at least annually and addresses b. Ensure that the FHP is reviewed and updated at least biosecurity, veterinary health, crisis annually with signatures by farm management indicating management and risk assessment approval. Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
c. Ensure that the farm's designated veterinarian reviews and approves the FHP annually and after each update of the FHP, by signature.
The FHP from 2016 was reviewed and found compliant
The FHP for Nielsby Dambrug is signed by Veterinarian Simon B Madsen. Signed 2.9.2016, Jimmy jensen, Christina Kongsted and Simon B. Madsen.
Compliant
The FHP for Nielsby Dambrug is signed by Veterinarian Simon B Madsen. Signed 2.9.2016, Jimmy Jensen, Christina Kongsted and Simon B. Madsen.
d. Others, please describe
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
14
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
a. Design a set of health status metrics that can be evaluated at all relevant phases of the life history. Note: metrics for serious health conditions (e.g. symptoms of infectious disease) should The farm has a set of health status metrics which are used to evaluate juveniles from other farms outweigh metrics for transitory conditions (e.g. fin abrasions). Have the metrics reviewed and approved by the farm's designated health care professional. b. Ensure that the farm's designated health care professional samples fish on-site during an annual inspection and maintains The veterinarian is consulted if the farm staff suspects that the health of juveniles is suboptimum records of conditions using metrics defined by 4.1.2a. c. Ensure that the samples of health condition (from 4.1.2b) are taken from all of the main cohorts in production during each health status inspection .
4.1.2
All main cohorts on the farms are evaluated
d. Prior to accepting a transfer of fish (whether the transfer is internal or external), ensure that the supplier has evaluated fish using the farm's health status metrics in 4.1.2a. Farm's Minor. Evidence of health screening on a sub-sample of fish prior to a decision to transfer each batch of may also use evidence from statutory evaluations (e.g. health fish is not available. Indicator: All fish, at all stages in the certificates) as a basis for accepting transfers provided that the life cycle, are sourced from a supply evaluations are appropriately documented. that is of equal or better health status than its own stock Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
e. Ensure that responsible farm staff are trained to evaluate fish condition using health status metrics. Training should include instruction on how to identify fish health symptoms. Farms may decide for themselves on the most effective training tools (e.g. lectures, courses, tests) and frequency of training and re-training (e.g. annually, every two years, etc).
Minor
Evidence of health screening on a sub-sample of fish prior to a decision to transfer each batch of fish is not available. Evidence of traning of farm staff on how to evaluate fish condition using health status metrics is not available.
Minor. Evidence of training of farm staff on how to evaluate fish condition using health status metrics is not available.
f. Arrange for the farm's veterinary health professional to reviewthe accuracy of fish health condition scores that were See 4.1.2 A and B assigned by trained farm staff. This validation exercise may be done annually on a small sample of fish.
g.Ensure that a sub-sample of fish are screened from each batch prior to transfer. Any batch which does not conform is returned to the supplier with health status metrics recorded.
See 4.1.2 A and B
h. Others, please describe a. Ensure that receivers evaluate fish health condition using metrics defined by the farm's designated veterinary health specialist (4.1.2a) at the receiving location prior to transfer, Indicator: All fish that are moved off and to convey this information prior to transfer. site, at all stages in the life cycle, are
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
Fish health status evaluated by farm in collaboration with Vet Simon B Madsen.
15
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
4.1.3
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
site, at all stages in the life cycle, are b. Ensure that trained farm staff (4.1.2e) evaluate the health moved to a location of equal or condition of a subsample of individuals prior to moving fish off Fish health status evaluated by farm in collaboration with Vet Simon B Madsen. lesser health status site. Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Compliant
c. Ensure that fish are only moved off site if there are records Fish health status evaluated by farm in collaboration with Vet Simon B Madsen. All movement from demonstrating that fish health in the receiving location is equal fingerling suppliers to on growing farms are done in accordance with the health status as defined in the to or less than that in the shipping location. FHP. d. Others, please describe
Indicator: Site access, disinfection and hygiene protocols are written and observed
a. Prepare written protocols for site access, disinfection and hygiene (these protocols may be incorporated into the Farm Health Plan in 4.1.1a).
Minor. The farms hygiene plan /protocols are included in the FHP. The farm uses Virkon S as a disinfectant in food bath. But there is no info on Virkon S in the hygiene plans.
b. In the above protocols (4.1.4a) make direct reference to national regulations related to site access, disinfection and hygiene.
The farm is classified category V. Category V farms can send fish to farms in same category.
c. Ensure that farm protocols for site access, disinfection and hygiene are implemented.
Protocols for site access and hygiene are implemented.
-
All staff are fully informed about the FHP and aspects to site access and hygiene.
4.1.4
Compliant Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
e. Others, please describe
a. Maintain records for disposal of all mortalities and fish trimmings.
Indicator: Biosecure disposal of mortalities and fish trimmings 4.1.5
Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
Dead fish is recorded in Dambase. Exampel 29.8.16: 2.5 tons Dead fish is transportet to Linkogas (Biogass). Invoice seen from 2.9.2016. 2.5 tons dead fish delivered to Linkogas.
b. Create a protocol for biosecure disposal of biological tissue Dead fish is recorded in Dambase. Dead fish is transportet to Linkogas (Biogass). Invoice seen from and fish trimmings with a rationale explaining how biosecurity 2.9.2016. 2.5 tons dead fish delivered to Linkogas. is achieved. Minor Minor. The farm is not able to document that national legislation with respect to transport of dead fish c. In the above protocol (4.1.5b), make explicit reference to has been followed. See: https://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/Leksikon/Sider/Animalskeany national regulations related to disposal of biological waste. biprodukter.aspx. Kongeåens Dambrug use a farm tractor and a closed trailer to transport the dead fish to Linkogas
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
The farm is not able to document that national legislation with respect to transport of dead fish has been followed. See: https://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/Leksikon/Si der/Animalske-biprodukter.aspx.
16
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
-
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
All staff is fully informed about the FHP and biosecure disposal of dead fish.
e. Others, please describe
a. Maintain records of all mortality events and identify the actions taken. Collected data should indicate a baseline mortality as well as major mortality events.
4.1.6
Number of veterinarian inspections in 2016: 27. Example date 24.8.2016. Disease YDS + parasites. Treatment Norfenicol 60 ml per ton per week for 10 days.
Indicator: Immediate investigation of all mortality events on site and, in instances where mortality remains b. For each major mortality event identified in 4.1.6a, maintain The farm has records of all mortality events and visits by Vet. All mortality events are investigated within unexplained or unattributed, further records to show that the farm undertook immediate 24 hours. investigation with fish health investigation (i.e. within 24 hours of detection). professionals off site [22] Requirement: Yes
Compliant
c. For investigation of major mortality events that are coducted The farm has records of all mortality events and visits by Vet. All mortality events are investigated within on site, maintain a record of the tests used and the results 24 hours. obtained.
Applicability: All d. For any major mortality events in 4.1.6c where the results were unexplained or unattributed, have a relevant fish health The farm has records of all mortality events and visits by Vet. All mortality events are investigated within professional perform an off site investigation and keep a 24 hours. record of their opinion as to cause. e. Others, please describe
a. Maintain log showing the date of visit, title and affiliation of An inspection log is maintained. Number of veterinarian inspectionsin 2016: 27. designated veterinarian.
4.1.7
Indicator: Minimum frequency of inspection of the farm by a b. Obtain signature from designated veterinarian confirming designated veterinarian [22] who specializes in aquatic animal health. inspection and date. The inspection must review the farm c. Maintain on site, a current (within 3 years) CV of the farm's health plan. designated veterinarian. Requirement: ≥ 1 inspection per year, at a time when the site is in production
-
The inspections frequency is compliant with the ASC requirements.
The veterinarian's CV was seen at the audit. The veterinarian is Simon B. Madsen.
Compliant
Feed records are available in Dambase
Applicability: All e. Others, please describe
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
17
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
a. Include rationale for maximum stock density in the farm health plan (see 4.1.1) that refers to peer reviewed reference material.
4.1.8
Indicator: Evidence that maximum stock density was determined jointly by the designated veterinarian [22] b. Obtain a statement signed by the designated veterinarian and site manager confirming their joint determination of and site management maximum stock density.
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Minor. The FHP contains info on the max stock density. According to the Farm Health Plan (FHP) the maximum stock in juvenile section 1 is 100 kg per raceway. The actual biomass was not known to the farm management at the audit in raceway number 15 and 16.
The FHP is signed by the vet and the farm manager Minor
Requirement: Yes
According to the Farm Health Plan (FHP) the maximum stock in juvenile section 1 is 100 kg per raceway. The actual biomass was not known to the farm management at the audit in raceway number 15 and 16.
