CHAPTER ONE Introduction and Problem Statement
1. Introduction The HIV/AIDS pandemic has been described to be in many ways a / unique family disease with far reaching health, social, psychological and economic
implications
Williams, 1990:3).
(See:WHO/UNICEF
1994:5,
Campbell
and
Although it initially enters the family as a result of
multiple sexual relations of one of the partners, its' mode of transmission is 90% heterosexual
(Campbell
and
Williams
1990:3).
consequence of this mode of transmission in Africa is
The
tragic
that besides
affecting men and women in equal numbers (See: Williams, 1990:3), it is almost a foregone conclusion that in
households in which one parent is
infected, the other often is as well (See:Preble, 1990:678).
Sadly, since all HIV infected persons (parents being no exception) ultimately progress from infection to AIDS and death, usually between 5-12 years after infection (See: Peble, 1990:673; Mukoyogo and Williams, 1991:2), most
HIV/AIDS orphaned children, unlike children of other
calamities; experience prolonged mental trauma and economic as they helplessly watch their parents wither and
hardships
die. (WHO/UNICEF,
1990:7).
Another uniquely tragic consequence of HIV/AIDS pandemic in Africa is its systematic decimation of economically their childbearing years; leaving in its elderly caregivers (See:Daily 1994:5; UNICEF
1990:15 and
productive adults in
wake vulnerable children and
Nation, May 22, 1993; WHO/UNICEF, 1991:2).
Researches conducted
in
sub-Saharan Africa have found that over 85% of persons with HIV/AIDS fall within the 20-45 age group (See: Mukoyogo and Williams, 1991:12; Daily
Nation, May 22, 1993; November 11, 1,992; UNICEF, 1991:5;
Anderson and Kaleeba, 1994:89). This, unfortunately, happens to be the
age bracket with the highest concentration of parents with children to care for.
The Global Programme for AIDS
reported that 0.7 million
(WHO/GPA, 1994:2) for instance,
children were born to HIV positive women in
Africa in 1993. Of these children, between 30-40% were probably infected with
HIV and are therefore destined to face early death (Mukoyogo and
Williams, 1991:2; UNICEF, 190:4; Preble, 1990:673); while infected are expected die by age 5 (Preble,
80% of the
1990:673). For the majority
(60-70%) who are uninfected, they will sooner or later be orphaned.
Accordingly,
among
the
many
daunting
and
unfortunately,
^
unanswered questions concerning children who survive their parents are : who normally assumes the responsibility of them ?
Do they usually find able and willing carers ? What material
deprivations do they death ?
caring and/or providing for
suffer during their parents' illness and after their
To what extent does the traumatic nature of the loss of their
parents impair their psychological development ?
Almost unnoticed, the HIV/AIDS epidemic has created a new, large (/ and especially vulnerable group of motherless children Africa (Michael and Levine, 1992:3-59).
in sub-Saharan
Various independent surveys
estimate the magnitude of country-specific HIV/AIDS orphanhood at 12% ( 0 . 6 - 1 . 2 million) of all Ugandan children under age 15 in 1991 (UNICEF, 1991:4); 160,000 Tanzanian children by 1994 (Bazira, 120,000 Malawian children by1995 (UNICEF,
1994:Abstract);
1991:9); 300,000 Kenyan
children by 1996 (UNICEF, 1991:3; WHO/UNICEF, 1994:52) and 1 1 % of Zambian children under age 14 Overall it is projected
by the year 2000 (UNICEF, 1991:9).
that sub-Saharan Africa will account for between
3.1 y 5.5 million HIV/AIDS orphans by the year 2000; rising to 16 million by 2015 (Valeroy 1991, Cited by Rutayuka, 1994:Abstract).
Besides creating an unmanageable orphan "burden'for families an institutions that offer child care and support, the
growing number of
children losing their mothers to HIV/AIDS is threatening to overwhelm any and all historic institutions
of child care and support
Africa
Consequently, researchers and child-related
(UNICEF,1991:1).
in
sub-Saharan
agencies ought to urgently explore how communities, institutions and governments
can
respond
in order to avert
an
impending
social
catastrophe of enormous proportions and dimensions. Although extended family networks continue to absorb orphaned children in conformity with traditional norms, (Hunter, 1990:683), AIDS observers are increasingly concerned that strands in
with the advent of mass HIV/AIDS orphanhood, some
the extended family
safety net' have become increasingly
frayed, or have snapped altogether (Mukoyogo and Williams, Hampton and Barnett, 1992:124).
