CNS Vital Signs Neurocognitive Case Studies Adding Value to Your Practice by Providing Solutions for Measuring, Monitoring and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health…
www.CNSVS.com
Introduction This Case Study Guide is designed to give clinicians helpful information about the use of CNS Vital Signs neurocognitive testing, behavioral assessments, and mental health screening. It includes a variety relevant patient and practice examples that may be used to address HOW CNS Vital Signs neurocognitive and behavioral health assessment platform can be used across the lifespan e.g., children, adolescent, adult and senior patients to gain deeper clinical insight and to help manage treatments. It also provides suggestions for combinations of codes that can be used when offering services and testing procedures using the CNS Vital Signs assessment platform capabilities. Please note that this information is designed to provide helpful tips regarding the actual use by CNS Vital Signs clinicians and has not been peer reviewed. It is also recommended that clinical users consult our peer‐reviewed papers including our Validity & Reliability paper published in the “Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology’ listed at the PULLICATIONS section of the CNS Vital Signs website. To learn more about the CNS Vital Signs neurocognitive testing, behavioral assessments, and mental health screening platform and how it will work best for your practice or research project you should schedule a FREE CNS Vital Signs webinar. EACH CNS Vital Signs Webinar can cover topics such as:
Clinical Use including… Test Report Interpretation Billing & Coding Validity & Reliability Research Applications Practice Efficiencies and much more…
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
At the top of the CNS Vital Signs Homepage CLICK
2
Brief Clinical Procedure Case Study Examples AD/HD
Adolescent Assessment and Medication Management College Student Assessment and Medication Management AD/HD Evaluation and Cogmed Evidence‐Based Outcomes Neurobehavioral Feedback Longitudinal Tracking
TBI & PTSD
27 year old Marine… 2 IED’s in Iraq… TBI & PTSD Posit Science Brain Fitness (24 yo professional baseball player) Cognitive Resilience Training
SLEEP
Sleep Disorder Patient
OTHER
Cognitive Fatigue; Sorting Out Comorbidities; Folic Acid, Plus Stimulant Measure Aerobic Exercise Use in MCI Dementia
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
3
Free Neuropsych Questionnaire NPQ-207 In-Take Tool for Assessing Symptoms and Possible Comorbidities NeuroPsych Questionnaire (NPQ) LF-207 (Page 1 of 8)
= Key Symptoms
Age: 12 (Informant Survey by Mother)
Administrator: Med Tech
Total Test Time: 10:31 (min:secs)
Language: English (United States)
Domain Attention Impulsive Learning Memory Anxiety Panic Agoraphobia Obsessions & Compulsions Social Anxiety Depression Mood Stability Oppositional Mania Aggression Psychotic Somatic Fatigue Sleep Suicide Pain
Reported Symptoms
Johnny’s mother completed this 207 questionnaire of possible neuropsych symptoms and possible comorbidities in the waiting room using an I‐ pad and the results were auto‐ scored. Based on clinic policy the results were printed and reviewed. Noticing the possibility of AD/HD from his school record and the NPQ Johnny was given the CNS Vital Signs BRIEF‐CORE assessment prior to the clinician interviewing and examining the patient.
Test Date: February 11 2009 11:24:43
Score 208 225 145 157 114 33 33
Severity Moderate Severe Mild Moderate Mild Not a Problem Not a Problem
56
Not a Problem
100 136 108 145 17 80 43 56 0 0 83 83
Mild Moderate Moderate Mild Not a Problem Mild Not a Problem Not a Problem Not a Problem Not a Problem Mild Mild
Average Symptom Score
142
Mild
PTSD Bipolar Autism Aspergers ADHD MCI Concussion Anxiety/Depression
85 100 46 81 197 173 111 110
Mild Mild Not a Problem Mild Moderate Moderate Mild Mild
Possible Comorbidities
Johnny, a twelve year old boy struggling in school was referred to a Neuropsychiatrist by the school for additional AD/HD evaluation and management.
Subject Reference/ID: AD/HD Case Study
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
Description The Neuropsych Questionnaire asks patients (or an appropriate observer) a series of questions about their clinical state. The questions are about the symptoms of various neuropsychiatric disorders. The terminology is similar to that used in the diagnostic manuals, and in many familiar clinical questionnaires and rating scales; but it has been simplified, and all symptoms are scored on the same metric. Scores are reported on a scale of 0 (not a problem) to 300 (severe). As a rule, scores above 225 indicate a severe problem; scores from 150-224 indicate a moderate problem; and scores from 75149, a mild problem. A high score on the Neuropsych Questionnaire means that the patient is reporting more symptoms of greater intensity. It doesn't necessarily mean that the patient has a particular condition; just that he or she (or their spouse, parent or caregiver) are saying that they have a lot of intense symptoms. Conversely, a low score simply means that the patient (or caregiver) is not reporting symptoms associated with a particular condition, at least during the period of time specified. It does not mean that the patient does not have the condition. Just as some people over-state their problems, others tend to under-state their problems. The Neuropsych Questionnaire is not a diagnostic instrument. The results it generates are only meant to be interpreted by an experienced clinician in the course of a clinical examination.