Applicability: All -
Interviews on the farm performed as part of the audit confirms that the farm manager was consulted in relation to the development of the FHP and in the determination of the maximum stock density.
d. Others, please describe Criterion 4.2 Chemicals and treatments
4.2.1
Indicator: Presence of a treatment plan, treatment record book and farm health history that includes a detailed recording of all treatments and all health events on the farm, as well as written veterinary prescriptions and receipts Requirement: Yes
a. Create requisite protocols which include at a mimimum: name of the veterinary health professional prescribing treatment; product name and chemical name (for all therapeutants and antimicrobials); treatment plan and reason Treatment plans and Records was seen at the audit for use (specific disease); date(s) of treatment; amount (g) of product used; dosage; quantity of fish treated (mt); WHO classifcation of any antibiotics used; and supplier of chemicals or therapeutants. b. Maintain all required records and receipts listed in 4.2.1a.
Compliant
Records and receipts that match treatments was seen at the audit
Applicability: All c. Others, please describe
4.2.2
a. Maintain a list of therapeutants (including antibiotics) banned by the EU and update the list no less than annually.
The farm has an updated list of therapeutants banned in the EU. This list is included in the farm health plan, signed 2.9.2016 by Jimmy Jensen, Christina Kongsted and Simon B. Madsen.
Indicator: Use of therapeutic treatments, including antibiotics or other treatments, that are banned under European Union (EU) law
b. Ensure that staff responsible for purchasing and administering therapeutants (including antibiotics) are aware of banned therapeutants listed in 4.2.2a.
The farm and veterinarian are aware of banned therapeutants
Requirement: Not permitted
c. Maintain records of voluntary and/or mandatory chemical residue testing conducted or commissioned by the farm from the prior and current production cycles.
No test for EU banned substances has been performed on the farm. Test for unwanted and unexpected substances has been performed at the slaughterhouse by the Danish authorities.
Applicability: All
Compliant
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
18
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Applicability: All d. Others, please describe
4.2.3
Indicator: Prophylactic use of chemical antimicrobial treatments (excluding prebiotics and probiotics that have been approved by a regulatory process that included a risk assessment) [23] Requirement: Not permitted Applicability: All
a. Inform the CAB if the farm used any prebiotic or probiotic No use of Prebiotics or probiotics on the farm. Formaldehyde and copper sulphate is used as treatments treatments for the last full production cycle and, if applicable, on the farm provide chemical names.
b. Maintain records of all chemical antimicrobial treatments for the last full production cycle as per 4.2.1a and 4.2.1b.
The veterinarian prescribes copper sulfate and formaldehyde. Example veterinarian inspection reports from 25.7.2016 (treatments copper sulpfate and formaldehyde) Compliant
c. Provide records to show that all chemical anitmicrobial treatments identified in 4.2.3b were prescribed by the farm's veterinary health care professional before application.
Records which demonstrate that all chemical antimicrobial treatments are prescribed by the farm's veterinary health care professional before application are available.
d. Others, please describe
a. Maintain records of all antimicrobial treatments for the last Records of all antimicrobial treatments are available. Published on www.kongeåeensdambrug.dk full production cycle as per 4.2.1b.
b. Make a public disclosure of all the antimicrobial treatments listed in 4.2.4a. by publishing the information on the farm's website or via another more effective medium (see Indicator: Public disclosure of all antimicrobial treatments used on the Instructions). farm
This is published on http://www.kongeaaensdambrug.dk/media/docs/antibiotika.pdf
4.2.4
Compliant Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
c. As an alternative to 4.2.4b, farms may choose to make a public disclosure using the ASC website. If applicable, use the form in Appendix VI of the ASC Salmon Standard to list all antimicrobial treatments used on the farm. Then submitt the completed form to ASC for publication on the ASC website.
NA. Public disclosure see http://www.kongeaaensdambrug.dk/media/docs/antibiotika.pdf
d. Others, please describe
a. Request that the veterinary health professional creates a The juvenile suppliers vaccinate the fish. There vaccination on Fole Dambrug. The records of vaccination record listing diseases that present a risk in the region and the waseen at the audit. The only relevant disease is Enteric Redmouth Disease. Vaccination against Enteric relevant, available vaccine (or absence of a suitable vaccine). Redmouth Disease is performed with AquaVac ERM.
Indicator: Proactive vaccination against diseases that present a risk in
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
19
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
4.2.5
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
against diseases that present a risk in the region and for which an effective, b. Maintain a record of all vaccinations administered. Fole dambrug vaccinate the fish. The records of vaccination was seen at the audit. legally authorized and commercially viable vaccine exists, as determined by the farm’s designated veterinarian c. Where the veterinary health professional has listed a disease that does not have a commercially viable vaccine, or a when an Requirement: Yes The juvenile suppliers vaccinate the fish. There vaccination on Fole Dambrug. The records of vaccination existing vaccination has not been administered (for whatever waseen at the audit. The only relevant disease is Enteric Redmouth Disease. Vaccination against Enteric reason), request that the veterinary health professional Applicability: All Redmouth Disease is performed with AquaVac ERM. supplies a written rationale for avoiding vaccination in the vaccination record.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Compliant
d. Others, please describe
PRINCIPLE 5: USE RESOURCES IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY EFFICIENT AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER Criterion 5.1 Traceability and transparency of raw materials in feed a. From each feed producer obtain a list of all ingredients The feed supplier is Aller Aqua and Biomar. The farm has a list of feed ingredients from Aller Aqua and representing more than 1% by weight of the feed as specified Biomar. in Indicator 5.1.2 (below). b. For all feed ingredients identified in 5.1.1.a, provide copies Requirement 5.1.1 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of third-party documentation showing certified traceability of of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity the production site and (for fish products), fishing area, signed by DIC 5.4.2016. landing site, species and harvest method.
5.1.1
Indicator: Evidence of traceability, demonstrated by the feed producer, of feed ingredients that make up c. For three ingredients of marine origin (fewer if fewer are more than 1% of the feed [24] used), collate three examples of traceback procedures conducted by a third-party auditor for the selected feed Requirement: Yes ingredients to the point of landing and vessel, in the source fishery. Applicability: All
d. For producers wishing to source from a feed manufacturer using a mass balance approach, provide a report from an onsite third-party audit of the feed manufacturer to assure traceability as in 5.1.1.b.
Requirement 5.1.1 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016.
Compliant
Requirement 5.1.1 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016.
e. Others, please describe
a. Obtain a statement from each feed supplier (on company letterhead) identifying all feed ingredients that make up more Indicator: Presence of a list of all than 1% of the feed by weight. Market names must be ingredients that make up more than accompanied by scientific latin names for natural ingredients 1% of the feed and formal chemical nomenclature for synthetic products.
The farm has a list of ingredients that make up more than 1% of the feed. The list of ingredients is declared on the feed labels from Biomar and Aller Aqua. This requirement is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. Compliant
5.1.2 Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
This requirement is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016.
20
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
c. Others, please describe Criterion 5.2 Responsible origin of marine raw materials a. Prepare a policy stating the company's support of efforts to shift feed manufacturers purchases of fishmeal and fish oil to fisheries certified under a scheme that is an ISEAL member and Requirement 5.2.1 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC has guidelines that specifically promote responsible declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity environmental management of small pelagic fisheries. Include signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016. supporting text from the relevant portion of the certification scheme showing management unique to small pelagics.
5.2.1
Indicator: Percentage of fishmeal and fish oil used in feed that comes from fisheries [25] certified under a scheme that is ISEAL-accredited and has guidelines that specifically promote responsible environmental management of small pelagic fisheries
b. Prepare a letter stating the farm's intent to preferentially source feed containing fishmeal and fish oil originating from fisheries certified under the type of certification scheme in 5.2.1a and inform all feed suppliers.
Requirement 5.2.1 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016.
c. Use feed inventory and feed supplier declarations in 5.1.2a to develop a list of the origin of all fish products used as feed ingredients.
Requirement 5.2.1 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016.
Requirement: 10% within three years of publication of the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard [by 7 d. Use the list from 5.2.1c to identify which fishmeal and fish February 2016) and 100% within five oil feed ingredients come from fisheries certified under a years [by 7 February 2018) scheme that is ISEAL-accredited and has guidelines that specifically promote responsible environmental management Applicability: All of small pelagic fisheries.
Compliant
Requirement 5.2.1 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016.
e. Starting 7 February 2016, provide evidence that the volume Requirement 5.2.1 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC of certified ingredients (result from 5.2.1d) is ≥ 10% of the total declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. volume of fishmeal and fish oil ingredients (result from 5.2.1c). f. Starting 7 February 2018, provide evidence that 100% of fishmeal and fish oil used in feed come from certified fisheries Not a requirement yet. as per 5.2.1d. g. Others, please describe
5.2.2.
