2
Comparison of Stillborn Birth Weights and Postmortem Weights
3
Halit Pinar MD*, Murat Iyigun PhD**
1
4 5
*Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
6
Division of Perinatal and Pediatric Pathology
7
Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University
8 9 10
**Department of Economics University of Colorado, Boulder
11 12
Corresponding author:
13
Halit Pinar, MD
14
Women and Infants Hospital
15
101 Dudley Street,
16
Providence, RI 02905
17 18
Email:
[email protected]
19
Phone: (401) 274 1122, extension 1190
20
Fax: (401)
pmwt may17
21 22 23 24
Abstract Objective: To compare the agreement (concordance) of fetal birth weights (BW), and the postmortem weights (BMW) of stillborns. Methods: Birth weights obtained by the nurses in the labor and delivery
25
(LDR) were compared with the weights obtained prior to the postmortem
26
examination prospectively in 110 stillborns. The affects of gestational age,
27
degree of maceration and time elapsed from delivery to postmortem
28
examinations were also examined.
29
Results: There were 45 female and 65 male stillborns in the study. The
30
gestational ages ranged from 17 to 40 weeks. Degree of maceration ranged from
31
0 to 5; 0 being no maceration and 5 representing the most extreme condition,
32
which was mummification. There was a decrease in the weights of all stillborns
33
when their birthweights and postmortem weights were compared. The average
34
relative weight loss was 7.3%. When all the variables were examined, only the
35
degree of maceration was identified to play a significant role (p=008). Higher
36
the degree of maceration meant more weight loss.
37
Conclusion: There is significant discrepancy between the birth and
38
postmortem weights of stillborns. While gender, gestational age and time
39
elapsed from delivery to postmortem examination did not have a significant
2
pmwt may17 40
impact, degree of maceration affected this observed weight loss. In stillborns
41
birth weights are more accurate than the postmortem weights.
42
Introduction
43
Body weight is one of the most significant parameters in the assessment of
44
growth in the developing organisms. Postmortem examination plays an
45
essential role in our efforts to elucidate the causes of stillbirth. Measuring the
46
body weight is an integral part of this process. Initial weights of the stillborns
47
are routinely obtained in the delivery room usually within minutes of delivery.
48
Due to our initial observations of inconsistencies in these two values, we
49
decided to compare the weights obtained at birth and before the postmortem
50
examination in a prospective manner. The possible effects of gestational age,
51
duration of the elapsed time from delivery to the postmortem examination and
52
degree of maceration on the weight of the fetus were analyzed.
53
Methods
54
Over a period of a year beginning in January 2002, 110 stillborns were
55
prospectively evaluated for birth and postmortem weights, gestational age,
56
degree of maceration and the time elapsed from delivery to the time of the
57
postmortem examination. The birth weights of these stillborns obtained
58
immediately after delivery and they were weighed again before the initiation of
59
the postmortem examination. Clinically determined gestational ages were used 3
pmwt may17 60
in our evaluations. Degree of maceration was determined using a standardized
61
grading system that ranged from 0 (no maceration) to 5 (maximum degree of
62
maceration – mummification) (Table 1). The scales that were used in both
63
locations were the same make and model (Fisher-xxxxx, model xxxx) and had
64
been maintained by the same team of technicians. The temperature of the
65
morgue was monitored as part of the CAP requirements and did not show any
66
aberrations. The ambient room temperatures were similar in both locations and
67
did not differ between seasons. Immediately after delivery the fetuses were
68
weighed with one or two plastic cord clamps and one or two absorbent sheets
69
then they were placed in special body bags (made by xxxxx®) and kept in this
70
manner in the morgue. Postmortem weights were obtained without the body
71
bag but with the cord clamps and absorbent pads. The weights were recorded in
72
grams and values rounded up to two decimal places.
73
74
Statistical analysis was performed using
Results
75
There were 45 female and 65 male stillborns comprising the 110 cases in
76
the study. Gestational ages ranged from 17 to 40 weeks. There were 12 cases
77
≤19 weeks gestational age. Days elapsed from delivery to the postmortem
78
examination ranged from 0 to 5. The average was 000 days. There was only one
79
case that underwent a postmortem examination after 5 days. Placentas were 4
pmwt may17 80
available and examined in all the cases. Distribution of major diagnoses made
81
after the postmortem and placental examination is shown in Table 2.
82
In this prospective study when we compared the birth weights with
83
postmortem weights of 110 stillborns, we found that relative postmortem
84
weights were consistently 7.3% was lower than their birthweights. Gender,
85
birthweight, gestational age and elapsed time from delivery to the postmortem
86
examination did not have a measurable effect on the weight loss. Stillborns, who
87
had a higher degree of maceration lost more weight.
88
Discussion
89
The first essential step when examining the embryo, fetus, or infant is to
90
determine where the case fits in the scale of human development. Typically,
91
human form, function, and size change in a normal and predictable manner
92
from conception. If pathologic processes are to be understood, the changes
93
during normal growth and development must have reference either to the age of
94
the subject or to the stage of gestation. The most obvious change with time is an
95
increase in size or mass, and the simplest view of human fetal and infant
96
development would regard weight as the main criterion needed for the
97
assessment of fetal maturity. Small newborns have more significant morbidity
98
and mortality than individuals in any other comparable time of life [1-3], and
5
pmwt may17 99 100 101
the smaller the baby, the greater the risk. Premature stillborns weigh less than their liveborn counterparts. For similar reasons, weight plays a major role in the evaluation of stillborns
102
in attempts to identify the cause and the classification of death. In the absence
103
of reliable dates, the weights of the stillborns are used to distinguish a second
104
trimester spontaneous abortion from a stillbirth. Currently in the United States
105
the most common definition of stillbirth is a fetal death occurring at ≥20 weeks
106
gestational age or ≥350 g birth weight. So the weight of the stillborn, especially
107
when the gestational age is not known, is especially significant and weighing
108
errors result in unwanted consequences.
