Cancer Survivorship: A New Subspecialty
Jennifer Klemp, PhD, MPH Assistant Professor Director, Cancer Survivorship CEO/Founder, Cancer Survivorship Training University of Kansas Cancer Center August 2013
Overview This course will healthcare providers: • Demands of Cancer Survivorship – Who, What, When, Where, Why, How • Recognize the majority of cancer survivors experience longterm and late effects of their treatment • Understand how Survivorship Care can promote and contribute to long-term health and integration into the EHR • Delivering Multidisciplinary Survivorship Care: What does it look like? • Common Concerns & Research Targets
2
“Who” is a Cancer Survivor? A cancer survivor is anyone who has been diagnosed with cancer – from the time of diagnosis and for the balance of his or her life. NCCN: National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship http://www.canceradvocacy.org/ 3
Cancer Control Continuum Diagnosis Early Detection
Prevention • Diet/Exercise • Sun Exposure • Alcohol
• Tobacco Control • Chemoprevention
•Cancer screening Pap test Mammogram PSA/DRE Fecal occult blood test Colonoscopy •Awareness of cancer risk, signs, symptoms
• Oncology/ surgery consultation
• Tumor staging
• Informed Decision Making
Treatment • Chemotherapy • Surgery
• Patient counseling & decision making
• Clinical trials
Survivorship • Long-term follow-up/ surveillance • Manage lateeffects
End of Life
• Symptom management
• Rehabilitation
• Support patient & family
• Coping
• Hospice
• Psychosocial
• Health promotion
• Informed decision making
• Radiation
• Maintenance therapy
• Prevention • Palliative Care
Phases of Cancer Care Adapted from: http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/od/continuum.html. Accessed July 25, 2011.
“Who”: Growing Number of Cancer Survivors? Estimated 18 million by 2020
http://www.cancerprogress.net/overview.html
5
“Who”: Age of Cancer Survivors Estimated Number of Persons Alive in the U.S. Diagnosed With Cancer by Current Age* *(Invasive/1st Primary Cases Only, N=11.4M survivors)
“Who”: Estimated Number of Cancer Survivors in the U.S. based on November 2009 SEER data by Site *(Invasive/1st Primary Cases Only, N=11.4M survivors)
“Who” Delivers Survivorship Care Survivorship care is by nature multidisciplinary and ideally provided using a team approach Specialty/Pri mary Care
Mental Health Physical Therapy/ Occupational Therapy
Pain
Management
Neurology/ Neuropsychology
Pulmonary
Gynecology/Urology
Endocrinology
Sexual Health/Fertility Cardiology
IOM, 2006 8
“What”: Survivorship Care is a Dynamic Process Physical/Medical
Social/Well Being
Psychosocial
Existential/Spiritual
A multidisciplinary approach to survivorship care considers a providers’ expertise and aims to meet each survivors unique physical, social, psychosocial and spiritual needs
“What”: Manage the Physical Consequences of Cancer Treatment Long-term Side Effects
Late Side Effects
• Chemotherapy
• Chemotherapy
Fatigue, endocrine symptoms, infertility, neuropathy, cognitive function, heart, kidney, and liver problems
• Surgery Scars, chronic pain
• Immunotherapy Rash/Dermatologic issues, endocrine/hypo-pituitary, GI (diarrhea, inflammatory bowel)
• Radiation Therapy
– 2nd primary cancers, cataracts, infertility, liver problems, lung disease, osteoporosis/endocrine issues, cognitive function, weight gain
• Surgery – Lymphedema, scar tissue
• Radiation Therapy – Cataracts, heart, lung, intestinal and thyroid problems, second primary cancers, memory problems, cavities and tooth decay
Fatigue, skin sensitivity 10
“What”: Manage the Psychosocial Late and Long-Term Effects of Cancer Treatment • Psychological – Depression, anxiety (fear of recurrence), uncertainty, isolation, altered body image
• Social – Changes in interpersonal relationships, concerns regarding health or life insurance, job loss, return to school, financial burden
• Existential and spiritual issues – Sense of purpose or meaning, appreciation of life 11
“When”: Across the Continuum of Care- Modified Cancer Care Trajectory Cancer-free survival Delivery of survivorship education & preventive strategies
Start Here
Recurrence/ second cancer Managed chronic or intermittent disease
Treatment with intent to cure
Diagnosis and staging
Delivery of post-treatment survivorship care
Treatment failure
Delivery of survivorship care in the advanced cancer setting
Palliative treatment Death
Institute of Medicine. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Translation. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11468. Accessed July 25, 2011.