4
Every patient with ATTENTION DEFICIT has a Unique PROFILE. Johnny, a twelve year old boy struggling in school was given CNS Vital Signs VSX BRIEF‐ CORE Clinical Battery… he scored below average in 5 of 9 cognitive domains (pre‐dose). After examining the H&P, the test results, and the PCS ‐ pediatric symptom checklist & Vanderbilt AD/HD rating scales; Johnny was given a prescription medication. Four weeks later he was administered the test again (post‐dose). The CNS Vital Signs report is available seconds after the testing session ends and is a useful tool for assessing academic and vocational accommodations as well as measuring medication effect and helping clinicians tailor medications to get the minimum dose vs. maximum neurocognitive effect.
Pre Dose
Post Dose
Domains most sensitive to attention deficit conditions.
“For the first time I am able to show my son that his mind functions better when he is on his medication than when he is not…” Johnny's Mother
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
“Our relatives are always giving us a hard time about giving our boys AD/HD medicine. For the first time I have proof that they need their medicine.” Johnny's Father
5
College Student Attention Deficit Case Study 1 PRE: Part of AD/HD Assessment Protocol
= Low Frontal Lobe Domain Scores
Patient History: James K. a 21 year old college student on a Presidential scholarship for his piano playing ability. James is gifted musically, has played with symphony orchestras, and can watch someone play a musical piece then repeat from memory the piece. James’ high school academic performance was average and he was a popular student. At college James has struggled, he reports he has a problem concentrating in the library compared to his peers. He has struggled with a number of courses and has dropped at least one course per semester. A peer in his dorm told James he should “get some Adderall”. James was referred for clinical evaluation. Clinical Findings: As part of the patient in‐take he was administered the Adult ADHD Self‐Report Scale in which he scored a 40 overall and a 25 in the ‘inattentive’ category (24 or greater = Highly likely to have ADHD). James was also administered the CNS Vital Signs neurocognitive 1 assessment and was identified as having possible frontal lobe deficits. Based on this information James was given the Brown ADD Scales which confirmed possible executive and attentional dysfunction. Reviewing James’ initial Domain Dashboard confirms James has above average skills in Memory, Processing Speed, and Psychomotor Speed which would be expected given his considerable piano playing skills. Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
6
College Student Attention Deficit Case Study 1 PRE: Part of AD/HD Assessment Protocol James K. 21 Year Old College Student: Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1.1) 1
How often do you have trouble wrapping up the final details of a project, once the challenging parts have been done?
3 ‐ Often
2
How often do you have difficulty getting things in order when you have to do a task that requires organization?
3 ‐ Often
3
How often do you have problems remembering appointments or obligations?
2 ‐ Sometimes
4
When you have a task that requires a lot of thought, how often do you avoid or delay getting started?
4 ‐ Very Often
5
How often do you fidget or squirm with your hands or feet when you have to sit down for a long time?
1 ‐ Rarely
6
How often do you feel overly active and compelled to do things, like you were driven by a motor?
2 ‐ Sometimes
7
How often do you make careless mistakes when you have to work on a boring or difficult project?
4 ‐ Very Often
8
How often do you have difficulty keeping your attention when you are doing boring or repetitive work?
4 ‐ Very Often
9
How often do you have difficulty concentrating on what people say to you, even when they are speaking to you directly?
2 ‐ Sometimes
Part A (Inattentive)
25
10
How often do you misplace or have difficulty finding things at home or work?
11
How often are you distracted by activity or noise around you?
3 ‐ Often
12
How often do you leave your seat in meetings or other situations in which you are expected to remain seated?
1 ‐ Rarely
13
How often do you feel restless or fidgety?
0 ‐ Never
14
How often do you have difficulty unwinding and relaxing when you have time to yourself?
2 ‐ Sometimes
15
How often do you find yourself talking too much when you are in social situations?
2 ‐ Sometimes
16
When you're in a conversation, how often do you find yourself finishing the sentences of the people you are talking to, before they can finish them themselves?
2 ‐ Sometimes
17
How often do you have difficulty waiting your turn in situations when turn taking is required?