For instance, in
HIV/AIDS deaths such as Rakai and Masaka combined total of 24,524 orphans Kagera region of Tanzania 1991:9); the prospect of already
a reality
1991:12;
areas ravaged by
districts of Uganda with a
in 1990 (UNICEF, 1990:15), and the
with 30,000 orphans in 1991 (UNICEF,
an overwhelmed extended family support is
whose evidence
may be observed in the
many
child-headed households, orphan siblings and/or groups surviving on their own, and in the increasing number of homeless street children.
In light of the unfolding scenario in the above named areas,
and
the massive scale of orphanhood predicted for most of East and Central African countries; the possibility of a massive breakdown of the traditional system of adoption is, potential
indeed, a chilling prospect.
Recognizing
enormity of the calamity and the need to initiate
intervention measures, some AIDS observers have searching questions about the scope and extended family support system. which the extended support for
the
institutional
began to
ask
tenacity of the traditional
Of particular importance is the extent to
family system continues to provide care and/or
HIV/AIDS - orphaned children. For instance, where the
extended family fails to provide for the orphaned children, happen to those children ?
what will
Unsurprisingly, UNICEF (1990:15) has aptly predicted that the problem of how the extended family can continue to provide food, shelter, clothing, school fees and beddings; not to mention love and affection for all the children it has to
absorb, may soon become the most important
social challenge, facing AIDS activists and researchers in Africa.
In fact, AIDS observers, widely
acicnowledge that dwindling
extended family support has condemned many HIV/AIDS children and households into a precarious survival (See: Williams, 1991:11 and UNICEF,1990:15).
^'
orphaned
Mukoyogo and
Consequently, hundreds of
thousands of HIV/AIDS orphaned children and caregivers are engaged in a relentless
struggle
for basic needs, i.e. food,
shelter,
clothing,
beddings, and school fees, for love and affection; and against exploitation and discrimination
(Mukoyogo
and Williams,
Anderson and Kaleeba (1994:21) opines that
1991:3).
Accordingly,
caregiving
household
deserve to be supported in their traditional role, for without support, families and
communities may abandon their traditional caring roles.
Resulting in destitution, homelessness and, ultimately
massive social
breakdown.
According to WHO/UNICEF (1994:49), the first step in this process is measuring the scale of orphan problems and needs, in order to crystallize the situation for policy-makers, donors, child-oriented agencies and to also provide the basis
for planned and coordinated responses.
However, since little is known as yet about the magnitude, problems and needs of children and households affected by HlV/AlDS; few governments and child -oriented agencies have initiated programmes and services for children and families in this situation.
Hopefully, the data and information generated from this and other N/ similar researches, will enable AIDS oriented agencies to monitor social, economic, political and demographic breakdowns; and learn how to
ameliorate its effects. It is our view therefore that the foregoing exposition constitute/adequate justification for a full-fledged
exploratory study on
children orphaned by HIV/AIDS.
1.1: Problem Statement
The
plight of children orphaned by HIV/AIDS, otherwise
to as AIDS orphans, has been reported to cause much
referred
psychological
trauma to infected parents before they die. (Hampton, 1990:18; UNICEF, 1993:22; Parents Magazine, No.89, November, 1993:8). Among the many questions often asked by
people with HIV/AIDS (PWAs) are : Who will
care for my children when I am gone? When my wife/husband is gone ?
Will my relatives neglect them just because we died of
But important as they are, the above unanswered magnitude,
since
there
questions,
HIV/AIDS?
unfortunately, remain
is as yet little empirical information on the
problems and needs of children and/or families affected by
the HIV/AIDS pandemic.