12
“Where” Do Cancer Survivorship Receive their Care? • Multidisciplinary – physician, nurse practitioner, psychologist, social worker
• Disease-specific – Breast, prostate • Consultative service – One-time comprehensive visit – Treatment Summary and Care Plan • Integrated Care Model – Usually a NP works within the team – Ongoing care
• Shared Care Model – Collaboration with primary care
13
“Where” Elements of Shared Care Delivery • Care shared by two or more clinicians of different specialties (ie. Oncology and Primary Care)
• Who does what: understanding of roles and responsible of care • Knowledge transfer – Treatment summary and care plan
Specific information on disease General information about late & long-term effects
• Communication channels – Contact information for oncology physicians and nurses
• Active patient involvement – Encouraged to contact primary care physician with problems – Provided with the information given to the primary care physician Renders et al: Diabet Med 20:846-852, 2003; Jones et al: Am J Kidney Dis 47: 103-114, 2006 Neilsen et al: Qual Saf Health Care 12(4) 263-272.
“Why”: Recommended by National Experts The Institute of Medicine report on cancer survivorship states:
Survivorship care is a neglected phase of the cancer care trajectory Cancer recurrence, second cancers, and treatment late effects concern survivors Few guidelines are available for follow-up care Providers lack education and training
15
Why: Addressing Barriers to Quality Care • Fragmented, poorly coordinated care • Absence of locus of control or central responsibility for follow-up care • Poor communication – Among clinicians – Between clinicians and patients
• Lack of guidance on medical & psychological tests, exams, follow-up • Provider education – Cancer Care Team – Primary Care – Expanding role
Midlevel providers Nurses
• Inadequate reimbursement: prevention & survivorship are expensive • Limited experience on the best way to deliver quality care – Models of providing care are currently being evaluated & include:
Shared-care model: services provided by specialty & primary care clinicians Clinician led model (MD, PhD, NP, PA) Specialized multidisciplinary survivorship clinic
– Will depend on resources available and clinical expertise 16
Example: Practice Guidelines NCCN Survivorship Version 1.2013 • Anxiety and Depression • Cognitive Function
• Exercise • Immunizations and Infections
• Fatigue • Pain • Sexual Function
These guidelines are designed to provide a framework for general survivorship care and management and are not intended to provide specific guidelines on the surveillance and follow-up requirement for a survivor’s primary care.
• Sleep Disorders www.nccn.org Accessed April 15, 2013
17
Why: National Standards QOPI –Initiatives Survivorship Quality Indicators in audit regarding survivorship: •Chemotherapy treatment summary provided to patient within 3 months of chemotherapy end. •Chemotherapy treatment summary provided or communicated to practitioner(s) within 3 months of chemotherapy end. •Chemotherapy treatment summary process completed within 3 months of chemotherapy end.
Why: National Standards for Survivorship Care Plans by 2015 •The Survivorship Care Plan is prepared by the principal providers and given to each cancer patient upon completion of treatment. •The Survivorship Care Plan contains a record of care received, important disease characteristics, and a written follow-up care plan incorporating available and recognized evidence-based standards
“How”: Survivorship “Chronic” Care Model Community Resources & Policies Non-profits, advocacy groups Wellness communities Government agencies
Self Management & Decision Support
Health System
Delivery System Design Cancer Survivorship Care
Clinical Information Systems EHR, Care Plan Informed Activated Patient
Productive Interactions
Prepared Proactive Providers
Functional & Clinical Outcomes Adapted from: http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/index.php?p=The_Chronic_Care_Model&s=2. Accessed July 25, 2011.
20
“How”: Patient Centered Survivorship Care Community Resources/A dvocates SelfManagement
Health Care Team
Survivor
Survivors who partner their care between self-management, community resources and their health care team are often empowered to approach their care in a proactive manner.
“How”: Elements of Cancer Survivorship Post-Treatment Care • Prevention: of new cancers & other late effects of treatment; compliance with long-term therapy • Surveillance: for cancer recurrence or 2nd cancers; evaluate new symptoms – screen for complications from cancer diagnosis & Tx
• Intervention: for consequences of cancer Rx – manage complications from cancer diagnosis & Tx
• Coordination: between specialists & primary care providers to ensure health needs are met Institute of Medicine. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Translation. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11468. Accessed July 25, 2011.
