2007 Performance Management for Utilities Measuring, Managing and Improving Utilities
DEVELOPING A CUSTOMERFOCUSED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Mark A. Halleman Infrastructure Management Group Inc. July 30, 2007
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
1
Agenda • Introduction…..starting with the end in mind • The process • Important preliminary decisions • Getting started • Results Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
2
Introduction This presentation is about the process of developing an Executive Management Dashboard that displayed KPIs for 22 divisions. It is about starting with pencil and paper and not about simply selling a software solution. Results included: • A set of validated, customer-focused performance measures for selected departments. • Increased awareness of the value of using performance information • A validated and established process for collecting and reporting performance measures for selected departments. • A trained staff that was familiar with the process of collecting, reporting, and most importantly using performance measures as a management tool Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
3
And how we moved from this…
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
4
15.229
Chr: 191 on 2/13
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
5
to this…
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
6
… and finally to this!
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
7
and this…
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
8
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
9
Alan Brache says… Brache, Alan P. How Organizations Work – Taking a Holistic Approach to Enterprise Health. New York: John Wiley & Sons, inc., 2002
Typical information/knowledge management weaknesses include: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Assuming that computers are the solution. Putting computer cart before the business horse. Tolerating a culture that discourages knowledge sharing. Assuming that information technology has to be managed internally. Underestimating cost and time. Installing systems that do not provide strategic information. Assuming that e-buiness will enable new markets. Delegating information/knowledge management to the Information System Department. Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
10
The Process beginning with paper & pencil
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
11
Why Was This Project Undertaken? To be able to demonstrate that we were: • Doing the right things, supporting the core mission • Doing them the right way, improving efficiency, increasing productivity and reducing operating costs • Improving service delivery • Increasing customer service • Ensuring regulatory compliance • Mitigating the impact of future rate increases
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
12
Important Preliminary Decisions Making some preliminary decisions before you start will pay dividends later on…….. Create a Steering Team EMT • Characteristics for an effective team
Create Design Teams • Criteria for selecting team members
Decide where to start • Criteria for selecting
Hiring an outside consultant • What can a consultant do that we can’t do for ourselves?
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
13
Important Preliminary Decisions Creating Teams Create a Steering Team - EMT • Characteristics of an effective team • Made up from utility staff • Champions committed to the success of the effort (leaders) • Have the position power to see that commitments are met. (overcome No’s)
Create Design Teams • Criteria for selecting team members
Decide where to start • Criteria for selecting Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
14
Important Preliminary Decisions Creating Teams Create a Steering Team EMT • Characteristics for an effective team
Create Design Teams • Attributes of team members • Credible • Technically knowledgeable • Potential change agents • Trustworthy
Decide where to start • Criteria for selecting
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
15
Important Preliminary Decisions Finding the right place to start. Create a Steering Team EMT • Characteristics for an effective team
Create Design Teams • Criteria for selecting team members
Decide where to start • Selection Criteria: • High external customer visibility and a core function • Big and complex enough to demonstrate that the effort is worthwhile • Manageable enough to control and developed quickly • Strong likelihood of success • Quickly produces tangible benefits Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
16
Important Preliminary Decisions Make certain the team knows what it is suppose to do….. When Chartering a Team, Define: Its responsibilities What decisions it is authorized to make Who they report to, and when and how to do so What decisions lay beyond the DT’s responsibility boundaries • They have a responsibility to ask, “Are the right people on the team?” or “Do we need additional resources?” or “Do we need a decision to be made by the EMT?” • When progress will be evaluated • When the team’s work is completed • • • •
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
17
Important Preliminary Decisions Should I have outside help? Hiring a consultant • Provide continuity for the team as DT members were required to perform their normal duties • Bring experience and expert knowledge of the “process” of change • Function as neutral facilitators • Provide objective feedback to keep the Utility’s teams to stay focused and on track • Planning and facilitating the workshops and provide OJT training and knowledge transfer to participants • Provide another perspective and serve as content experts as well as process experts - Serve as a catalyst for change
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
18
General Criteria for Creating Performance Measures • Applied across the entire enterprise • Reflect the voice of the customer • Serve as management levers • Are dynamic and need to be routinely reviewed to make sure that they provide meaningful information • Measures continuous improvement, identify opportunities for training, justify new tools, etc
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
19
Establishing Measures Determining what should be measured? • Create a work catalog • Separate activities into core, support and convenience activities • Focus on Core Service delivery • Use of Action Verbs • Ask, “How can you prove to yourself that you are doing the right thing and doing it the right way?” • Avoid asking • How it can be measured? • Is the data available? Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
20
Establishing Measures Use a Balanced Approach Performance management is a balancing act of three competing forces: • Effectiveness – doing the right things - right. “There’s no sense doing well what shouldn’t be done at all.”