0 ‐ Never
18
How often do you interrupt others when they are busy?
1 ‐ Rarely
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
4 ‐ Very Often
Part B (Hyperactive/Impulsive)
15
ASRS Total Score
40
7
College Student Attention Deficit Case Study 2 POST: Part of AD/HD Assessment Follow-up
The Results: James was prescribed 20mg of Vyvanse™ and returned for a follow‐up to measure the impact of Vyvanse™ on neurocognitive function. The Domain Dashboard test scores, 2 POST‐MEDICATION, reveals a beneficial or positive shift in his neurocognitive function. No side‐effects were experienced or observed by the student. The college health center provided James with copies of his tests which he was able to share with his family. The family was impressed that the CNS Vital Signs test was able to quantify and illuminate the various neurocognitive functions and help them better understand their son’s status and see the impact medication had on their son’s cognition. Vyvanse™ is a product of Shire Pharmaceuticals.
CNS Vital Signs neurocognitive tests are psychometrically sound and include measures of the most common complaints of AD/HD: inattention (Complex Attention Domain), impulsive responding (Complex Attention and Executive Function Domain), executive control (Executive Function, Cognitive Function), and speed of processing (Processing Speed Domain), and working memory (four‐part CPT). Clinicians can now easily and objectively measure executive control, attention, and other important domains as part of their evaluation and management activities. CNS Vital Signs helps contribute to an efficient, systematic continuity between evaluation and treatment (medication management).
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
8
Why Use CNS Vital Signs to Assess AD/HD? Frontal Lobe Objective Measure of Clinical Pathology Frontal Lobe Tests Symbol Digit Coding (SDC)
The CNS Vital Signs tests can compliment other “Executive Function” assessments e.g., Brown AD/HD, BRIEF, CONNERS, Barkley, etc. to help identify and effectively address neurocognitive challenges that can have dramatic impact on academic and vocational performance.
Neurocognitive Function ■ ■ ■ ■
Information Processing Speed Complex Attention Visual‐Perceptual Speed Information Processing Speed
■ ■ ■ ■ ■
Executive Function Simple and Complex Reaction Time Speed‐Accuracy Trade‐Off Information Processing Speed Inhibition / Disinhibition
Approx. 2.5 Minutes
■ ■ ■ ■
Executive Function: Shifting Sets Reaction Time Information Processing Speed Speed‐Accuracy Trade‐off
Continuous Performance (CPT)
■ ■ ■
Sustained Attention Choice Reaction Time Impulsivity
■ ■
Sustained Attention Working Memory
Clinical Domains
Processing Speed
Measure: How well a subject recognizes and processes information i.e., perceiving, attending/responding to incoming information, motor speed, fine motor coordination, and visual‐perceptual ability. Relevance: Ability to recognize and respond/react i.e., fitness‐to‐drive, occupation issues, possible danger/risk signs or issues with accuracy and detail.
Executive Function
Measure: How well a subject recognizes rules, categories, and manages or navigates rapid decision making. Relevance: Ability to sequence tasks and manage multiple tasks simultaneously as well as tracking and responding to a set of instructions.
Complex Attention
Measure: Ability to track and respond to information over lengthy periods of time and/or perform mental tasks requiring vigilance quickly and accurately. Relevance: Self‐regulation and behavioral control.
Cognitive Flexibility
Measure: How well subject is able to adapt to rapidly changing and increasingly complex set of directions and/or to manipulate the information. Relevance: Reasoning, switching tasks, decision‐making, impulse control, strategy formation, attending to conversation.
Stroop Test (ST) Approx. 4 ‐ 5 Minutes
Shifting Attention (SAT)
Approx. 5 Minutes
4‐Part Continuous Performance (FPCPT) Approx. 7 Minutes
Auto‐scored
Approx. 4 Minutes
Working Memory Sustained Attention
Measure: How well a subject can perceive and attend to symbols using short‐term memory processes (4PCPT). Relevance: Ability to carry out short‐term memory tasks that support decision making, problem solving, planning, and execution. Enables “right‐now” responses. Measure: How well a subject can direct and focus cognitive activity on specific stimuli. Relevance: How well a subject can focus and complete task or activity, sequence action, and focus during complex thought.
