Yahya Al Naggar1,2, Anja Vogt2, Garry Codling2, El Saied Naiem1, Mohamed Mona1, Amal Seif1 and John P. Giesy2 1 Department 2 Toxicology
of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Tanta University 31527, Tanta, Egypt.
Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 44 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B3, Canada.
Provide an overview about OPs residues in honey, pollen and bees
in Egypt.
Characterization of 14 current use OPs
in Bee Matrices
Estimate potential hazard of OPs to bee hives.
Are there OPs residues in samples of honey, pollen and bees collected from Egypt during spring and summer 2013? Are
there
concentrations
differences between
spring
in and
summer? Is there a potential hazard from direct and/or dietary exposure to these OPs to bee colonies?
Toxicology Centre Oxon Diazinon
Malathion
Chlorpyrifos
Methyl
Profenofos
Ethoprop Fenamiphos
Dicrotophos
Dimethoate
Coumaphos Title or place of presentation
Dichlorvos
Phorate
Fenthion
Date of presentation
Toxicology Centre
35% of all arable crops need honey bees to pollinate and 90% of wild plants need bees too [1].
Egypt has about 1.3 million hives[2] : 7,700 are mud hives 270,000 beekeepers
Stats on Bee keeping in Egypt are limited but it is considered to be one of the most influential in the Middle East and
Africa [3].
Title or place of presentation
Date of presentation
Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD): Normally 15% of hives fail over winter, today its ~30% Egypt has reported incidence of CCD along River Nile [4]. To
date,
no
clear
single
explains colony loss in bees [5]
factor
Parasites and Pathogens. Malnutrition and Loss of habitat. Genetic factors and Beekeeping practice.
Pesticides Combination of all factors.
Toxicology Centre
There are no clear guidelines for use in Egypt OPs have become the major compound group used in pest control, over 80% of all insecticide used in Egypt are OPs [6]
World market share of insecticides, by class (2008) Title or place of presentation
Date of presentation
Study areas
Map of study sites (S1-15) in the Nile Delta governorates of Egypt.
[7]
Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged Safe
Weigh 3g of matrix in a 50 ml falcon tube
Fortified with 100 µL of Dimethoate d6 (PCS)
Extraction Add 27 mL of extraction solution (44% deionized water, 55% acetonitrile, and 1% glacial acetic acid).
Salting-out Add 6 g MgSO4 + 1.5 g NaAc, centrifuge (4000 rpm, 10 min)
Clean-up C18 SPE cartridges + PSA
Quantification LC-MS/MS
Shaking (1 min)
Assessment of Hazard The hazard characterization scheme applied was based on methods proposed by the USEPAs Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention for assessing risks of foliar sprayed pesticides.[8]
Uncertainty was assessed by calculating :
Best case
In the best case scenario concentrations of OPs less than the limit of detection (LOD) were set to zero (0.0)
Worst case
In the worst case scenario concentrations of OPs less than the LOD were set to LOD
Total daily intake (TDI) of pesticides received by bees via food was calculated (Equation 1): TDI = OP concentration detected in honey and pollen x Proposed total food consumption rate of adult workers (292 mg d-1)
(1)
HQs for individual OPs were calculated (Equation 2): HQs = TDI (honey + pollen )/ Acute oral LD 50
(2)
HQs based on lethality of bees exposed to OPs directly were estimated (Equation 3): HQs = OPs detected in bee body burden /Acute oral LD 50
(3)
Organophosphorous pesticides (OPs) (ng/g, wm) detected in honey, pollen and honey bees Spring No. of positive samples
Mean Conc.
Dimethoate
4/19
3.36
Dichlorvos
1/19
2.8
OP
Honey
Summer Mean Conc.
Diazinon
1/20
0.25
Dicrotophos Profenofos
1/20 2/20
0.34 0.28
Chlorpyrifos
1/20
3.27
OP
Malathion Profenofos
6/14 5/14
0.61 1.45
Diazinon Malathion
5/17 6/17
0.16 2.91
Chlorpyrifos
1/14
23.63
Dimethoate
1/17
0.43
Profenofos
16/17
11.56
Chlorpyrifos
11/17
26.44
Ch. Methyl Fenthion Diazinon
2/17 217 5/18
17.5 5.74 0.19
Fenamiphos
2/18
0.36
Profenofos
2/18
6.85
Chlorpyrifos
1/18
31.04
Pollen
Bees
No. of positive samples
Diazinon
4/16
0.42
Chlorpyrifos
1/16
32.72
Toxicology Centre
Proportion of positive samples (%)
Diazinon 100
Chlorpyrifos
90
Malathion
80
Profenofos
Spring honey
Summer honey Spring pollen
70 60 50 40
0
10
20
30
Frequencies of detections (%) (n=104)
Summer pollen Spring bees Summer bees
30 20 10 0
Percentages (%) of positive samples of OPs detected in honey, pollen and honey bees Title or place of presentation
Date of presentation
Tier-1 HQs for lethality of bees exposed to OPs in honey and pollen consumed by bees during spring
OP
Ref.LD50 (ng. bee-1)
Total Daily Intake (TDI) (ng. bee-1 day-1) Honey Honey Pollen Pollen (best case) (worst case) (best case) (worst case) 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.02
HQs (honey & pollen) best case 0.000
worst case 0.000
Diazinon
168.0
Dicrotophos
137.6
0.00
2.10
0.00
1.26
0.000
0.024
Ethoprop
5560.0
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.17
0.000
0.000
Malathion
335.2
0.00
0.13
0.18
0.18
0.001
0.001
Dimethoate
129.6
0.98
0.98
0.00
3.56
0.008
0.035
Coumaphos
14390.0
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.13
0.000
0.000
Phorate
196.0
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.58
0.000
0.003
Dichlorvos
218.4
0.82
0.82
0.00
0.16
0.004
0.004
Fenamiphos
1870.0
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.11
0.000
0.000
Profenofos
95.0
0.00
0.04
0.42
0.42
0.004
0.005
Chlorpyrifos
67.8
0.00
0.04
6.90
6.90
0.102
0.102
Ch. methyl
110.0
0.00
0.82
0.00
0.91
0.000
0.016
Fenthion
251.2
0.00
0.43
0.00
1.17
0.000
0.006
0.1 10
0.2 5
Sum Margin of Exposure (MOE)
Tier-1 HQs for lethality of bees exposed to OPs in honey and pollen consumed by bees during summer.
