Embodied emissions in trade (EET): insights from bilateral trade data
Embodied emissions in trade (EET): insights from bilateral trade data Misato Sato ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy LSE Friday 4th M...
Embodied emissions in trade (EET): insights from bilateral trade data Misato Sato ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy LSE Friday 4th March 2011 Envecon 2011 @ The Royal Society
!"
Presentation outline ! What is EET? ! In which policy context is it relevant? ! How much carbon is embodied in international trade? Some
estimates from the existing literature. ! An alternative approach ! 3 key findings ! discussion
“Embodied” emissions in trade
Largest interregional fluxes of emissions embodied in trade (Mt CO2 /y) from dominant net exporting countries to the dominant net importing countries. Davis & Caldeira (2010)
Fig. 1. sions e domin the do Fluxes aggreg France Luxem
Relevant policy contexts ! High level policy questions ! Sustainable development and ecological foot-printing ! Supply chain security and natural resource dependency ! National responsibility: production- vs consumption-based
approach to carbon accounting ! Environmental integrity of Kyoto Protocol etc.
! Specific and current debates ! Carbon leakage ! Border carbon adjustments ! Role of trade in decarbonising global supply chains
How much carbon is embodied in trade? Findings from the literature so far ! Many studies (over 50) quantifying EET ! Several approaches: ! Single Region Input Output (SRIO) ! Full / Partial Multi-Regional-Input Out (MRIO) ! Others e.g. material balance approach, multiplying trade balance and average carbon intensity of GDP, Hybrid LCA-MRIO, CGE models ! Simplified picture emerging and high uncertainty. ! Broad conclusions: ! Large volumes of EET have been found (for 2005-2006, between 4Gt7Gt annually or roughly 15-30% of global emissions) ! In general find that industrialised countries are net importers of EET..
Industrialised countries are in general net importers of EET. BEET against production by country The Balance of EET against CO2CO2 production by country in 2001(2001) (Peters & Hertwich (2008)) 25 South Africa Venezuela Malaysia Indonesia
20 Australia
Romania
10
10000
India
Canada
10000
15000
0
-15 -20
Italy
-10
Japan
-5
France
5000
Germany
0
UK
BEET (%)
5
China
Russia
15
Rest of Middle East
Czech Republic Belarus/Ukraine
USA
20000
Spain
- Total Global Emissions: 24.8 Gt CO2 - Total Embodied Emissions in Imports/Exports: 5.3Gt CO2 - Annex B Net import 1.34Gt (roughly 10% of Annex B emissions in 2001)
-25 CO2 emissions from production (Mt CO2)
Yet uncertainty around the results are high – a comparison of some estimates for China Study
Model
Year
Productio Consump EEE n (Mt) tion (Mt)
EEI
Weber et al (2008)
SRIO
2005
5030
5560
1679 (33%)
2200 (44%)
Huimin & Ye (2010)
SRIO
2005
5699
5039
1760 (31%)
1100 (19%)
Yan & Yang SRIO (2010)
2005
5429
4699
1180 (22%)
450 (8%)
Lin & Sun (2010)
Partial MRIO
2005
5458
3370
2670 (49%)
583 (11%)
Nakano et al Full (2009) MIRO
2005
4508
3921
794 (18%)
207 (5%)
Bruckner et al (2010)
2005
4449
3459
1357 (31%)
366 (8%)
Full MRIO
See forthcoming Sato (2011) www.cccep.ac.uk/Publications/Working-papers/home.aspx
The existing studies provide some interesting insights, yet….
1.
Non-trivial uncertainty in country-level EET estimates, as they are sensitive to base-data, model structure and multiple assumptions made
2. Appears to paint a very simplified picture 3. Not suitable for gaining more detailed insights about EET flows
and inform the “more specific” policy debates # A more granular approach to quantifying EET ! Forthcoming paper “Embodied carbon flows in global supply chains:
A study drawing on bilateral trade data” www.cccep.ac.uk/ Publications/Working-papers/home.aspx
Approach: “material balance” r,s r,s w EEEj =ΣXj * EFj ! Following Muradian et al. (2002) and others. ! EF from LCA data : around Cradle-to-gate estimates gathered from 9
databases and around 30 papers
! UN COMTRADE trade data, physical weight values ! Key strengths: ! Weight-based data, not monetary ! Transparent ! Disaggregated: 970 products (aggregated to 60 sectors) and all countries. All countries (195); Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) Rev 3, 4digit (plus some 5digit for important sectors), total some 970 commodities.
Some caveats ! No input-output - double counting ! Trade data: ! Reliability. Need to reconcile EEIr,s and EEEs,r ! No distinction between different production processes ! Problem of attributing exports to production
! Carbon intensity data ! Lack of harmonization in LCA, comparability of estimates ! world average Efjw ! No product classification – don’t readily match trade data
Despite the focus on China in the literature, most of the global EET occurs within Europe 41'!-% (4-% "3-% .!:% )*"% 8*9% '37% 56(% 1'*% 5(6% 34-% 12(% 0-*% ./)% -")% &*(% +,(% !"#$% ")*% &'(% !"#$% EU-internal ;%