Master Plan

Welcome to the Master Plan Public Meeting

Existing Airport Layout

What is a Master Plan?

Decision-making tool to guide development of the Airport.

Needs to consider:

– Management and operating policies

– Safety and security

– Construction of new and expanded facilities

– Maintain practical costs

– Reserve areas for future airport development

– Customer service and satisfaction – Maintain land uses that allows for logical incremental development

Why prepare a Master Plan? To provide an overall framework needed to guide orderly and strategic development of DIA. – Meet future needs • Additional capacity • Changing travel needs and characteristics

– Address anticipated changes in the industry • New technologies • Changing aircraft fleets • Security requirements • Environmental priorities • Energy (fuel sources / prices) • Economic changes • Operational changes • Regulatory changes

– Promote cohesive and integrated development in the airport environs • Support and maximize economic contribution to region and state • Foster compatible development

How did we get here? The opening of DIA has led to strong passenger traffic growth. Annual Passenger Traffic at Denver International Airport 100,000,000

90,000,000

80,000,000

Early 1970s/1980s Congestion at Stapleton Airport leads to an expansion study for the existing airport and a site selection study for a new airport

-

60,000,000

-

40,000,000

-

30,000,000

-

20,000,000

2001 Economic recession and attacks of September 11th

-

70,000,000

50,000,000

Passengers

September 2003 Opening of sixth runway, Runway 16R/34L – the 16,000-foot runway is the longest commercial runway in North America May 1989 Denver approves referendum to build Denver International Airport 1994 Continental Airlines announces dismantling of Denver hub and the new Frontier Airlines launches

May 1988 Adams County annexation election agrees to annexation of land for Airport to the City and County of Denver April 1988 Intergovernmental Agreement signed by Adams County and the City and County of Denver 1986 Original Frontier Airlines ceases operations

ORIGINAL DESIGN CAPACITY – 50 MILLION PASSENGERS

September 1989 FAA Approval / Groundbreaking

40-Millionth Passenger

Base Forecast

30-Millionth Passenger

-

1980

50-Millionth Passenger

February 28, 1995 Airport Opening

STAPLETON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 10,000,000

2006 Southwest Airlines launches service from Denver

1985

1990

DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

1995

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

How is DIA doing? Feature

Summary

Passenger Traffic

Fifth-busiest airport in North America and one of the highest growth rates of major airports in past five years

2008 Rank Airport Passengers 1 Atlanta 90,039,280 2 Chicago O’Hare 69,353,654 3 Los Angeles 59,542,151 4 Dallas/Ft. Worth 57,069,331 5 Denver 51,245,334 6 New York/JFK 47,790,485 7 Las Vegas 44,074,707 8 Houston/Bush 41,698,832 9 Phoenix 39,890,896 10 San Francisco 37,234,592 11 Orlando 35,622,252 12 Newark 35,299,719 13 Detroit 35,144,841 14 Charlotte 34,732,584 15 Miami 34,063,531

Annual Passenger Traffic US Rankings Calendar Year 2008

Percent Change in Scheduled Seat Departures January - June 2008 vs. January - June 2009 5% -

Resiliency

Airline capacity has remained strong compared to other large airports in challenging economic climate

0% -5% -

-2.0%

-2.4%

-3.5%

-3.9%

-4.4% -6.4%

-10% -

-9.4%

-10.5%

-10.9%

-15% -

-15.1%

Ph oe ni x Lo s An ge le Ch s ic ag o O’ Ha re La s Ve ga s

Yo rk /J FK Sa n Fr an cis co Ho us to n/ Bu sh

N ew

$18.00 $17.00 $16.00 -

$16.85 $16.07 $15.58

$15.00 $14.00 -

$15.28

$15.20

$14.33

$14.51

$14.27 $12.86

$13.00 -

$12.90

$13.01

$11.41

$12.00 -

$10.69 $10.59

$11.00 -

st

)

20 07 20 0 (e 8

20 06

20 05

20 04

20 03

20 02

20 01

20 00

19 99

19 98

$10.00 19 96 19 97

Airline costs have been reduced by 31 percent over last seven years

DIA Cost per Enplaned Passenger

19 95

Airline Costs

At la nt a

DE N Da VE lla R s/ Ft .W or th

-20% -

Sources: Airports Council International; OAG Schedule Tapes; and Denver International Airport Financial Statistics

Destinations Served Nonstop from Denver International Airport Domestic and International

How is DIA doing?