Essential Elements of Survivorship Care
Earle & Ganz, JCO, Vol 30, Num 30, 2012
“How”: Components of a Survivorship Care Plan • Description of diagnosis • Summary of treatment – Therapies – Contact information for each key provider – MAJOR complications experienced
• Individual risk for late effects, second cancers – Risk assessment and management strategies: Give orally & in writing – Cancer risk – Genetic Counseling for appropriate patients.
• Long-term monitoring for late effects – Ongoing “To Do” List: Lifestyle strategies, adherence to oral therapies, etc…
Jacobs, L. Developing Models of Care for Adult Cancer Survivors.2006.
EPIC Treatment Summary and Survivorship Care Plan Template Highlights: • EPIC 2012 (enhanced workflow with EPIC 2014) • @___@ fields will auto-fill • MUST use the problems list • Data can be manually entered or smart text • Functionality lost for version 2010 users is limited to discrete data points • Meaningful use: • Printed and/or • Included in MyChart • Templates in prodution: • General (customizable) • Breast • GI • GU • Lung • Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancers
“How”: Barriers to Post-Treatment Survivorship Care Planning • How to implement a survivorship care plan?
Templates available Time consuming No/lack of reimbursement Not easily configured with medical records
• What will we do with the plan? – Will it really be used??? – JCO Dec, 2011: did not improve patient reported outcomes – JOP Jan, 2012: not ready for prime time
• Unrealistic demands on limited staff
Grunfield et al., Evaluating Survivorship Care Plans: Results of a Randomized, Clinical Trial of Patients With Breast Cancer, JCO Dec 2011. 28
How: Barriers to the Delivery of PostTreatment Survivorship Care Limited experience on the best way to deliver quality care – Models of providing care are currently being evaluated – Will depend on resources available and clinical expertise PCP’s are not prepared Oncologist want to maintain control & do not communicate Survivors are in limbo- who does what? Need ongoing professional education to bridge the gap between oncology, McCabe, JCO: 2013 specialty and primary care Grunfeld , JCO; 2006, 2011 Cheung, JCO; 2009, 2010 Del Giudice, JCO; 2009 Nekhlyudov, JCO; 2009
29
Opportunities for Continuing Education: Survivorship Care Training Web/Mobile Training Program •
Cancer Survivorship Training for Healthcare Professionals • CE and content matter expert developed curriculum www.cancersurvivorshiptraining.com
“How” Does KUMC/KUCC Deliver Survivorship Care?
31
Access to Services Shortly After Diagnosis Fertility Preservation Consult
Cancer Genetics Consult
Clinical Trials
Survivorship Care
•Nutrition Consult •Exercise Evaluation
Quality of Life
32
Examples of Post-Treatment Care Diet and Exercise Interventions
Cancer Rehab Clinical Trials
Survivorship Care
Quality of Life
CardioOncology
33
• Academic Medical Center & Hospital • 8 Community Locations • Midwest Cancer Alliance• Survivorship Clinic in Hays, KS
“A Modern Family”
Example: Prevention At Both Ends of the Cancer Continuum Breast Cancer Prevention Center
Breast Imaging & Treatment
Early Detection
Prevention • Diet/Exercise • Sun Exposure • Alcohol • Tobacco Control • Chemoprevention
•Cancer screening Pap test Mammogram Fecal occult blood test Colonoscopy Prostatespecific antigen/Digital rectal exam •Awareness of cancer risk, signs, symptoms
Diagnosis
Survivorship
Treatment
• Long-term follow-up/ surveillance
• Oncology/ surgery consultation
• Chemotherapy
• Tumor staging
• Radiation
• Patient counseling & decision making
• Symptom management
• Rehabilitation
• Psychosocial care
• Health promotion
• Clinical trials
• Surgery
• Manage lateeffects
• Coping
• Prevention
•Informed decision making
Continuum Adapted from: http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/od/continuum.html. Accessed July 25, 2011.
