C Systems. Ward Atkinson Sun Test Engineering

Consumer Use of A/C Systems Ward Atkinson Sun Test Engineering Consumer Vehicle Use • Average private vehicle travel trip time 1995 20.1 minutes • ...
Author: Emery Barber
4 downloads 0 Views 350KB Size
Consumer Use of A/C Systems

Ward Atkinson Sun Test Engineering

Consumer Vehicle Use • Average private vehicle travel trip time 1995 20.1 minutes • Average private vehicle trip length 1995 11.8 miles • Average private vehicle trip speed 1995 35.4 mph

A/C System Performance • Many Factors Determine Comfort – Vehicle Colors – Location and Amount of Glass – Total System Airflow – Panel Outlets – Refrigeration Capacity – Environment



Interior Soak Temperatures

Temperature degrees F.

Soak Condition Diffrent Ambients

Many Factors Determine Comfort – Vehicle Colors – Location and Amount of Glass – Total System Airflow – Panel Outlets – Refrigeration Capacity

185 175 Clear Glass 165 Truck 155 145 135 125 115 105 95 85 90 F. White 65 F. Black 65 F. Ivory 75 F. Black 75 F. Ivory 90 F. White 65 F. Ivory Ambient - Vehicle Color

Sun Test 5-99

I.P Surface

Breath Level



Interior Soak Temperatures

Many Factors Determine Comfort – Vehicle Colors – Location and Amount of Glass – Total System Airflow – Panel Outlets – Refrigeration Capacity

Soak temp vs Colors 160 150

130 120 110

Light colors have lowest soak temperatures

Exterior Vehicle color

R ed

R ed

B lu B e lu eda rk B lu eda rk B lu eda rk G re G en re en -d ar G k re en -d ar k

ck Bl a

ck B la

ck B la

te i lv r er -d ar k w W hi hi te te -P la tin um

S

P ew

G re y

G ol d

B lu B e lu eli g ht C op pe r

ge -li gh t

100 Be i

Temperature ( F)

140



Summary of Vehicle Soak Breath Level Temperature

Many Factors Determine Comfort – Vehicle Colors – Location and Amount of Glass – Total System Airflow – Panel Outlets – Refrigeration Capacity

Soak temperature vs solar load 160

2

y = -0.0002x + 0.4279x - 145.33 2

R = 0.1249

150

Soak temperature

140

130

120

110

100 1000

1100

1200

1300 Solar load

1400

1500

1600



Effect of Panel Outlets/Airflow On Occupant Comfort

Many Factors Determine Comfort – Vehicle Colors – Location and Amount of Glass – Total System Airflow – Panel Outlets – Refrigeration Capacity

• Similar Intermediate Vehicles

Ambient 102/112F

– Breath Level City Traffic 78 F and 79 F – Breath Level Road Speed 72 F and 71 F – Panel Temperature City Traffic 56 F and 50 F – Panel Temperature Road Speed 47 F and 48 F



Passenger Comfort Two Different Intermediate Vehicles

Many Factors Determine Comfort – Vehicle Colors – Location and Amount of Glass – Total System Airflow – Panel Outlets – Refrigeration Capacity

Front vs. Rear Seat Comfort 5.5 5 Comfort Rating

4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5

City 1

City 4 City 2

40 min 30 min

City 3

45 min 35 min

Front Vehicle 2

Rear Vehicle 2

Front Vehicle 1

Rear Vehicle 1



Cooling is Required Above 65 F Ambient

Many Factors Determine Comfort – Vehicle Colors – Location and Amount of Glass – Total System Airflow – Panel Outlets – Refrigeration Capacity

Panel Outlet Air Temperature @ 170 CFM To Maintain 75 Degree F. Breath

Panel Air Temperature Degrees F.

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

65

70

75

Ambient Temperature Sun Test 5-99

With Sun

No Sun

80



City Traffic Comfort

Many Factors Determine Comfort – Vehicle Colors – Location and Amount of Glass – Total System Airflow – Panel Outlets – Refrigeration Capacity

Comfort vs CT capacity reference 6 5.5 5

Comfort y = 6E-05x + 2.8195 2

R = 0.0206

Comfort Rating

4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 Capacity ref



Panel Outlet Temperature City Traffic

Many Factors Determine Comfort – Vehicle Colors – Location and Amount of Glass – Total System Airflow – Panel Outlets – Refrigeration Capacity

Panel Temperature City Traffic 70

Panel Temperature Degrees F

65

60

55

50

45

40 1000

1100

1200

1300 Solar load

1400

1500

1600



Road Speed Comfort

Many Factors Determine Comfort – Vehicle Colors – Location and Amount of Glass – Total System Airflow – Panel Outlets – Refrigeration Capacity

Comfort vs CT capacity reference y = 6E-05x + 4.1588

6

2

R = 0.0378

5.5 5

Comfort

Comfort Rating

4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 Capacity ref



Panel Outlet Temperature Road Speed

Many Factors Determine Comfort – Vehicle Colors – Location and Amount of Glass – Total System Airflow – Panel Outlets – Refrigeration Capacity

