UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Redelijkheid en overredingskracht van argumentatie : een historisch-filosofische studie over de combinatie van het dialectische en het retorische perspectief op argumentatie in de pragma-dialectische argumentatietheorie Wagemans, J.H.M.

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA): Wagemans, J. H. M. (2009). Redelijkheid en overredingskracht van argumentatie : een historisch-filosofische studie over de combinatie van het dialectische en het retorische perspectief op argumentatie in de pragmadialectische argumentatietheorie

General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)

Download date: 12 Aug 2017



Bibliografie Deze bibliografie bevat uitsluitend werken waar in dit proefschrift naar is verwezen. Voor een uitgebreide bibliografie van studies over dialectica, retorica en argumentatietheorie zie http://home.medewerker.uva.nl/j.h.m.wagemans. Barnes, J. (Ed.) (1995). The complete works of Aristotle. The revised Oxford Translation. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. 2 volumes. 6th printing, with corrections. [Bollingen Series LXXXI, 2.] Princeton: Princeton University Press. [1984.] Bons, J.A.E. (2004). Plutarch as source for early Greek rhetoric. The case of Gorgias frg. 23 DK. In L. de Blois, J.A.E. Bons, T. Kessels & D. Schenkeveld (Eds.), The statesman in Plutarch’s works (vol. 1, pp. 237-248). Leiden/Boston: Brill. Bons, J.A.E. (2007). Gorgias the sophist and early rhetoric. In I. Worthington (Ed.), A companion to Greek rhetoric (pp. 37-46). Malden, MA/Oxford/Carlton: Blackwell. Braet, A.C. (1999). Aristoteles’ Rhetorica : Een werk dat pathos veroordeelt én behandelt. Taalbeheersing, 21, 206-219. Conley, Th.M. (1990). Rhetoric in the European tradition. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Cornford, F.M. (1979). Plato’s theory of knowledge: The Theaetetus and the Sophist of Plato translated with a running commentary. Reprint. London/Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul. [1935.] Diels, H., & Kranz, W. (1989). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und Deutsch von Hermann Diels. Herausgegeben von Walther Kranz. 3 Bände. 18. Auflage, unveränderter Nachdruck der 6. Auflage 1951. Zürich/Hildesheim: Weidmann. [1951.] Eemeren, F.H. van (1987). Argumentation studies’ five estates. In J. Wenzel (Ed.), Argument and critical practices: Proceedings of the Fifth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 9-24). Annandale, VA: SCA. Eemeren, F.H. van (2001). The state of the art in argumentation theory. In F.H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory (pp. 11-26). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

208

Eemeren, F.H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1982). Regels voor redelijke discussies: Een bijdrage tot de theoretische analyse van argumentatie ter oplossing van geschillen. Dordrecht: Foris. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Berlin/Dordrecht: De Gruyter/Foris. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1999a). Delivering the goods in critical discussion. In F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair & Ch.A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 163-167). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1999b). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies, 1(4), 479-497. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2000). Rhetorical analysis within a pragmadialectical framework: The case of R.J. Reynolds. Argumentation, 14(3), 293-305. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2002a). And always the twain shall meet. In F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 3-11). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2002b). Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. In F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 131-159). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (Eds.) (2000). The relation between dialectic and rhetoric. Argumentation, 14(3) (special issue). Eemeren, F.H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (Eds.) (2002). Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst, R., & Kruiger, T. (1986). Drogredenen. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff. Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa/London: The University of Alabama Press. Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst, R., Snoeck Henkemans, A.F., et al. (1997). Handboek argumentatietheorie: Historische achtergronden en hedendaagse ontwikkelingen. Groningen: Nijhoff. Eemeren, F.H. van, Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. (2005). Argumentatieve indicatoren in het Nederlands: Een pragma-dialectische studie. Amsterdam: Rozenberg.