35
Access to Empirically Driven Services & Clinical Research • Follow-up clinic for patients >3 years from diagnosis • Monitor risk of breast & related cancers • Reproductive health (fertility) & sexuality • Cardiac risk & evaluation
• Endocrine/menopausal symptoms • Psychosocial/cognitive function • Genetic counseling and testing • Weight management: diet & exercise • Cancer Rehab/PT 36
What Trends Do We See in First 262 Patients in BrCa Survivorship Clinic? • Median age = 58 (34-86) • 88% = Stage 1 & 2 BrCa
• 70% were ER+ • 49% were premenopausal at diagnosis – Only 4% are premenopausal at entry into the Survivorship clinic • Average Weight Gain: 5 pounds – Baseline BMI at diagnosis: 25.79 – BMI at time of 1st Survivorship Visit: 27.38 • Median # of minutes of exercise/week = 60-120 Klemp JR, Smith AK, Ranallo L, Godbey D, Khan QK, Fabian CJ. Baseline characteristics of women initiating follow-up care in a newly developed breast cancer survivorship center. Cancer Res. 69, 2009.
KUMC Breast Cancer Survivorship Center n=262 • Menopausal Symptoms: – 58% Hot Flashes – 56% Vaginal Dryness – 46% NOT sexually active • 92% had undergone a bone density analysis; 50% of these women had low bone density and were on a bisphosphonate • A sizable proportion are not getting regular women’s health screening tests from PCPs. • Quality of life continues to be negatively impacted. Patients report an interest in Energy Balance, Menopausal Symptom Management, and concern over Heart and Bone Health
Examples of Common Concerns & Survivorship Research Targets • Long-term impact of cancer and its treatment – CVD risk • Diet and exercise – Weight gain – Loss of lean muscle
• Adherence with long-term therapy – Side effects (High Dose Vitamin D) – Cost • Quality of life – Cognitive dysfunction – Fatigue – Distress – Depression • Sexual health
39
Ultimate Goal
“Being cancer-free is not the same as being free of cancer” Julia Rowland, PhD Director, NCI Office of Cancer Survivorship
41
Resources • IOM: Lost in Transition report from 2005 • IOM: Implementing the Survivorship Care Planning, Workshop Report, 2006 • JCO Special Review Issue: Cancer Survivorship, November 10, 2006
• M. Feuerstein (ed.) Handbook of Cancer Survivorship, Springer, 2007 • Journal of Cancer Survivorship: New in 2007 • P.Ganz (ed.) Cancer Survivorship: Today and Tomorrow, Springer, 2007 • www.cancersurvivorshiptraining.com 42
EXTRA SLIDES Survivorship Research
43
Common Concerns: Weight Control • Unintentional weight gain or weight loss can be common in cancer survivors
• In the US, obesity is an epidemic and a well established risk factor for some cancers (ie: breast, colon, GYN) – Being overweight or obese can increase risk for cancer recurrence – Also, a worse prognosis compared to those with a normal body weight
44
Weight Control • Recommendations include: – Achieve & maintain a healthy weight – Balance caloric intake with physical activity – Engage in at least 30 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity most days of the week – Eat 5 or more fruits & vegetables per day – Limit consumption of alcohol and red meats – Choose whole grains
Doyle C, et al. Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:323-353.
45
Benefits of Physical Activity in Breast Cancer Survivors • Quality of life – Exercise after a diagnosis of cancer:
Helps with weight management Decreases CVD risk Reduces fatigue Elevates mood Reduces stress Improves sleep Improves fitness
46
Overweight and obese postmenopausal women have a 30-50% increased risk of breast cancer and have a shorter recurrence-free & decrease in overall survival • 2010 US Incidence: 33% obese, 40% of adults obese – 60-70% of women with breast cancer are overweight at diagnosis
• Etiology Risk: Increased hormones and growth factorsincreases breast cancer risk – 20% reported gaining 22-44 kg post treatment
• Prevent Obesity – Diet and exercise
• Treat Obesity – Diet, exercise, drugs, bariatric surgery Dawood S, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:1718-1725.
47
Weight, Recurrence, & Survival in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Goodwin PJ, et al, J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:42-51.