CNS Vital Signs is used throughout the world as a clinical tool to evaluate and manage ADHD. Executive Functioning, sometimes called executive control system, is generally considered a frontal lobe (see orange section of the brain) neurocognitive system that controls and manages other cognitive processes. It is considered a higher‐order brain function, which include attention, behavioral planning and response inhibition, and the manipulation of information in problem‐solving tasks. Sometimes referred to as the "command and control" or the "conductor" of many cognitive skills. Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
9
Neurobehavioral Feedback
Age: 34
Pre November 9, 2010
Post November 24, 2010
Many clinicians that provide Neurobehavioral Feedback training also use CNS Vital Signs assessment Platform as part of their evaluation and then to assess neurobehavioral feedback treatment efficacy. Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
Post March 7, 2011
10
Brief Clinical Procedure Case Study Examples AD/HD
Adolescent Assessment and Medication Management College Student Assessment and Medication Management AD/HD Evaluation and Cogmed Evidence‐Based Outcomes Neurobehavioral Feedback Longitudinal Tracking
TBI & PTSD
27 year old Marine… 2 IED’s in Iraq… TBI & PTSD Posit Science Brain Fitness (24 yo professional baseball player) Cognitive Resilience Training
SLEEP
Sleep Disorder Patient
OTHER
Cognitive Fatigue; Sorting Out Comorbidities; Folic Acid, Plus Stimulant Measure Aerobic Exercise Use in MCI Dementia
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
11
27 YO Marine… 2 IED’s: Neurocognitive Tests Robert, a 27 year old Marine that was involved in 2 improvised explosive devices in Iraq was struggling and was referred to an experimental treatment program using HBOT (hyperbaric oxygen). Robert was given CNS VS neurocognitive tests and 3 health rating scales (Medical Outcomes Survey SF‐ 36, Epworth Sleep Scale, & NPQ‐ 45) at baseline prior to treatment. The baseline revealed frontal lobe impairment and multiple symptom deficits e.g. sleep, depression, etc.
Baseline Post-Injury 1.05.2009
Post-Injury Treatment 2.11.2009
Robert was reevaluated following HBOT therapy, Cognitive behavioral theory was added due to Roberts current emotional state. Post baseline assessments were given one month following the treatment. General improvement was seen in both his cognitive and symptom scores.
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
12
27 YO Marine… 2 IED’s: SF-36 1
2
Baseline Post-Injury Robert, a 27 year old Marine was still running 5 miles a day and reported a high pain tolerance. His scores for Role Functioning , Energy/ Fatigue, Emotional Well Being, Social Functioning, and Health Change was confirmed by a spouses informant scale and through clinical interview.
1 2
1 2
Post-Injury Treatment
Robert was drinking a fifth of alcohol a week.
3
General improvement was seen in his symptom scores following treatment.
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
3
13
27 YO Marine… 2 IED’s: Epworth Sleep Baseline Post-Injury
Post-Injury Treatment
The patient is getting enough sleep if they score 6 or less. Scores of 7 or 8 are average. If the patients score is 9 or more they should seek the advice of a sleep specialist without delay.
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
14
27 YO Marine… 2 IED’s: NPQ-45 Baseline Post-Injury
Post-Injury Treatment
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
15
Posit Science: 24 Year Old Baseball Player
Pre Tom, a 24 year old professional baseball player was hit in the head with a baseball and was struggling. He was referred to a clinical practice in Florida for cognitive training using the Posit Science System. Tom, was given the CNS VS neurocognitive tests at baseline prior to treatment. The baseline revealed reaction time impairment.
Post
Tom was reevaluated following therapy. Post baseline assessments were given one month following the treatment.