Indicator: Prior to 100% achievement of 5.2.1, the Fishsource [26] score required for the fisheries from which marine raw material in feed is derived (excluding trimming and by-products)
a. Provide a FS score for each fish species identified as a feed Requirement 5.2.2 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC ingredient (see 5.1.2a) for all feeds used by the farm during the declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity last 12 months. For first audits, farm records must cover ≥ 6 signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016. months.
-
Requirement 5.2.2 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016.
Compliant
Requirement: All individual scores ≥
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
21
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Requirement: All individual scores ≥ 6, and biomass score ≥ 8 Applicability: All
5.2.3
Indicator: Prior to 100% achievement of 5.2.1, demonstration of chain of custody and traceability for fisheries products in feed through an ISEAL-accredited or ISO 65compliant certification scheme that incorporates the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization’s “Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries”
c. Others, please describe
a. Obtain from the feed supplier documentary evidence that the origin of all fishmeal and fish oil used in the feed is traceable via a third-party verified chain of custody or traceability program.
Requirement 5.2.3 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016.
b. Ensure that all species within the scope of the chain of Requirement 5.2.3 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC custody or traceability program align with fish meal and fish oil declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity ingredients used in the farm's feeds (consistent with 5.2.2.a signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016. and 5.3.1.a).
Compliant
Requirement: Yes c. Others, please describe Applicability: All
5.2.4
Indicator: Evidence that by-product feed ingredients do not come from fish species that are categorized as vulnerable [27], endangered or critically endangered according to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species [28]
a. Compile and maintain a list (as per 5.3.1a below) of the Requirement 5.2.4 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC fishery of origin for all fishmeal and fish oil originating from by- declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity products and trimmings. signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016. b. For each by-product species (5.2.4a) that is an ingredient of any feed used during the last 12 months, search the IUCN Requirement 5.2.4 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC database to determine if it is categorized as vulnerable, declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. endangered, or criticatlly endangered. For first audits, farm records must cover ≥ 6 months.
Compliant
Requirement: Yes Applicability: All except as noted in c. Others, please describe [27]
Criterion 5.3 Dependency on wild-caught marine ingredients in feed [29]
5.3.1
a. Maintain a detailed inventory of the feed used including: - Quantities used of each formulation (kg); - Percentage of fish oil in each formulation used; - Source (fishery) of fish oil/EPA/DHA in each formulation Indicator: Fishmeal Forage Fish used; Dependency Ratio (FFDRm) for grow- Percentage of oil in each formulation derived from out (calculated using formulas in trimmings; and Appendix III, subsection 1) - Supporting documentation and signed declaration from feed supplier. Requirement: ≤1.5
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
Fish produced in period : 271030 kg. Dead fish. 75000 kg. bFCR: 1.04 (282788/ 271030). eFCR: 1,44 (282788 / (271030-75000)
Compliant
22
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Requirement: ≤1.5 Applicability: All
b. Calculate FFDRm using formulas in Appendix III. Exclude fish meal derived from rendering of seafood by-products (e.g. the FFDRm: Fish meal in feed: 20.1 %. Fish meal from trimmings: 2.8%. FFDRm: (17.3*0.87)/22.2: 0.68 "trimmings" from a human consumption fishery). c. Others, please describe a. Inform the CAB whether the farm choses Option A or Option B to show compliance. If Option A is selected, proceed directly Option A is chosen to 5.3.2b below. Otherwise, skip to Option B in the next section.
Option A Indicator: Compliance with the following requirement: Fish Oil Forage Fish Dependency Ratio (FFDRo) for grow-out 5.3.2 (calculated using formulas in Option A Appendix III, subsection 1) c
b. Maintain a detailed inventory of the feed used as specified under 5.3.1a.
Fish produced in period : 271030 kg. Dead fish. 75000 kg. bFCR: 1.04 (282788/ 271030). eFCR: 1,44 (282788 / (271030-75000)
c. Calculate FFDRo using formulas for eFCR value as given in Appendix III .
Fish oil in feed: 7,1%.Fsh oli from trimmings 6,8%. FFDRo 1,44* 0.3/ 5: 0,09.
Compliant
Requirement: ≤2.95 Applicability: All, but note that farms may choose to demonstrate compliance with either Option A or Option B under Indicator 5.3.2.
Option B Indicator: Compliance with the following requirement:
d. Others, please describe
a. Inform the CAB whether the farm choses Option A or Option B to show compliance. If Option B is selected, proceed directly NA. Option A is chosen to 5.3.2b below. Otherwise, return to Option A in the previous section.
Maximum level of EPA/DHA content b. Maintain a detailed inventory of the feed used as specified NA. Option A is chosen from marine sources as a percentage under 5.3.1a. of fatty acids in the feed (excluding 5.3.2 EPA/DHA from trimmings and byOption B products) c. Calculate EPA/DHA percentage using formula in Section 2 of NA. Option A is chosen Appendix III. Requirement: ≤ 9% Applicability: All, but note that farms may choose to demonstrate compliance with either Option A or Option B under Indicator 5.3.2.
N/A
d. Others, please describe
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
23
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Criterion 5.4 Responsible origin of non-marine raw materials in feed Requirement 5.4.1 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC a. Compile and maintain a list of all feed suppliers with contact declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity information (see also 5.1.1a). signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016.
5.4.1
Indicator: Presence and evidence of a responsible sourcing policy for the feed manufacturer for feed ingredients that comply with internationally recognized moratoriums and local laws [30] Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
b. Obtain from each feed manufacturer a copy of the manufacturer's responsible sourcing policy for feed ingredients Requirement 5.4.1 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC showing how the company complies with recognized crop declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. moratoriums and local laws [34]. c. Obtain copies of third-party audits of feed suppliers (5.1.1) and confirm that these show evidence that supplier's responsible sourcing policies are implemented.
Compliant
Requirement 5.4.1 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016.
d. Others, please describe a. Prepare a letter to each feed supplier stating the farm's intention to source only feeds with soy ingredients that are certified by the Roundtable for Responsible Soy (RTRS) or equivalent. Indicator: Percentage of soy ingredients that are certified by the Roundtable on Responsible Soy, or equivalent [31] 5.4.2
Requirement: 100% within five years of publication of the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard (by 7 February 2018) Applicability: All
The farm has send the required letter of intent concerning sourcing of soy to the feed producers
b.Keep records to show that the farm sent the letter of intent The farm send the letter to the feed suppliers in June 2016 (5.4.2a) to each feed supplier. Compliant c. Obtain and maintain declarations from all feed suppliers detailing the origin of soya in the feeds.
Requirement 5.4.2 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016.
d. Starting 7 February 2018, provide evidence that all soya used in feed is certified by the RTRS or equivalent [31].
Not a requirement yet.
e. Others, please describe
5.4.3
Indicator: Disclosure by the feed supplier of any ingredients that contain more than 0.9% transgenic [32] plant material
a. Obtain from feed suppliers a disclosure detailing all plant material used as feed ingredients (i.e. soya and others plants) and specify which of these ingredients contains >0.9% transgenic plant material by weight.
Requirement 5.4.3 is covered by the ASC Declaration of Conformity. Aller Aqua has a valid ASC declaration of conformity signed by DIC 5.4.2016. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016. Compliant
Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
b. Others, please describe
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
24
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
a. For feeds with ingredients containing > 0.9% transgenic plant material (i.e. those feeds specified in 5.4.3a), ensure that No use of transgenic material in the feed. See the ASC declaration of conformity from Aller Aqua. Biomar the farm can identify any harvested fish that were fed such has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016. products. If no such feeds were identified in 5.4.3a, then Indicator 5.4.4 is not applicable.
5.4.4
Indicator: Disclosure by the farm to the direct purchasers of its harvested fish of any feed ingredients that have contained more than 0.9% transgenic material
b.If disclosures about transgenic matrial are needed (based on 5.4.4a), the farm must compile a list of all buyers who may NA. There is no use of transgenic material in the feed. See the ASC declaration of conformity from Aller have obtained fish from the harvest in question. The list must Aqua. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016. include contact details of buyers.
Compliant
Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
c. As applicable (based on 5.4.4a), the farm must make disclosures to all buyers listed in 5.4.4b. Maintain documentary evidence of disclosures. For first audits, farm records of disclosures must cover > 6 months.
NA. There is no use of transgenic material in the feed. See the ASC declaration of conformity from Aller Aqua. Biomar has a valid ASC Declaration of Conformity signed by Bureau Veritas 17.5.2016.
d. Others, please describe Criterion 5.5 Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (on farm)
a. Maintain records for all energy consumption on the farm by Period 1.1 2016-30.6.2016. 773730 kWh. Diesel 1.291 l. petrol 435 l. Total 790 563 kWh. Or 4 kWh per source (fuel, electricity) throughout the year. kg of fish produced. 14576000 kj per ton produced.
b. Use results from 5.5.1a and relevant conversion factors to calculate the farm's total energy consumption in kilojoules (kj) see 5.5.1 A during the last 12 months.
