Example of Business Process Improvement By Martin Smith Contact Martin Smith at
[email protected].
Abstract: This project is an example of business process improvement, or re-engineering as it is sometimes called. The corporation was not radically re-structured; instead, one department achieved significant gains in efficiency and quality of service by re-designing several processes. A small team of front-line supervisors and managers did the design work and then carried out the implementation of the new process design. Two internal consultants supported the team. The project was characterized by a disciplined approach, strong executive support and quantified results.
Situation: The setting was the Accounting Department of a local telephone company. The department had about 500 employees. Most were assigned to two work centers. 3.5 million bills were issued each month to business and residence customers. Critical Business Issue: Reduce expenses by 8-10% in each of the next five years. Intervention: Re-design the CASH PROCESS. This process involves receipt of the customer’s payment, crediting the customer’s account and depositing the amount in the company’s account.
Exhibit 1. Relationship Map Specific to Cash Process
Re giona l Te le phone Com pa ny
Corporate Data Center
Loca l Te le phone Compa ny
Accounting De pa rtme nt
Coin Collections
Cash Sum m ary
Public Communications
Dishonored Check s Dishonored Check s Error Reports Data Corrections
Revenue Accounting Office
Bank Central Cash Unit
Investigation Investigation Requests Requests
Notify of Out of Balance
Customer Service Centers
Investigation Requests
Balance Sheet Data
Unidentified Paym ents Paym ents
Dishonored Check s
Proof for Cash Sum m ary
Information Systems Support Group
Unidentified Paym ents
Refund Data
Payment Agents
Paym ents Inquiries
Treasury Corporate books
Inquiries
Refunds
Customers
Exhibit 2. Schedule for Design Phase Week
Project Activity
1. Train the Team
1 2
3
4
5 6
7
8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Start: Sept 17
2. Plan the Project 3. Prepare Relationship Map 4. Build IS Map 5. Identify Disconnects 6. Patch or Redesign? 7. Define Attributes 8. Build SHOULD Map 9. Specify Measures 10. Stakeholder Review 12. Revise
13. Formulate Recommendations 14. Decide What to Implement NOTE: The Project Team worked full time for 4 weeks and part time for 10 weeks.
End: Dec 15
Exhibit 3. Flowchart for Sub-Process, Dishonored Checks, BEFORE the Re-design Bank
1 Di shonored Check Rec eived from Customer's Bank
24 Bank Fi les Updated
3 End
2
Central Cash Unit
Yes
47 Process Payment
32 Correct
Mem o Card
Upda ted Custom er Account Data
Check
Our Cus tomer ?
Daily Bank Stat ement
4 No
Resident of XYZ State?
Yes
6 Prepare Form to Re-bill Cus tomer
7 Prepare Form to Adjust Customer's Account
12 Enter Adjus tment i nto Busi ness Office Support System
No
14 System Correctly Updated?
No Form
19 Yes
16 Corr ect Err or
17 Alert Service Rep
Correction
Dai ly Cash Sheets (Form 508) Prepared to Reflect Di shonored Checks
21 Fi le di shonored Checks
20 Mai l Copy
30 Bal ance Dai ly Bank Statement
No 31 Bal ance ?
Yes
34 Printout Corr ect?
No
33
41 Pul l Check and Cal l Bank
End
Yes 43 Funds Availa ble ?
No
44
45
Enter Note in Busi ness Office Support System
Enter Note in BOSS and Prepare Memo Card
Acco unt Debi t Form 508
5 Ca sh O pe ration
26
Prepare Tra nsaction Form 770
29 Veri fy Printout
27 Batch 508's
Re-bal ance Form 508's
35 Corr ect Err ors
Yes Transact ion Ticket
B atched Forms
8 Da ta Entry Group
28 Data Keyed
Key Data
36 Transmit Batch Li sting Printout
Electroni c Tran smission
Com pute r Roo m
Corrections
37 Execute Run 1
9 Execute
Custome r ser vice Cente r
18 Contact Cus tomer
Electroni c Tran smission
Yes 38 Redeposit?
Yes 39 No
Check Returned ?
Notificatio n to Return Custom er Check
No
50 Contact Cus tomer to Resol ve
40 End
Electronic Me ssage
10 Systems
Service Order System
15 Busi ness Office Support System
51 Cash System
48 Busi ness Office Support System
49 Busi ness Office Support System
NOTE. Do not try to read the content of the process steps but rather understand the diagramming conventions. Rows represent work groups or computer systems. Boxes indicate steps where work is performed. Diamonds are decision points. Lines crossing the boundaries between rows represent hand-offs from one function to another. Compare Exhibit 7 to Exhibit 3. The old design had 50 steps compared to the 24 steps in the new design.