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
16
Cognitive Resilience Training
20 Year old soldier post IED
6 Week Cognitive Resilience program Pre BASELINE Week One: Effective Movement Training including VIPR, TRX and functional movement assessment and remedial interventions including triangulated movement Week Two: Nutrition and Hydration incorporating Post 6 WEEK TREATMENT 10g fish oil daily, 300ml water per 10kg, no processed food, sugar, alcohol etc. Week Three: Recovery training using Heart Rate Variability training and mindfulness Mindset: Week Four, incorporating gratitude rituals, positive psychology based interventions, cognitive restructuring, HRV training, Mindfulness training Mindset: Week Five, re‐socializing including Interpersonal Psychotherapy, Relaxation training, self‐hypnosis, visualization, calibrated exposure desensitization therapy Week Six, Stress management, Heart Rate Variability training, review of nutrition and exercise rituals, advanced exposure to threatening stimuli A six week integrated solution based on exercise, nutrition/hydration, recovery and mindset interventions resulted in normalization of all parameters measured and a return to active duties. Follow up treatment with medication in the field made little difference to deployment status. See www.roysugarman.com Integrated body‐brain solutions appear to be effective interventions for such clients
Enquiries: Dr Roy Sugarman USA: 480‐463‐1109 Aus: 0403 289 092
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
17
Brief Clinical Procedure Case Study Examples AD/HD
Adolescent Assessment and Medication Management College Student Assessment and Medication Management AD/HD Evaluation and Cogmed Evidence‐Based Outcomes Neurobehavioral Feedback Longitudinal Tracking
TBI & PTSD
27 year old Marine… 2 IED’s in Iraq… TBI & PTSD Posit Science Brain Fitness (24 yo professional baseball player) Cognitive Resilience Training
SLEEP
Sleep Disorder Patient
OTHER
Cognitive Fatigue; Sorting Out Comorbidities; Folic Acid, Plus Stimulant Measure Aerobic Exercise Use in MCI Dementia
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
18
Sleep Case Study 1 PRE: Part of Sleep Assessment Protocol Dan a 39 Year Old Office Worker: Epworth Sleepiness Scale In contrast to just feeling tired, how likely are you to doze off or fall asleep in the following situation? 1
Sitting and reading
3 - High chance of dozing
2
Watching TV
2 - Moderate chance of dozing
3
Sitting inactive in a public place (e.g., a theater or a meeting)
2 - Moderate chance of dozing
4
As a passenger in a car for an hour without a break
1 - Slight chance of dozing
5
Lying down to rest in the afternoon when circumstances permit
2 - Moderate chance of dozing
6
Sitting and talking to someone
0 - Would never doze
7
Sitting quietly after a lunch without alcohol
0 - Would never doze
8
In a car, while stopped for a few minutes in traffic
0 - Would never doze
Epworth Score
10
The patient is getting enough sleep if they score 6 or less. Scores of 7 or 8 are average. If the patients score is 9 or more they should seek the advice of a sleep specialist without delay
NeuroPsych Questionnaire (NPQ) SF-45 Domain
Score
Severity
Attention Impulsive Memory Anxiety Panic Depression Mood Stability Aggression Fatigue Sleep Suicide
190 217 200 220 120 182 188 120 233 300 40
Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Mild Moderate Moderate Mild Severe Severe Not a Problem
Pain
120
Mild
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
Description The Neuropsych Questionnaire Short Form asks patients (or an appropriate observer) a series of questions about their clinical state. The questions are about the symptoms of various neuropsychiatric disorders. The terminology is similar to that used in the diagnostic manuals, and in many familiar clinical questionnaires and rating scales; but it has been simplified, and all symptoms are scored on the same metric. Scores are reported on a scale of 0 (not a problem) to 300 (severe). As a rule, scores above 225 indicate a severe problem; scores from 150-224 indicate a moderate problem; and scores from 75-149, a mild problem. A high score on the Neuropsych Questionnaire Short Form means that the patient is reporting more symptoms of greater intensity. It doesn't necessarily mean that the patient has a particular condition; just that he or she (or their spouse, parent or caregiver) are saying that they have a lot of intense symptoms. Conversely, a low score simply means that the patient (or caregiver) is not reporting symptoms associated with a particular condition, at least during the period of time specified. It does not mean that the patient does not have the condition. Just as some people over-state their problems, others tend to under-state their problems. The Neuropsych Questionnaire Short Form is not a diagnostic instrument. The results it generates are only meant to be interpreted by an experienced clinician in the course of a clinical examination.
19
Every patient with SLEEP can have a Unique PROFILE. 1
Pre CPAP: May 12, 2011
2
Post CPAP: June 24, 2011
Baseline Prior to Sleep Study
Dan, a thirty‐nine year old man struggling vocationally was given CNS Vital Signs VSX BRIEF‐CORE Clinical Battery… he scored low in 6 of 9 cognitive domains (pre‐cpap). After examining the H&P, the test results, and the SF‐36, NPQ‐45, and Epworth Sleep rating scales; Dan underwent a sleep study and was prescribed CPAP. Following four weeks of compliant CPAP therapy he was administered the CNS Vital Signs test again (post‐cpap). The CNS Vital Signs report is available seconds after the testing session ends and is a useful tool fort measuring treatment effect and helping clinicians reinforce CPAP compliance to maximize neurocognitive effect.