Unsurprisingly,
AIDS observers, among them, UNICEF
1991), and WHO/UNICEF (1974),
have voiced their sceptism
reliability of whatever available information on East
Africa.
orphanhood
For is
one,
derived
WHO/UNICEF, 1994:64).
most from The
empirical the
rural
likely
(1990; over the
HIV/AIDS orphanhood in information
areas
on
(UNICEF,
HIV/AIDS 1991:20;
rationale for this bias is the
assumption that a majority of HIV/AIDS orphans are found in rural areas, since reverse are
(urban-rural) migration by PWAs and/or orphan relocation
seen as common responses in most sub-Saharan African towns
(Bennet, 1987:534; Mburugu, 1993:13-14; WHO/UNICEF, 1994:77). However,
Preble (1990:672-73) and UNICEF, (1991:12) appears
consider the assumption illogical since HIV infection higher in urban areas.
to
rates are invariably
v
The question as to whether a majority of HIV/AIDS orphans are found in rural or urban areas is a moot research issue. primary concern in the present study is that information on HIV/AIDS orphanhood in
However, our
paucity of data and
urban areas is hampering the
formulation of approaches for use in urban environments, where cases of HIV/AIDS orphaned children without extended family carers are perceived to be fairly common (See:WHO/UNICEF, 1994:64).
Moreover, Kenya with a projected population of 300,000 HIV/AIDS orphaned children by 1996 (See: Dr. Abduallah, in Parents Magazine, No.89, November, 1993; UNICEF, 1992:3; WHO/UNICEF, 1994:52), rising to 600,000 by the year 2000 (National Development Plan, 1994-96:262); has the second highest HiV/AIDS orphaned population in East Africa. After Uganda with an estimated 0.6 - 1.2 million orphans in 1991 (Hunter, 1991:681); and ahead of Tanzania with 160,000 orphans in 1994 (Bazira, 1994: Abstract) and an estimated
500,000
by the year 2000 (Mukoyogo
and Williams, 1991:4).
Ironically though, besides UNICEF's (1994) consultancy reports coauthored by Saoke and Mutemi, there has not been any other significant study
of HIV/AIDS orphanhood problem in Kenya.
available empirical information on the three initial AIDS
In fact, whatever
problem is largely derived from
epicentres; namely, Rakai and Masaka districts of
Uganda, and the Kagera region of Tanzania (See, among others, Hunter 1990; Muller, et al. 1990;
Mukoyogo and Williams,
1991; Kamali,
ef.a/,1992; and Mutembei,1992). Unfortunately, in the absence of up-todate empirical information on the numbers, needs of children orphaned by
distribution, problems and
HIV/AIDS, organisations addressing the
needs of HIV/AIDS orphaned children in Kenya are inevitably, working in an
information and policy vacuum. Accordingly, measuring the scale of
orphan problems in Kenya would serve as an important stepping stone for policy makers, donors and child - oriented
organizations, as well as
providing a basis for planned and coordinated responses.
1.2: Justification and Study Objectives
The study aims at interviewing orphan caregivers and adolescent orphans in Kisumu and its peri-urban environs with a view to finding out the nature and scope of their problems and needs; socio-economic status; type and level of extended family support; and non-family assistance. The motivation to conduct this particular research emanates from the fact that no significant study on HIV/AIDS orphanhood has been conducted in
/
Kenya to date in spite of persistent concerns by dying (HIV/AIDS-infected) parents over the welfare of their children, and despite
the large and
increasing number of children orphaned by HIV/AIDS. The number of HIV/AIDS orphans in Kenya, for instance, are expected to double in the four years between 1996 and the year 2000 from 300,000 to 600,000. Consequently, children
organizations
operate
tackling
problems
and
needs
of
these
largely in a policy vacuum for lack of upto
date
researched information on the numbers, distribution, problems and needs of children orphaned by HIV/AIDS.
Accordingly, the present study expects to document demographic, socio-economic and sociological factors relating to orphan caregivers and their wards with a view to establishing: 1.
the impact of HIV/AIDS orphanhood on the socio-economic status of the affected children and households;
2.
the extent to which the traditional extended family provides child care and support to HIV/AIDS orphans;
3.
the
nature
and
magnitude
of
problems
and
needs
of
HIV/AIDS orphans and their caregivers; 4.
the type and level of non-family assistance received by orphan households;
5.
salient
caregiving
and
support
patterns
which
may
be
./
/
incorporated
into
assistance
programmes
for
HIV/AIDS
affected children and households.
The above stated objectives are primarily aimed at answering the following questions. (i)
Who normally assumes the responsibility of caring and/or providing for HIV/AIDS orphaned children? Do HIV/AIDS orphans find able and willing caregivers?
(ii)
Will traditional extended family support be sufficiently elastic to absorb orphans of the HIV/AIDS pandemic?
