UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY
AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN BOOKSTACKS
THE HECKMAN BINDERY, JUST
FONT
SLOT
BINDING COPY
INC.
North Manchester, Indiana TITLE
CUSTOM
PERIODICAL:
BOOK
D CUSTOM
ACCOUNT
H CC 1W
STANDARD
D MUSIC NEW
LIBRARY
ECONOMY
D ECONOMY
RUBOR
TITLE
THESIS
AUTH. 1ST
8
1988
7
NO. 1468-1485
MATERIAL
FOIL
.aCULTY
H CC 1W
LEAD ATTACH
COLOR
I.D.
SAMPLE
VORKING PAPER
NO VOLS THIS TITLE
Q WHI
2
ACCOUNT NAME
488
UNIV OF ILLINOIS
ACCOUNT INTERNAL
ISSN.
I.D.
BO 191
;d. #2
BINDING
WHEEL
SYS.
I.D.
FREQUENCY
STX4
H CC 1W
330 B385< n CV"> no. 1468-1485 cop. 2
H CC 7W
U.
of ILL.
LIBRARY 3ANA
76
COLLATING
35
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS
Dept=STX4 Item 1CR2ST3CR MARK BY # B4 SEP SHEETS
PTS.BD PAPER
TAPE STUBS
-NM=[ZY# •
1
CLOTH EXT
i
LEAF ATTACH
SPECIAL PREP.
INSERT MAT.
ACCOUNT LOT NO
PRODUCT TYPE
ACCOUNT PIECE NO
HEIGH
GROUP CARD
n
CpvER
// x
SIZE
VOL IMG I
T /
FILLER
PIECE
NO
47
001247981
Table
3
Consistency of Bank Loss Reserve Decisions for the years 1982-1985 Number of Banks
Consistently Conservative Consistently Aggressive Not Consistent
Sample size = 82
1
>
K0/K1
'l
(4a)
+ e
'
(4b)
t
where
the Bid price on a 2-year or 5-year swap on day
t;
A is the Ask price on a 2-year or 5-year swap on day
t;
B
is
TBILL TNOTE
Z
is )
t
tv >
t
I K.
JI
the rate on 2-year T Bills on day t;
is the rate on 5-year T-Notes on day t.
The positive relationship between the size of the Bid-Ask spread and the level of interest rates implies that
8,
and
3.
are positive.
The daily percentage change of the Bid-Ask Spread and Interest
Rates was calculated by Equations 5a and 5b.
(A-B) %A Spread =
" (A-B) t+1 , (A-B)
t
(T Bill Rate)
%i T
B1U
(5a)
>
RatSS "
- (T Bill Rate)
~ (T Bill Rate)
(5b)
t
If
the result of Equation 5b was greater than zero,
that day was
classified as an up day for interest rates as well as for %A Spread, if
the results were less than or equal to zero,
fied as
a
down day.
thac day was classi-
Looking at the data for down days revealed that
during the crash of October 1987 (October 19 to November 4) not only did the T Bill and T-Note rate fall as a result of the flight to
quality, but the Bid-Ask spread more than doubled as
a
result of the
Hence the regressions run to test
uncertainties in the market place.
the down change relationships (6b and 6d) were run two ways.
First,
all down days were included and then those down days associated with the October 1987 crash were omitted for the data set.
The regression
equations run to test the change relationships are:
%A Spread = a + r OVD 2YR,t,up %A Spread r 0VD
„ 2YR,t,down .
%A T Bill
8
2
= a +
6-
2
= a + %A Spread, r VD 5YR,t,up
+ e„
t,up
%A T Bill
,
t,down
%A T Note t t,down
8-,
3
(6a)
t
=
+ e„
(6b)
t
et
(6c)
t
t
%A Spread,...,
5YR,t,down
For 6a and 6c,
= a +
Q 3
%A T Note t + e t,down t
the expected sign of the beta is positive.
(6d)
And for
the hypothesized sign for the beta is negative indicating
6b and 6d,
an inverse relationship between a downward change in the interest rate
and a widening of the spread.
Results
Table 4b.
1
gives the results of the regression for Equations 4a and
As expected,
the significantly positive beta indicates that as
the level of interest rates is high, the Bid-Ask spread is wider than
when the level of interest rates is low. 2-year T Bill and the 5-year T-Note.
