WHO CARES ABOUT DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE? PRESENTATION (PDF FORMAT)

Bank of Italy From the SelectedWorks of Paolo Santella Spring May 11, 2007 WHO CARES ABOUT DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE? PRESENTATION (PDF FORMAT) Paolo Sa...
Author: Sybil Beasley
6 downloads 0 Views 485KB Size
Bank of Italy From the SelectedWorks of Paolo Santella

Spring May 11, 2007

WHO CARES ABOUT DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE? PRESENTATION (PDF FORMAT) Paolo Santella Carlo Drago Giulia Paone

Available at: http://works.bepress.com/paolo_santella/42/

Seminar I-Com on Corporate Governance I-Com Istituto per la Competitività, Rome 11 May 2007

“Who cares about director independence?” Independent directors and company disclosure: the case of Italy in 2003 P. Santella, C. Drago, G. Paone The paper is available free of charge on IDEAS: http://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/2288.html and SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=971189

Data and methodology

„ Data are collected for 40 companies making the S&P MIB index in 2003: 284 independent directors (101 belong to not financial companies and 183 from financial companies) „ Two sets of independence criteria (EC and Preda) and 12 single criteria considered (7 EC and 5 Preda) „ Every rate for each criterion is assigned (“from the investor point of view”) using three different qualitative outcomes: “yes” compliance, “no” not compliance “ns” not disclosure. „ We derive from the initial data the adjacency matrices of cross-directorships and dual directorships. „ Free float data (to study the relationships between free float and global rates) source: Consob Independent directors and company disclosure in Italy

P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone

2

By single criteria By set of criteria (Preda and EC)

Exploratory data analysis: general compliance

Company level Company profiles

Ranking

Ranking

Scores

Scores

Global rates by company

Single criteria by company

Network level

Network structure Independent directors and company disclosure in Italy

P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone

Network analysis

3

EC Global rates by company

“Ns” rates (yellow)

Highest compliance and highest disclosure: 80 Fiat, 78.57 Enel and 76.79 Finmeccanica These companies are characterised by an higher level of compliance and disclosure (lower ns rates) but not always lower levels of not compliance

“No” rates (red)

“Yes” rates (blue)

EC criteria: Companies that show higher Independent directors compliance are Fiat, Enel, Finmeccanica. and company disclosure Such in companies also show higher free floatP.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone Italy

4

These two groups of companies are characterised by different data structures (higher compliance and disclosure versus lower not compliance and lower disclosure)

by considering the median level (60%) as global compliance rates we can build two visual groups.

Independent The situation doesdirectors not change much for Preda criteria. Similar companies and company disclosure on topinofItaly the ranking (Enel, Fiat and ENI), for which also we observe high P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone levels of not compliance but also high levels of disclosure

5

ns

fam

yesns

ns

0

1

professional qualification

shares owned

ec business relationships

1

0

1

yes

ns

0

ec.bus

1

yes

0

no

financial

no

financial

sha

ns no

1

financial

yes

pro

family ties

yes

0 no

1

oth

0

other committments

yes

bus

no

bus relationships

financial

Independentfinancial directors and company disclosure in Italy

financial

permanence on the board

cross-directorships

financial

0

1

yes

no

1

ec.cro

nsno

0

yes

ec.per

nsno

1

yes

ec.add

additional remuneration 0

financial

Lower compliance for three key criteria: other commitments and business relationships

financial

Mosaic plots: counts by rate are proportional P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone 6 to length (of the split rectangle fin\not fin)

0

other committments

1

0

1

oth yes ns

ns yes

bus

no

no

business relationships

financial

financial

1

ns

0

yes

ec.bus

no

ec business relationships

Independent directorsfinancial and company disclosure in Italy

P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone

7

family ties

pro

yes

fam

0

1

yes

nsno

1

ns

0

professional qualification

financial

financial

0

1

yes

sha

no

shares owned

Independent directorsfinancial and company disclosure in Italy

P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone

8

In general higher compliance and compliance and disclosure: comparative boxlots preda\ec disclosure for not financial companies either for preda and ec 0

60 0

20

40

60 40 20 0

ec_yes ec_ns Independent directors and company disclosure in Italy

Graphs by fi nancial

1

80

1

80

0

ec_no

pr_yes pr_ns

pr_no

Graphs by fi nancial

P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone

9

EC Company global rankings: corporate profiles

Assicurazioni Generali

Autostrade

Autogrill

Alleanza Assicurazioni

Banca Antonveneta

Benetton Popolare di Verona e Novara

Bulgari

RAS

Banca Intesa

Capitalia

Seat Pagine Gialle San Paolo IMI

Enel

Fiat ENI

Mediaset Luxottica

Mediolanum Mediobanca

STMicroelectronics

SnamRete Gas

Banche Popolari Unite

Banca Popolare di Milano

Edison

Italcementi

Gruppo Editoriale l'Espresso

RCS Mediagroup

Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena

E.Biscom(Fastweb)