(iii)
What material deprivations do the affected children suffer during their parents* illness and/or death? socio-economic
differentials
between
Are there any
orphaned
children
supported by widowed parents and those supported by aged grandparents and other relatives? (iv)
Do most HIV/AIDS
orphaned children drop out of school at
the time when their parents are too ill to participate in productive work, or after the parents' death? (v)
Do children absorbed in caregiving households work for their livelihood,or
they
are
adequately
provided for
by
their
guardians?
1.3. Summary of Chapters
This thesis is divided into six broad chapters.
In chapter one, the
problem of HIV/AIDS orphanhood is introduced and formulated.
It is
explicitly stated that the present study focuses on HIV/AIDS orphanhood as a social predicament which originate^from HlV/AlDS, but which is not directly associated with HIV/AIDS the biomedical condition itself. A study of this problem, it is argued, is justified on account of
inter alia : its
geographical scope and magnitude, and its negative implications on the survival chances, welfare status, and psycho-social adjustment of the
v
affected and infected children. Furthermore the study's key objectives are outlined, and sun^mary of chapters made.
Chapter two, provides the empirical grounding and the theoretical model adopted in this thesis. Empirical
information is presented in form
of background information on HIV/AIDS orphanhood at the global, subSaharan Africa and Kenya context, and in form of a thematic review of literature relating to the study objectives.
The themes explored revolve
around caregivers' socio-economic status; demographic characteristics of HIV/AIDS orphans, scope of extended family care/support; problems and needs of HIV/AIDS orphans and their caregivers; type and level of nonfamily support to orphans and their caregiving households.
In the absence of a general sociological theory of HIV/AIDS orphanhood, this study sought to explain the phenomenon using the clanship system model developed by Ankrah (1993). thesis in this model is that beyond
The substantive
the changing and/or weakening
traditional African family is a network of people, most of whom are connected by kin or blood relationships, termed the clanship system. Patterns of family treatment and care are deeply embedded in this wider kinship system.
Hence, the clanship system could become the locus of
AIDS activity designed to ensure the well-being and continuity of the family where its leadership undertakes to sustain, to reorganize, or to create wholly new families or structures among populations being devastated by; AIDS.
New associations based on common emotional bonds of caring
beyond kinship ties will be necessary to support vulnerable members. However, for such to prove durable in the troubled socio-economic context of sub-Saharan Africa, these will need strong links to; or derive their legitimacy from the resilient traditional social network: the African Kinship System.
/ ^
In chapter three, a case is made for the collection and use of
^
primary field data, and for the choice of Kisumu town and its environs as the study site.
A detailed data collection strategy is presented.
In
particular, this strategy stipulate the mode adopted in the selection of study respondents, community
mobilisers and key informants.
The
methods of data analysis and problems encountered in the course of data collection
are specified.
In addition, operational definitions
variables and concepts is also made.
of
key
The data on which this study is
|
based is primarily drawn from 214 HIV/AIDS orphan caregivers and 47 adolescent
orphans.
This is augmented by documentary
data and
information elicited from key informants and FGD participants.
Maps are
also provided alongside to acquaint the reader with the site of study.
The study's findings are presented in chapters 4 and 5. Those in chapter 4 are isolated from the analysis of descriptive data, while those presented in chapter 5 are derived from the tested hypotheses.
Several key findings were isolated from the five themes covered in chapter four.
One, a high degree of regional and ethnic homogeneity;
gender bias and orphan caregiving was observed among the study respondents. 82 percent were female members of the Luo community : a majority ethnic group in Nyanza province. The mean family size was 7.5, with a range of 2-19 persons per household.
The mean number of
orphans per caregiver was 4.5, with a range of 1-13 orphans.
It was
therefore concluded that the problem of AIDS and by implication, that of AIDS orphanhood, is related to local socio-cultural factors and that AIDS orphanhood is aggravating the problem of role conflict among an already over-burdened female gender.
Two, orphan caregiving was found to be highly selective of poor individuals and households.
85 percent of the respondents fell into low
income categories; 60 percent lived in crowded 1-2 roomed houses; 81
10
v
percent were either unschooled or had some basic primary education; 84 percent
had
no dependable
gainful
employment;
while
74
percent
identified lack of school fees and other educational expenses as a major impediment
to orphan
schooling, as compared
to 20
percent
who
prioritized basic needs problems. Overall, 90 percent of them identified low and/or inadequate income as the leading impediment to orphan caregiving.