pesticide
Ref.LD50 (ng. bee-1)
Total Daily Intake (TDI) (ng. bee-1 day-1) Honey (worst case) 0.07
Pollen (best case) 0.05
Pollen (worst case) 0.05
HQs (honey & pollen) best worst case case 0.00 0.00
Diazinon
168.0
Honey (best case) 0.07
Dicrotophos
137.6
0.10
0.10
0.00
1.26
0.00
0.01
Ethoprop Malathion Dimethoate Coumaphos Phorate Dichlorvos
5560.0 335.2 129.6 14390.0 196.0 218.4
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.09 0.13 0.99 0.13 0.01 6.29
0.00 0.85 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.17 0.85 0.13 0.13 0.58 0.16
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.03
Fenamiphos
1870.0
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
Profenofos
95.0
0.08
0.08
3.38
3.38
0.04
0.04
Chlorpyrifos
67.8
0.95
0.95
7.72
7.72
0.13
0.14
Ch. methyl Fenthion
110.0 251.2
0.00 0.00
0.82 0.43
5.12 1.68
5.12 1.68
0.05 0.01
0.05 0.01
0.2 5
0.3 3.3
Sum Margin of Exposure (MOE)
Tier-1 HQs for lethality of bees from direct exposure to OPs during spring and summer. Conc. (ng g-1, wm) Ref.LD50 (ng. bee-1)
spring
summer
168
0.42
Dicrotophos
137.6
Ethoprop
HQs
0.19
spring best worst case case 0.000 0.000
summer best worst case case 0.000 0.000
ND
ND
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.002
5560
ND
ND
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Malathion
335.2
ND
1.11
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Dimethoate
129.6
ND
ND
0.000
0.007
0.000
0.007
Coumaphos
14390
ND
ND
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
196
ND
ND
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Dichlorvos
218.4
ND
ND
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
Fenamiphos
1870
ND
0.36
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
95
ND
6.85
0.000
0.000
0.006
0.006
67.76
32.72
31.04
0.039
0.039
0.037
0.037
110
ND
ND
0.000
0.003
0.000
0.003
251.2
ND
ND
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.04 25
0.1 10
0.04 25
0.1 10
OP
Diazinon
Phorate
Profenofos Chlorpyrifos Ch. methyl Fenthion
Sum Margin of Exposure (MOE)
0.6
Best case
Worst case
Summer
Spring
0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Spring
Summer
Comparison of HQs for lethality of bees from direct exposure or and dietary exposure to OPs .
Samples collected in summer were more contaminated with OPs. Pollen was most contaminated with OPs. Profenofos, chlorpyrifos, malathion and diazinon were the most frequently detected OPs. Coumaphos, the most common OP used directly on hives was not detected. The OPs investigated
pose a minimal threat to bees in Egypt at
measured concentrations, higher-tier assessments (Tier II and Tier III)
were not indicated by the results of this study.
Literature derived concentrations of OP insecticides daizinon, malathion, profenofos and chlorpyrifos in honey were compiled and were tested as a mixture at two different concentrations, the median and the 95th percentile for best and worst case to assess their effects on: 1.
Learning behavior and memory of bee foragers after 24 h exposure.
2.
Survival, AChE, detoxification and immunity genes transcripts of honey bee workers after 5 days exposure.
[1] Klein, A.M., Vaissie`re, B.E., Cane, J.H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S.A., Kremen, C., Tscharntke, T., 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. R. Soc. B 274,303–313 [2] The first international Forum for the Egyptian Beekeepers, 2009. (For the Best Future for Beekeeping Industry). http://pcela.rs/1st_forum_Egyptian.htm [3] http://www.beekeeping.com/articles/us/arab_countries.htm [4] Fairbrother, A., Purdy, J., Anderson, T., Fellk, R., 2014. Risks of Neonicotinoid Insecticides to Honeybees. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 33(4), 719-731. [5] Hassan, A.R., 2009. “Proceedings of the 4th COLOSS Conference”. http://www.unep.org/dewa/Portals/67/pdf/Global_bee_colony_disorder_and_threats_insect_pollinators.pdf. [6] Mansour, S.A., 2004. Pesticides exposure- Egyptian scene. Toxicol. 198, 91–115 [7] Al Naggar, Y., Vogt, A., Codling, G., Naeim, E., Mona, M., Seif, A., Giesy, J (In press). Organophosphorus insecticides in honey, pollen and bees (Apis mellifera L.) and their potential hazard to bee colonies in Egypt. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. [8] USEPA, 2012. White Paper in Support of the Proposed Risk Assessment Process for Bees. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Fate and Effects Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Contact
PhD researcher, Toxicology center, Saskatchewan University 44 campus drive, Saskatoon, S7N 5B3 Phone: 3067156328 Assistant Lecturer Zoology Department, Faculty of Science Tanta University 31527 Egypt. E-mail:
[email protected] :
[email protected] https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yahya_Al_Naggar https://usask.academia.edu/yahyaAlNaggar