BNL

Fondiaria SAI Finmeccanica

Banca Fideuram

Mondadori

TelecomItalia Mobile

TelecomItalia

Independent directors Each star represents a ec.no Star plot of global rankings: and company disclosure company. Every rank of global rate is proportional to C.Drago, G.Paone P.Santella, in Italy the length of the ray.

Pirelli & Co

ec.yes

ec.ns

Unicredito Tiscali

10

Company global rankings: corporate profiles Higher free float companies: strong “environmental pressure” on higher disclosure (and higher compliance) Cooperative banks: higher not compliance and lower compliance for EC criteria Assicurazioni Generali Autostrade Alleanza Assicurazioni

Autogrill

Banca Antonveneta

Benetton Popolare di Verona e Novara

Bulgari

RAS

Banca Intesa

Capitalia

Luxottica

Seat Pagine Gialle San Paolo IMI

Enel

Mediolanum Mediobanca

STMicroelectronics

SnamRete Gas

Pirelli & Co Mondadori

TelecomItalia Mobile

TelecomItalia ec.no ec.ns

Independent directors and company disclosure in Italy

Fiat ENI

Mediaset

Gruppo Editoriale l'Espresso

Banche Popolari Unite

Banca Popolare di Milano

Edison

Italcementi

RCS Mediagroup

Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena

E.Biscom(Fastweb)

BNL

Fondiaria SAI Finmeccanica

Banca Fideuram

pr.yes P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone

Unicredito Tiscali

ec.yes pr.ns pr.no

11

Company rankings by independence criteria: corporate profiles Higher free float companies: higher compliance but known lower performances in relational criteria

Assicurazioni Generali

Autostrade

Autogrill

Alleanza Assicurazioni

Banca Antonveneta

Benetton Popolare di Verona e Novara

Bulgari

RAS

Banca Intesa

Capitalia

Seat Pagine Gialle

Fiat ENI

Mediolanum

Pirelli & Co

Mediobanca

STMicroelectronics

SnamRete Gas

Mondatori

TelecomItalia Mobile

Telecomfam Italia sha pro bus Independent oth Star plot of rankingdirectors by criteria: Each star represents a per and company disclosure ec.bus company. Every rank of criteria is proportional to the length of P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone in Italy add cro

the ray.

San Paolo IMI

Enel

Mediaset Luxottica

Banche Popolari Unite

Banca Popolare di Milano

Edison

Italcementi

Gruppo Editoriale l'Espresso

RCS Mediagroup

Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena

E.Biscom(Fastweb)

BNL

Fondiaria SAI Finmeccanica

Banca Fideuram

Unicredito Tiscali

Cooperative banks: lower performance on 12 EC criteria

0.60 (0.27) Unicredito

Fineco

RCS

0.57 (0)

Telecom Italia 0.74 (0.20)

Milano Assicurazioni Capitalia

RAS

Mediobanca

0.61 (0.25)

E-Biscom

0.54 (0.20) 0.52 (0.17)

0.71 (0)

Fondiaria SAI 0.60 (0.30) 0.47 (0.21) Cattolica Assicurazioni

BPVN Meliorbanca

0.63 (0.29)

Banca Fideuram

Credito Bergamasco

Crossdirectorships: financial companies form the centre of the network; not financial companies are the periphery.

Pirelli

Camfin

0.57 (0)

San Paolo IMI

BNL

0.40 (0.25)

Tod's

0.51 (0.09)

Alleanza Assicurazioni

Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze

Banca Intesa 0.65 (0)

0.48 (0.22) MPS

Unipol 0.60 (0.19)

Banche popolari Unite

Italcementi 0.45 (0.17)

0.48 (0.10)

Independent directors Espresso and company disclosure in Italy 0.40 (0.17)

CIR

P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone

In the box the EC compliance rate and in brackets the incidence of cross-directorships on total number of independent directors 13

1 (0.14) Pirelli 2 (0.33) 1 (0.50) Italcementi

E-Biscom

4 (0.33) RAS

Eni Banche Popolari Unite

Unicredito

4 (0.20)

5 (0.33) Enel

1 (0.17) 3 (0.43)

Autogrill

Mediobanca 1 (0.25)

1 (0.20)

Luxottica 1 (0.33)