It was therefore
concluded that the problem of
orphanhood is inextricably linked to low socio-economic
AIDS
status; and that
caregiver poverty is the main explanatory variable to orphan destitution.
Three, HIV-infected fathers
(or male partners) were found to
\/
predecease their wives (or female partners) regardless of differences in socio-cultural and geographical factors.
75 percent of the orphans were t
paternal, as compared to 43 percent maternal and 34 percent orphans.
Furthermore, a strong negative correlation obtained between 1
being orphaned and access to schooling.
Of the 807 orphans aged
between 5-18 years, 43 percent did not pursue any schooling or training activity.
Unfortunately, limited schooling, or the lack of it, impacts
negatively on the life chances of orphaned children.
Four, all (100 percent) the 807 orphans were supported by family members.
J -
double ' •
Thus suggesting resilience of the traditional extended family
fosterage system. However, for the vast majority of orphan caregivers, 50 percent of whom were surviving widowed mothers, the locus of material and psycho-social
support tends to shift away from the
husband's
extended family segment (in-laws) to their respective agnates upon the husbands demise.
Infact, maternal relatives, as opposed to paternal
ones, maintained a higher level of social contact and material assistance to orphan households by 17 and 31 percentage points respectively.
Lastly, absence of a formal institutional framework for tackling the problem of AIDS orphanhood was quite evident at the study site. Only 25
11
percent
of orphan households
material assistance.
reported ever having
received
some
Even then, all (100 percent) the assistance came
from community-based agencies, namely: the extended family: 60 percent, neighbourhood friends: 28 percent; NGOs: 7 percent; local groups: 5 percent.
religious
It is however observed here that persistence of
institutional apathy and/or indecision; rampant AIDS orphanhood, and previous donor support, have goaded some individuals and PVOs in Kisumu, Kenya, to initiate some spontaneous intervention activities aimed at mitigating the plight of HIV/AIDS orphans. Among these initiatives were : 5 informal schools; 2 community orphan homes and 6 community Pharmacies.
In chapter five, specific hypotheses were tested for
statistical
significance of association. In particular, the Chi-square (X^) statistic was
V'
used to ascertain the extent to which relationships between the dependent and
the
independent
association.
variables
depart
substantially
from
chance
Among the key findings are that an orphan's access to
schooling/training is closely related to the surviving parent's/caregiver's socio-economic status, rather than his/her demographic characteristics; that
orphan
caregiver's
priority
needs preferences
economic and demographic
are influenced
by both the
variables; that a caregiver's
choice to take up orphan caregiving is always a moral one and does not depend on the economic well being of the family or caregiver; and that, a caregiver's
subsequent
inclination
to
surrender
orphan
upkeep
responsibility to another carer tends to be influenced significantly by his/her economic, rather than social or cultural factors.
Chapter six is devoted to summary discussion, conclusions, policy recommendations and suggestions for further research. essentially
a synthesis
of the theoretical
information
The chapter is reviewed
and
empirical findings on HIV/AIDS orphanhood in Kisumu, Kenya. Among the key conclusions are ; that institutional orphan care/support programmes
12
v/
are not sustainable caregiving models for Kenya, and sub-Saharan African countries in general; that orphan support agencies should recognise and built on people's strength or own capacity to cope with AIDS orphanhood; that there is an urgent need for an integrated multi-sectoral structure and strategy to co-ordinate orphan responses; that all orphan intervention programmes should base their strategies and action plans on data derived from Focused Ethnographic Studies (FES) of the target communities; that orphan assistance agencies should identify vulnerable children as early as possible
in
programmes
the
cycle
of
parental
should seek to assist
loss;
that
orphan
intervention
HIV/AIDS- affected children
and
families equally, and should as a rule not isolate AIDS orphans from other orphaned children; and that there are no model responses to the problem of AIDS orphanhood.
This is because AIDS orphanhood is a dynamic
problem whose severity varies in space, time and community.
The present study therefore recommends a mix of responses to be applied
selectively,
singly
circumstances may warrant.
or
in
varying
combinations,
as
the
The recommendations consist of specific
structural changes that should be undertaken in order to bolster the country's capacity to tackle HIV/AIDS orphanhood; together with a wide range of assistance initiatives that target orphaned children and/or their caregivers. Finally, specific issues in need of further clarification in future orphan researches are identified.
13