Efficient Hydrogen Motors

Wilson Hago Andre Morin www.efficienthydrogenmotors.com

705 Anacapa st Santa Barbara-CA -93101

Efficient Hydrogen Motors

All Photographs are copyright of Andre Morin

Source: Science et Vie (2009)

   





Background: why bother? Present automobile technology Hydrogen in Fuel Cell Vehicles Hydrogen in Internal Combustion Engines (H2ICE) EHM H2ICE engine design features including CO2 capture EHM business strategy

Since 2005 conventional supply has not grown 5% of supply is lost every year to depletion $200/barrel $7/gallon coming in the next few years S. Foucher (2007)

Hubbert (1956) Expensive!

CO2 Levels over time Honisch et al Science (2009)

Tripati et al Science (2009)

Berner Science (1997)

CO2 levels have been been within 2x of Preindustrial levels for 60M years

Rising CO2 levels since Industrial revolution Marland (2006)

Milliken

How much should we care about CO2 levels? What should our target be? 450 PPM 600 PPM 800 PPM 1000 PPM 5000 PPM

EU stabilization point Some people will feel air stuffy CA limit for offices ASHRAE limit Federal limits for workers

CO2 tipping point: Nonlinear effects take over

1 gallon gasoline ≈ 20 lbs CO2  for a car with 20 mpg, 1 mile ≈ 1 lb CO2 Typical car drives 12k miles/year

Current CO2 emissions taxes Boulder $3/ton BC $5/ton

$14/to n

$17/to n

$40/to n

$25/ton

www.chevrolet.com/experience/fuel-solutions/fuel-cell/

EHM: the best emissions strategy is a negative emissions strategy.

•Automobiles = mobile windmills! •Take avg automobile speed of 40mph. This is 20 m/sec. Assume it exposes an area of 1 m2. At 390 ppm CO2 it encounters 15 g/sec CO2. •An average driving time in US per day is 40 min. If one installs a device with 20% capture efficiency (150 µmoles/m2 sorbent/sec) one automobile could capture 11.2 kg CO2 /day. •With 200 million vehicles doing this, this represents a capability of removing 8.2 x108 tons CO2 /year worldwide. GRT CO2 capture device •Constitutes -15% of yearly US automobile emissions production and -5% yearly worldwide automobile emissions. •Should be used with cars running on fuels with no carbon footprints. •Assumption: •CO2 removal  less ambient CO2

Tesla Roadster VW Polo Chevy Volt Toyota Prius Electricity

Big Battery

Electric Motor Automobile

CH4 Coal

Internal Combustion Engine

Carbon Footprints all over Petroleum

Little Battery

Automobile

Hydro Geothermal Wind

On-board CC

Solar

On-board CC

Electricity

Big Battery

Nuclear Biomass

Little Battery

Electric Motor Internal Combustion Engine

Electric motor

Coal with CCS CH4 with CCS

On-board H2 storage

CCS = carbon capture and sequestration CC = carbon capture

Hydrogen Production

Fuel Cell

Liquid H2 Compressed H2 Metal Hydride Complex Hydride Physisorbed H2

1966

Range: 120 miles 5 kW, 550 lbs, 1000 hrs FC Top speed: 70 mph source: www.Podtech.net

Fuel Cell Powered Vehicles Mercedes Hygenius 115HP, 258 lb-ft torque 250 mile range 66kW PEMFC Li-ion battery CGH2 4kg@10000psi

Toyota FCHV 430 mile range CGH2 6.3 kg@10000psi

Honda FCX Clarity 134 HP, 189 lb-ft 240 mile range 100kW PEMFC CGH2 4kg@5000 psi

GM HydroGen4 100HP, 235 lb-ft torque 200 mile range 93kW PEMFC CGH2 4.2kg@10000psi

Ford Focus FCV 90 HP, 140 lb-ft 200 mile range CGH2 @3600 psi Cost is still major obstacle!

OEM Strategy to FC commercialization

Phase I 2010 technology development and cost reduction Phase II 2010-2015 make fuel cell competitive to internal combustion Phase III 2015+ full scale commercialization

-Fuel cell efficiency 55% avg on dyno, 35% avg on road -Fuel cell durability