“I was like “WOW what a difference” when I was able to see the benefits of the CPAP machine…” Sleep Study Participant
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
Retest Following Four Weeks of Compliant CPAP
“It was like getting my old husband back… he wanted to quit the CPAP machine… I said let’s give it 3 weeks more… now I think he is motivated.” Sleep Study Participant Spouse
20
Brief Clinical Procedure Case Study Examples AD/HD
Adolescent Assessment and Medication Management College Student Assessment and Medication Management AD/HD Evaluation and Cogmed Evidence‐Based Outcomes Neurobehavioral Feedback Longitudinal Tracking
TBI & PTSD
27 year old Marine… 2 IED’s in Iraq… TBI & PTSD Posit Science Brain Fitness (24 yo professional baseball player) Cognitive Resilience Training
SLEEP
Sleep Disorder Patient
OTHER
Cognitive Fatigue; Sorting Out Comorbidities; Folic Acid, Plus Stimulant Measure Aerobic Exercise Use in MCI Dementia
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
21
Case Study: Cognitive Fatigue – ADD 1 Baseline / Patient In-take Lisa, a 54 year old mother of 2 would be driving in Dallas traffic and start having “Mini‐Seizures” that would require her to pull to the side of the road and her husband would need to leave work to rescue her. Lisa had been to numerous doctors and generally prescribed multiple anti‐ depressants and anti‐anxiety medications with little or no effect. Lisa was referred to a Neurologist and was tested using CNS VS, on the last test she started exhibiting the symptoms seen while driving.
2 Post Folic Acid Therapy…
Lisa was given a number of blood and genetic tests and a was reevaluated following therapy. Post baseline assessment was given one year later post folic acid therapy. Lisa had not experienced any “Mini‐Seizures” one year later and improved cognition was reveled using CNS VS retest. Based on the follow‐up exam and past history Lisa was administered the Adult AD/HD scale and based on the follow‐ up test, history, and rating scale she was prescribed a low dose of Vyvanse…
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
then assessed for Attention Deficit
Administered Adult AD/HD Scale 22
2
Lisa’s Adult AD/HD Rating Scale
1
How often do you have trouble wrapping up the final details of a project, once the challenging parts have been done?
3 ‐ Often
2
How often do you have difficulty getting things in order when you have to do a task that requires organization?
4 ‐ Very Often
3
How often do you have problems remembering appointments or obligations?
2 ‐ Sometimes
4
When you have a task that requires a lot of thought, how often do you avoid or delay getting started?
4 ‐ Very Often
5
How often do you fidget or squirm with your hands or feet when you have to sit down for a long time?
2 ‐ Sometimes
6
How often do you feel overly active and compelled to do things, like you were driven by a motor?
2 ‐ Sometimes
7
How often do you make careless mistakes when you have to work on a boring or difficult project?
3 ‐ Often
8
How often do you have difficulty keeping your attention when you are doing boring or repetitive work?
3 ‐ Often
9
How often do you have difficulty concentrating on what people say to you, even when they are speaking to you directly?
4 ‐ Very Often
Part A (Inattentive)
10
How often do you misplace or have difficulty finding things at home or work?
11
How often are you distracted by activity or noise around you?
12
How often do you leave your seat in meetings or other situations in which you are expected to remain seated?
13
How often do you feel restless or fidgety?
14
How often do you have difficulty unwinding and relaxing when you have time to yourself?
27 3 ‐ Often 2 ‐ Sometimes 1 ‐ Rarely 2 ‐ Sometimes 2 ‐ Sometimes
15
How often do you find yourself talking too much when you are in social situations?
1 ‐ Rarely
16
When you're in a conversation, how often do you find yourself finishing the sentences of the people you are talking to, before they can finish them themselves?
1 ‐ Rarely
17
How often do you have difficulty waiting your turn in situations when turn taking is required?
18
How often do you interrupt others when they are busy?
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
1 ‐ Rarely 2 ‐ Sometimes Part B (Hyperactive/Impulsive) 15 ASRS Total Score 42
23
3
Lisa’s Cognitive Fatigue – ADD Case Study, continued
A month and a half later Lisa was retested and the effect of a low dose stimulant, adjusted diet and exercise was revealed both objectively by the CNS Vital Signs test as well as by statements from Lisa. COMMENT: One of the most difficult assessments is determining the comorbidity of cognition dysfunction that leads to depression or is the depression caused from metabolic or environmental circumstances. The following two pages has information from a recent study that can help demonstrate how CNS Vital Signs can help clinicians sort out possible underlying conditions that may need to be ruled in or out.