5.5.1
Indicator: Presence of records and evidence of all energy consumption on the farm (including electric power and fuels) and evidence of an energy c. Calculate the total weight of fish produced (in metric tons, use assessment of on-farm energy mt) during the last 12 months. When calculating total annual consumption production, it is acceptable for farms to estimate the total weight using records for processed weight or tonnage sold. Requirement: Yes, measured in kilojoule/mt fish/year Applicability: All
d. Use the results of 5.5.1b divided by the results of 5.5.1c to calculate energy consumption on the farm in kilojuoule/mt fish/year.
see 5.5.1 A
Compliant
see 5.5.1 A
e. Provide the CAB with evidence that the farm has had an energy use assessment (see Instructions above) within the last see 5.5.1 A 12 months.
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
25
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
f. Others, please describe Criterion 5.6 Non-therapeutic chemical inputs Indicator: Percentage of combustibles contained in waterproof bunds 5.6.1 Requirement: 100%
a. Maintain a written list of all types of combustibles used on the farm.
Quantity of diesel on the farm 8.9 2016. 700 l Diesel. 60 l petrol
b. Ensure that all combustibles are stored in waterproof bunds. The combustibles were stored in waterproof bunds during the on-site inspection.
Compliant
c. Others, please describe Applicability: All a. Maintain a detailed list of all chemicals or therapeutants on The farm has a complete list of chemicals and therapeutants on the premises. List of chemicals of audit date: 1300 l formaldehyde, HCl 25 l. Copper sulphate: 25 kg. Indicator: Percentage of chemicals the farm. stored in impermeable containers or buildings 5.6.2 Requirement: 100%
b. Ensure that all chemicals or therapeutants are stored in impermeable containers or buildings.
Compliant All chemicals are stored in impermeable containers.
Applicability: All c. Others, please describe a. Prepare a written policy or procedure explaining how used lubricants are recycled or turned over to a waste management The farm has a compliant policy of lubricants. Used engine oil and lubricants is delivered to waste company. If no waste management company exists, obtain a management company Indicator: Percentage of used signed letter from the government agency in charge of waste lubricants recycled or turned over to disposal at the provincial/state level as confirmation. a waste management company 5.6.3 Requirement: 100% Applicability: All
Waste collected by Marius Pedersen, Kolding. Waste collected one time per week. Invoice seen from b. Where waste is collected by a waste management company, Kongeåens Dambrug Aps (Fole Dambrug belongs to Kongeåens Dambrug ApS). Date 31.07.16. Invoice maintain receipts of payment for services. number 3176500. 400 l container
Compliant
c. Others, please describe
a. Prepare a written policy explaining how the chemical containers are reused or turned over to a waste management company. If no waste management company exists, obtain a The farms written policy was seen at the audit and found compliant. All used chemical containers are signed letter from the government agency in charge of waste returned to supplier. Date of the farms policy concerning chemical containers September 2016 Indicator: Percentage of chemical disposal at the local level as confirmation that neither public containers reused or turned over to a nor private waste disposal services are available. waste management company 5.6.4 Requirement: 100%
b. Where containers are re-used, maintain records of chemical purchases and demonstrate tallied alignment against the NA Chemical containers are not reused number of containers in re-use/re-cycled.
Compliant
Applicability: All -
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
Waste collected by Marius Pedersen, Kolding. Empty chemical containers are returned to the supplier
26
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
d. Others, please describe
a. Prepare a written farm policy explaining how and which nonhazardous, non-recyclable wastes are turned over to a waste management company or buried on-site. If no waste The farm policy was audited and found compliant. Waste is collected by waste management company. management company exists, obtain a signed letter from the Waste collected one time per week. Invoice seen from Kongeåens Dambrug Aps (Fole Dambrug is part of government agency in charge of waste disposal at the local Kongeåens Dambrug Aps). Date 31.07.16. Invoice number 3176500. 400 l container level as confirmation that neither public nor private waste disposal services are available.
5.6.5
Indicator: Percentage of non-hazardous, non-recyclable wastes turned over to a waste management company or landfill [33] Requirement: 100% Applicability: All
b. For on-site burial of waste, show that an outside expert (hired groundwater or geology consultant with minimum of five years experience and university degree, or academic groundwater geologist) has signed a letter affirming that waste NA. There is no burial of waste burial poses no risk of contamination to surface and underground waters. Maintain CV of outside expert on file for possible inspection. c. Include a statement in the farm waste disposal policy (5.6.5a) which prohibits the burning of non-hazardous, nonrecyclable wastes.
Compliant
The farm policy was audited and found compliant. There is no burning of any waste on the farm.
Waste is collected by waste management company. Waste collected one time per week. Invoice seen d. Where waste is collected by a waste management company, from Kongeåens Dambrug Aps (Fole Dambrug is part of Kongeåens Dambrug Aps). Date 31.07.16. Invoice maintain receipts of payment for services. number 3176500. 400 l container. e. Where waste collection is a public service, show schedule of collections. f. Others, please describe
a. Provide a list of the three closest recycling facilities for relevant farm products (regardless of how far away these may be). Provide the auditor with contact informationl for the local 3 recycling stations 1) Haderslev Genbrugs plads, Fjordager Bakke 3, 6100 Haderslev. 2) Vojens waste management agency. If the farm is obligated to utilize a Genbrugsplads. Tingvejen 29. 6500. Vojens and 3) Gram Genbrugsplas. Industrivej 5, Gram designated recycling facility (e.g. as specified in local regulations or environmental use permit), the farm shall provide this information to the auditor.
5.6.6
Indicator: Demonstration that a farmer is aware of recycling facilities that are accessible to the farm and demonstration of a commitment to b. Prepare a written statement articulating the farm's use those facilities commitment to recycle waste from production.
The farm policy was audited and found compliant.
Compliant
Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
c. Provide a description of the types of production waste materials and how these are either disposed of, or recycled.
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
Type of waste includes empty feed bags, used nets etc. Waste is collected by waste management company. Waste collected one time per week. Invoice seen from Kongeåens Dambrug Aps (Fole Dambrug is part of Kongeåens Dambrug Aps). Date 31.07.16. Invoice number 3176500.,400 l container
27
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
d. Inform CAB of any infractions or fines for improper waste disposal received during the previous 12 months and corrective actions taken.
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
NA. The farm is compliant with respect to 5.6.6,
e. Others, please describe PRINCIPLE 6: BE SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE Criterion 6.1 Child labor
a. Minimum age of permanent workers is 15 or older (except in No workers below the minimum age of 18 is working on the farm countries as noted above). Indicator: Number of incidences of child [34] labor [35] 6.1.1
Compliant
Requirement: None Applicability: All
b. Employer maintains age records for employees that are sufficient to demonstrate compliance.
The farm has age records for all employees
c. Others, please describe
Criterion 6.2 Forced, bonded or compulsory labor a. Contracts are clearly stated and understood by employees. Contracts do not lead to workers being indebted (i.e. no ‘pay to Contracts and payslips seen for 1) Lukasz Zakowski, farm worker; 2) Aleksander Ludwik Greczko, farm work’ schemes through labor contractors or training credit worker, and 3) Tommy Schmidt farm worker programs). b. Employees are free to leave workplace and manage their own time.
Compliant. Demonstrated by interview with the farm workers
Indicator: Number of incidences of forced [38], bonded [39] or compulsory labor
c. Employer does not withhold employee’s original identity documents.
Compliant. Demonstrated by interview with the farm workers
Requirement: None
d. Employer does not withhold any part of workers’ salaries, benefits, property or documents in order to oblige them to continue working for employer.
Compliant. Demonstrated by interview with the farm workers
e. Employees are not to be obligated to stay in job to repay debt.
None of the farm worker are obligated to stay in job to repay debt Audit evidence: interview with the farm workers
6.2.1
Compliant
Applicability: All
f. Maintain payroll records and be advised that workers will be The farm has compliant payroll records for the workers. interviewed to confirm the above. g. Others, please describe Criterion 6.3 Discrimination [40] in the work environment
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
28
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
a. Employer has written anti-discrimination policy in place, stating [41] the company does not engage in or support discrimination in hiring, remuneration, access to training, promotion, termination or retirement based on race, caste, national origin, religion, disability, gender, sexual orientation, union membership, political affiliation, age or any other condition that may give rise to discrimination. Indicator: Evidence of proactive antidiscrimination practice [41] 6.3.1
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Date of anti-discrimination policy 02.09.2016. the policy was reviewed and found compliant
see 6.3.1 a
Requirement: Yes
b. Employer has clear and transparent company procedures that outline how to raise, file, and respond to discrimination complaints.