•
Efficiency – the unit cost or measurement that highlights the “cheapest, fastest, lowest, highest, etc.”
•
Quality – not reducing costs in ways that sacrifice safety, environmental compliance, or customer satisfaction. “voice of the customer.” “value is in the eyes of the receiver.” “delight has a price.”
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
21
Establishing Measures Design a Proof of Concept • • • • • • • • •
Collect data Record data Review information Validate assumptions Check alignment with Business Plans Address logistical issues Refine and adjust measures Design reports (tables, graphs, wallboards, etc.) Verify that the message is received Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
22
Keep People Informed Design a Communication Plan before it’s too late. Consider a plan to keep people informed: • Who needs to know what? • When do they need to know? • What’s the message? • By whom should they be told, and how? Present the information in a manner that is easily interpreted
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
23
Wall Placards Used to Communicate Progress Attendance
Peak Demand vs. Treatment Capacity Treatm ent capacity
Backlog of Important Work
Average
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
Electric Consumption
Lake Huron WTP - 2004
Lake Huron WTP - 2004 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500
Average
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
January
February
0
Average
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
kWh per MG Treated
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
January
Employee Days
May
March
January
February
Peak dem and
Average
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
Lake Huron WTP - 2004
400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
MGD
100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% 82% 80%
April
Lake Huron WTP - 2004
Plant-to-Plant Comparison Attendance
Backlog of Important Work
WTP Plant-to-Plant Com parison - June 2004
Electric Consumption
Peak Demand vs. Treatment Capacity
WTP Plant-to-Plant Com parison - June 2004
WTP Plant-to-Plant Com parison - June 2004
WTP Plant-to-Plant Com parison - June 2004 500
80
100%
2,500
450
70
400
96%
60
92% 90% 88% 86%
80% Springw ells
Lake Huron
Waterw orks park
Northeast
240
250
225
210
155
150
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
Southw est
300
200
30
0
Northeast
Springwells
125
120
130
100
10
82%
300
300
40
20
84%
Treatm ent Capacity
350
50 MGD
Employee Days
94%
Peak Dem and
380
Lake Huron
Southwest
Waterworks Park
24
2,000
kWh per MG Treated
98%
1,500
1,000
500
50
0
Northeast
Springw ells
Lake Huron
Southw est
Waterw orks Park
Northeast
Springw ells
Lake Huron
Southw est
Waterw orks Park
Communicating Performance Measures in the Field
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
25
Using Measures to Manage Improvement
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
26
The Results Demonstrable Success
Annual rate increase, %
New Director
Performance Improvement Program Began
Actual Rate Increases Projected Rate Increases Capital Investment
Results Demonstrable Success • • • • • •
A set of validated, customer-focused performance measures for selected departments. Increased awareness of the value and proper interpretation of performance measures A trained staff that was familiar with the process of collecting and reporting performance measures. A validated and established process for collecting and reporting performance measures for selected departments. A proven process for success for moving forward with the next set of selected departments. A list of requirements for a long-term, software solution that leveraged the use of existing software systems, where possible, that minimized new capital costs Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
28
Questions and Discussions
for more information contact:
[email protected]
Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.
29