3 (1.00) RCS Telecom Italia

Autostrade Assicurazioni Generali

2 (0.40)

4 (0.31) Benetton

STML

2 (0.50)

Tim

Mondadori

1 (0.33)

Dual directorships:

1 (0.20)

1 (0.14)

1 (0.33)

Enlarged network size but similar structure

Banca Intesa 1 (0.14) Finmeccanica

Fondiaria SAI 1 (0.13)

Independent directors and company disclosure Alleanza in Italy

Assicurazioni

Mediolanum 1 (0.10)

Banco Popolare Verona e Novara

1 (0.11)

P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone 1 (0.05)

Mediaset

1 (0.33)

1 (0.25)

In the box the number of directors involved and in brackets the incidence of dual 14 directorships on the total

0.60

Luxottica

0.61

Autogrilll

0.71

0.53

Italcementi

0.49 0.60

Unicredito

Telecom Italia

RCS Enel 0.76

Banche Popolari Unite Mediobanca

0.54

0.60

E-Biscom 0.66

Fondiaria SAI

Fineco

0.46

Capitalia

0.60

RAS

0.47

Milano Assicurazioni

Meliorbanca

Pirelli 0.63

Assicurazioni Generali

Banco Popolare Verona e Novara

0.62

Camfin

Autostrade

0.55

0.66

Benetton 0.41

STML

Cattolica Assicurazioni

Credito Bergamasco

0.47

0.72

Eni Finmeccanica Tim

0.72

0.66

Mondadori Mediolanum

Mediaset

0.49

0.62

0.44

Banca Intesa Banca Fideuram Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze

CIR

Independent directors and company disclosure in Italy 0.40 Espresso

San Paolo IMI

MPS 0.59

Unipol

0.66

Alleanza Assicurazioni

0.59

0.63

0.41

In the box the average company compliance for EC and Preda

Dual and cross directorships networks:

The position defines the quality of compliance. Higher compliance for peripherical (and higher P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone free float) companies

BNL 0.44

15 Tod’s

Alleanza Assicurazioni Assicurazioni Generali

Banca Intesa

Aut ogrill

Autost rade

BNL

BancaMonte dei PaschiBanca Popolare di MilanoBanchePopolari Unit eBancoPopolare di V.e N.

Cross-directorship links tend to be associated also with other links and the number of independent directors in these cases is lower E.(higher incidence) ENI Capitalia Biscom (Fastweb)

Fondiaria SAI Gruppo Editorialel'Espresso

Mondadori

Pirel li & Co

Banca Antonveneta

Banca Fideuram

Benett on

Bulgari

Higher free float companies tend to have a very low incidence of crossdirectorships

Edison

Enel

Fiat

Finmeccanica

Ital cementi

Luxottica

Mediaset

Mediobanca

Mediolanum

RAS

RCS Mediagroup

STMicroelectronics

San Paolo IMI

Seat Pagine Gialle

0 .2 .4 .6 . 8 1

Snam Rete Gas

0 .2

.4 .6 .8

1

0

Telecom Italia

Telecom It alia Mobile

.2 .4 .6 .8

0 .2 .4 . 6 . 8 1

Independent directors Graphs by Company and company disclosure in Italy

1

Tiscali

0 .2

.4 . 6

Unicredit o

.8

1

0

.2 .4 .6 .8

P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone

1

0 .2 .4 .6

.8

1

Cross-directorships incidence (red) Dualdirectorships incidence (blue) Cross and Dual incidence considered together (green) 16

Similar data structure for the two sets of criteria (companies that perform better in EC tend to perform better also in Preda)

Independent directors and company disclosure in Italy

Positive linear association between free float and compliance for not financial companies. The same data structure does not hold for financial companies

Horizontal and vertical red lines indicate the median for compliance rates (y axis) and free float (x axis). The 1- labels represent the partecipation to a cross-directorship network. P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone

17

Independent directors and company disclosure in Italy

Higher disclosure for not financial companies (only those characterised by higher free float); lower disclosure for not financial C.Drago, companies part of the P.Santella, G.Paone networks.

18

Conclusion

A) General low level of compliance for both financial and not-financial companies. B) In particular, not-financial companies with more fragmented shareholder base show higher compliance rates (responsiveness to market pressure). C) Financial companies: - show an even lower level of compliance; - are connected through cross-directorship networks; - tend not to show higher compliance the more fragmented their shareholder base (poor responsiveness to market pressure) D) Financial and not-financial companies are connected through dualdirectorship networks. Independent directors and company disclosure in Italy

P.Santella, C.Drago, G.Paone

19