This is true for both the
-9-
Table
1
Regression Results for Interest Rate Levels and Spreads
(A - B)
Q
=
1.41
=
.45
=
.16
=
2YR,t
° +
e
a+
3
TBILL i
2YR,t
+ S i
i
Standard Error R
2
ft
=
241
(A - B)
s|
=
1.23
Standard Error
=
.26
=
.19
R
2
to
Table 6b,
6c,
2
=
=
5YR,t
TN ° TE 1
5YR,t
+ 6 i
241
contains the results of the regressions for Equations 6a, For positive changes
and 6d.
interest there
is
in the T Bill and T-Note rate of
no statistically significant
relationship between
increases in the 3id Ask Spread and increases in the interest rate. However, for downward changes in the T Bill and T-Note rates there is a
significantly positive relationship between interest rate decreases
and
a
narrowing spread.
As
can be seen from a comparison of the two
regressions with or without the impact of the October 87 Crash, there is
a
statistically negative relationship between downward changes in
-10-
rate and a widening spread.
the interest
However, for the entire
sample (October Crash included) the relationship is much more significant
.
Table
2
Regression Results for Percentage Changes in Interest Rates and Spreads
%A Spread r 0VD
2YR,t,up
=
a +
O
2
%A TBILL
t,up
+ e t
All Data =
5.48
Standard error =
16.07
6
R
2
2
to
= =
144
%A Spread cvn *
5YR,t,up
All Data =
18.24
Standard error =
12.74
6
3
2
R
=
& = 136
.03
=
a +
%A TNOTE
6
3
t,up
+ e t
-11-
Table
%A Spread
2YR>t)d own
2
(continued)
= a +
B
2
%A TBILL
+ e,
,
t
,down
t
Crash Data Excluded
All Data = -
77.86
= -21.68
8 2
Standard error R
2
=
19.65
=
.18
m =
Standard error = R
2
=
m =
96
= a + %A Spread, VD * 5YR,t,down
6.
%A TNOTE^
8.91 .12
88
+ e^
t.down
3
,
t
Crash Data Excluded
All Data = -114.53
8
Standard error = R
2
=
m =
8^
Standard error
16.49
R
.41
2
= -39.53
=
19.27
=
.16
m =
104
96
Conclusions In pricing interest
rate swaps of a given maturity,
participants consider many factors such as credit
the market
risk, of
the counter-
parties, transaction costs, the level of interest rates, changes in
interest rates, and the supply and demand for interest rate swaps. The results of this research indicate that the level of interest rates are significant in determining the Bid and
market.
Ask.
spread in the swap
Further, downward movement in interest rates has an inverse
relationship with the Bid and Ask spread, as interest rates fall the
-12-
Bid Ask spread widens.
ments,
In a period of extreme interest rate move-
for example the October 87 Crash,
this relationship is intensi-
fied.
For upward movements in the interest rates,
there does not seem to
be a statistically identifiable relationship between increases in the
interest rates and the Bid and Ask spread.
This would imply that some
of the other factors as mentioned above play a more important -role in
spread determination when rates are rising.
Further work
needed in
is
quantifying and gathering data on the other factors so that
a
more
complete explanation can be offered for the pricing of interest rate swaps.
-13-
Ref erences
"An Economic Analysis of Interest Bicksler, James and Andrew H. Chen. Rate Swaps." Journal of Finance July 1986, pp. 645-655. ,
Use, Risk, and Prices." "Interest Rate Swaps: Felgran, Steven D. New England Economic Review November/December 1987, pp. 22-32. ,
C. W. Smithson, and L. M. Wakeraan. "The Evolving Market Smith, C. W. Finance Journal Winter 1986, pp. Midland Corporate for Swaps." 20-23. ,
,
Evaluating the Credit Exposure of and K. W. Fung. Wall, Larry D. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Interest Rate Swap Portfolio . Working Paper 87-8, December 1987. ,
Whittaker, Gregg J. "Pricing Interest Rate Swaps in an Options Pricing Framework." Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. RWP 87-02, May 1987.
D/510
HECKMAN BINDERY
INC.
JUN95 tkmnd
To-n&f N MANCHESTER. INDIANA 46962