To Anchorage Edmonton Vancouver

Seattle

Spokane Pasco

Portland

Calgary

Saskatoon Regina

Kalispell Missoula Helena

Eugene

Dickinson

Bozeman

Boise

Bismarck

Billings

Redmond Medford

Winnipeg

Great Falls

Montreal

Fargo

Ottawa

Cody Sheridan Jackson Gillette Worland Rapid City Idaho Falls Casper Riverton

Traverse City Appleton Madison

Pierre Sioux Falls

Chadron Rock Springs

Feature

Summary

Domestic Destinations

Increase in nonstop destinations

Sacramento Oakland San Francisco San Jose

Reno

Salt Lake City

Vernal

London/Heathrow

Minneapolis

Laramie

Scottsbluff Cheyenne North Platte Steamboat Springs McCook Kearney Vail Aspen

Des Moines

Milwaukee Cedar Rapids Moline

Grand Rapids

Boston

Toronto

Frankfurt

Detroit New York-LGA New York-JFK

Newark Cleveland Chicago-ORD & MDW Akron/Canton Philadelphia Pittsburgh Columbus Baltimore

Omaha Peoria Lincoln Dayton Indianapolis Washington IAD Grand Cincinnati -DCA Junction Gunnison Fresno Hays Moab Kansas City Colorado Montrose Monterey Springs St Louis Garden City Telluride Pueblo Great Bend Cortez Bakersfield Las Vegas Alamosa Dodge City Durango Wichita Liberal Farmington Santa Barbara Raleigh/Durham Springfield Knoxville Burbank Tulsa Charlotte Ontario Nashville Los Angeles Amarillo To Honolulu, Memphis Fayetteville Albuquerque Palm Springs Orange County Lihue, Kona & Kahului Oklahoma City Little San Diego Atlanta Huntsville Rock Phoenix

DENVER

Birmingham

Tucson

Dallas El Paso

Austin San Antonio

Houston-IAH & HOU

New Orleans Orlando Tampa Ft. Lauderdale Miami

Cargo tonnage has decreased by 50 percent over last eight years

Noise

No noise violations in 2008

Regional Economy

$22.3 billion per year in employee salaries and related economic activity

Environmental Industry leader for Focus environmental stewardship

Mazatlan

Cancun Cozumel

Puerto Vallarta

Mexico City Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo

N W

E S

San Jose

Total Annual Aircraft Operations 650,000

600,000 Note: Some markets served seasonally only Source: Official Airline Guide (OAG) Schedule Tapes, June 2008

550,000

500,000

450,000

400,000 19 80 19 81 19 82 19 83 19 84 19 85 19 86 19 87 19 88 19 89 19 90 19 91 19 92 19 93 19 94 19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04 20 05 20 06 20 07 20 08

Cargo

Nonstop service to London and Frankfurt and multiple destinations in Canada, Mexico, and Costa Rica

Aircraft Operations (Takeoffs & Landings)

International Destinations

Los Cabos

What is the Master Plan process? The master plan will be completed in the 1st quarter of 2010. FAA Approval

Demand scenarios Projections – Passengers – Aircraft operations – Cargo – General Aviation

