Using the Centralized Care Transition Call Model and Discharge Lounge to Reduce Readmissions and Improve Patient Experience
Pam Castleman,CNO Gwendolyn Reese, Nursing Director
Regional One Health Regional One Health is home to the oldest hospital in Tennessee, chartered in 1829.
Care Transition Call Model Outcomes of hardwiring care transition calls
Reduction in readmissions Improvement in compliance Increase in patient perception of care Opportunity to recognize staff Improvement in clinical outcomes
Care Transition Call Model CNO early supporter of a centralized model for calls due to the following:
Scheduled implementation of new clinical documentation system Request of new CNL for more responsibility Budget cycle Presence of discharge lounge Availability of prn clinical staff
Business Case for Centralized Model No additional FTE’s required for pilot Evaluation of nursing workload Readmission rates for patient populations Discharge instruction scores
Presence of patient educator
Centralized Model Development Identification of Nursing Director passionate about project Assignment of CNL as Project Manager Assignment of IT partner Development of population specific questions
Development of profile for assigned staff
Planning Phase of Centralized Model Assignment of CNL as Project Manager Determination of IT requirements Selection of questions for patient populations Development of job description for quality screeners
Planning Phase of Centralized Model • The most important decision during the planning phase was to make sure the questions were relevant to the patient population we serve
Do you know the date and time of your follow-up appointments? Do you have questions about your medication regimen? Do you have any questions about how to care for yourself since discharge?
Special questions for CHF, Sickle Cell ,CAP
Early Challenges Inability to reach patients after discharge No transition preparing patients for post-discharge calls Escalations shared with managers but no knowledge of actions Inclusion of patient population discharges as staff added
Creative Solutions Incorporation of staff in discharge lounge to link discharge with care transition calls Addition of prn staff to increase number of calls and visit all pending discharge patients Utilization of patient education nurse to reinforce discharge teaching as well as introduce post visit call Assignment of nurse managers to listen to calls Posting of escalation information on units
• Video of quality screener with patient
Contact Summary By Unit – Discharge/Encounter Dates from: 6/1/2012– 8/31/2012 Patients Attempted
Patient Contacts Completed
Patients Completed
Patients Do Not Call
Patients Wrong Number
Patients Patients Contacts Not In Progress Contacted Contacts In Progress
Patients Not Attempted
Patients Dropped
Due To Attempts
Due To Time
Patient Counts
Patient Patients Total Removed
Net Patient Total
Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent 545
95.11%
321
56.02%
12
2.09%
97 16.93%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
115
20.07%
28
4.89%
578
5
573
B41 4N Jefferson
81 100.00%
57
70.37%
3
3.70%
11 13.58%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
10
12.35%
0
0.00%
81
0
81
B42 Trauma Stp Dn 4S Jefferson
20 100.00%
15
75.00%
0
0.00%
3 15.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2
10.00%
0
0.00%
20
0
20
B51 Med/Sur 5N Jeff (J5b1)
35 100.00%
18
51.43%
1
2.86%
11 31.43%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
5
14.29%
0
0.00%
35
0
35
B52 Med/Surg 5S Jeff (J5b2)
35 100.00%
23
65.71%
0
0.00%
4 11.43%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
8
22.86%
0
0.00%
35
0
35
C41 Pcu 4 Center Jeff (J4c)
27 100.00%
15
55.56%
0
0.00%
5 18.52%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
7
25.93%
0
0.00%
29
2
27
C51 5N Center Jefferson (J5c1)
48 100.00%
24
50.00%
3
6.25%
11 22.92%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
10
20.83%
0
0.00%
48
0
48
C52 5S Center Jefferson (J5c2)
41 100.00%
24
58.54%
1
2.44%
8 19.51%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
8
19.51%
0
0.00%
42
1
41
D42 Sicu 4S Jefferson
2 100.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2 100.00%
0
0.00%
2
0
2
D43 Micu 4S Jefferson
6 100.00%
3
50.00%
0
0.00%
2 33.33%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
16.67%
0
0.00%
6
0
6
D44 Cicu 4S Jefferson
2 100.00%
2 100.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2
0
2
Total Unit
Discharge/Encounter Date
D51 5S Post Trauma Jeff (J51) Discharge Room
92 100.00%
50
54.35%
2
2.17%
18 19.57%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
22
23.91%
0
0.00%
92
0
92
136 100.00%
76
55.88%
1
0.74%
20 14.71%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
39
28.68%
0
0.00%
138
2
136
Jefferson Er Inpatient
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
5 100.00%
5
0
5
Jts Ticu Ground Jefferson
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
3 100.00%
3
0
3
Med Rehabilitation Inpatient
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
20 100.00%
20
0
20
20 100.00%
14
70.00%
1
5.00%
4 20.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
5.00%
20
0
20
Tbc Turner Burn Center
0
0.00%
Contact Summary By Unit – Discharge/Encounter Dates from: 1/1/2014 – 3/31/2014 Patients Attempted