209

Ferwerda, R. (1996). Sextus Empiricus – Grondslagen van het scepticisme. Vertaald, ingeleid en van aantekeningen voorzien door R. Ferwerda. Baarn: Ambo. Ferwerda, R., & Eykman, J. (1989). Diogenes Laërtius – Leven en leer van beroemde filosofen. Vertaald door dr. Rein Ferwerda en dr. Jan Eykman. Baarn: Ambo. Fine, G. (1999a). Introduction. In G. Fine (Ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 1-35). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fine, G. (1999b). Knowledge and belief in Republic 5-7. In G. Fine (Ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 215-246). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Reprinted from S. Everson (Ed.) (1990), Cambridge companions to ancient thought 1: Epistemology (pp. 85-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.] Foss, S.K., Foss, K., & Trapp, R. (2002). Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric. 3rd edition. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. Gagarin, M. (2001). Did the Sophists aim to persuade? Rhetorica, 19(3), 275-291. Gamut, L.T.F. (1991). Logic, language, and meaning 1: Introduction to logic. Chicago/ London: University of Chicago Press. Garssen, B.J. (1997). Argumentatieschema’s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief: Een theoretisch en empirisch onderzoek. Amsterdam: IFOTT. Gerbrandy, P. (2001). Quintilianus – De opleiding tot redenaar. Vertaald (uit het Latijn), ingeleid en van aantekeningen voorzien door Piet Gerbrandy. Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij. Gill, Ch., & McCabe, M.M. (2004). Introduction. In Ch. Gill & M.M. McCabe (Eds.), Form and argument in late Plato (pp. 1-4). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Green, L.D. (1994). Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Renaissance views of the emotions. In P. Mack (Ed.), Renaissance rhetoric (pp. 1-26). New York: St. Martin’s Press. Hasper, P.S. (2003). The metaphysics of continuity: Zeno, Democritus & Aristotle. Dissertation University of Groningen. Hasper, P.S., & Krabbe, E.C.W. (te verschijnen). Aristoteles – Over drogredenen: Sofistische weerleggingen. Vertaald, ingeleid en van aantekeningen voorzien door Pieter Sjoerd Hasper en Erik C.W. Krabbe. Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij. Heysse, T. (1997). Why logic doesn’t matter in the (philosophica����������������� l) study of argumentation. Argumentation, 11(2), 211-224. Hohmann, H. (2002). Rhetoric and dialectic: Some historical and legal perspectives. In F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 41-51). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Hösle, V. (1998). Hegels System: Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität. 2. Auflage. Hamburg: Meiner. Hunink, V. (1992). Apuleius – Toverkunsten: Pleidooi na een aanklacht wegens magische praktijken. Vertaald en van aantekeningen voorzien door Vincent Hunink met een inleiding van Rudi van der Paardt. Amsterdam: Athenaeum-Polak & Van Gennep.

210

Huys, M. (2004). Aristoteles – Retorica. Vertaald, ingeleid en van aantekeningen voorzien door Marc Huys. Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij. Johnstone, H.W. (1988). Questions about philosophical argumentation: Introduction. Argumentation, 2(2), 153-155. Kahn, Ch.H. (1996). Plato and the socratic dialogue: The philosophical use of a literary form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kennedy, G.A. (1994). A new history of classical rhetoric. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Kirk, G.S., Raven, J.E., & Schofield, M. (1983). The presocratic philosophers: A critical history with a selection of texts. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Krabbe, E.C.W. (2001). Dialectical and rhetorical strategies. In H.V. Hansen, Ch.W. Tindale, J.A. Blair, R.H. Johnson & R.C. Pinto (Eds.), Argumentation and its applications (pp. 1-13). Windsor, ON: OSSA. [CD-ROM ISBN 0-9683461-2-X.] Krabbe, E.C.W. (2002). Meeting in the house of Callias: An historical perspective on rhetoric and dialectic. In F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 29-40). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Laar, J.A. van (2003). The dialectic of ambiguity: A contribution to the study of argumentation. Dissertation University of Groningen. Lausberg, H. (1998). Handbook of literary rhetoric: A foundation for literary study. Forword by George A. Kennedy. Translated by Matthew T. Bliss, Annemiek Jansen, and David E. Orton. Edited by David E. Orton and R. Dean Anderson. Leiden/ Boston/Köln: Brill. Leeman, A.D., & Braet, A.C. (1987). Klassieke retorica: Haar inhoud, functie en betekenis. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff/Forsten. Leff, M. (2002). The relation between dialectic and rhetoric in a classical and a modern perspective. In F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 53-63). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Mansfeld, J. (1983). Die Vorsokratiker I: Milesier, Pythagoreer, Xenophanes, Heraklit, Parmenides. Griechisch/Deutsch. Auswahl der Fragmente, Übersetzung und Erläuterungen von Jaap Mansfeld. [Reclams Universal-Bibliothek 7965.] Stuttgart: Reclam. Mansfeld, J. (1986). Die Vorsokratiker II: Zenon, Empedokles, Anaxagoras, Leukipp, Demokrit. Griechisch/Deutsch. Auswahl der Fragmente, Übersetzung und Erläuterungen von Jaap Mansfeld. [Reclams Universal-Bibliothek 7966.] Stuttgart: Reclam. Marten, R. (1965). Der Logos der Dialektik: Eine Theorie zu Platons Sophistes. Berlin: De Gruyter. May, J.M., & Wisse, J. (2001). Cicero – On the ideal orator ( De oratore). Translated, with introduction, notes, appendixes, glossary, and indexes by James M. May and Jakob Wisse. New York: Oxford University Press.