Assess capacity of existing facilities Determine future facility needs

Preferred Development Plan

Alternatives Concepts TERMINAL

LANDSIDE SUPPORT

AIRFIELD Alternative Concepts

SCREENING Screened Concepts

INTEGRATION Integrated Concepts

SCREENING Shortlist Integrated Concepts

EVALUATION Preferred Alternative

Refine based on feedback from stakeholders Final adjustment based on technical requirement

Implementation Plan

Airport Layout Plan

Phasing of expansion Business planning Environmental overview

Capital improvement plan Facility development decision tree Financial plan

We Are Here

Ongoing Public Outreach

Advisory Committee

Public Meeting

Advisory Committee

Advisory Committee

Outreach

Public Meeting



Advisory Committee

Terminal Airfield Landside Support facilities

Forecast

Facility Requirements

Advisory Committee

Inventory

FAA Approval

Airline Plans

How are the forecasts developed? STEP 1

Forecast base activity in 2030 using FAA, airline, historic and socioeconomic data STEP 2

Developed a range of potential future scenarios

STEP 3

Evaluate the implications of airport operations and passenger activity under different scenarios STEP 4

Project passenger, aircraft, and cargo activity in 2030 for each forecast scenario

Base Forecast

Aircraft Operations

FAA

FORECAST

Aircraft Fleet

Growth (2008 to 2030) Forecast Scenario Passengers

Socioeconomic Data

Implications

Historical Trends National Aviation Activity & Trends

+ 84 %

+ 77 %

+ 108 %

+ 98 %

Increased demand for all facilities

Scenario 2: Decrease in hubbing /connecting activity

+ 64 %

+ 60 %

More landside support (car rental, hotel, parking) More terminal support (security checkpoints, ticketing) Reduced airfield operations Reduced gate demands

Scenario 3: An evolution to larger aircraft fleet

+ 84 %

+ 64 %

Requires fewer gates but more concourse frontage Fewer aircraft operations Airfield enhancements

Scenario 4: Robust international growth as Denver evolves into an international gateway + 103 %

+ 90 %

Larger aircraft International arrival facilities Higher connection percentage

Scenario 1: High Growth

Forecast of activity received FAA approval in 2007. The long-term activity growth trends serve as the basis for long range airport development planning and factors may influence actual activity growth (e.g. such as current economic conditions).

What is forecasted between now and 2030? Significant future growth is anticipated at DIA. Scenario 1 Scenario 4 Scenario 3 Base Forecast Scenario 2

100,000,000

Existing Base Forecast (2006-2015) High Growth (2006-2015) Base Forecast Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

Commercial Passengers

80,000,000

Existing Base Forecast (2006-2015) High Growth (2006-2015) Base Forecast Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

600,000

60,000,000 40,000,000 20,000,000 Historic Tonnage

0

Forecast Tonnage

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

1,100,000 Commercial Passenger Operations

Activity Forecast Scenarios Commercial Operations (Takeoffs & Landings)

700,000

500,000

2000

Scheduled Aircraft Activity

800,000

2030

900,000 800,000

Other Aircraft Activity

Cargo Forecast

700,000

General Aviation Existing General Aviation Forecast

600,000

Other Air Taxi Existing

500,000

Other Air Taxi Forecast Military Existing

400,000

Military Forecast

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

300,000 200,000 100,000 0 2000

Cargo Existing

2000

400,000

2035

Scenario 4 Scenario 1 Base Forecast Scenario 3 Scenario 2

1,000,000

Cargo Volume (in tons)

Activity Forecast Scenarios Commercial Passengers

120,000,000

Cargo Volume Forecasts

2035

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

2035

45,000 40,000 Operations (Takeoffs & Landings)

Commercial Passengers

35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Year 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029

Master plan activity forecasts guide a range of facility needs over a 25-year planning horizon. Actual development decisions will be based on achieving projected activity triggers rather than specific calendar milestones.

