Commission proposal recasting the WEEE Directive Orsolya CSORBA European Commission – DG Environment
IdentiPlast 2009
Outline of the presentation 1. Introduction
Policy context
Facts and figures
2. Recast of the WEEE Directive 3. Expected benefits from the proposal
Introduction
Policy context- across the Life-Cycle Natural Resources
Disposal
Waste & Recycling
Natural Resources
Reuse, Recycling, Recovery
Design
SCP: Better Products
Manufacturing
Collection
Distribution Use
SCP: Smarter Consumption
SCP: Leaner Production
Facts and figures Dynamic market Î
Expanding electronics market - fast innovation cycles
Î
Yearly 10.3 million tonnes of electrical and electronic equipment are placed on the market in the EU-27
Fast growing waste stream Î
WEEE generation: around 9 mn tonnes per year
Î
Forecast: 12.3 million tonnes of WEEE by 2020
Î
up to 24 kg WEEE per EU inhabitant per year
Why a WEEE Directive? Fastest growing waste stream 90% was landfilled, incinerated or recovered without pretreatment Use of hazardous materials RoHS and WEEE Directives to solve this
Present WEEE Directive Collection of waste (collection target: 4kg/ person yearly) Treatment, reuse, recycling and recovery of WEEE Recycling and recovery targets Producer responsibility – financing the waste management Situation changed since WEEE and RoHS- but still not optimal
Revision of the Directive
Main problems “Leakage” of WEEE Î
Sub-standard treatment in EU
Î
Illegal waste shipments out of EU
Administrative burden Î
Registration and reporting requirements for producers
Lack of clarity – hampers markets Î
Unclearities in scope
Î
Unclearities in definitions (free riding)
Problems related to waste leakage Only 33% WEEE is reported as collected and treated 13% goes to landfill 54% potentially to substandard treatment inside and outside the EU (Illegal trade to 3rd countries )
¾ Environmental Damage ¾ Materials to replace raw materials are lost ¾ Loss of business opportunity for waste industry and related employment
Leakage of WEEE 54% possibly to unauthorised treatment and / or illegal export
33% Household
13% Landfills
Collection facility/retailer/ 2nd hand shop
Proper treatmentrecyclingrecovery
Key issues of the WEEE recast (1) Changed collection target Î
65% by weight of EEEs placed on MS market in the two preceding years on average (non household appliances included) by producers by 2016 Better enforcement of the Directive Î Export of WEEE and treatment of WEEE Î Minimum monitoring requirements for shipments of WEEE Changed recycling/reuse target Î Increased targets by 5% for reuse of whole appliances Î Recovery and recycling /reuse target for medical devices
Key issues of the WEEE recast (2) Better control of waste - through the supply chain Extended Producer Responsibility Î
Member States to encourage producers to finance all the cost occurring for collection facilities from private households
Important because: Î
Reduce sub-optimal treatment or illegal shipping
Î
Net benefit for producers from direct access to WEEE
Producers totally or partially in 18 MS already pay for these costs
Key issues of the WEEE recast (3) Reduced administrative burden Î Harmonised registration and reporting for producers Î National producer registers to be inter-operational Î Potential savings for industry of up to over 60 million € expected Clarification of scope Î Clarified which appliances excluded from the scope Î Comitology to categorise household and non-household equipments Clarification of definitions and alignment with other policies Î Definitions (ex: with waste framework directive) Î Visible fee allowed in line with SCP
Expected benefits from the proposal
Expected impacts Environmental improvement Î Better control of the waste stream Better regulation Î Improved clarity Î Administrative burden reduction Business opportunity Î More revenue and jobs for the waste treatment sector Î Recycling creates 5 to 7 times more jobs than incineration, 10 times more jobs than disposal at landfills Î Contributes to the employment of long term unemployed and disadvantaged Î Recovered material value of ~ € 2 bn a year
European Commission
[email protected]
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/