109
It is a known fact that the bodies if left exposed to the forces of nature are
110
affected according to the prevailing conditions. In dry and hot climates in the
111
loss of water and weights is fast. In wet and hot climates it takes longer for the
112
body to decompose. In wet and cold climate the decomposition takes even
113
longer. During the interval from fetal death until delivery, the retained fetus
114
undergoes maceration, a progressive deterioration of external and internal
115
macroscopic and microscopic features. Maceration is characterized by softening
116
and peeling of the skin, discoloration and softening of viscera, and fluid
117
accumulation in body cavities. These changes are nonputrefactive and result
6
pmwt may17 118
from fetal immersion in amnionic fluid and digestion of fetal tissues by autolytic
119
enzymes.
120
The most likely explanation of the effects of maceration after delivery is
121
fluid loss from the fetal body surface. In advanced stages of maceration, loss of
122
epidermis increases. This results in the increase of the raw area where fluid can
123
be lost in some manner. Despite the stillborn were wrapped, placed in special
124
body bags and preserved in temperature-controlled environments, fluid loss
125
from these exposed areas could not be avoided. Since the bodies were wrapped
126
in special absorbent sheets, fluid loss was probably in the form absorption
127
rather than evaporation. Although in adults small fluctuations of weight do not
128
carry any clinical significance, in the fetal period any error in the measurement
129
of weights will carry significant consequences.
130
In conclusion, we have shown the discrepancy between the birth and
131
postmortem weights of the stillborns and we are recommending to use the
132
birthweights in the investigation of the stillbirths whenever they are available.
133
7
pmwt may17
134
References
135
Bloemenkamp KVM. Fetal growth. International Congress Series
136
137
2005;1279:295–301. Bove KE. Practice guidelines for autopsy pathology: the perinatal and pediatric
138
autopsy. Autopsy Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Arch
139
Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:368-76.
140
Chang TC, et al. Prediction of perinatal morbidity at term in small fetuses:
141
comparison of fetal growth and Doppler ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
142
1994;101:422–7.
143 144
Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;25(1):80–9.
145
Fox NS, Chasen ST. Comparison of clinical estimation of fetal weight at the
146
beginning and end of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;101(2):133-6.
147 148
149 150
Gardosi J. Ultrasound Biometry and fetal growth restriction. Fetal maternal med review. 2002;13:249–59. Gardosi J, Geirsson RT. Routine ultrasound is the method of choice for dating pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(9):933–6. 8
pmwt may17 151 152
153
Gardosi J, Vanner T, Francis A. Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(7):792–7. Genest DR, Singer DB. Estimating the time of death in stillborn fetuses: III.
154
External fetal examination; a study of 86 stillborns. Obstet Gynecol
155
1992;80:593–00.
156 157
158 159
160 161
162 163
164
Gilbert-Barness E ed. Handbook of Pediatric Autopsy Pathology. Humana Press, 2004. Goldenberg RL, Kirby R, Culhane JF. Stillbirth: a review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;16(2):79-94. Medchill MT, et al. Prediction of estimated fetal weight in extremely low birth weight neonates (500–1000 g). Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:286–90. Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Fetal growth. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;12(2): 111–5. Peregrine E, O'Brien P, Jauniaux E. Clinical and ultrasound estimation of birth
165
weight prior to induction of labor at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
166
2007;29(3):304-9.
9
pmwt may17 167 168
169 170
171 172
173 174
175 176
177 178
179 180
Pinar H. Postmortem findings in term neonates. Semin Neonatol 2004;4:289302. Potter EL, Craig JM. Postmortem examination. In: The pathology of the fetus and the infant. 3rd ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers. 1975:84-5. Shanklin DR. Cimino DA, Lamb TH. Fetal maceration: I. An experimental sequence in the rabbit. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1964;88:213-23. Shanklin DR. Fetal maceration: II. An analysis of 53 human stillborn infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1964;88:224-9. Smith GCS. First trimester origins of fetal growth impairment. Seminars Perinatol. 2004;28(1):41– 50. Strachan GI. The pathology of foetal maceration: A study of 24 cases. Br Med J 1922;2:80-2. Wigglesworth JS. The macerated stillborn fetus. In: Wigglesworth JS. Perinatal pathology. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1984,84-92.
10
pmwt may17 181
182
Table 1. Description of grades of maceration Physical Findings at PM Examination
Grade
No maceration. Tissue appears normal.
0
Desquamation involving ≤ 1% of total body surface and brown-red discoloration of umbilical cord stump. Tissue appears red/pink and fresh with focal discoloration.
1
Desquamation of face, abdomen or back involving ≥1% and ≤5% total body surface. Tissue appears red/pink and fresh with focal discoloration and serous fluid collection.
2
Desquamation involving > 5% of body surface. Tissue appears red/pink and mixed with brown.
3
Total brown skin discoloration. Tissue appears brown/gray.
4
Mummification. Tissue appears gray.
5
Table 2. The distribution of diagnoses of the 000 stillborns in the study
11