Evaluation Criteria

What are the airfield needs? One runway by 2015 and two to three more by 2030. Aircraft Delay Curve

Historical Annual Operations Projected Annual Operations -Base Forecast Average Aircraft Delay Current ATC Procedures

1,400,000

7.0

1,200,000

6.0 Annual Capacity - Existing Airfield & Current Air Traffic Procedures 789,000 Operations

1,000,000 800,000

5.0 4.0

600,000

3.0

400,000

2.0

200,000

1.0

0 2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

0.0 2030

Average Delay Per Operation (Minutes)

Annual CapacityExisting Airfield

Operations (Takeoffs & Landings)

Existing Airfield (Base Forecast)

Note: The average delay per aircraft values reflect only those delays attributed to the runway component. Other operational delays, such as those associated with aircraft taxi operations, enroute airspace and/or gate availability are not included in these values.

Runway Requirements 12

Total Number of Runways

10 8 6 4 Current Airfield Future Airfield (2030) Future Airfield (Beyond 2030) Annexation Line Property Line

2 0 2006

2030

2030

Existing Base Forecast Scenario 1

2030

Scenario 2

2030

Scenario 3

2030

Scenario 4

- Meets 2030 requirements - Airfield operational efficiency - Length of additional taxiway development - Impacts to existing facilities

What are the terminal needs? In the short term (2015), expansion of the existing facilities. – 20 additional gates – International passenger processing and gates – Passenger train expansion – Baggage system upgrades – Expansion of passenger security screening – FasTracks rail station – On-site hotel accommodations

What are the terminal needs? Existing Terminal Area

In the long term (2030), creation of new facilities. Gate Requirements

– Significant international passenger processing expansion

CONCOURSE C

8.0 -

- 300

7.0 -

- 250

CONCOURSE B

– Terminal expansion equivalent to two or three additional modules (existing terminal consists of three modules)

Gate Frontage Required

– Passenger train and baggage system expansions

Gate Frontage Available Build-out of Concourses A, B, C Mainline Equivalent Gates Required

Miles of Gate Frontage

6.0 -

- 200

5.0 4.0 -

- 150 CONCOURSE A

3.0 -

- 100

2.0 -

TERMINAL

1.0 0.0 -

- 50

MODULE 1 MODULE 2

2006

Existing

2015

Base Forecast

2020

Base Forecast

2025

Base Forecast

2030

MODULE 3

Base Forecast

2030

2030

2030

2030

-0

Mainline Equivalent Gates Required

– Approximately 100 additional gates

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

Forecast Demand Scenarios

7.0 -

- 250

Gate Frontage Required Gate Frontage Available Build-out of Concourses A, B, C Mainline Equivalent Gates Required

Miles of Gate Frontage

6.0 -

- 200

5.0 4.0 -

- 150

3.0 -

- 100

2.0 1.0 -

- 50

0.0 -

-0

2006

Existing

2015

Base Forecast

2020

Base Forecast

2025

Base Forecast

2030

Base Forecast

Forecast Demand Scenarios

Terminal Requirements

2030

2030

2030

2030

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

4,500,000 -

-7

4,000,000 -

-6

3,500,000 -

Terminal Area Required Number of Terminal Modules

Terminal Area (square feet)

- 300

Mainline Equivalent Gates Required

8.0 -

-5

3,000,000 2,500,000 -

-4

2,000,000 -

-3

1,500,000 -

-2

1,000,000 -

-1

500,000 0-

2006

Existing

2015

Base Forecast

2020

Base Forecast

2025

Base Forecast

2030

Base Forecast

Forecast Demand Scenarios

2030

2030

2030

2030

-0

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

Number of Terminal Modules

Terminal Requirements

Gate Requirements

What are the concepts for terminal expansion? Evaluation Criteria - Meets 2030 requirements - Flexibility to meet demands beyond 2030 - Passenger convenience - Meets security requirements

Current Terminal/Concourses Future Terminal & Concourse Expansion (2030) Future Terminal & Concourse Expansion (Beyond 2030)

Existing Template Expansion Concept

East/West Terminal and Concourse Concept

South Terminal Concept

What are the landside needs? Expansion of all facilities over the planning horizon.