Panel Temperature Road Speed 70

Panel Temperature Degrees F

65

60

55

50

45

40 1000

1100

1200

1300 Solar load

1400

1500

1600

Phoenix Solar Radiation



Many Factors Determine Comfort – Vehicle Colors – Location and Amount of Glass – Total System Airflow – Panel Outlets – Refrigeration Capacity – Environment

100F + Ambient

90F + Ambient 80F + Ambient

Vehicle Fuel Consumption • Effect of No A/C vs.. Open Windows • Full A/C Capacity vs.. Comfort Requirements • Maximum Energy Soak and Cooldown – Variation Due To Ambient Temperature

• Road Speed Energy Greatly Reduced

• • •

Vehicle Drag --



Effect of No A/C vs.. Open Windows Full A/C Capacity vs.. Comfort Requirements Maximum Energy Soak and Cooldown – Variation Due To Ambient Temperature Road Speed Energy Greatly Reduced

Estimated Fuel Economy Penalty Windows Down Vs CD 12.0%

3.4% Loss

Drag of Three Test Vehicles

10.0%

6.0% 4.0% 2.0%

B H

23 0 SL K

C

or v

et te

SW y

Vehicle Drag

C

el eb rit

o

ra nd Am

Fi er

G

o Fi er

38 0S L

X1 /9

Im pa la

Va na go n

Si de ki ck

T1 00

MPG % HiWay

0.6

MPG % Combined

0.5

Fuel Penalty Windows Down Vs. Drag Ranged from 1.3% -3.4%

0.4 Drag

am ry

0.0% C

MPG %

8.0%

0.3 0.2 0.1 0

4 5 1 986 998 s 001 985 98 2001 198 1986 1981 1981 1980 1980 1993 1989 987 99 xu Le ac 2 on 1 ta 1 e v 1 e s 1 ac 1 iac 1 C iac he v e de s n VW he v Fiat yota zuki 001 adill itre T oyo e Ch rce d onti Pont n GM Pont C 2 rc P go la C X1/9 00 T o ck Su C W t 430 le C HB amry rv e t 0 M e dAm ie ro Yuko ie ro ity S L M e Vana Impa T 1 ide ki LS e Vil F F e br 80S C Co LK23 ran D l S 3 G S Ce WJA 09-21-01

Vehicles

Effect of A/C Operation Vs. No A/C Windows Open

• • •

Effect of No A/C vs.. Open Windows Full A/C Capacity vs.. Comfort Requirements Maximum Energy Soak and Cooldown – Variation Due To Ambient Temperature Road Speed Energy Greatly Reduced



Fuel Consumption A/C Operating Rec. Lo Fan --OSA Hi Fan vs. Windows Down No A/C 8

7.5

7

Ambient Ranges: Lexus 90-99 F Cadillac- GMC 90 F

6.2

6

5.2

MPG

5

4.2

4 3

2.7

2.5 2.5

2.1

2.1

2 1

1.3 0.6

1.1

0.6 0.2

0

0 30 MPH

Lexus Rec. Lo Fan Lexus OSA Hi Fan WJA 09-21-01

3.3

3.1

50 MPH

0

70 MPH

Cadillac Rec. Lo Fan Cadillac OSA Hi Fan

80 MPH

GMC Rec. Lo Fan GMC OSA Hi Fan

Fuel Consumption

• • •



Effect of No A/C vs.. Open Windows Full A/C Capacity vs.. Comfort Requirements Maximum Energy Soak and Cooldown – Variation Due To Ambient Temperature Road Speed Energy Greatly Reduced

Diffrence in Fuel Use OSA vs. Rec (High Fan) 1.9

2

1.8

Ambient Ranges: Lexus 90-99 F Cadillac- GMC 90 F

1.5 1.1

1.1

MPG

1 0.7

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.5

0 30 MPH

50 MPH

70 MPH

-0.5 WJA 09-21-01

Lexus

Cadillac

GMC

-0.180 MPH

Fuel Consumption (Maximum Cooling)

• • • •

Effect of No A/C vs.. Open Windows Full A/C Capacity vs.. Comfort Requirements Maximum Energy Soak and Cooldown – Variation Due To Ambient Temperature Road Speed Energy Greatly Reduced

Lexus Driver Information Center Fuel Comsumption Hi Fan OSA & Rec vs. No A/C Windows Up 12 10.3

Ambient: 101-104 F R.H. 17%

10 8.8

MPG

8

7.1 6.4

6

4 2.5

2.3

2

0 WJA 09-21-01

30 MPH

50 MPH Hi Fan OSA

80 MPH Hi Fan Rec.

Simulated A/C Fuel Consumption Testing • Vehicle Fuel Testing (Rolls Testing with Simulated Solar) – Not Representative of A/C Energy Use

• Occupant Comfort Vs. MPG Use – Same A/C System For Different Vehicle Body Types

A/C Tunnel Simulation

• Does Not Represent “Real World” Results • Does Not Simulate Occupant Comfort • Difficult For Direct Comparison Between Test Facilities • Good For “A” “B” Test Comparison

A/C Tunnel Simulation Vehicle Testing • System Operation – Cold Panel Outlet Temperature – Energy -COP

• System Controls – Compressor – Refrigerant Flow Device

• System Testing – Single Point Vehicle Test – Multi Point Test