Patient Contacts Completed
Patients Completed
Patients Do Not Call
Patients Wrong Number
Patients Patients Contacts Not In Progress Contacted Contacts In Progress
Patients Not Attempted
Patients Dropped
Due To Attempts
Due To Time
Patient Counts
Patient Patients Total Removed
Net Patient Total
Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent 1014
99.80%
775 76.28%
35
3.44%
19
1.87%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
185 18.21%
2
0.20%
1114
98
1016
159 100.00%
125 78.62%
5
3.14%
3
1.89%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
26 16.35%
0
0.00%
165
6
159
B42 Trauma Stp Dn 4S Jefferson
50 100.00%
37 74.00%
1
2.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
12 24.00%
0
0.00%
54
4
50
B51 Med/Sur 5N Jeff (J5b1)
80 100.00%
60 75.00%
2
2.50%
2
2.50%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
16 20.00%
0
0.00%
84
4
80
B52 Med/Surg 5S Jeff (J5b2)
76 100.00%
55 72.37%
4
5.26%
1
1.32%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
16 21.05%
0
0.00%
84
8
76
C41 Pcu 4 Center Jeff (J4c)
64 100.00%
48 75.00%
3
4.69%
2
3.13%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
11 17.19%
0
0.00%
68
4
64
C51 5N Center Jefferson (J5c1)
72 100.00%
52 72.22%
0
0.00%
3
4.17%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
17 23.61%
0
0.00%
84
12
72
C52 5S Center Jefferson (J5c2)
79 100.00%
63 79.75%
5
6.33%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
11 13.92%
0
0.00%
86
7
79
D42 Sicu 4S Jefferson
9 100.00%
7 77.78%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2 22.22%
0
0.00%
11
2
9
D43 Micu 4S Jefferson
14 100.00%
12 85.71%
1
7.14%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
7.14%
0
0.00%
15
1
14
D44 Cicu 4S Jefferson
13 100.00%
9 69.23%
3 23.08%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
7.69%
0
0.00%
14
1
13
Total Unit
Discharge/Encounter Date
B41 4N Jefferson
D51 5S Post Trauma Jeff (J51)
124
99.20%
95 76.00%
4
3.20%
3
2.40%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
22 17.60%
1
0.80%
140
15
125
Discharge Room
254
99.61%
197 77.25%
6
2.35%
3
1.18%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
48 18.82%
1
0.39%
287
32
255
20 100.00%
15 75.00%
1
5.00%
2 10.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2 10.00%
0
0.00%
22
2
20
Jts Ticu Ground Jefferson
Escalation Data Drives Improvement PCM Escalation Reasons
Pain
Cleanliness of Hospital
MD Communication
Other
Patient's Response
Discharge Process
Nursing Communication
Responsiveness of Staff
0
5
10
15
20
25
Benefits of Centralized Model •
Serial phone calls and special features for clinical follow-up to reduce preventable readmissions. CHF, DM, and CAP patients are called every 7 days after discharge for a total of 3 surveys.
• Call documentation that meets medical record requirements • Ability to identify and update patient registration information • Excellent data collection with detailed reports
Regional One Health Readmissions Hospital Admissions vs. Readmissions 2012
1122
1200 1000
940
866
Number of Patients
800
991
897
842
974
987
986
978
970
989
Hospital Total Admissions
600 400
Hospital Total Readmissions 65
200
53
50
44
46
60
38
0 JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUNE
JULY
54
AUG
32
SEP
53
OCT
62
NOV
Readmit Excludes : -Deliveries - Newborns - Rehab admits
63
DEC
2012
Hospital Total Admissions
Hospital Total Readmissions
JAN 1122
FEB 866
MAR 940
APR 842
MAY 897
JUNE 991
JULY 974
AUG 987
SEP 986
OCT 978
NOV 970
DEC 989
65
53
50
44
46
60
38
54
32
53
62
63
Regional One Health Overall Hospital and Sickle Cell Patient Readmission Rate MED vs. Sickle Cell Disease Readmission Rate - 2012
30.94%
25.94%
Rate
20.94%
15.94%
SSD READMIT % MED READMIT % Linear (SSD READMIT %)
10.94%
Linear (MED READMIT %) 5.94%
0.94% JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Averag e
SSD READMIT % 14.29% 12.50% 20.00% 15.79% 8.33% 12.50% 4.55% 13.64% 20.00% 17.39% 26.32% 12.50% 14.82% MED READMIT % 5.79% 6.12% 5.32% 5.23% 5.13% 6.05% 3.90% 2012 5.47% 3.25% 5.42% 6.39% 6.37% 5.37%
Impact of Care Transition Calls on Readmissions
Financial Impact of Discharge Teaching and Care Transition Calls on Sickle Cell Readmissions
SICKLE CELL
Annual Charges
BASELINE $ 14,755,744 GOAL Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Project To Date
IP Patients 272 7 5 10 12 7 8 11 8 12 80
Charges/IP Patient $
54,249
$ 379,743 $ 271,245 $ 542,491 $ 650,989 $ 379,743 $ 433,992 $ 596,740 $ 433,992 $ 650,989 $ 2,224,211
Estimated Readmisssion Readmissions Based Rate on Actual Volume 14.80% 5.00% 14.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 8.33% 2.50%
*Includes benefit of shifting IP Volume to OP Setting, Avoiding Readmissions
3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35 16.77
Actual Readmissions
Cost Of Est. Readmission
40 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
$ 2,183,850 $ 737,787 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 181,951
Estimated Cost Avoidance $ 1,446,063 $ 127,702 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 181,951 $ 127,702 $ 1,529,064
Thank you for your time Pam Castleman, Chief Nursing Office
[email protected] Gwendolyn Reese, Director of Nursing
[email protected]