Public Parking Requirements

- 600

Existing Spaces Acres

Spaces

70,000 60,000 50,000 -

- 500

40,000 -

- 300

- 400

30,000 20,000 -

- 200 - 100

10,000 0-

Existing

2006

2015

Base Forecast

2020

Base Forecast

2025

Base Forecast

2030

Base Forecast

2030

2030

2030

2030

-0

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

Employee Parking Requirements 14,000 -

150 -

400 100 Existing

Requirements at 100 % Utilization

50 -

Existing Spaces

0-

- 80

10,000 -

- 70

8,000 -

- 60

6,000 -

- 40

- 50 - 30

4,000 -

2006

Existing

2015

Base Forecast

2020

Base Forecast

2025

Base Forecast

2030

Base Forecast

Forecast Demand Scenarios

2030

2030

2030

2030

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

Acres

Spaces

Requirements at 85% Utilization

Acres

Acres

200

- 90

12,000 -

200 -

300

- 100

- 20

2,000 0-

- 10 2006

Existing

2015

Base Forecast

2020

Base Forecast

2025

Base Forecast

2030

Base Forecast

Forecast Demand Scenarios

2030

2030

2030

2030

-0

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

Acres

250 -

500

90

- 700

80,000 -

Rental Car Facility Requirements

600

100

90,000 -

Forecast Demand Scenarios

700

0

- 800

Existing

800

100

100,000 -

Acres

– Roadways – Parking – Rental Car – Terminal Curbside – Commercial Vehicle Facilities

Rental Ca

Requirements at 85% Utilization Requirements at 100 % Utilization

What are the concepts for landside expansion?

Existing Template Expansion Concept

East/West Terminal and Concourse Concept

South Terminal Concept

Public Parking Rental Car Facilities Employee Parking Landside People Mover Ground Transportation Center

FasTracks Rail Alignment Future Roadways Annexation Line Property Line

Evaluation Criteria - Ability to accommodate 2030 demands - Location of facilities - Efficient land utilization

Evaluation Criteria

What are the support facility needs? Expansion of most facilities required over the planning horizon.

- Meets 2030 requirements - Regional access - Proximity to associated facilities - Utilities/other infrastructure - Expandability

Support Facilities Requirements 120 -

2006 Existing 2015 2030

100 80 60 40 -

io

n

ns

at is

tr

ra

in

pe

Ad

m

tO or Ai

rl

in

e

rp Ai

or rp Ai

tio

an en nt

ai tM

ht ig Fl

ce

ns

Ki

tc

dl an lH

he

in

g

E ia

Co

ns

ol

id

at

ed

Ai

rl

M

in

at

e

er

M

Ai

ai

rl

nt

in

en

e

an

GS

ce

n io at vi lA

ra ne Ge

Be

lly

l-

Fr

Ca

ei

rg

gh

t

o

0-

Al

Acres

20 -

Support Facilities Alternatives

Current Airfield Future Airfield (2030) Future Airfield (Beyond (2030) Existing Support Facilities Future Areas for Support Facilities Annexation Line Property Line

What are the next steps? Public and Stakeholder Outreach

TERMINAL

LANDSIDE SUPPORT

AIRFIELD

– Additional advisory committee meetings

Alternative Concepts

– Second public meeting on preferred development plan (mid-summer 2009)

SCREENING Screened Concepts

– FAA review and approval of airport layout plan (early 2010)

INTEGRATION Integrated Concepts

We Are Here

SCREENING Shortlist Integrated Concepts

EVALUATION Preferred Alternative

Preparationof ofAirport Airport Layout PlanPlan Preparation Layout

Input from the public is encouraged and welcomed. – Fill out a comment card – Visit www.flydenver.com/masterplan – Email [email protected]

Master Plan

How can you provide input?