Flavour Physics and CP Violation

Flavour Physics and CP Violation Robert Fleischer CERN, Department of Physics, Theory Unit Helmholtz International Summer School “Heavy Quark Physics”...
Author: Raymond Collins
2 downloads 2 Views 640KB Size
Flavour Physics and CP Violation Robert Fleischer CERN, Department of Physics, Theory Unit Helmholtz International Summer School “Heavy Quark Physics” Dubna, Russia, 6–16 June 2005 (III)

Lecture III • Rare Decays: – Example: Bs,d → µ+µ− • How Could New Physics Enter in the Roadmap of Quark-Flavour Physics? • What about New Physics in Bd → J/ψKS? • Challenging the Standard Model through Bd → φKS • The B → ππ, πK Puzzles & Rare K and B Decays: →

Example of a systematic strategy to search for NP

1. “B → ππ puzzle” 2. “B → πK puzzle” 3. Connection with rare K and B decays

Rare B Decays

→ complement CP-B!

• These processes originate from b → s or b → d flavour-changing neutral current transitions, i.e. do not receive tree contributions in the SM: – B → K ∗γ, B → ργ, ... – B → K ∗µ+µ−, B → ρµ+µ−, ... – Bs,d → µ+µ− ⊕ inclusive decays: b → sγ, b → s`+`−, ... • Characteristic features in the SM: – Exhibit small branching ratios at the 10−4...10−10 level. – Do not – apart from B → ργ – show sizeable CP violation in the SM. Important probes to search for new physics! [Many reviews: Ali; Buras; Greub; Hurth; Mannel; Misiak; ...]

A More Detailed Example: Bs,d → µ++µ−−

A More Detailed Example: Bs,d → µ µ

• Originate from Z penguins and box diagrams in the SM:

• Originate from Z penguins and box diagrams in the SM: s, d

t

W

Z µ

b

µ νµ

t

t

b

s, d W

µ

W

+ ...

µ

• Belong to the cleanest decays in the field of rare B decays: • Belong the cleanest in the field of rare B decays: – Only the matrix toelement of a decays quark current is required: fBq – NLO QCD– corrections calculated. Only matrix were element of quark current is required: fBq – Long-distance contributions are expected to be negligible. – NLO QCD corrections have been calculated.

[Buchalla & Buras (1993); Buchalla, Isidori & Rey (1997)] [Buchalla & Buras (1993)]

• Branching ratios in the SM:contributions → LHCare expected to be negligible. – Long-distance [Buchalla, Isidori & Rey (1997)] +



BR(Bs → µ µ ) = 4.1×10

−9

»

fB s 0.24 GeV

–2 »

s→d



mt 167 GeV

• Standard-Model branching ratios: → +



BR(Bd → µ µ ) : + −

−9

–3.12 »

LHC

O(10

−10

|Vts| 0.040

)

BR(Bs → µ µ ) = 4.1 × 10 [Details: Buras » –2&» R.F., hep-ph/9704376] –3.12 » – » – fBs mt |Vts | 2 τBs ×

–2 »

τBs 1.5 ps



• Current experimental upper bounds: +