211

McCabe, M.M. (2004). Unity in the Parmenides: The unity of the Parmenides. In Ch. Gill & M.M. McCabe (Eds.) (2004), Form and argument in late Plato (pp. 5-47). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Meinhardt, H. (1990). Platon – Der Sophist. Einleitung, Übersetzung und Kommentar von Helmut Meinhardt. Griechisch/Deutsch. [Reclams Universal-Bibliothek 6339.] Stuttgart: Reclam. Owen, G.E.L. (1986). Logic, science, and dialectic: Collected papers in Greek philosophy. Edited by Martha Nussbaum. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Perelman, Ch., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). La nouvelle rhétorique: Traité de l’argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Perelman, Ch., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Translated by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. [Translation of Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca (1958).] Popper, K.R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Popper, K.R. (1978). De groei van kennis. Vertaling van Zeno Swijtink. 3e druk. Meppel: Boom. [Vertaling van hoofdstukken uit Popper (1963).] Poster, C. (1997). Aristotle’s rhetoric against rhetoric: Unitarian reading and esoteric hermeneutics. American Journal of Philology, 118, 210-249. Rapp, Ch. (2002). Aristoteles – Rhetorik. Übersetzt und erläutert von Christof Rapp. 2 Halbbände. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Rees, M.A. van (2006). Variaties op een thema: Opstellen over de rationaliteit van verbale communicatie van M.A. van Rees. Bezorgd door Frans van Eemeren en Peter Houtlosser. Amsterdam: Rozenberg. Ritter, J., Gründer, K., & Gabriel, G. (Hgg.) (1971-2007). Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. 13 Bände. Basel: Schwabe. Robinson, R. (1953). Plato’s earlier dialectic. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1941.] Ryle, G. (1965). Dialectic in the academy. In R. Bambrough (Ed.), New essays on Plato and Aristotle (pp. 39-65). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Slomkowski, P. (1997). Aristotle’s Topics. [Philosophia Antiqua LXXIV.] Leiden/ New York/Köln: Brill. Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. (1997). Analysing complex argumentation: The reconstruction of multiple and coordinatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. Sprute, J. (1994). Aristotle and the legitimacy of rhetoric. In D.J. Furley & A. Nehamas (Eds.), Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Philosophical essays (pp. 117-128). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Stemmer, P. (1992). Platons Dialektik: Die frühen und mittleren Dialoge. Berlin: De Gruyter.

212

Stenzel, J. (1961). Studien zur Entwicklung der platonischen Dialektik von Sokrates zu Aristoteles. 3. Auflage, unveränderter Nachdruck der 2., erweiterten Auflage von 1931. Stuttgart: Teubner. [1931.] Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Toulmin, S.E. (1976). Knowing and acting: An invitation to philosophy. New York: MacMillan. Toulmin, S.E. (2001). Return to reason. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press. Ueding, G. (Hg.) (1992ff.) Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik. 8 Bände. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Vlastos, G. (1991). Socrates: Ironist and moral philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vlastos, G. (1999a). The socratic elenchus. In G. Fine (Ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 36-63). Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Reprinted from Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 1 (1983), 27-58.] Vlastos, G. (1999b). Socrates’ disavowal of knowledge. In G. Fine (Ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 64-92). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Reprinted from Philosophical Quarterly, 35 (1985), 1-31.] Volkmann, R. (1987). Die Rhetorik der Griechen und Römer in systematischer Übersicht. [Nachdruck der 2. Auflage, Leipzig 1885.] Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Olms. [Leipzig: Teubner, 1885.] Wagner, T., & Rapp, Ch. (2004). Aristoteles – Topik. Übersetzt und kommentiert von Tim Wagner und Christof Rapp. [Reclams Universal-Bibliothek 18337.] Stuttgart: Reclam. Walton, D.N., & Krabbe, E.C.W. (1995). Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Wenzel, J.W. (1979). Jürgen Habermas and the dialectical perspective on argumentation. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 16(2), 83-94. Wenzel, J.W. (1992). Perspectives on argument. In W.L. Benoit, D. Hample & P.J. Benoit (Eds.), Readings in argumentation (pp. 121-143). Berlin/New York: Foris. [Reprinted from J. Rhodes & S. Newell (Eds.) (1980), Proceedings of the 1979 Summer Conference on Argument (pp. 112-133). Falls Church: SCA.] Win, X. de (1999). Plato – Verzameld werk. 5 delen. Nieuwe, geheel herziene uitgave. Kapellen/Baarn: Pelckmans/Agora. [1962-1965.] Wlodarczyk, M. (2000). Aristotelian dialectic and the discovery of truth. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 18, 153-210. IJsseling, S. (1975). Retoriek en filosofie: Wat gebeurt er wanneer er gesproken wordt? Bilthoven: Ambo. Yunis, H. (2007). Plato’s rhetoric. In I. Worthington (Ed.), A companion to Greek rhetoric (pp. 75-89). Malden, MA/Oxford/Carlton: Blackwell.

213

Zekl, H.G. (1997). Aristoteles – Organon Band 1: Topik, Topik neuntes Buch oder Über die sophistischen Widerlegungsschlüsse. Herausgegeben, übersetzt, mit Einleitung und Anmerkungen versehen von Hans Günter Zekl. Griechisch/Deutsch. [Philosophische Bibliothek 492.] Hamburg: Meiner.