Applicability: All
c. Employer respects the principle of equal pay for equal work and equal access to job opportunities, promotions and raises.
see 6.3.1 a
d. All managers and supervisors receive training on diversity and non-discrimination. All personnel receive nondiscrimination training. Internal or external training is acceptable if proven effective.
see 6.3.1 a
Compliant
e. Others, please describe
Indicator: Number of incidences of discrimination 6.3.2
Requirement: None Applicability: All
a. Employer maintains a record of all discrimination complaints. These records do not show evidence for discrimination. b. Be advised that worker testimonies will be used to confirm that the company does not interfere with the rights of personnel to observe tenets or practices, or to meet needs related to race, caste, national origin, religion, disability, gender, sexual orientation, union membership, political affiliation or any other condition that may give rise to discrimination.
No discrimination complaints has been received
No discrimination complaints has been received
Compliant
c. Others, please describe Criterion 6.4 Work environment health and safety a. Employer has documented practices, procedures (including Minor. Training of workers in health and safety issues performed last time 28.1.2014 as part of an emergency response procedures) and policies to protect evaluation of the workplace hazards (APV). Signed by all employees & Training in health and safety employees from workplace hazards and to minimize risk of training is also performed as part of the job. accident or injury. The information shall be available to employees. b. Practices, policies and procedures are regularly revised to address workplace hazards that were identified in risk Indicator: Percentage of workers trained in health and safety practices, assessments (see Indicator 6.4.5, risk assessents revised at least annually). procedures and policies
The training of workers in health and safety practices is included in Procedure "Policy on social responsibility" September 2016.
6.4.1
Minor Requirement: 100%
c. Employees know and understand emergency response procedures.
The farm workers understand emergency response procedures. Confirmed by interviewing the farm workers
Training of workers in health and safety issues performed last time 28.1.2014 as part of an evaluation of the workplace hazards (APV)
Applicability: All
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
29
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Applicability: All d. Employer conducts health and safety training for all employees on a regular basis (once a year and immediately for The training of workers in health and safety practices is included in Procedure ”Policy on social all new employees), including training on potential hazards responsibility". Documented training 7.7.2016. and risk minimization, Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) and effective use of PPE.
e. Others, please describe
6.4.2
a. Employer records all health- and safety-related accidents.
No incidents of health and safety related accidents within the past 2 years.
b. Employer maintains complete documentation for all occupational health and safety violations.
No incidents of health and safety related accidents or violations
Indicator: Evidence that health- and c. Employer implements corrective action plans in response to safety-related accidents are recorded any accidents that occur. Plans are documented and they and corrective actions are taken No incidents of health and safety related accidents or violations include an analysis of root cause, actions to address root cause, actions to remediate, and actions to prevent future Requirement: Yes accidents of similar nature. Applicability: All
d. Employees working in departments where accidents have occurred can explain what analysis has been done and what steps were taken or improvements made.
Compliant
No incidents of health and safety related accidents or violation
e. Others, please describe
6.4.3
a. Employer maintains documentation to confirm that all Indicator: Proof of company personnel are provided sufficient insurance to cover costs accident insurance covering related to occupational accidents or injuries (if not covered employee costs stemming from a jobunder national law). Equal insurance coverage must include related accident or injury when not temporary, migrant or foreign workers. Written contract of covered under national law employer responsibility to cover accident costs is acceptable evidence in place of insurance. Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
Indicator: Workers use and have access to appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE)
Insurance to workers. Company Ensure International through Dansk Akvakultur. Period 1.1-31.12.2016. Number: 320204-32 and 670-8.035.915. Compliant
b. Others, please describe
a. Employer maintains a list of all health and safety hazards (e.g. chemicals).
Risk assessment of hazards and risks in the workplace is available.
b. Employer provides workers with PPE that is appropriate to known health and safety hazards.
Minor. Audit evidence 1) Eye wash solution and first aid kits expired and 2) Eye wash solution is not available in the chemical storage room. Minor
6.4.4 Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
c. Employees receive annual training in the proper use of PPE Workers are trained as part of the job (see 6.4.1d). d. Be advised that workers will be interviewed to confirm the Workers were interviewed at the audit. above.
Minor. Audit evidence 1) Eye wash solution and first aid kits expired and 2) Eye wash solution is not available in the chemical storage room.
e. Others, please describe
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
30
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
a. Employer makes regular assessments of hazards and risks in the workplace. Risk assessments are reviewed and updated at Risk assessment of hazards and risks in the workplace is dated 28.1.2016 least annually (see also Indicator 6.4.1). Indicator: Evidence of a health and safety assessment of site facilities and processes 6.4.5 Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
Evidence that employees are trained in how to prevent known hazards is not adequate. Audit finding: b. Employees are trained in how to identify and prevent known some old underground tanks located between juvenile section 1 and juvenile section 2 are covered with hazards and risks (see also 6.4.1d). old and unstable plywood. This hazard has not been fully addressed. c. Health and safety procedures are adapted based on results from risk assessments (above) and changes are implemented to help prevent accidents.
Minor
Evidence that employees are trained in how to prevent known hazards is not adequate. Audit finding: some old underground tanks located between juvenile section 1 and juvenile section 2 are covered with old and unstable plywood. This hazard has not been fully addressed.
Risk assessment of hazards and risks in the workplace is dated 28.1.2016
d. Others, please describe Criterion 6.5 Wages
Seen pay slip for t3 farm workers. Payment is done in accordance with the norm at the area and the a. Employer keeps documents to show the legal minimum wage are raised in accordance with the employment contract. Wages are mostly done - in bigger wage in the country of operation. If there is no legal minimum companies - by bargaining and between management and local union. This facility do only have few wage in the country, the employer keeps documents to show workers and in this situation we almost never see traditional agreement between management and the industry-standard minimum wage. union. The monthly payment is in accordance with the labour market for this area in Denmark.
Indicator: The percentage of employees who are paid a basic needs wage [42]. 6.5.1 Requirement: 100% Applicability: All
b. Employer's records (e.g. payroll) confirm that worker's wages for a standard work week (≤ 48 hours) always meet or exceed the legal minimum wage. If there is no legal minimum wage, the employer's records must show how the current wage meets or exceeds industry standard. If wages are based on piece-rate or pay-per-production, the employer's records must show how workers can reasonably attain (within regular working hours) wages that meet or exceed the legal minimum wage. c. Employer maintains documentary evidence to show compliance (e.g. payroll, timesheets, punch cards, production records, and/or utility records). Be advised that workers will be interviewed to confirm the above. d. Proof of employer engagement with workers and their representative organizations, and the use of cost of living assessments from credible sources to assess basic needs wages. Includes review of any national basic needs wage recommendations from credible sources such as national universities or government. e. Employer has calculated the basic needs wage for farm workers and has compared it to the basic (i.e. current) wage for their farm workers. f. Employer demonstrates how they ensure paying a basic needs wage to their workers.
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
No formal recording of work hours. Confidential interviews with the employee, review of payslip and employment contract (37 hour/week, in accordance with local law) confirm that the employee only have very few over time hour (average 2-4 hour/ month). Normal work week are 37 hour. Over time work are paid by "a day of".
Compliant see above
The monthly payment is beyond the requirement for basic needs wage. No defined living wage by law. If no income from work, pension, payment under sickness etc. can Danish citizens get money from the local authority (before tax): 30-year-old, parent 14.203 DKK/month. Under 25 year, living away 6.889 DKK/month. Under 25 year, living at home 3.324 DKK/month
See above See above
31
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
g. Others, please describe a. Wages and benefits are clearly articulated to workers and documented in contracts. b. The method for setting wages is clearly stated and understood by workers.
6.5.2
Indicator: Evidence of transparency c. Employer renders wages and benefits in a way that is in wage setting convenient for the worker (e.g. cash, check, or electronic payment methods). Workers do not have to travel to collect Requirement: Yes benefits nor do they receive promissory notes, coupons or merchandise in lieu of payment. Applicability: All d. Be advised that workers will be interviewed to confirm the above.
The method for setting wages is understood and accepted by the workers. Evidence Interviews with the workers See 6.5.2 A
See 6.5.2 A
Compliant
See 6.5.2 A
e. Others, please describe Criterion 6.6 Access to freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining [44] a. Workers have the freedom to join any trade union, free of any form of interference from employers or competing organizations set up or backed by the employer.
Workers have the freedom to join trade unions. This facility does only have a few workers and in this situation, we almost never see traditional agreement between management and union.
b. Union representatives are chosen by workers without managerial interference. ILO specifically prohibits “acts which are designated to promote the establishment of worker NA. A union representative is not chosen by workers. See 6.6.1 a organizations or to support worker organizations under the control or employers or employers’ organizations."
6.6.1
Indicator: Incidences of employees denied freedom to associate, the ability to bargain collectively or denied access to representatives, or representative organizations, chosen by workers Requirement: 0 (zero) Applicability: All
c. Trade union representatives have access to their members in NA. A union representative is not chosen by workers. See 6.6.1 a the workplace at reasonable times on the premises. d. Employment contract explicitly states the worker's right of freedom of association.