46 Mai l Check to Cus tomer
Exhibit 7. Flowchart for Sub-Process, Dishonored Checks, AFTER the Re-design Cycle Ti me
(7 Days)
(1 Day)
(1 Day)
4 Ba nk, Payment Proce ssing Agent, o r Ele ctronic Funds Transfe r
1 Dis honored Check Received
2 Check Presented Second Time for Payment
3 Yes
Returned Again?
No
7 End
Can Check Be Autodebited?
No
Yes
6 Checks & Listing Forwarded
5 Debits Listed
List
List and Che ck s
No
Check
Cash Operation
9 Cus tomer Account Debited
12 Total Entered on Daily Worksheet
Electronic Tra nsaction
13 Data Entered into Business Office Support System
18 Statements Filed
19 Res ident of XYZ State?
Yes
20 $5 Charge Debited to Customer's Account List
Work sh eet
Data En try Group
17 Daily Bank St at ement Balanced
Data
22 Batch Listing Transmitted
10 Run 1 Executed
Batch
23 Run AB01 Executed
Compute r Room Data
14 Balance Pos ted to Treasury Daily Report
Treasury
Systems
11 Cash System
15 End
16 Business Office Support System
24 Cus tomer Record Info System
21 End
Exhibit 4. Categories of Disconnects (total of 62) • • • • • •
Duplication of effort Steps that should be performed by other departments Discrepancies between the two processing centers Unnecessary steps Cycle time delays Opportunities for automation. Exhibit 5. Categories of Recommendations (total of 32)
• • • • • • • •
Automation of manual activities Work elimination Transfer of responsibilities and personnel from one department to another Job redesign Measurement plan for tracking process performance Documentation of work procedures Training to cover the new procedures Re-arrangement of the work force Exhibit 6. Design Attributes for “Dishonored Checks” Sub-process Element
Attributes
Inputs
• Automatic check debiting • All checks processed twice by the bank • Non-company check volume reduced
Processing
• No re-depositing of checks • Fewer hand-offs • Manual forms eliminated
Outputs
• Debit reflected ASAP • “Uncollectables” reduced
Implementation: 29 of the 32 recommendations were implemented within 12 months of the executive decision to proceed. A year-to-year comparison yielded the following results.
Exhibit 8. Results Measure
Result
Process Steps
• 44% Reduction from 422 to 237 steps
Manually Processed Payments
• 90% reduction from 42,000 to 4,000 per month
Unplaced cash (payment cannot be credited to an account)
• 43% reduction
Customer Queries about processing of payment
• 44% reduction
Force
• 45% fewer employees assigned to Cash process
Operating Expense
• $930,000 reduction in annual expense
Postscript: the General Manager commissioned another project at the time this project entered the implementation phase. Over the next two years, two additional projects were undertaken. Together, these projects encompassed about 75% of the department’s work activity.
Exhibit 9. Lessons According to the Project Team • Start with a small process, something that can be done in a short timeframe. • Set clear time lines. Keep them firm. Keep short intervals between target dates. This policy reinforces accountabilities and maintains momentum of the project. • Don’t dissipate resources over too many projects. Limit the organization to two projects at one time, one in design and the other in implementation. • Include key stakeholders on the project team. Work units responsible for the process must be represented on the team. The staff who maintain the supporting computer systems should also be represented. • Focus on short term pay-offs. Pay-offs should be quantified in terms of financial, cycle time and customer service results. • Use a PC for all flowcharting and documentation. Capture entries on the PC while the team is working out the design on the easel. Edit the draft off-line. • Manage the on-going process immediately. Don’t wait for all the changes to be implemented. Collect measurement data as soon as practical. Schedule process reviews as part of the GM’s staff meeting at least once a month. Exhibit 10. Lessons According to the Author • The support of the General Manager and the senior management team was essential. They enforced strict adherence to the project schedule. They attended the same training as the team. They met at decision points with the project team. The GM initiated quarterly sessions with all management and representative non-management personnel to review the status of each of several processes. Measurement trends and improvement plans were reviewed for each process. • Any given change effort requires coordination with other change efforts to ensure adequate resources. • Another alignment issue was the coordination of the process change with departmental strategy on one hand, and job-level design on the other hand. Further Information: Bisson, B., Folk, V. and Smith, M.E. (2000). Case study: How to do a business process improvement. Quality and Participation, 23 (1), pp. 58-63. www.stractics.com