United States Refining Toolkit Implications for Canadian Crude Producers Argus Canadian Crude Summit Calgary, Alberta May 18, 2016

United States Refining Toolkit – Implications for Canadian Crude Producers Argus Canadian Crude Summit Calgary, Alberta May 18, 2016 Baker & O’Brien...
Author: Willa Holmes
1 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
United States Refining Toolkit – Implications for Canadian Crude Producers

Argus Canadian Crude Summit Calgary, Alberta May 18, 2016

Baker & O’Brien, Inc. All rights reserved.

Baker & O’Brien: Independent Energy Consultants Overview – Independently owned and managed – Technical and commercial expertise – Active over full life cycle of assets: new project development -> business support -> commercial disputes

Capital Project Services Operations Support

Commercial Analyses Mergers and Acquisitions

Consulting Staff – Chemical, Mechanical, and Electrical engineers – Consultants average over 25 years industry experience – Experienced problem solvers Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

Dispute Resolution This material is for information only and carries no expressed or implied warranty

1

Outline • Focus on Petroleum Administration for Defense Districts (PADD) 2 and 3 • Refinery Investments - Recent Past and Future • Refinery Utilization Trends • Trends in Quality of Processed Crudes • Canadian Crude Market Penetration

Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

2

Refinery Investments - PADD 3 35.0%

10,000

Light Crude Fractionators

25.0% Crude Capacity (MB/CD)

9,500

MB/CD

Coking/Crude (%) Hydrocracking/Crude (%)

20.0%

FCC/Crude (%) Motiva - Port Arthur

15.0% 9,000 Valero - Port Arthur and others

10.0%

Valero St. Charles and Chevron Pascagoula

Source: PRISMTM Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

3

20Q1

19Q1

18Q1

17Q1

16Q1

15Q1

14Q1

13Q1

12Q1

11Q1

5.0% 10Q1

8,500

Percent of Crude Capacity

30.0%

Refinery Investments - PADD 2 4,500

35.0%

4,000

25.0% Crude Capacity (MB/CD) Coking/Crude (%)

MB/CD

Hydrocracking/Crude (%) FCC/Crude (%)

20.0%

3,500

15.0%

BP - Whiting WRB Refining - Wood River

10.0%

Source: PRISM Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

4

20Q1

19Q1

18Q1

17Q1

16Q1

15Q1

14Q1

13Q1

12Q1

11Q1

5.0% 10Q1

3,000

Percent of Crude Capacity

30.0%

Refinery Investments - Conclusions • Investments were made to process heavy crude – The significant projects have been completed – No major projects are on the horizon

• Recent investments have been aimed at “light tight oil” and condensate processing – The significant projects have been completed – No major projects are on the horizon

Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

5

Crude Capacity Utilization (%) – PADD 3 100%

Percentage of Calendar Day Capacity

95%

90%

85%

Sources: EIA – Petroleum Supply Monthly PRISM Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

6

15Q1

14Q1

13Q1

12Q1

11Q1

10Q1

80%

Relative Coker Utilization (%) – PADD 3 110%

Coker Utilization / Crude Utilization

105%

100%

95%

90%

Sources: EIA – Petroleum Supply Monthly PRISM Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

7

15Q1

14Q1

13Q1

12Q1

11Q1

10Q1

85%

Crude Capacity Utilization (%) – PADD 2 100%

Percentage of Calendar Day Capacity

95%

90%

85%

Sources: EIA – Petroleum Supply Monthly PRISM Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

8

15Q1

14Q1

13Q1

12Q1

11Q1

10Q1

80%

Relative Coker Utilization (%) – PADD 2 110%

Coker Utilization / Crude Utilization

105%

100%

95%

90%

Sources: EIA – Petroleum Supply Monthly PRISM Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

9

15Q1

14Q1

13Q1

12Q1

11Q1

10Q1

85%

Crude Quality - Conclusions • Based on capacity utilization: – Heavy crude processing capability in PADD 3 seems to be fully utilized – There appears to be capacity in PADD 2 to increase heavy crude processing at the expense of light and medium crudes

Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

10

Average Crude Quality - PADD 3 1.7%

33

1.6%

32

1.5%

31

1.4%

30

1.3%

API Gravity

Sulfur, wt %

34

API Gravity Sulfur, wt %

Source: EIA – Petroleum Supply Monthly Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

11

15Q1

14Q1

13Q1

12Q1

11Q1

1.2% 10Q1

29

Average Crude Quality - PADD 2 1.7%

33

1.6%

32

1.5%

31

1.4%

30

1.3%

API Gravity

Sulfur, wt %

34

API Gravity Sulfur, wt %

Source: EIA – Petroleum Supply Monthly Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

12

15Q1

14Q1

13Q1

12Q1

11Q1

1.2% 10Q1

29

Crude Quality - Conclusions • PADD 3 – Heavy crude expansions did not change the average quality of crude processed in the PADD – The start up of LTO and condensate distillation capacity has significantly changed average PADD crude quality

• PADD 2 – Heavy crude projects have resulted in higher average sulfur levels – The average API gravity of sweet crudes in the PADD has increased, offsetting the impact of the heavy crude projects on average crude gravity

Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

13

Canadian Crude Market Penetration - PADD 2

Percentage of Total Crude Processed

60.0%

50.0%

40.0%

Canadian Crude

Sources: DOE – Company Level Imports PRISM Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

14

15Q1

14Q1

13Q1

12Q1

11Q1

10Q1

30.0%

Canadian Crude Market Penetration - PADD 3 20.0% Canadian Crude Columbia + Venezuela Crude

Percentage of Total Crude Processed

15.0%

10.0%

5.0%

Sources: DOE – Company Level Imports PRISM Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

15

15Q1

14Q1

13Q1

12Q1

11Q1

10Q1

0.0%

Market Penetration - Conclusions • PADD 2 – Canadian crude as a percentage of total crude runs has increased significantly, but seem to be leveling off – Canadian imports are now competing with U.S. crude, not imports from other countries

• PADD 3 – Canadian crude as a percentage of total crude runs has increased significantly, but is still small – There is room for more Canadian crude, but with competition from other heavy foreign crudes

Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

16

Legal Notice

Baker & O’Brien, Inc., (Baker & O’Brien) prepared this report for the Argus Canadian Crude Summit. The opinions and findings in this report are based upon Baker & O’Brien’s experience, expertise, skill, research, analysis, and related work to date. This report relies upon public and proprietary data available to Baker & O’Brien at the time this report was prepared. All forecasts and projections contained in this presentation represent Baker & O’Brien’s best judgment, utilizing its skill, and expertise. However, such forecasts and projections are inherently uncertain due to the potential impact of factors or future events that are unforeseeable at this time or beyond Baker & O’Brien’s control. Baker & O’Brien prepared this report for the sole benefit of this Argus Canadian Crude Summit. Any reproduction, distribution, or disclosure of this information is strictly prohibited without Baker & O’Brien’s prior written authorization. Baker & O’Brien expressly disclaims all liability for the use, disclosure, reproduction, or distribution of this information by or to any third party.

Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

17

Baker & O’Brien – Independent Energy Consultants

Dallas

Houston

London

12001 N. Central Expressway Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75243 Phone: 1-214-368-7626 Fax: 1-214-368-0190

1333 West Loop South Suite 1350 Houston, TX 77027 Phone: 1-832-358-1453 Fax: 1-832-358-1498

146 Fleet Street Suite 2 London EC4A 2BU Phone: 44-20-7373-0925

www.bakerobrien.com Copyright Baker & O'Brien, Inc.

18

Suggest Documents