NA. A union representative is not chosen by workers. See 6.6.1 a
e. Employer has explicitly communicated a commitment to ensure the collective bargaining rights of all workers.
NA. A union representative is not chosen by workers. See 6.6.1 a
Compliant
f. Local trade union, or where none exists a reputable civilsociety organization, confirms no outstanding cases against the NA. A union representative is not chosen by workers. See 6.6.1 a farm site management for violations of employees’ freedom of association and collective bargaining rights. g. There is documentary evidence that workers are free and able to bargain collectively (e.g. collective bargaining agreements, meeting minutes, or complaint resolutions).
NA. A union representative is not chosen by workers. See 6.6.1 a
h. Be advised that workers will be interviewed to confirm the above.
Workers were interviewed as part of the audit
i. Others, please describe Criterion 6.7 Disciplinary practices
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
32
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
a. Employer does not use threatening, humiliating or punishing Confidential interviews with the employees confirm compliance with the requirement. No evidence of disciplinary practices that negatively impact a worker’s any kind of punishment physical and mental health or dignity. Indicator: Incidences of abusive disciplinary actions 6.7.1
Requirement: None Applicability: All
b. Allegations of corporeal punishment, mental abuse [46], physical coercion, or verbal abuse will be investigated by auditors.
see 6.7,1 a above
Compliant
c. Be advised that workers will be interviewed to confirm there see 6.7.,1 a is no evidence for excessive or abusive disciplinary actions.
d. Others, please describe
a. Employer has written policy for disciplinary action which explicitly states that its aim is to assist the worker to improve [45].
6.7.2
Indicator: Evidence of nonabusive disciplinary policies and procedures whose aim is to improve the workers’ performance [45] b. Maintain documentary evidence (e.g. worker evaluation Requirement: Yes
Minor. Written policy for disciplinary action which explicitly states that its aim is to assist the worker to improve is not available
Confidential interviews with the employees confirm compliance with the requirement. No evidence of reports) and be advised that workers will be interviewed to any kind of punishment confirm that the disciplinary action policy is fair and effective.
Minor
Applicability: All c. Others, please describe Criterion 6.8 Overtime and working hours a. Employer has documentation showing the legal requirements for working hours and overtime in the region where the farm operates. If local legislation allows workers to Records of hours worked are available. exceed internationally accepted recommendations (48 regular hours, 12 hours overtime) then requirements of the international standards apply.
b. Records (e.g. time sheets and payroll) show that farm workers do not exceed the number of working hours allowed under the law.
There is registration of work hour. Confidential interview with the employee, review of employment contract, pay slip and registration of concrete overtime state that work hour are in accordance with the requirement in local law and this standard. Normal work hour 37 hour/week.
Indicator: Violations or abuse of working hours [47] and overtime [48] c. Payment records (e.g. payslips) show that workers are paid a Over time hour are paid with time off. premium rate [49] for overtime hours. laws and agreements 6.8.1
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
Compliant
33
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
6.8.1
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Compliant Requirement: None Applicability: All
d. Overtime is limited and occurs in exceptional circumstances as evidenced by farm records (e.g. production records, time Interviews with the employees confirm that the overtime is limited. sheets, and other records of working hours).
e. If an employer requires employees to work shifts at the farm (e.g. 10 days on and six days off), the employer compensates workers with an equivalent time off in the calendar month and see above there is evidence that employees have agreed to this schedule (e.g. in the hiring contract).
f. Be advised that workers will be interviewed to confirm there Workers was interviewed at the audit, Workers confirmed that the farm is compliant with requirement is no abuse of working hours and overtime laws. 6.8.1.
g. Others, please describe Criterion 6.9 Interactions with communities a. Provide evidence to show whether or not the farm fits the definition of a 'new farm' as used here. If yes, proceed to NA. The farm is not a new farm 6.9.1b. If not, then Indicator 6.9.1 does not apply to the farm.
6.9.1
Indicator: For new farms, evidence of engagement and consultation with surrounding communities about potential social impacts [50] from the farm Requirement: Yes Applicability: All new farms (see note)
b. Provide results of a participatory Social Impact Assessment (p-SIA) or equivalent methodology as evidence of the farm's engagement and consultation with surrounding communities NA. The farm is not a new farm about potential social impacts from the farm. Mandatory for all farm sites with greater than ten (10) staff/employees. c. Evidence provided in 6.9.1b should include minutes from community meetings and a log of communications with stakeholders. Consultations should address economic impacts, natural resource access and use, human health and safety NA. The farm is not a new farm issues, and changes to physical infrastructure and cultural issues, with a particular focus on impacts to indigenous people, where applicable.
N/A
d. Others, please describe
a. The farm engages in consultations with the local community at least twice every year (bi-annually). Note: farms with less Open door policy. The farm is in contact with local stakeholders. No complaints from stakeholders have than 6 employees consultations once every year is sufficient. been received. Complaints are handled by Haderslev Municipality. This may include local authorities and/or elected community representatives.
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
34
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
6.9.2
Indicator: Evidence of regular communication, engagement and consultation with surrounding communities Requirement: Yes
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
b. Consultations are meaningful. OPTIONAL: the farm may choose to use participatory Social Impact Assessment (pSIA) or see 6.9.2 a an equivalent method for consultations. Mandatory for all farm sites with greater than ten (10) staff/employees. c. Consultations include participation by elected representatives from the local community who were asked to see 6.9.2 a contribute to the agenda.
Compliant
Applicability: All d. Maintain records and documentary evidence (e.g. meeting agenda, minutes, report) to demonstrate that consultations comply with the above.
Minor. Evidence of consultations with the local community is not available
e. Be advised that representatives from the local community and organizations may be interviewed to confirm the above.
No stakeholders or representatives from the local community have contacted the farm or Bureau Veritas.
f. Others, please describe
a. Farm policy provides a mechanism for presentation, Open door policy. The farm is in contact with local stakeholders. No complaints from stakeholders have treatment and resolution of grievances (i.e. complaints) lodged been received. Complaints are handled by Haderslev Municipality. by stakeholders, community members, and organizations.
6.9.3
Indicator: Evidence of an operational grievance and conflict resolution mechanism to address community concerns Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
b. The farm follows its policy for handling stakeholder grievances as evidenced by farm documentation (e.g. followsee 6.9.2 a up communications with stakeholders, reports to stakeholder describing corrective actions). Compliant c. The farm's mechanism for handling grievances is effective based on resolution of stakeholder complaints and community see 6.9.2 a concerns (e.g. follow-up correspondence from stakeholders). d. Be advised that representatives from the local community, including complainants where applicable, may be interviewed Minor. Evidence of consultations with the local community is not available to confirm the above. e. Others, please describe
No stakeholders or representatives from the local community have contacted the farm or Bureau Veritas.
********** A farm seeking certification must have documentation from all of its fingerling and egg suppliers to demonstrate compliance with the following requirements. ********** SECTION 7: REQUIREMENTS FOR FINGERLING AND EGG SUPPLIERS
a. Obtain copies of supplier's business permit and land title deed.
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
The Egg suppliers is Troutex. The juvenile supplier is FREA
35
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
7.1
Indicator: Presence of documents issued by pertinent authorities proving compliance with local and national authorities on land and water use, effluent regulations and use of treatments Requirement: Yes
b. Obtain records from suppliers showing discharge permit requirements as required.
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Discharge permits are available
Compliant c. Obtain records from suppliers showing treatments used on fingerlings and eggs.
Treatments records are available
Applicability: All d. Maintain on-site copies of laws governing water use, land Compliant for Troutex and FREA use, effluent regulations and chemical treatments for animals.
e. Others, please describe a. Obtain written evidence showing whether or not the fingerling and egg suppliers use closed production systems [51]. If yes, then Indicator 7.2 does not apply.
7.2
Troutex does not have a closed production system. FREA is a closed production system
Indicator: New introductions of exotic species from the date of b. Obtain written evidence showing that the fingerling and egg Production species: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The species has been introduced to Danish publication of the ASC Freshwater suppliers do not produce an exotic species. If they do not, then freshwater farms more than 100 years ago. A wild population of rainbow trout is not established in Trout Standard (7 February 2013), Denmark. unless the hatchery/fingerling facility Indicator 7.2 does not apply. is a closed production system [51] Requirement: None Applicability: All
c. If the supplier produces an exotic species, obtain written evidence that the species was widely commercially produced in the area before publication of the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard.
Compliant
Production species: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The species has been introduced to Danish freshwater farms more than 100 years ago. A wild population of rainbow trout is not established in Denmark.
d. Others, please describe
Indicator: Allowance for siting in National Protected Areas [52] 7.3
Requirement: None [53,54]
a. Obtain from suppliers of fingerlings and eggs a map showing the location of the operation relative to nearby protected areas Maps of the suppliers farms are available i.e.FREA and Troutex. as defined federally/at the National level.