48
Weight Gain Most Often in Premenopausal Women Undergoing Chemotherapy • Sarcopenic: loss of lean muscle mass plus increase in fat mass
• Apparent within 3-6 months of diagnosis • Difficult to lose
• Associated with increased levels of insulin, cytokines, adipokines, and estrogen
49
Develop and Test a Structured Diet & Exercise Program for Breast Cancer Survivors
Research funded by Back in the Swing and the NIH BIRCWH K-12 Research in Women’s Health 50
Breast Cancer Risk Biomarkers and Energy Balance in Post-Menopausal Breast Cancer Survivors Breast Cancer Survivors, n=52 BMI >25-45 kg/m2 Pre-Test Assessment • Body Composition • Blood Work • Quality of life Surveys
6-Month Energy Balance Intervention Structured diet & exercise program targeted to Breast Cancer Survivors Post-Test Assessment • Body composition • Blood work • Quality of life surveys 51
Solution: Structured Diet & Exercise Program “Energy Balance” • Calorie controlled (1200-1600 cal/day) • Exercise – Aerobic – Resistance training
• Accountability • Group format
52
Participant Characteristics & Weight Loss, n=52 • Median age = 51 • Median time since diagnosis: 4.25 yrs • Current anti-hormone therapy = 65% • Menopausal status at diagnosis: 62% pre-menopausal At Diagnosis
PrePostIntervention Intervention
Change from Pre- to PostIntervention
Weight (lbs)
187.9
202
178.3
↓23.6 lbs (12% of the starting weight)
BMI (kg/m2)
31.2
32.6
28.2
↓13.5%
Weight post-intervention was less than at diagnosis Klemp JR, et al. J Womens Health. 2010;19:1788. Abstract P-34.
53
Increase in Minutes of Exercise Per Week
Exercise minutes per week
PreIntervention
PostChange from Intervention Pre- to PostIntervention
60
227
↑ 4X
• Exercise minutes included cardiovascular, planned exercise • A certified cancer trainer instructed participants on resistance training exercises Klemp JR, et al. J Womens Health. 2010;19:1788. Abstract P-34.
54
Common Concerns: Cardiovascular Disease • 4-fold increase in clinical CVD in women treated for breast cancer – 2% at 10 years and 12% at 25 years • Heart disease is the 2nd most common cause of death in women diagnosed with breast cancer • 80% of breast cancer survivors had a predicted CVD risk that was equal to or greater than the estimated breast cancer recurrence risk • Poor fitness level increases mortality from BrCa by 3fold Schmitz & Carver et al., . (2013). 1-6. Patnaik et al., (2011). Breast Cancer Res, 13(3), R64. Bardia et al., BrCa Res & Tx, 2012 Peel, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2009
Exercise Intensity To Improve CR Function in Combination with Weight Loss Breast Cancer Survivors • 3mo-3 yrs from Diagnosis • > 5 nodes removed • BMI >25
Baseline Measures CPET Fasting Blood Draw Body Composition & Anthropometrics Arm volume & measurements Questionnaires Slow Progressive Weight Training 2x/week for 4 weeks Behavioral Weight Control IT: Interval Training increase exercise intensity
13 weeks
Behavioral Weight Control MCT: Moderate Continuous Training
Repeated Measures CPET Fasting Blood Draw Body Composition & Anthropometrics Arm volume & measurements Questionnaires
Resistance Training Powerblocks Garmin Heart Rate Monitor
Baseline Participant Characteristics by Exercise Group
Klemp JR, Burnett D, Porter C, Schmitz KJ, Kluding P, Fabian CJ. J of Women's Health. October 2012, 21(10): 985-1013. Burnett D, Klemp JR, Porter C, Schmitz KJ, Fabian C, Kluding P. Cancer Research December 17, 2012 72:P2-1117
Examples of standard and interval exercise training sessions Time = 35 minutes
Warm up /Cool Down 60-75 % max HR Zone 1: 60-85% Maximal HR Zone 2: 85-95% Maximal HR
Burnett 2013
Results
Klemp JR, Burnett D, Porter C, Schmitz KJ, Kluding P, Fabian CJ. J of Women's Health. October 2012, 21(10): 985-1013. Burnett D, Klemp JR, Porter C, Schmitz KJ, Fabian C, Kluding P. Cancer Research December 17, 2012 72:P2-11-17.
Study Conclusions • Decrease in insulin Between Group Differences Approaching Significance • Resulted in 65% (Standard Exercise) & 69% (Interval Exercise), individual adherence with weekly cardiovascular exercise goal • Resulted in significant changes in VO2max Graded intensity exercise group experienced significantly greater improvements • Home-based exercise: convenient & practical • Education and safety are essential to avoid adverse events NCCN 2013 Survivorship Guidelines: Exercise – Risk Stratify: Low, Moderate, High, Avoid PA
Ultimate Goal
62