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
24
Helping Assess Comorbidities Cognition and Depression “Indeed, there is some suggestion that cognitive or executive functioning deficits may be a trait risk factor for depression (Douglas and Porter, 2009; Frasch et al., 2009; Micco et al., 2009; Reppermund et al., 2009). Furthermore, worse neuropsychological test performance at baseline is associated with poorer response to treatment (Dunkin et al., 2000; Kampf‐ Sherf et al., 2004; Mohlman and Gorman, 2005), and cognitive deficits are more pronounced in patients who are unemployed (Baune et al., 2010). It is possible that treatment refractory depression is a subtype characterized in part by cognitive impairment. The accurate identification and quantification of neurocognitive impairment are important for research relating to neurobiological underpinnings, treatment, and functional outcome in patients with mood disorders. It is essential, methodologically, that we have accurate methods for identifying those patients who are objectively cognitively impaired and separate them from patients who have the subjective experience of poor thinking skills or thinking that is easily perturbed by negative affect, but perform normally on cognitive testing in controlled conditions. The treatments and outcomes for these two groups may differ markedly, as well as the prognosis.” Source: Identifying a cognitive impairment subgroup in adults with mood disorders. J Affect Disord. 2011 Aug;132(3):360‐7. Epub 2011 Mar 25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21439647
25
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
25
Cognition and Depression Cognitive Flexibility
Healthy Control Mood Disorder, Normal Cognition Mood Disorder, Cognitive Impairment
Domain scored from two venerable AD/HD tests
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80-89 90-99 100-109 110-119 120-129 130-139
Fig. 3. Distributions of CNS Vital Signs cognitive flexibility index score in patients with or without impaired cognition. Figure note: Healthy control, N=660. Mood disorder, normal cognition, n=128. Mood disorder, cognitive impairment, n=58. *Normative scores were truncated at 40. Each value represents the percentage of subjects in that score range.
26
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
26
Human Performance Application Source: J Clin Psychol Med Settings (2009) 16:186–193; Steven Masley, Richard Roetzheim, Thomas Gualtieri
Aerobic Exercise Enhances Cognitive Flexibility Introduction: Physical activity is believed to prevent cognitive decline and may enhance frontal lobe activity… The association between physical fitness and cognitive health is as intuitive as ‘‘mens sana in corpore sano.’’ Over time, this Latin phrase has come to mean that only a healthy body can produce or sustain a healthy mind… Conclusion: Over a 10 week period, increasing frequency of aerobic activity was shown to be associated with enhanced cognitive performance, in particular cognitive flexibility, a measure of executive function.
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
27
Human Performance Application Percent Increase in Cognitive Flexibility with Increasing Frequency of Aerobic Exercise
Percent Increase
35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0%
Control, Minimal Exercise
Moderately Frequent Exercise
Highly Frequent Exercise
Source: J Clin Psychol Med Settings (2009) 16:186–193; Steven Masley, Richard Roetzheim, Thomas Gualtieri
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
28
HOW? Neurocognitive Health Management Aggressive Evaluation, Management and Monitoring of MCI/Dementia Syndromes Don Schmechel et,al. ICAD Paris 2011
First Visit
Second Visit 4-6 Weeks
2 Month Visit
3 Month Depending on Intervention
History & Physical ………………………………………………………………..… Neurocognitive Exam ………………………………………………….………… MMSE Screen ………………………………………………………………………… Social Work Consultation & Overview ………………………………………….. Review/Order Neuroimaging, Sleep Studies, etc. …………………………….. Blood Work …………………………………………………………………………… Genetic Testing ………………………………………………………………………. Other Blood Work (homocysteine, inflammatory indices, etc.) …………………………..… Establish Primary, Secondary, Medical Diagnosis …………………………… Computerized Neurocognitive Testing (CNS Vital Signs) ……………………………………………… Review of Clinical Status ……………………………………………………………………………………………… Review of Genetics, Blood Work, Imaging ……………………………………………………………… Revision of Diagnosis ………………………………………………………………………………………. Selection of Interventions (Nx-Nutrition, Rx-Pharmacologic, Ex-Exercise, etc.) ……………………………………………….. Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
29
Why CNS Vital Signs? CNS Vital Signs valid, reliable, and affordable ‘research quality’ NEUROCOGNITIVE & BEHAVIORAL HEALTH assessment platform can be easily configured and deployed depending on each practices or researchers needs and goals. The CNS Vital Signs assessment platforms helps to support a practices comprehensive, state‐of‐the‐art clinical assessment, and evidence‐based treatment services for children, adolescents, and adults across the lifespan by:
Accurately measuring and characterizing a patient’s neurocognitive function based on his or her status or effort Facilitating the thinking about the patient’s condition (50+ well known medical and health rating scales)and helping to explain the patient’s current difficulties Optimizing serial administration which helps to monitor and guide effective intervention. Systematically collecting brain function, behavioral, symptom, and comorbidity data enabling outcomes and evidence‐based medicine
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
Enhanced Brain & Behavior Evaluation and Care Management OBJECTIVE, PRECISE, and STANDARDIZED… Customizable Toolboxes or Test Panels Supporting many Neurological, Psychiatric, & Psychological Clinical Guidelines
$ Extend Practice Efficiency Objective and Evidence‐Based Assessments, Auto‐Scored and Systematically Documented. (HIPAA Enabled)
Enhanced Revenue Streams Expanded Services with Well Established Billing Codes to Improve Practice Performance
30
CNS Vital Signs Vision:
Advancing Neurocognitive Assessment Across the Lifespan Acquisition
Development
Disposition + or ‐ Learning Abilities Early Development Genetics
Decline
Organizing, Managing, and Controlling Behaviors and Activities
Expectations
Training & Coping
Maternal Health
Maintenance
Cognitive, Emotional, Physical, and Social Challenges
Sense of Control
Learning Responses
Self‐Confidence
Self‐Controlled
Peer Influence
Response to Stress
Parental Care
Physical and Mental Health and Wellbeing S l e e p E x e r c i s e N u t r i t i o n............ S l e e p E x e r c i s e N u t r i t i o n............ S l e e p E x e r c i s e N u t r i t i o n
Learning, Training, Experiencing and Events S c h o o l Pre ‐ S c h o o l
W o r k
R e t i r e m e n t
Environment(s) F a m i l y C o m m u n i t y L i f e s t y l e... F a m i l y C o m m u n i t y L i f e s t y l e.... F a m i l y C o m m u n i t y L i f e s t y l e HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, HEALTHY HABITS, & ACCESS TO CARE Prenatal Early‐Childhood (0‐4)
Child (5‐12)
Adolescent
Lifestage
Adults
Older Adults
Adapted From: Mental Capital and Wellbeing: Making the most of ourselves in the 21st century
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
31
Advancing Neuro-Psychiatric Care… Assessing Neurocognition is a Key Factor Accruing Mental Capital Neurocognitive skills are cumulative; success builds upon success. Thus early abilities ‐ or their lack ‐ contribute heavily to future success or failure. Early capability makes later learning more efficient and increases the complexity of what can be learned
Attitudes Aspirations Beliefs Values Talents
Knowledge Beliefs & Skills
Family Education Level & Involvement Home and Family Environment
Academic Vocational Training & Abilities School – Work Environment
Learning Environments
Mental Wellbing Outcomes
Mental Wellbeing CORE
SelfConcept
Symbolic Skills
Self-Efficacy Self-Esteem
Positive
Performance
Social Skills
Trajectory
Executive Control Auditory Processing Visual Processing Visuo-Spatial Motor Systems
Sensory
Self Monitoring Self – Reflection Self - Control
Neurocognition
Language Dyscalculia Dyslexia AD/HD Hearing/Deafness Autism Asperger's Depression Anxiety
Attention Reaction Time Processing Speed Reasoning Psychomotor Speed Memory Executive Function Cognitive Flexibility
Intellectual Functioning Cognitive Flexibility Resilience Optimism Coping style Self-esteem Self-efficacy Social engagement Social inclusion Employability
Social Perception Social Knowledge Communication Skills
+
Motivation Problem Solving Learning Social
Social Cognition Motivation Autonomy Mastery Purpose
-
Delinquency School Failure Depression Mental Ill-health Criminality Substance Abuse Teen Pregnancy Eating Disorders
Negative
Performance Trajectory
Emotion
Gene – Environment Interaction Prenatal Early ‐ Childhood (0‐4)
Genetic and Maternal Health Disposition
Child (5‐12)
Adolescent
Adults
Older Adults
Lifestage Adapted From: Mental Capital and Wellbeing: Making the most of ourselves in the 21st century
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
32
NEXT STEPS:
Contact Us…
Getting Started
Learn More
Step One: Register at www.CNSVS.com After registering download the VSX ‘Brief‐Core” Assessment Software with 5 FREE Test Sessions… Take it for a test drive.
Contact me to receive report examples, case studies, administration guides etc.
Step Two: Schedule a FREE One‐on‐One In‐ Service Webinar… Contact CNS Vital Signs Support
[email protected] with dates and times that you will be available. After the webinar the total CNS Vital Signs Assessment platform (Web & Local) can be configured to meet your practice needs.
Website: www.CNSVS.com
Phone: 888.750.6941
Email:
[email protected]
Address: – 598 Airport Blvd. – Suite 1400 – Morrisville, NC 27560
“The webinar training was terrific… it covered the Validity & Reliability of the platform, the interpretation of results, billing and coding, testing protocol, and the integration of the CNS Vital Signs platform into our practice.” Practice Administrator
Solutions for Measuring , Monitoring, and Managing Neurocognitive and Behavioral Health
33