Compliant
Applicability: All except as noted in 53 and 54 b. Others, please describe
Indicator: Evidence of an assessment of the property for the presence of species listed on the
a. Prepare a letter informing egg and fingerling suppliers that the supplier must compile a list of IUCN Red Listed species in the relevant categories that may occur on their property following the instructions in Indicator 2.1.3.
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
Letter sent to suppliers 9.8.2016.
36
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
7.4
presence of species listed on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) “Red List of Threatened Species” as vulnerable, near threatened, endangered or critically endangered; an evaluation of the farm’s impact on any such species present; and clearly defined mitigation measures to reduce any negative impacts and allow existence of such species
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
b. Obtain from egg and fingerling suppliers a "risk assessment" (search and mitigation plan) that evaluates how the supplier's operation impacts on any IUCN Red Listed species identified in Compliant risk assessment is available from FREA and Troutex 7.4a. The risk assessment may be done by the supplier or it may be performed by an academic ecologist or environmental consultant.
c. Obtain from egg and fingerling suppliers a copy of the supplier's ETP species response plan and protocols based on the findings of the risk assessment.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Compliant
Compliant risk assessment is available from FREA and Troutex
Requirement: Yes Applicability: All d. Others, please describe
a. Obtain a written statement from egg and fingerling producers detailing the applicable national and local disease regulations and guidance on disease management which the supplier follows.
7.5
The farm has a written statement from the egg suppliers detailing how the supplier conforms to applicable national and local regulations and guidance on disease management.
Indicator: Evidence that the egg and fingerling producer must have an equivalent or better health status than that of the grow-out facility, and b. Prepare a letter informing egg and fingerling producers that they must evaluate eggs and fry using health status metrics must follow all national and local The letter was seen at the audit. The farm sent the required letter to the eggs suppliers 9.8.2016 (jurisdictional) guidance on disease developed by the farm's veterinary health professional (see 4.1.2a). management
Compliant
Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
c. Maintains records of the farm's evaluations of the condition Records of the farm's evaluations of the condition of eggs and fingerlings upon delivery are available. of eggs and fingerlings upon delivery.
d. Others, please describe a. Prepare a letter informing egg and fry suppliers that they must disclose all chemical and antibiotic treatments on eggs The letter was seen at the audit. The letter was sent to the egg suppliers 9.8.2016 Indicator: Evidence of disclosure to and fry, along with stated rationale and the quantity used (see Indicator 7.1c). the grow-out farm of all chemical and
7.6
antibiotic treatments on eggs and fry, including the reason for their use and b.Optional: Farm may conduct voluntary set tests on a the quantity used subsample of eggs and fry for each stocking event, to test for chemical and antibiotic use consistent with the supplier's Requirement: Yes declaration.
Compliant No chemical and antibiotic test on a subset of samples for each major stocking event are performed
Applicability: All
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
37
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
Compliance Criteria (Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence 1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team. 2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate. 3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe in the blue cells below.
Evaluation (Per indicator, select one category Justification of classification of NC in the drop-down Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the menu) classification of any NCs or non-applicability
Applicability: All c. Others, please describe
7.7
Indicator: Allowance for the use of therapeutic treatments, including antibiotics or other treatments, that are banned under European Union (EU) law
a. Inform egg and fry suppliers in writing that the farm will not purchase from suppliers using any therapeutants or antibiotics Statement seen at the audit. The statement was sent to the suppliers 9.8.2016. that are banned under EU law.
Requirement: Not permitted
b. Compare any results from 7.6b to the farm's EU banned list (see 4.2.2a) to show that the egg and fry suppliers do not use There is no use of banned antibiotics or chemicals on the egg suppliers farms banned chemicals.
Applicability: All
c. Others, please describe
a. For every supplier of fry and egg to the farm, obtain a copy of the supplier's Fish Health Management Plan (FHMP).
7.8
Indicator: Presence of a fish health management plan implemented in agreement with the facility’s designated veterinarian Requirement: Yes Applicability: All
Minor
FHMPs are available from Troutex and FREA
b. Ensure that the egg and fry supplier's FHMP is reviewed and updated at least annually with signatures by management see 7.8. A indicating approval. Compliant c. Ensure that the egg and fry supplier's designated veterinarian reviews and approves the FHMP annually and after each update of the FHMP, by signature.
See 7.8. A
d. Others, please describe
7.9
a. For suppliers identified in 2.4.1a, obtain a copy of the supplier's company-level policies and procedures relating to Indicator: Evidence of companykey ILO labor issues. level policies and procedures that demonstrate the company's commitment to each of the 8 key ILO labor issues described in Principle 6 -
Compliant company-level policies and procedures are available from the suppliers
see 7.9 A
Compliant
Requirement: Yes Applicability: All c. Others, please describe
7.10
Indicator: Evidence of regular communication, engagement and consultation with surrounding communities Requirement: Yes
a. Ensure that the farm obtains documentary evidence from egg and fry suppliers of regular communciations with surrounding community as described under 6.9.2a, 6.9.2b, 6.9.2c and 6.9.2d
Evidence of the supplier's regular communication with surrounding communities is available. Seen for Troutex. Compliant
b. Others, please describe
Applicability: All
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0 Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
38
ASC Audit Report - Traceablity Description of risk factor if present. 10
Traceability Factor
10.1 The possibility of mixing or substitution of certified and non-certified product, including product of the same or similar appearance or Fole Dambrug is a single site farm. There will be only certified species, produced within the same operation. fish on the farm. There are several external non ASC certified trout farms in Denmark. The risk of introducing uncertified trout is considered low because of the well implemented quality management system. Nielsby Dambrug have detailed production records which demonstrate number juveniles and large trout in the various sections of the farms. The annual production is approximately 700 tons. The tracking, tracing and segregation system in use is considered adequate. Der er kun ASC certificerede fisk på dambruget. Risiko for at der introduceres ikke ASC fisk på dambruget er meget lav pga det velimplementerede kvalitets system. Dambruget har registrering af æg, yngel og større fisk i de forskellige sektioner på dambruget. Den årlige produktion er ca 700 tons. Sporbarhedssystemet overholder ASC standardens krav.
10.2 The possibility of mixing or substitution of certified and non-certified product, including Subcontractors transport the market size trout from Fole product of the same or similar appearance or Dambrug to the slaughterhouse The traceability during species, present during production, harvest, transport is covered by the slaughterhouse ASC-CoC transport, storage, or processing activities. certification. Underleverandører transportere ørreder fra Nielsby Dambrug til slagteri. Sporbarheden af fisk under transport er dækket af slagteriets ASC- CoC certificering.
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Traceability
Describe any traceability, segregation, or other systems in place to manage the risk.
Fole Dambrug has implemented full traceability through production software Dambase. Dambruget har registrering af yngel og større fisk i de forskellige sektioner på dambruget via Dambase.
Subcontractors transport the market size trout from Fole Dambrug to the slaughterhouse The traceability during transport is covered by the slaughterhouse ASC-CoC certification. Underleverandører transportere ørreder fra Nielsby Dambrug til slagteri. Sporbarheden af fisk under transport er dækket af slagteriets ASC- CoC certificering.
1/3
10.3 The possibility of subcontractors being used to handle, transport, store, or process certified Subcontractors transport the market size trout from Fole products. Dambrug to the slaughterhouse. The traceability during transport is covered by the slaughterhouse ASC-CoC certification. Some of the trout are sold to slaughterhouse Agustson A/S ( ASC-C-00029). Underleverandører transportere ørreder fra Fole Dambrug til slagteri. 10.4 Any other opportunities where certified product could potentially be mixed, substituted, or mislabelled with non-certified product before the point where product enters the chain of custody.
10.5 Detail description of the flow of certified product within the operation and the associated traceability system which allows product to be traced from final sale back to the unit of certification
The risk is small. The traceability during transport is covered by the slaughterhouse's ASC-CoC certification. Some of the trout are sold to slaughterhouse Agustson A/S (ASC-C-00029). Sporbarheden af fisk under transport er dækket af slagteriets ASC- CoC certificering. Dambruget sælger bl.a. til Agustson A/S (ASC-C-00029).
Subcontractors transport the market size trout from Fole Dambrug to the slaughterhouse. The traceability during transport is covered by the slaughterhouse ASC-CoC certification. Underleverandører transportere ørreder fra Fole Dambrug til slagteri. Sporbarheden af fisk under transport er dækket af slagteriets ASC- CoC certificering
Kongeåens Dambrug has implemented full traceability through production software Dambase. Dambruget har registrering af yngel og større fisk i de forskellige sektioner på dambruget via Dambase.
Fole Dambrug produces juvenile trout to Kongeåens Dambrug and Nielsby Dambrug which belongs to the same company and market size trout. The trout are produced from eggs. The egg supplier is Troutex. Juveniles are supplier by FREA. The trout will be covered by slaughterhouse ASC-CoC certification from the point where the fish is harvested on the farm and pumped into the truck which transport the fish live to the slaughterhouse. Fole Dambrug producer sættefisk og portions ørreder. Sættefisk leveres til Kongeåens dambrug Nielsby dambrug som tilhører samme firma. Ørrederne producers fra eg indkøbt fra Troutex. Ørrederne er dækket af slagteriets CoC certificering fra det punkt hvor fisken pumpes levende fra leveringsdammen på dambruget op i lastbilen der transportere fisken levende til slagteriet.
10.6 Traceablity Determination:
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Traceability
2/3
10.6.1 The traceability and segregation systems in the operation are sufficient to ensure all products identified and sold as certified by the operation originate from the unit of certification, or and segregation systems are 10.6.2 The traceability
Fole Dambrugs traceability and segregation system is sufficient to ensure all products identified and sold as certified by the operation originate from the unit of certification. Dambruget har registrering af yngel og større fisk i de forskellige sektioner på dambruget via Dambase. Dambrugets sporbarhedssystem overholder ASC standardens krav NA
not sufficient and a separate chain of custody certification is required for the operation before products can be sold as ASC-certified or can be eligible to carry the ASC logo.
10.6.3 The point from which chain of custody is required to begin.
At the point where the fish is harvested on the farm and pumped into the truck which transport the fish live to the slaughterhouse. Fra det punkt hvor ørrederne pumpes fra dambruget og op i fisketransport bilen
10.6.4 Is a sepearate chain of custody certificate required for the producer?
No, the farm does not need a separate Chain of Custody Certificate. Nej. Det er ikke nødvendigt med en separat CoC certificering af dambruget.
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Traceability
3/3
ASC Audit Report - Closing 11 Findings 11.1 A summary table that lists all non-conformities and observations NC reference NC Status Clause Reference Description of NC
Descriptions of actions pending
1 2.5.3
Records from regular staff trainings on escape prevention procedures are not available. Registrering af træning af medarbejdere i forebyggelse af udslip af fisk er ikke tilgængelig
Closed
4.1.2
Evidence of health screening on a sub-sample of fish prior to a decision to transfer each batch of fish is not available. Evidence of traning of farm staff on how to evaluate fish condition using health status metrics is not None. The NC is closed with an available. Der forelægger ikke tilstrækkeligt dokumentation for at hver action plan. Ingen. Afvigelsen gruppe af fisk er blevet vurderet iht. de af dambruget udvalgte fiske helse er lukket med en aktion plan kriterier. Dokumentation for træning af medarbejdere i evaluering af fiskenes sundhedstilstand mangler.
Closed
4.1.4
The farm use Virkon S as a disinfectant in food bath. But there is no info on None. The NC is closed. Ingen. Virkon S in the hygiene plans. Det fremgår ikke af dambrugets Afvigelsen er lukket fiskehelseplan (FHP) at Virkon S bruges som desinfektionsmiddel
4.1.5
The farm is not able to document that national legislation with respect to transport of dead fish has been followed. See: https://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/Leksikon/Sider/Animalskebiprodukter.aspx. Dambruget kan ikke dokumentere at den Danske lovgivning vedrørende transport af død fisk er overholdt. https://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/Leksikon/Sider/Animalskebiprodukter.aspx.
Closed
None. The NC is closed with an action plan. Ingen. Afvigelsen er lukket med en aktion plan
2
3
4
Closed
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Closing
None. The NC is closed. Ingen. Afvigelsen er lukket
1/4
5
Closed
4.1.8
According to the FHP the maximum stock in juvenile section 1 is 100 kg per raceway. The actual stock was not know to the farm management at the None. The NC is closed. Ingen. audit in raceway number 15 and 16. Ifølge FHP så er max biomasse i Afvigelsen er lukket kummehus 1 100 kg per kummen. Den faktiske biomasse i disse kummer er ikke registreret.
Closed
6.4.1
Training of workers in health and safety issues performed last time 28.1.2014 as part of an evaluation of the workplace hazards (APV). APV blev gennemført sidste gang 28.1.2014
6.4.4.
Audit evidence. Eye wash solution and first aid kits expired. Eye wash solution is not available in the chemical storage room. Safety data sheet on None. The NC is closed. Ingen. medicine are not available. Øjeskylle væske og materiale i Afvigelsen er lukket førstehjælpskassen er udgået på dato. Øjeskyllevæske findes ikke i kemikalie rum. Der mangler sikkerheds datablade for medicin
Closed
6.4.5
The health and safety assessment of site facilities is not adequate. Audit finding: some old underground tanks located between junenile section 1 and juvenile section 2 are covered with old and unstable plywood. This hazard has not been fully addressed. Der forelægger ikke tilstrækkelig dokumentation for at der er blevet foretaget en gennemgang af arbejdssikkerhed på dambruget. Audit fund: Betong kummer mellem kummehus 1 og 2 er dækket med gammelt krydsfiner.
Closed
6.7.2
Written policy for disciplinary action which explicitly states that its aim is to None. The NC is closed. Ingen. assist the worker to improve is not available. Der mangler skriftlig politik og Afvigelsen er lukket procedure der har som mål at forbedre medarbejdernes arbejdsindsats.
Closed
6.9.2
Evidence of consultations with the local community is not available. Der forelægger ikke tilstrækkelig dokumentation for at ASC standardens krav mht. regelmæssig kommunikation med det lokale samfund er overholdt.
6 None. The NC is closed with an action plan. Ingen. Afvigelsen er lukket med en aktion plan
7
Closed
8
9
None. The NC is closed. Ingen. Afvigelsen er lukket
10
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Closing
None. The NC is closed with an action plan. Ingen. Afvigelsen er lukket med en aktion plan
2/4
11.2 A copy of the non-conformtity report form completed for each non-conformity and observation raised. 11.3 If any approved requests for variations or interpretations have been used, a full copy of the approved variation or interpretation form shall be appended If to the report. used in raing an NC, the ASC reference number (NCF 5) and a justitification for its use (NCF 6) shall be completed in the NC report form. 12 Evaluation Results 12.1 A report of the results of the audit of the operation against the specific elements in the standard and guidance documents. 12.2 A clear statement on whether or not the audited unit of certification has the capability to consistently meet the objectives of the relevant standard(s).
A draft report containing the results of the audit has been developed. Draft rapport indeholdende audit resultater er skrevet
Based on the draft audit report the unit of certification has the capability to consistently meet the objectives of the relevant ASC trout standard - version 1. Bureau Veritas will make the certification decision based on the audit report and evidence gathered as the result of information submitted by stakeholders. Baseret på audit resultatet overholder dambruget ASC ørred standardens krav. Bureau Veritas vil basere certificerings beslutning på audit rapport og information modtaget fra interessenter.
123 In cases where Biodiversity Environmental NA. Ikke aktuel Impact Assessment (BEIA) or Participatory Social Impact Assessment (PSIA) is available, it shall be added in full to the audit report. IF these documents are not in English, then a synopsis in English shall be 13 Decision 13.1 Has a certificate been issued? (yes/no)
13.2 The Eligiblity Date (if applicable)
No. This is a draft report. Nej dette er en draft rapport
NA. Ikke aktuel
13,3 Is a separate coc certificte required for the No. Nej producer? (yes/no) 13.4 If a certificate has been issued this section NA. Ikke aktuel shalldate include: of issue and date of expiry of the NA. Ikke aktuel 13.4.1 The certificate.
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Closing
3/4
13.4.2 The scope of the certificate
Planned scope: ASC Trout. Aquaculture: Species Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
13.4.3 Instructions to stakeholders that any complaints or objections to the CAB decision are to be subject to the CAB's complaints procedure. This section shall include information on where to review the procedure and where further information on complaints can be found.
Stakeholders are welcome to contact ASC Lead auditor Lars Windmar on email:
[email protected]. Mobile phone: +45 50 88 83 95 or Bureau Veritas on email
[email protected]. Information on Bureau Veritas complaint's procedure is available on www.bureauveritas.dk. Interessenter kan kontakte ASC lead auditor Lars Windmar på email
[email protected]. Telefon +45 50 88 83 95 eller Bureau Veritas på email MSC
[email protected]. Informatioin om Bureau Veritas klage procedure kan findes på www.bureauveritas.dk.
14 Surveillence 14.1 Next planned Surveillance 14.1.1 Planned date 14.1.2 Planned site 14.2 Next audit type 14.2.1 Surveillence 1 14.2.2 Surveillance 2 14.2.3 Re-certification 14.2.4 Other (specify type)
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Closing
4/4
